Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter 41 Share on Facebook 9 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit 2 Share on StumbleUpon 1 Tell A Friend 10 (63 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   22 comments

General News

NSA's "Stellar Wind" Violates Every American Citizens' Constitutional Rights

By (about the author)     Permalink
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 6   Well Said 4   Supported 3  
View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H2 10/8/12

Become a Fan
  (19 fans)
- Advertisement -

NSA Whistleblower Explains Stellar Wind Program by gw

Following the 2001 terror attack masterminded by Osama bin Laden, the US government changed surveillance policy drastically, secretly and illegally, according to one of the authors of an NSA program designed to eavesdrop, collect and data-mine foreign communications.

Courtesy of the NY Times, filmmaker Laura Poitras profiles William Binney, a 32-year veteran of the National Security Agency who helped design a top-secret program he says is broadly collecting Americans' personal data.

- Advertisement -

Before the September 11 terror attacks, the "piece of paper" known as the US Constitution provided protection for every American from this invasion of privacy, however a "decision point" changed this when then President George Bush, VP Dick Cheney, CIA Director George Tenet and NSA chief Michael Hayden conspired to violate these rights.

Bush and Cheney decided that Osama bin Laden's strike would render our Fourth Amendment rights invalid, despite ironclad language. From the US Constitution:

- Advertisement -
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized

In simplest terms, the terrorists won, changing American tradition of freedom and liberty. Today, fear of terror attacks drive a policy expressly prohibited since 1791. 

This was not done openly, with the consent of the governed or through Constitutional law making. It was done secretly, and according to NSA technical director William Binney, also targets every member of Congress.

Binney resigned in protest the same year, as his NSA collection and surveillance operation turned inward, forgoing necessary approvals and warrants to reflect the checks and balances enshrined in America's founding principles. 

Perhaps most jarring, Binney says 9/11 was only the excuse to flip the switch on a project already underway - the 'domestic' program was green-lighted at the very inception of the Bush presidency in February, 2001. From

"He said the NSA began building its data collection system to spy on Americans prior to 9/11, and then used the terrorist attacks that occurred that year as the excuse to launch the data collection project.

"It started in February 2001 when they started asking telecoms for data," Binney said. "That to me tells me that the real plan was to spy on Americans from the beginning."

The Obama team has been reluctant since day one to "look backwards" at these crimes, but one transition team member revealed in 2011 that Obama actually feared a coup - the NSA or CIA might revolt if he defended citizens' rights. Just the opposite, the NSA is now revolting against the Administration for failing to uphold the Bill of Rights, with Binney just one of several whistleblowers speaking out.

Mr. Binney even says Obama has expanded on the program by collecting the email communications of every American. Republicans never bring this criticism up of the President. Even if former Constitutional law professor Obama rationalizes a trade-off of guaranteed civil liberties for better security, questions remain. Why this was not done with Congress or the courts, why do the networks not report on this, why isn't this an issue in elections, and why not make it legal.

Osama bin Laden's Stated Plan
After bleeding the USSR dry over ten years plus, Osama bin Laden vowed next to bankrupt the United States - and Bush obliged. 

US foreign policy was a chief campaign issue in 2004, until the economy actually did crash. Since then, attention has shifted. Spending planned by both parties for this surveillance continues to bleed the US economy. The video above shows the largest NSA data collection facility in history under construction.

If you hear a strange noise, it might be bin Laden laughing from hell over the protests of George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, George Mason...

We welcome comments from anyone who wishes to defend the NSA data collection program Stellar Wind.


(OpEdNews Contributing Editor since October 2006) Inner city schoolteacher from New York, mostly covering media manipulation. I put election/finance reform ahead of all issues but also advocate for fiscal conservatism, ethics in journalism and (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
Google Content Matches:
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Limbaugh/Hannity Parent Company Admits Hiring Actors to Call Radio Shows

The #OWS Video Rupert Murdoch Doesn't Want You To See

LocalLeaks' Charges of Cover-Up by Parents, Police in Steubenville Rape Forces Official Response [Updated]

Limbaugh, Hannity, Beck Respond To Report That Parent Company Hires Actors for Call-ins

Obama to Grant Banks Robosigning Immunity in Showdown With Breakaway AGs [Updated]

#OWS Cheers As Defiant Judge Stops Obama From Selling Immunity To Wall Street


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
12 people are discussing this page, with 22 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

They hate us because we're free... so we made ours... by Wil Masisak on Monday, Oct 8, 2012 at 12:55:25 PM
It's inexplicable to me that this was allowed to h... by David Roche on Monday, Oct 8, 2012 at 1:06:53 PM
so-called Utah Data Center (UDC) to Utah. He ... by Daniel Geery on Monday, Oct 8, 2012 at 1:11:39 PM
click here... by Daniel Geery on Monday, Oct 8, 2012 at 1:19:17 PM
Good article, its not so hard to believe that afte... by Jack Swint on Monday, Oct 8, 2012 at 1:19:29 PM
see  It's even... by Carol Lemieux on Monday, Oct 8, 2012 at 1:52:35 PM
I am glad that we agree that full-bore surveillanc... by Phil Weingart on Monday, Oct 8, 2012 at 2:20:18 PM
The reason incandescent bulbs are being phased out... by Gustav Wynn on Monday, Oct 8, 2012 at 3:17:18 PM
"Following the 2001 terror attack masterminded by ... by Dave Nottingham on Monday, Oct 8, 2012 at 4:10:44 PM
...we are told.If you believe otherwise, Binney ac... by Gustav Wynn on Monday, Oct 8, 2012 at 4:49:36 PM
Your own FBI admitted it had no evidence Osama was... by Paul Carline on Tuesday, Oct 9, 2012 at 2:40:47 AM
Bin Laden could have easily disavowed involvement ... by Gustav Wynn on Tuesday, Oct 9, 2012 at 7:11:51 AM
"Even if it wasn't real at first, al Qaeda is real... by R.A. on Tuesday, Oct 9, 2012 at 9:12:54 AM
"whatever truly happened, Americans will continue ... by Michael Rose on Tuesday, Oct 9, 2012 at 7:19:41 AM
Michael Rose wrote: "I take your point Mr Wynn, bu... by R.A. on Tuesday, Oct 9, 2012 at 8:47:20 AM
Count to 10 and read between the lines and in cont... by Michael Rose on Tuesday, Oct 9, 2012 at 4:48:17 PM
Just because we don't agree on A doesn't mean we c... by Gustav Wynn on Tuesday, Oct 9, 2012 at 10:37:21 AM
"The more 'media' were in on it, the less likely a... by Michael Rose on Tuesday, Oct 9, 2012 at 7:08:55 PM
In this article, the author states: "... In short,... by Jeff Bell on Monday, Oct 8, 2012 at 11:19:56 PM simply accept it for the sake of argument in... by Gustav Wynn on Tuesday, Oct 9, 2012 at 7:30:54 AM
I followed the link and read the "I'm Willing to T... by R.A. on Tuesday, Oct 9, 2012 at 8:30:07 AM
Maybe the problem is that the evidence is such a h... by Gustav Wynn on Tuesday, Oct 9, 2012 at 2:17:43 PM