Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend
  2
2 Shares     
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Article Stats
No comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

NH Voting Technology Committee to release report

Become a Fan
  (8 fans)
By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Headlined to H3 12/16/09

opednews.com

The NH committee was formed to justify software-based voting systems. Here's my bet on the top 10 items to be found on the committee's final report. I truly hope they prove me wrong.

  • 10) They will recommend moving to an open source code voting system. They will not address the fact that open source code does not meet the NH constitutional mandate for open vote counting because humans can not observe a software-based vote count regardless of whether or not the software is open source, or that open source only opens the voting system to a small circle of computer experts who do not meet the legal definition of "We the People".
  • 9) They will not refer to the NH State Audit on the Office of the Secretary of State, which pointed to horrifying lack of process and gaping security holes in the conduct of all of its business, which includes administering our elections.
  • 8) They *might* announce intention to work with Harri Hursti, who is in fact back in America to launch his own new company developing and selling software-based voting systems.
  • 7) They will not refer to Hursti's 2007 testimony about the inherent security vulnereabilities of software-based voting.
  • 6) They will not mention the fact that somebody in the NH government at some point decided to remove our ballots from public inspection under the NH Right to Know law, further concealing the election process and investigations from the public eye.
  • 5) They will not refer to NH's frightening lack of ballot chain of custody as documented by voting rights activists in the 2008 primary recount.
  • 4) They *might* try to follow suit of many other states justifying concealed vote counting and recommend post-election audits of paper ballots. If so, they will not acknowledge that post-election audits (aka "recounts" in NH) do not satisfy NH's constitutional mandate for open vote counting on Election Night and that post-election counts involve ballots removed from the public eye and therefore do not and can not substitute for public vote counts on election night.
  • 3) They will not mention NH's constitutional mandate for public vote counting.
  • 2) They will not address the fact that software-based voting systems conceal the vote count from public observation.
And the number one prediction for the Voting Technology committee's final report:
  • 1) They will not provide any analysis whatsoever as to whether or not technology concealing the vote count from the public eye has a rightful place in democratic elections, which by definition require public oversight of every step in the voting system process (with the exception of the voter's casting of a secret ballot). They will not address the fact that software-based voting systems concealing the vote count from the public oversight violates the voting rights of all NH citizens.

SOURCE: Nashua Telegraph

NH's electronic voting panel issuing report

Eds: APNewsNow.

CONCORD, N.H. (AP) -- A special New Hampshire committee studying electronic voting systems is issuing its final report.

Deputy Secretary of State David Scanlan (SCAN'-lan) said Harri Hursti (HUR'-stee), one of the world's leading experts on voting systems, will discuss voting systems in America. Hursti is known for his demonstration of the vulnerability of the systems in an HBO documentary, "Hacking Democracy."

The Electronic Ballot Counting Device Advisory Committee will hold its final meeting at 10:30 a.m. Tuesday in Executive Council chambers in Concord, N.H.

 

https://www.youtube.com/handsonelections

Nancy Tobi is best known as a national leader in the voting rights movement for her seminal work exposing the dangers and fallacies in various election reform efforts past, present and future. Nancy is co-founder and former Chair of Democracy for (more...)
 
Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

NH recounts no check and balance for its privatized corporate-controlled elections

Summary of the Stimulus bill - Don't look half bad to me

NH Secretary of State: "Citizen Election Observers Threaten Election Integrity"

The Myth of Verified Voting: How GOP strategists & J. Abramoff transformed America's elections & the reform movement

2009 Holt Bill. E-Voting: Making a bad system worse

The Gasser

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
No comments