Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite View Article Stats
18 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Making the Connections - Why Crackdown on OWS Now?

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 4   Valuable 4   Well Said 3  
View Ratings | Rate It

Headlined to H2 11/17/11
Become a Fan
  (1 fan)

opednews.com

Richard Eskow, writing at Campaign for America's Future asks a very important question: why the crackdown on the #occupy movement at this particular moment? We need to connect that to a few other events and positions.

First of all, from the standpoint of a national elite, the crackdown this week was not particularly urgent. With colder weather coming in, and the headiness of the first victories dying down, the elite might have enjoyed a somewhat calmer winter. This would have been a good time for a natural pause-to-catch-one's-breath for the movement. I've seen it myself in my own local group, whose attendance has leveled off after the first spurt of growth. This is not to cast any aspersions -- it's getting colder, the holidays are coming; it's just a natural pause, not the decline of what will no doubt become a very strong movement.

Eskow connects the fact that the crackdown came now with three events he sees forthcoming. Specifically, he believes (1) the super committee will propose a deal to keep taxes on the rich low by cutting Medicare and Medicaid, (2), that new and bigger "Free Trade Agreements" are coming soon, and (3) that the deal to immunize the big banks for title fraud is about to come down.

I think that points two and three are further out in the future, not imminent. They'll happen, most likely just after the 2012 election. There's no new reason to think them imminent. I agree with Eskow that there's a connection between the raids and the first point, the super committee, and think the situation is dire.


Leon Panetta by
Getty Images

The tell -- Leon Panetta's attack upon trigger cuts to DoD allocations indicate that Obama will accept any deal from the super committee, no matter how onerous.

Obama signalled capitulation in the super committee negotiations when he allowed Defense Secretary Leon Panetta to rail against any triggered cut of Pentagon spending. Panetta said the trigger cuts would be "devastating" and that the DoD would be at substantial risk of "not meeting our defense needs." One of the key characteristics of this President is to use an aggressive military policy stance to blunt criticism from the right that he is insufficiently "strong." There is, in my opinion, almost no chance that Obama will allow a triggered reduction to include Pentagon spending, because such a reduction would make worthless all his efforts expended to appear "strong." The sequestering of DoD funds was his only leverage upon the super committee (not that anyone following this President would have expected him to use that leverage). Therefore, I believe Obama will accept any last minute deal no matter how hurtful to the middle class, working class, elderly, and poor. As Edward Herman has said, "The Democrats invariably betray their voting base, but not their investor base."


That the attacks against several "occupied" cities were coordinated via a conference call among mayors has been documented by the mayor of Oakland in a radio interview. There is compelling reason to believe that the Federal government was part of that coordination effort. That a key decision affecting as potentially large a political movement as the #occupy movement would not be subject to Presidential review, is in my opinion, unthinkable. I believe that the President was aware of a coordinated effort to evict the occupiers.

If the administration expects the austerity budget to emerge from the super committee to be substantially worse than most of us fear, that would constitute reason enough to attempt to clear the cities of what would be magnets for a protesting, disaffected political base formerly loyal to Obama. Given a week of such protests, more and more of the base would be drawn in. Take away the occupiers' base camps, and those protests would have less of a head start, less momentum. That, I think, explains the effort to remove multiple occupations at this time.

It is with that base of Obama supporters that I wish to point out another connection. Specifically, to those supporters disappointed in Obama yet scared silly of the current Republican boogeyman of the month: Palin, Bachmann, Perry, Cain, Gingrich... (Wow, Gingrich! Are the Democrats so desperate for someone to scare their supporters that they'd pretend that Gingrich is a viable candidate?).

Take a few million of these Republican-fearing supporters, get them riled up about an austerity program, and then expose them to the #occupy movement. It's a recipe for an Obama loss. And that conversely, is the strength of those "timid" voters. If there is one thing that Obama has shown in the last three years, it's that he'd rather quit than fight. If someone showed that particular group of voters that the people hold the power, that they can make a choice rather than accept a choice, Obama would withdraw from the race by Spring 2012. He is a careerist, as seen in his extraordinary caution throughout his political career. Close the door to further advancement, and like a careerist, he will cash in and run.

And every politician in America would suddenly know deep down that tens of millions of votes are available for the candidate who can best convince a formerly timid group looking for a populist candidate that he will deliver their agenda. And some way would be found to end the austerity program in its infancy, to help that candidate. If Obama does an LBJ, the Democratic party won't let the next guy dangle in the wind like HHH.

There is one and only one group in the U.S. now with the power to stop an austerity program. It is that most timid portion of Obama's base, scared stiff of Republican boogeymen, yet far more powerful than they could imagine themselves to be.

This article originally appeared at scribillare.com.

 

I am a professional in the computer field whose specialty is databases. I grew up, went to school in, and lived in New York for many years. I have lived in Florida for twenty years now, and it is a wonderful place to see and experience nature. I am (more...)
 
Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Occupy Movement Supporters Consider Eminent Domain as a Tool to Help Homeowners in Foreclosure

Occupy Movement and Libertarians, Tea Partiers Find Common Cause in Fight Against NDAA

Book Review – Truth And Consequences: The U.S. vs. Bradley Manning
By Greg Mitchell and Kevin Gosztola


Making the Connections - Why Crackdown on OWS Now?

Measuring Corporate Tax Dodgers by Industry

An American Spring is in the Air

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
14 people are discussing this page, with 18 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

nobody of any consequence on the net or anywhere e... by Ron Rabatsky on Thursday, Nov 17, 2011 at 4:28:52 PM
Opinions  do not create news- they create atm... by Mark Sashine on Thursday, Nov 17, 2011 at 5:24:16 PM
A few points:1) The Occupy movement has not been d... by R.A. on Thursday, Nov 17, 2011 at 9:16:29 PM
Robert, I think you've described the logic well. A... by John Iacovelli on Thursday, Nov 17, 2011 at 11:01:35 PM
You're a total dipshit, Ron.... by Ned Lud on Friday, Nov 18, 2011 at 8:55:11 AM
of "oped," which can be found at dictionary.com an... by Daniel Geery on Friday, Nov 18, 2011 at 10:09:17 AM
for Ron R., who posted the first comment here.... by Daniel Geery on Friday, Nov 18, 2011 at 10:11:11 AM
Until they do the bidding of the many, not the few... by Michael Dewey on Thursday, Nov 17, 2011 at 4:28:54 PM
Despite the overwhelming support of OWS in the OEN... by Doc McCoy on Friday, Nov 18, 2011 at 12:57:59 AM
Oh, of course, the OWS is a 'crowd', the Tea- part... by Mark Sashine on Friday, Nov 18, 2011 at 7:14:22 AM
Degenerate man is characterized by lust. He may th... by Ned Lud on Friday, Nov 18, 2011 at 8:49:57 AM
When Bashar al-Assad commands the army murder the... by Michael Rose on Friday, Nov 18, 2011 at 12:13:40 PM
I am not sure that we can say that government is p... by John Iacovelli on Friday, Nov 18, 2011 at 4:31:26 PM
I don't think it was anything specific; but an esc... by Philip Pease on Friday, Nov 18, 2011 at 12:14:59 PM
Holy smoke -  43%? I'm surprised someon... by Thomas Brown on Friday, Nov 18, 2011 at 2:30:17 PM
People like old codger are incapable of seeing any... by Robert Tracey on Friday, Nov 18, 2011 at 11:46:34 PM
You put your analysis together with real precision... by Michael Collins on Saturday, Nov 19, 2011 at 1:24:17 AM
If President Obama continues to "encourage States ... by jtenn on Saturday, Nov 19, 2011 at 3:59:17 PM