General News

Lyndeborough NH passes warrant article prohibiting concealed vote counting by computers or any other method

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H2 3/13/10

Become a Fan
  (8 fans)

Any citizen in New Hampshire can bring a petition article to their Town Warrant by securing the signatures of at least 25 registered voters. The article is then added to the Town Warrant to be voted on in Town meeting. Today, the citizens of Lyndeborough resoundingly approved enacting into the town's laws the following warrant article regarding the counting of votes. I hope that NH citizens all around the state will enact the same law in their town at next year's Town Meetings.

Here is the petition citizens signed to add the article below regarding the counting of votes to the Town Warrant:

To see if the Town of Lyndeborough will prohibit vote counting concealed from the human eye by method of computers or otherwise, and require that all methods used for sorting and counting the votes in an election be publicly observable for full citizen oversight of the entire voting system (with the exception of the voter's casting of the secret ballot).

Whereas the New Hampshire Bill of Rights and our State Constitution have guaranteed the right to vote since 1784, guaranteeing that it may not be administered in a discriminatory fashion:

Whereas the New Hampshire Constitution reinforces the U.S. Constitutional guarantee of a republican form of government, in which citizens are understood to possess inalienable rights and to be the ultimate source of all legitimate power so that citizens are sovereign and not any king, as defined in Article 8 of the New Hampshire Constitution:

Whereas Article 32 of the New Hampshire Constitution mandates observable vote counting in open public meeting as a mechanism for ensuring that our elected public servants receive the consent of the governed via open and honest elections administered under full citizen control and oversight:

Whereas the Voting Rights Act Section 8 stipulates that vote tabulation must be observable:

Whereas each New Hampshire city and town has the individualized legal right to decide which State-approved voting system it will use, and whereas currently, other than the statewide disability solution mandated by the Help America Vote Act, the two State-approved voting systems available to New Hampshire cities and towns are publicly observable, paper ballot hand count systems or paper ballot optical scan systems, which conceal the vote count from the public eye:

Therefore we, the undersigned citizens of the town of Lyndeborough determine to protect our rights to have our votes sorted and counted in open meeting as required by the New Hampshire Constitution by adding the following article to our town warrant:

Shall the Town of Lyndeborough prohibit vote counting concealed from the human eye by method of computers or otherwise, and require that all methods used for sorting and counting the votes in an election be publicly observable for full citizen oversight of the entire voting system (with the exception of the voter's casting of the secret ballot)?

At the Town Meeting, I presented the following argument in favor of passage:

In Lyndeborough today we count every ballot by hand on election night in full public view. Our counting teams have 2 people doing the count and tally and 1-2 others observing to make sure that the people counting and tallying the ballots don't make any errors during the count. These are the kinds of public checks and balances envisioned by the Founders to ensure our system of democracy.

Lyndeborough is one of 144 towns in New Hampshire that still conduct hand count elections. The rest of the state uses optical scanning computers to count the ballots. Some of those towns have chosen to use computers because they have too many registered voters in a single polling place, which makes counting by hand impractical. Others are SB2 towns who have given up their town meetings in favor of putting their town warrant on the ballot, which makes complicated ballots and also makes hand counting impractical. Those towns would need to make some changes in order to go back to public hand counts.

But using computers to count ballots is expensive. Each of those voting machines costs around $6000 to buy, then you need to pay to properly store them and also pay for the programming and servicing. Computerized elections can be budget busters. Last time I looked into this, Lyndeborough didn't even have a line item on our budget for elections. We have community volunteers counting our ballots in full public view and it doesn't cost the town a dime.

But the most troubling thing about computerized elections is that nobody can see the votes being counted. The electrons doing the count are invisible. Neither the machines nor the people who programmed those electrons and are anonymous private employees have an oath of allegiance to the State of NH.

Next Page  1  |  2

Nancy Tobi is best known as a national leader in the voting rights movement for her seminal work exposing the dangers and fallacies in various election reform efforts past, present and future. Nancy is co-founder and former Chair of Democracy for (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

NH recounts no check and balance for its privatized corporate-controlled elections

Summary of the Stimulus bill - Don't look half bad to me

NH Secretary of State: "Citizen Election Observers Threaten Election Integrity"

The Myth of Verified Voting: How GOP strategists & J. Abramoff transformed America's elections & the reform movement

2009 Holt Bill. E-Voting: Making a bad system worse

The Gasser


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
2 people are discussing this page, with 2 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

votes counted! Yes, as Nancy asks, "Why should suc... by MJ Creech on Sunday, Mar 14, 2010 at 12:41:09 PM
It is obvious we will begin to beat back the "Big ... by Guitar Chris on Monday, Mar 15, 2010 at 12:44:36 AM