Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; , Add Tags  (less...)
Add to My Group(s)

Well Said 5   Must Read 4   Supported 2   View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H3) on 5/5/10:     Permalink
View Article Stats      (49 comments)

Ludwig von Mises and the Austrian School are morons, China is full of Geniuses (UPDATED)

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (21 fans)   -- Page 1 of 2 page(s)

opednews.com


Worried Dollar


OK, maybe that's a bit strong, but von Mises, and the whole Austrian school are discredited.
Fortunately for them and for the Western world - which is essentially broke - China is NOT following the Austrian school at all, and they are so far ahead of the Chicago Quants and Austrian (supposedly) free-marketers that those two groups literally can't comprehend how China manages its economy.

To begin with, China IS managing its economy, something Bernanke and company are not - they are constantly playing catch-up, reacting instead of being proactive like China.
China has boosted its reserve requirements since the beginning of the year, to, now, about 16%, vs. 8% here (and really, when you strip away the smoke and mirrors, zero). Furthermore, they are requiring at LEAST 20% down on all home purchases, and as much as 50%(!) in hot cities like Beijing (where government employees get stipends and create a local housing bubble, it is true). This is not a perfect solution - simply collecting Ground Rent from landlords and speculators would be better and more direct, but it gets to the same place indirectly - cooling off a housing bubble before it can form.

The free marketers won't even admit that a managed economy is doable, hence their refusal to see a working model in action. They would rather have periodic booms and busts, than admit their economic model is fundamentally flawed, and fatally too.
China is miles ahead of the U.S. in economic management. It is an economy run by serious economists who learn from their mistakes - and ours - and who are not beholden to political partisanship and game-playing for the sake of the election cycle, from a public who is generally too stupid and selfish to understand how the real economy works.
Yes, there are serious human rights issues, but it is neither as bad there, nor as good here, as the Right and Tea Partiers would like us to believe. Besides, that's got little to do with macro-economic management.

Don't be fooled by wild swings of the Chinese stock market. That, unfortunately, remains a gambler's playground, both in China and from investors abroad who sell EVERYTHING at once, regardless of the fundamentals (witness the global sell-off yesterday based on fears of a Sovereign Debt Crisis - something China is NOT susceptible to). The Chinese economy is sound and will be the largest economy in 10 years (not 20 as is widely predicted), unless the West makes serious reforms in nearly every aspect of the economy. This does not mean giving up capitalism. It does mean giving up rigged, favoritism-based capitalism which reward monster failures and punishes small succeeders.

We also need:
1. serious tax reform to untax productivity and seriously tax natural resource use and abuse (e.g. the Gulf BP disaster, the West Virginia coal mine mess etc.).
2. State Banks to pry money away from Money Leveraging Institutions (MLIs).
3. Monetary reform to return money production back to the government where the constitution puts it (Article 1, section 8) and not the MLIs. A "Public Option for Money," as Max Keiser put it when he interviewed me. To prevent inflation, this newly created money should be targeted to things we unquestionably need, like infrastructure. See the American Monetary Institute for more information.
4. Educational reform to teach children about the real world, not the myths of one made up 2,000 years ago. Today's world requires leaders in science, math, reading comprehension, logical & rational thinking, not superstition and pandering.
5. Campaign finance reform to return the funding of candidates back to the People instead of We the Corporation or their proxies like Citizen's United. (We also need to end the escalating corruption of our actual voting process so elections aren't stolen, or given away by high-handed Supreme Court judges, like in 2000).
6. Serious media that investigates news and doesn't parrot back whatever the current administration says, and treats citizens like the adults they ought to be.


A tall order? Yes, absolutely. That's why I believe China, not America, will rule the century, even with their own problems of Authoritarian Capitalism. After all, the seat of human civilization was in Southeast Asia for most of human history, the bulk of human population is still there, and the leading innovations are now there too (including the lead in Green Energy - China now produces more wind power than we do). Why wouldn't things return to where they've been historically? Or...do you think we are just gifted by God and Race? Better rethink that one.

UPDATE
This just arrived in my email today from Tony Sagami, a Financial Analyst that writes Uncommon Wisdom, specializing in Southeast Asia investments. Read this and then decide for yourself where the world economy is going to be in 10 years:


The International Monetary Fund is an international organization that oversees the global financial situation of its 186 member countries. The IMF was formed with the goal of stabilizing international exchange rates and to provide financial assistance to countries that experience serious financial and economic difficulties with loans and other forms of financial aid.

Tracking those economic developments on a national, regional and global basis requires an army of economists, so the IMF has a very good handle on the global financial picture.

What the IMF sees in China and India impresses the heck out of it. The International Monetary Fund is now forecasting that China and India will generate 40% of the world's growth in the next two years.

Forty percent? Wow! Let me give you some perspective on how impressive that is.

  • Twenty years ago, China and India generated just 10% of the world's economic growth.

  • Ten years ago, it improved to 18%.

  • China alone will generate more growth than the entire G7 (the U.S., the U.K., Germany, France, Japan, Canada, and Italy).

  • India will generate more growth than all the 27 countries in the European Union.

China and India aren't the only countries in Asia that are prospering. The IMF says that China, Indian, and the 10 ASEAN nations (Brunei, Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Myamar, Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, and Vietnam) will generate half the world's growth.

"By the end of 2009, output in most of Asia returned to pre-crisis levels even in those economies that were hit hardest by the crisis. After the deepest recession in recent history globally, we know that Asia is leading this global recovery," said Anoop Singh of the International Monetary.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people:
Reform the Economic System before it's too late!

Click here to see the most recent messages sent to congressional reps and local newspapers

Scott Baker is a Senior Editor and Writer at Op Ed News, a Writer for Daily Kos and Huffington Post, and is the author of Neitherworld - a two-volume novel blending Native American myth, archaeological detail, government conspiracy, with a sci-fi (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
49 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

I originally wrote most of this as a comment by Scott Baker on Wednesday, May 5, 2010 at 2:46:59 AM
China's next steps, and ours by Dick Thomson on Wednesday, May 5, 2010 at 7:18:15 AM
Free Trade only works in a Free World by Scott Baker on Wednesday, May 5, 2010 at 9:53:49 AM
Land by Dick Thomson on Wednesday, May 5, 2010 at 11:41:31 AM
You don't need perfect labor equality by Scott Baker on Thursday, May 6, 2010 at 3:23:06 AM
Von Mises speaks to suffering in the deadly PRC regime by John Newcomb on Wednesday, May 5, 2010 at 8:15:08 AM
Which is why by Dick Thomson on Wednesday, May 5, 2010 at 9:17:51 AM
China and Family Planning by Scott Baker on Wednesday, May 5, 2010 at 10:04:48 AM
Kind of like attacking the Libertarian God by Rob Kall on Wednesday, May 5, 2010 at 8:49:22 AM
China by mike buchan on Wednesday, May 5, 2010 at 9:59:25 AM
Not to argue the actual premise by Mark Sashine on Wednesday, May 5, 2010 at 10:08:23 AM
HAIL CHINA (ask tibet) by Ned Lud on Wednesday, May 5, 2010 at 10:43:09 AM
You misunderstand me by Scott Baker on Wednesday, May 5, 2010 at 11:30:33 AM
i'm baaaaaaaaack by Ned Lud on Wednesday, May 5, 2010 at 12:06:36 PM
Controlling the Economy by Starla Immak on Wednesday, May 5, 2010 at 11:14:49 AM
Your information is out of date by Scott Baker on Wednesday, May 5, 2010 at 11:42:28 AM
If I were to pick a game to play on economics models by Margaret Bassett on Wednesday, May 5, 2010 at 12:11:53 PM
Monopoly was originally a Georgist Game by Scott Baker on Wednesday, May 5, 2010 at 6:27:18 PM
Economics has been corrupted by Scott Baker on Thursday, May 6, 2010 at 3:35:54 AM
China but mostly the U.S of A by HarveyY on Wednesday, May 5, 2010 at 1:10:09 PM
China by mike buchan on Wednesday, May 5, 2010 at 1:19:08 PM
Every Time I Write about China by HarveyY on Wednesday, May 5, 2010 at 1:59:18 PM
A dictatorship is an extremely efficient way by Daniel Geery on Wednesday, May 5, 2010 at 3:03:15 PM
Not all dictatorships are created equal by Scott Baker on Thursday, May 6, 2010 at 3:50:32 AM
Purchasing power falls as China rises by JohnPeebles on Wednesday, May 5, 2010 at 3:14:20 PM
"sound money" is irrelevant with free trade by Dick Thomson on Wednesday, May 5, 2010 at 7:29:45 PM
clarifications by JohnPeebles on Thursday, May 6, 2010 at 12:19:28 AM
Tarrifs by Scott Baker on Thursday, May 6, 2010 at 4:04:16 AM
Good points by Dick Thomson on Thursday, May 6, 2010 at 7:39:08 AM
Canard! by Carol Thompson on Wednesday, May 5, 2010 at 5:39:28 PM
OK, Genius by Darren Wolfe on Wednesday, May 5, 2010 at 7:16:23 PM
What's needed is BOTH by Don Smith on Thursday, May 6, 2010 at 12:49:47 AM
True, as far as it goes... by Scott Baker on Thursday, May 6, 2010 at 4:12:06 AM
Rigged capitalism is bad by Darren Wolfe on Thursday, May 6, 2010 at 5:14:26 AM
For free markets, but against rigged capitalism by Dick Thomson on Thursday, May 6, 2010 at 8:49:44 AM
You have the insight of a 3 year old by Darren Wolfe on Thursday, May 6, 2010 at 9:35:24 AM
USing the insight of a five year old... by Scott Baker on Thursday, May 6, 2010 at 12:21:11 PM
Who said anything about no rules? by Darren Wolfe on Thursday, May 6, 2010 at 12:48:32 PM
An Austrian View of China by Darren Wolfe on Wednesday, May 5, 2010 at 7:27:07 PM
capitalism by Ty on Wednesday, May 5, 2010 at 7:50:12 PM
We need to practice the same policies abroad... by Scott Baker on Thursday, May 6, 2010 at 4:20:16 AM
I think inflation and SOL is what will hit China and India by Steven Leser on Wednesday, May 5, 2010 at 10:04:32 PM
Not reality Steven by Doc "Old Codger" McCoy on Thursday, May 6, 2010 at 4:04:58 AM
Understanding China by Doc "Old Codger" McCoy on Wednesday, May 5, 2010 at 11:23:52 PM
China by mike buchan on Thursday, May 6, 2010 at 2:15:15 AM
Yes by Doc "Old Codger" McCoy on Thursday, May 6, 2010 at 3:29:35 AM
Hear hear by Scott Baker on Thursday, May 6, 2010 at 4:29:42 AM
Which way forward? by Margaret Bassett on Thursday, May 6, 2010 at 1:48:55 PM
Element of risk by Peter Duveen on Saturday, May 8, 2010 at 10:07:18 AM