![]() |
By Jim Arnold (about the author) Page 1 of 5 page(s)
For OpEdNews: Jim Arnold - Writer Light
seems sometimes to act like a wave, sometimes like a particle. This seemingly
nonsensical behavior has been accepted for so long, and entire careers devoted to it,
so much so, that a hypothesis which would explain light's peculiarities, and
resolve its apparent duality, is evidently unwelcome among physical scientists
- even in violation of their most fundamental principles. A
guiding principle of science specifies that the worthiness of a theory or
hypothesis should be judged by its conformity to evidence, and by its
comprehensiveness and economy of explanation, all measured against other
theories with the same object. But the hypothesis I've offered to numerous
physics journals hasn't been explicitly criticized or refuted according to
those standards, it's simply been rejected as "unsuitable." A hypothesis on the nature of
light Abstract It is proposed that light
is at absolute rest, its apparent motion being the reflection of the motion of
mass in time. The hypothesis
resolves the paradox of the apparent wave/particle duality of light, accounts
for its speed being invariant and a limit, explains other peculiarities of its
behavior, and identifies the source of gravitational energy. Introduction Light is currently
regarded as in some ways wavelike, in some ways particle-like, invariant in
speed, the limit of speed, and having various strange non-local effects. Einstein's suggestion (1905) that light
be accepted as both wavelike and particulate, pending an intelligible resolution
of the evidence, has become an abiding commitment to paradox as quantum theory
has expanded the range of the counter-intuitive to encompass much of
theoretical physics. Nonetheless, the value of the fundamental scientific
preference for simplicity of description, explanatory power, and logical
coherence remains, in principle, as desirable as ever. However much science is now
accommodated to the paradoxical features of light, a theory that would obviate
a need for strange compromise is always to be preferred by scientific
standards. The idea that light might
be at absolute rest seems no doubt a very odd and unlikely remedy at first
impression, but I hope to justify it here by an appeal to the explanatory power
by which it may be judged superior to the conventional view. A Heuristic Graphic A simple spacetime diagram
(figure 1a) conforming to Special
Relativity and the Lorentz transformations(1), and drawn according
to the relativistic perspective of a single observer, provides a heuristic
representation by which the present hypothesis might be most readily
understood. The x-axis represents space, while its perpendicular, the t-axis, represents time - both according to observer A, who is considered to be at rest and moving in time(2)
along the t-axis. Vector B represents a body in motion relative to A. A travels 10 sec(3)in
time in the scope of the diagram while "at rest" in space. Body B, which as a matter of convenience is located
initially at o, moves from
the vicinity of A at a
velocity, according to A,
which takes it 8 ls in 10 sec. The final coordinates of B (8,6) can be derived from the Lorentz
transformations, or geometrically by means of measuring the lengths in the
diagram. By locating B at 6 seconds in time it is represented that the
clock of B has moved 6 sec in the reference frame of A. The spacetime interval
given by s2 = t2 - x2 (with t
proportional to c) is expressed
here by
"
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Contact Author |
Contact Editor |
View Authors' Articles |
| 15 comments |
Want to post your own comment on this Article?
|
||||
Tell a Friend:
|
Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews |