Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 1 (1 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   2 comments

General News

Let them know

By (about the author)     Permalink
Related Topic(s): ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H3 6/4/09

- Advertisement -

BAD IMAGE - https://salsa.wiredforchange.com/o/5180/images/top-banner-2.gif (must exist and begin with http)



Dear Supporter,

I need your help to get this message out:

A recent headline in Bloomberg News said: "Obama Offers Key Posts to those who Bankrolled Campaign."

Under the 11th Circuit's ruling in "The Siegelman Case," President Obama and contributors who accept appointments could be indicted and convicted of bribery and extortion if President Obama knew at the time they made a contribution that the donor wanted the post to which the President later appointed them.

54 former Attorneys General, both Democrats and Republicans, said the 11th Circuit's ruling in the Siegelman case means "a prosecutor has the power to indict and convict any politician and any donor whenever a donation was made and the politician took action consistent with the donor's desire, while aware of said desire."
- Advertisement -


Your Congressional representatives need to know about this. Send them a message today!

Here is why it is important to Members of the House and Senate:

What's at stake is whether an elected official can be prosecuted for doing something for a contributor. Sound crazy? It is! The U.S. Supreme Court made it clear in McCormick v. U.S. that it takes an actual explicit quid pro quo agreement before the line between politics and crime is crossed. However, in my case, the court said that juries may infer an agreement from the minds and actions of the elected official and the contributor, the opposite of explicit.

The 54 former State Attorneys General told the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals in the Siegelman case: "Such an interpretation puts at risk every politician who accepts a campaign contribution." "...criminalizing activities that fall short of an explicit quid pro quo agreement, can only lead to an impermissible chilling effect on the First Amendment right to contribute to political campaigns."

It is important not only to my freedom but also to every elected official, including the President Obama, to get this First Amendment issue clarified.

As I raise money to pay for my $150,000 appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court I am asking you to continue the fight in Congress.

Click here to send a message to your U.S. House and Senate Members, and urge them to investigate the prosecutorial misconduct in my case and remind them that 54 former state Attorneys General have said that the ruling in the Siegelman case "puts every politician at risk."

Thank you so much.

Sincerely,


Don Siegelman
Governor of Alabama 1999-2003

 
Paid for by Friends of Don Siegelman 2008

 

Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people:
Governor Don Siegelman needs your help.

Click here to see the most recent messages sent to congressional reps and local newspapers

www.thatspolitics.com

Democratic Activist and Strategist, doing most activist work thru a nationwide email listserv, referred to as "Pam's List". Elected member of the Alabama State Democratic Executive Committee as well as a member of my county, (Madison) Democratic (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Slain Trust fund millionaire James G. Cummings 'furious' over Obama's election, was making dirty bomb

Federal probe of Alabama attorney general no shock to bloggers

A Lynching in Alabama

Wikileaks and The Next HOPE

Why Are Newspapers Dying?

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
2 people are discussing this page, with 2 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)
would be the presidents themselves as big donors t... by Archie on Friday, Jun 5, 2009 at 4:25:58 PM
Heck, 54 Attorneys General said so.  Why shou... by bucketslogg on Saturday, Jun 6, 2009 at 2:00:48 AM