Home
Refresh   Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ;
Add to My Group
July 31, 2008 at 07:43:50

View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H2) on 7/31/08:

Judiciary Backpedals on Reports and Transcripts from "Non-Impeachment" Hearings

submit to twitter
submit to reddit
submit to digg

Tell A Friend

By mikel weisser (about the author)     Page 1 of 1 page(s)

opednews.com     Permalink

For OpEdNews: mikel weisser - Writer

 

Claiming an intern error, the House Judiciary Committee has retracted Monday statements regarding updates on the July 25th hearing on alleged presidential abuses, AKA the “non-impeachment” hearings.

A late Wednesday afternoon call showed the Judiciary Committee now claiming congressional procedures will require the official transcripts of the six hour hearing to be held for 90 days, meaning the official transcripts will not be made available to the American public until just before the November elections. A staffer who declined to give her name claimed that Monday’s statement that the transcripts would ready for the public on Aug. 3rd was an “intern error,” explaining that there are “new people in the office and they don’t know.”

The same explanation of “intern error” was given for the retraction of another, even more critical, earlier statement that an official committee report, or announcement of the findings from the hearing would be made available in “two weeks.” “There are no plans for any report or statement regarding the findings from those hearings. They are completed. We do not make press releases on hearings that have already happened.”

When asked to clarify, the staffer did acknowledge that the latest press release posted on the Judiciary’s website [dated 7/28/08—post hearing] was indeed a report of findings from a hearing, but the staffer explained it was actually a report of another committee’s hearing.

“To clarify then, you will post reports on the hearings of other congressional committees, but not of your own hearings?”

“We do not make press releases on hearings that have already happened,” the staffer replied.

 While the Judiciary anticipates no plans to release a report concerning the July 25th hearings, the staffer says the committee chair, John Conyers D-MI, would not rule out potential future committee actions based on voluminous evidence introduced on the 25th by Constitutional law experts Bruce Fein and Elizabeth Holtzman, among others, but the staffer would not specify what any further actions might be, only that none have been planned.

When questioned for further information on the transcripts, the staffer claimed that those in the DC area could come to the committee office to view the current draft edition of the transcripts. Interested citizens would be allowed to examine the document and even take notes, but not allowed to make photocopies.

In an additional, though unrelated, example of backpedaling by Judiciary staff, when asked about the volume of calls making inquiries after Friday, the unnamed staffer, at first replied “There’s just been a couple a day.” Since this call was made after 4:30 DC time, the caller clarified to be sure, “The phrase ‘a couple literally refers two, as in a married couple for example; and while the term can be construed to include as many as four, are you trying to imply that besides this call, counting as one, only one other person in America called today to ask about Friday’s hearings?”

After a pause the staffer clarified, “No sir, several called today.”

Given the significance of these backpedals. It might prove helpful for those pressing for impeachment to independently call the Judiciary and ask the same simple questions: 1) When will the committee release the transcripts to the public? 2)  When will the committee announce a report to the full house from the hearings? 3) What kinds of actions is the committee preparing in light of the numerous charges of criminal behavior laid out for the public record in the hearings?

The House Judiciary Committee public phone number is 202-225-3951. Readers who make calls themselves could compile the results in the comments below.

 

--yzur--

 

Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people:
Contact Judiciary to Demand Follow-up on Impeachment Hearings

Click here to see the most recent messages sent to congressional reps and local newspapers

Born the son of a nightclub singer, Mikel Weisser watched anti-war hippies getting beaten on TV during the Vietnam War and decided to devote his life to protest against unreasoning authority, but not to getting beaten. Though he spent almost two (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Book Recommendations for "Conyers John"
What Went Wrong In Ohio: The Conyers Report On The 2004 Presidential Election
by Congressman John Conyers

$14.95
Lowest New Price $2.81

Number of pages: 142
Publisher: Academy Chicago Publishers

A shorter workweek in the 1980's. Foreword by John Conyers.
by William, Jr McGaughey

$55.00

Number of pages:
Publisher: Unknown

CONYERS, JOHN: An entry from Macmillan Reference USA's
by Christine Lunardini

$2.90

Number of pages: 2
Publisher: Macmillan Reference USA

View All Book Recommendations

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

FACEBOOK      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      NETSCAPE      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
24 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
 

Judiciary Committee backpedals on "Non-Impeachment" Hearings by Nancy Holt on Thursday, Jul 31, 2008 at 12:11:25 PM
90 days to check typos! Doesn't that speak volumes by Brett Paatsch on Thursday, Jul 31, 2008 at 9:24:51 PM
she doesn't want to be divisive with the other oath breakers by mikel weisser on Friday, Aug 1, 2008 at 12:53:52 AM
thank you for ACTING! & What a great report by mikel weisser on Friday, Aug 1, 2008 at 12:48:58 AM
I also callled... by Amanda Lang on Thursday, Jul 31, 2008 at 1:09:30 PM
Good comment Amanda by Brett Paatsch on Thursday, Jul 31, 2008 at 9:17:30 PM
Another great report. The Important difference here is-- by mikel weisser on Friday, Aug 1, 2008 at 1:21:06 AM
forgot by mikel weisser on Friday, Aug 1, 2008 at 1:24:30 AM
original panel statements still viewable here by Aurora on Thursday, Jul 31, 2008 at 1:26:55 PM
We can't wait until October 24th for transcripts by Mrs P on Thursday, Jul 31, 2008 at 4:01:32 PM
Who are you? by Amanda Lang on Thursday, Jul 31, 2008 at 7:23:04 PM
Its not just a question of laziness by Brett Paatsch on Thursday, Jul 31, 2008 at 10:12:30 PM
blankname, goodidea by zephyr on Friday, Aug 1, 2008 at 12:04:28 AM
All of the Comgressmen Know by ronheri on Thursday, Jul 31, 2008 at 5:45:00 PM
This is actually a critically important report by Brett Paatsch on Thursday, Jul 31, 2008 at 9:07:09 PM
Interns and incompetent receptionists would still be able by Brett Paatsch on Thursday, Jul 31, 2008 at 9:31:12 PM
Impeachment is still "off the table"...here's why. by Frank J. Ranelli on Friday, Aug 1, 2008 at 1:26:48 AM
Yes of course by mikel weisser on Friday, Aug 1, 2008 at 1:58:47 AM
That may be an important fact about Pelosi's motivation by Brett Paatsch on Friday, Aug 1, 2008 at 2:03:54 AM
Not Conjecture by Frank J. Ranelli on Friday, Aug 1, 2008 at 9:23:55 AM
One of our own OpEd Contributors already transcribed... by bucketslogg on Friday, Aug 1, 2008 at 1:42:31 AM
okay, I don't know how to do links... by bucketslogg on Friday, Aug 1, 2008 at 1:45:58 AM
That's Right, If "Unofficial" is Enough-- by mikel weisser on Friday, Aug 1, 2008 at 2:09:38 AM
Non Impeachment Hearings by Brad on Saturday, Aug 2, 2008 at 2:05:37 AM

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment


 

 

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum