![]() |
|
|
September 4, 2008 at 16:22:33
John McCain, fortunate son or collaborator with N. Vietnamese captors? by Douglas Valentine (Posted by martinweiss) Page 1 of 5 page(s) |
|
|
McNasty In the fall of 1967, Navy pilot John McCain was routinely bombing Hanoi from an aircraft carrier in the South China Sea. On October 26, he was trying to level a power plant in a heavily populated area when a surface-to-air missile knocked a wing off his jet. Banged-up John McCain and what was left of plane splashed into Truc Bach Lake. A compassionate Vietnamese civilian left his air raid shelter and swam out to McCain. McCain’s arm and leg were fractured and he was tangled up in his parachute underwater. He was drowning. The Vietnamese man saved McCain’s sorry ass, and yet McCain has nothing but hatred for “the gooks” who allegedly tortured him. As he told reporters on his campaign bus (The Straight Talk Express) in 2000, “I will hate them as long as I live.” (1)
Americans have to hate people, and dehumanize them as “gooks” or “rag-heads” in order to drop bombs on them. Stirring up such hatred is the forte of the US government, as witnessed by its Israeli-driven PR campaign against Arabs and Moslems. That’s why Bush and his media minions tied “brutal dictator” Saddam Hussein to 9/11 – so Americans would hate Iraqis enough to kill and abuse them in a thousand ways, everyday, for five years. Or, according to McCain, for 100 years if necessary.
The flip side to the equation is that people generally hate those who drop bombs on them. When the Germans dropped bombs on London, the Allies called it Terror Bombing. The French resistance especially hated the Germans, especially after the Gestapo set up shop in occupied France in 1940.
Likewise, Iraqi and Afghani resistance fighters hate the Americans (who more and more resemble the Germans of 1940) for occupying their countries. They especially hate our Gestapo – the CIA – and its torturers. But that’s War for you, and John McCain is lucky the locals didn’t eat him alive – like Uzbek nationalists trapped in a horrid prison camp in Afghanistan nibbled on CIA officer John “Mike” Spann shortly after Spann summarily executed a prisoner. Spann was killed in the ensuing riot, shortly before the CIA and its Afghan collaborators massacred the remaining Uzbek prisoners on 28 November 2001.
The Vietnamese had good reason to hate McCain. On his previous 22 missions, he had dropped God knows how many bombs killing God knows how many innocent civilians. “I am a war criminal,” he confessed on “60 Minutes” in 1997. “I bombed innocent women and children.” (2)
If he is sincere when he says that, why isn’t he being tried for war crimes by the U.S .Government?
In any event, the man who rescued McCain tried to ward off an angry mob, which stomped on McCain for a while until the local cops turned him over to the military. McCain was in pain, but suffering no mortal wounds. He was, however, in enough pain to break down and start collaborating with the Vietnamese after three days in a hospital receiving treatment from qualified doctors – something no other POW ever enjoyed.
War is one thing, collaborating with the enemy is another; it is a legitimate campaign issue that strikes at the heart of McCain’s character…or lack thereof.
There are certainly degrees of collaboration. As a famous novelist once asked, “If you’re a barber and you cut a German’s hair, does that make you a collaborator?”
Being an informant for the Gestapo, or its stepson the CIA in Iraq, and informing on the resistance and sending them to their death, is different than being a barber. In occupied countries like Iraq, or France in World War Two, collaboration to that extent is an automatic death sentence.
The question is: “What kind of collaborator was John McCain, the admitted war criminal who will hate his alleged torturers for the rest of his life?”
Put another way, how psychologically twisted is McCain? And what actually happened to him in his POW camp that twisted him? Was it abuse, as he claims, or was it the fact that he collaborated and has to cover up?
Covering-up can take a lot of energy. The truth is lurking in his subconscious, waiting to explode. A number of US officials, including Andrew Card, have commented on McCain’s inexplicable angry outbursts.
In a July 5 2006 NewsMax.com article, former Senator Bob Smith (R-NH), was quoted as having said about McCain: “I have witnessed incidents where he has used profanity at colleagues.... He would disagree about something and then explode.” Smith called it “irrational behavior. We've all had incidents where we have gotten angry, but I've never seen anyone act like that."
So, you say, McCain has a short fuse behind the plastered TV smile. So he calls his colleagues assholes and shit-heads. In high school they called him “McNasty.” That’s just how he is. Always was, always will be.
Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people:
McCain: Traitor?
Click here to see the most recent messages sent to congressional reps and local newspapers
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Contact Editor |
|
|
|
|
| 3 comments |
|
Something else for you guys to check out:
When McCain was asked about his Christianity during the Saddleback Church interview he went right to the old stable of the POW camp. He then told the story of the Vietnamese Guard who let him out of his cell, treated him very well for a period of time, then drew a cross in the sand (indicating that he, the guard was also a Christian), I attended Bible School in the 60's and early 70's and I am certain that I have heard that very story extolled by a preacher or two. The problem is, that I might have heard it BEFORE McCain was released! I'm wondering if he utilized a Christian "Urban Legend" that never really happened, to pacify the crowd? I'd really like that to be investigated. by Greg Purcell (8 articles, 0 quicklinks, 3 diaries, 47 comments) on Thursday, Sep 4, 2008 at 8:14:03 PM
|
|
Sign in sand from Solzhenitsyn
The cross in sand remark was plagiarized from Alexander Solzhenitsyn. See OpEdNews article on same. by martinweiss (41 articles, 6 quicklinks, 13 diaries, 503 comments [3 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Thursday, Sep 4, 2008 at 11:55:24 PM
|
|
Since McCain's turnabout on Bush in 2000, I've been wonderin
In the infamous South Carolina primary of 2000, Karl Rove and minions waged a whispering campaign that included racist slurs directed against McCain and a full frontal assault by the so-called "Christian" right against McCain. One would have thought that McCain would never forgive Bushco for the lying and slandering. But in a strange twist of affairs that has always puzzled me, John McCain became one of Bush's biggest cheerleaders and supporters. Since then, I have always suspected that Rove and his fellow Bushies had some kind of blackmail information -- that is, unsavory, potentially catastrophic material on McCain -- that was used to keep him in line with Bush policy. And given the historical reality we live in, I always wondered if it had something to do with his time in Vietnam -- was he really the heroic resister that he portrays himself as, or did he collaborate? Thus, this article confirms something that I've suspected for a long time. And I believe that Rove and company have known the damaging information about McCain long enough to use it to blackmail him. A psychologist I know says McCain is a sociopath, only slightly less dangerous than a psychopath (what the Cuban doctor called him). McCain has struck me as mentally ill for some time. Whether his mental instability is due to untreated PTSD, a personality disorder he has always had, or some other cause, it is not really important. What is important is that the vast American middle -- the ones who chant Obama Osama -- will be conned again, this time into voting this psychological time bomb as president of the United States. The ultra-rich in this country (and probably in other countries as well) believe that they are immune to the consequences of global climate change, immune to the consequences of global food shortages, immune to the consequences of any developing catastrophe that their own actions are ensuring will become unavoidable. They also believe they are immune to the consequences of having John McCain in the White House, that he will work always in their best interest -- but when John McCain's hand is always so near the big red button, no one can avoid the consequences. by S. E. Hoffman (2 articles, 6 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 28 comments) on Friday, Sep 5, 2008 at 7:12:40 PM
|
Want to post your own comment on this Article?
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tell a Friend:
|
Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews |