![]() |
| Home | Hot News | Economic Crisis | Barack Obama | Impeachment | Election Integrity | LGBT Gay | Media | Business - Economics | Edges | Government | Religions |
| Life Arts Science | Security WMDs Terror | Rights Justice Democracy | Obama transition | Veterans Military | Torture Guantanamo | Barack Obama Family, et | Iraq Afghanistan Pakista | MiddleEast |
|
Tags for This Article:
McCain-John (3909) McCain-John (3909) McCain-John (3909) Government (3579) Impeachment (3219) Republican (2458) Democracy (1979) Democratic (1962) Power (1464) State (1153) Other (1000) Corporations (999) Elections (942) Presidency (819) Energy (761) Presidential Campaign (631) Democracy (611) Katrina (479) Presidential Campaign Democratic (478) Events (381) Community (357) Ideas (357) Presidential Campaign Democratic (345) Presidential Campaign Republican (334) Debate (324) Independent (322) Green (301) Presidential Primary Elections (273) 9-11 (245) Community (234) Presidential Campaign Republican (222) Presidential Candidates (189) Marriage (185) Organizations (164) Alternative (158) Agenda (83) Representation (80) Community (69) Partisanship (62) Email (52) Balance (41) Presidential Scholars (29) Nassau County (28) Professors (20) Nassau (18)
|
(more...)
(less...)
Add to My Group
Debate Background Hofstra University is hosting a Presidential Debate on Wednesday, October 15, 2008. The debate is sponsored by the so-called Commission on Presidential Debates. Hofstra mistakenly calls this commission "nonpartisan" when it is actually bi-partisan--entirely controlled by the Democratic and Republican Parties and funded by a few large corporations (much like the presidential election). Or, as Connie Rice put it in her 2004 NPR story, Top 10 Secrets They Don't Want You to Know About the Debates: The "independent and non-partisan" Commission on Presidential Debates is neither independent nor non-partisan. CPD should stand for 'Cloaking-device for Party Deceptions'--it is not an independent commission on anything. The CPD is under the total control of the Republican and Democratic parties and by definition bipartisan, not non-partisan. Walter Cronkite called CPD-sponsored debates an 'unconscionable fraud.' Of course, that won't stop the corporately-funded PBS from televising the debate in 2008. Since they did not heed the word of the 2000 debate moderator Mark Shields who commented on the exclusion of that year's Green Party presidential candidate from the debates:
You can read all about Nader's 2000 Green Party candidacy in his Crashing the Party. As part of the activities leading up to this debate, Hofstra is having Historical Re-enactments and Discussions on Democracy on Tuesday, October 14, 2008. If many of the characters included in the scheduled re-enactments were alive today, they would be protesting the exclusion of Green Party candidate Cynthia McKinney, independent candidate Ralph Nader, and Libertarian candidate Bob Barr from the debates. All of these candidates will be on a sufficient number of ballots to win a majority of the electoral college votes. John AdamsJohn Adams was a proponent of the separation powers, going as far as not to even trust a single legislature. In his Thoughts on Government he wrote, "a single assembly is liable to all the vices, follies, and frailties of an individual." As to the separation of powers Adams wrote that
It would logically follow that Adams would apply this principle to candidates and political parties so that a debate should include all presidential candidates. When Adams first ran for president in the election of 1789 under the new U.S. Constitution there were 12 white men running for president. George Washington won the presidency without the support of any political party. Adams would be quite shocked to find out that in 2008 only two candidates will be allowed to speak when many more are on the ballot, and solely because of their membership in a political party. Of course, corporations were a rarity in Adams' time, so they did not control our economy or politics. Green Party candidates do not take money from corporations, allowing Green Party elected officials to be independent servants of all the people.
Though Adams ran as a candidate of the Federalist Party, he did not see the winner take-all system of elections which forced the country into choosing between two patronage-bestowing parties as the best answer as he stated in a 1789 letter:
Under the Constitution rules in Adams' time, he became the Vice president, by virtue of being the runner-up in the Electoral College. Oddly enough, my 9-year-old nephew just suggested this weekend that he thought Obama and McCain should just become President and Vice President. Especially with these two men, creating this joint administration would not be as unworkable a solution as the corporate media often makes it sound. An AP story reviewed the McBama agenda which set out the similarities between the corporate candidates McCain and Obama on a variety issues such as Iraq, tax cuts, offshore drilling, stem cell research, and same-sex marriage. Having Green Party presidential candidate Cynthia McKinney in the debates would provide an alternative to this corporate agenda. Furthermore, Cynthia McKinney differs from the Obama/McCain corporate agenda by being outspoken about demanding impeachment, supporting single-payer universal healthcare, rejecting nuclear energy, investigating the government's failures during Hurricane Katrina, and providing a real investigation into the events leading up to the tragedy of 9-11. With Washington refusing to run for a third term, Adams succeeded in gaining the presidency in the election of 1796. In this election there were again 12 white men running for president. In Adam's time, it was considered unsightly for candidates to campaign, so the newly formed political parties did it for them. it would still be shocking to Adams that only 2 political parties were allowed to participate in this process. Under the original Electoral College system, Adam's frenemy Thomas Jefferson was elected as his Vice President. This system provides balance of viewpoints closer to the use of proportional representation in elections advocated by the Green Party for more inclusive government. The following quote from Adams summed up my feelings about the exclusion of candidates and thereby the blocking of alternative viewpoints in the presidential debates:
Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people: Click here to see the most recent messages sent to congressional reps and local newspapers www.onthewilderside.net The Wilder's life has always veered between art and politics. When they got together in the late 1990's, Kimberly and Ian ratcheted up their activities. Together, Ian and Kimberly Wilder published chapbooks; gave dozens of poetry readings; published poetry; wrote newspaper articles; and hosted events.
Ian has performed spoken word as a part of the near-mythic folk groovin' band Nylon & Steel, and was co-founding lyricist for the duo Spiritwalkers. His work with Nylon & Steel can be found on the album "Slip Behind the Molecule".
With Nader's 2000 presidential campaign, the Wilders were drawn back into politics. Within four years they had co-founded the Babylon Greens at their kitchen table; run the first full ticket of Greens in their town's history; got Kimberly twice elected to the Executive Committee of Green Party of New York State; and then Ian to the position of GPNYS State Party Co-chair.
In 2006 , Ian stepped back from state politics after retaining the right to enroll Green in NY by successfully getting Malachy McCourt on the ballot for Governor.
Now, in 2008, Ian is on the GPNYS statewide Executive Committee. Kimberly has entirely resigned the state level committee (need a rest). And, Kimberly is Co-Chair of the national GP-US Diversity Committee. The circle goes round and round...
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
Copyright © OpEdNews, 2002-2009 |