Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 9   Valuable 6   Well Said 5   View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H3) on 12/18/10:     Permalink
View Article Stats      (143 comments)

Jesse Ventura Hammers The 9/11 Official Pentagon Attack Scenario

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (32 fans)   -- Page 1 of 3 page(s)

opednews.com


Publicity photo of Jesse Ventura from the 1987 adventure movie "Predator"

*****
Special Note: for whatever reason, the embed of Episode 8 that is the focus of this article has disappeared, so I am both linking it (a lot) and embedding it twice so this does not happen again. So if you just read this article without seeing the video, now you easily can.

EPISODE 8 HERE

Earlier articles on Ventura episodes:

1) Episode 7 (on the Gulf Oil Disaster)

2) Episode 5 (on the JFK assassination)


*****

In Jesse Ventura's latest nugget from his wildly popular TruTV investigative series, Episode 8 of Conspiracy Theory with Jesse Ventura, the former Navy UDT/SEAL member, actor, wrestler and governor of Minnesota takes on one of the Establishment's sacred myths driving the almost decade long, bloody, chaotic, financially ruinous and corruption-laced War on Terror, the belief that American Airlines Boeing 757 Flight 77, 35 minutes after taking off from DC's Dulles Airport, was hjacked by five al-Qaeda operatives (two of whom, it was later revealed, were alive and well in the Middle East at that time, their identities misused) who stormed the cockpit and overwhelmed the flight crew, allowing their own pilot, Hani Hanjour, to turn the plane around and deliberately fly it into the Pentagon some 50 or so minutes later. Or so the story goes.

There have been many criticisms of, even accusatory attacks on the official government storyline over the past few years, but it seems that for every attack there is a counterattack that doesn't really resemble any dialectical process, but rather trench warfare from World War I, replete with Howitzer bombardments on the critic plus withering rifle fire, as well as smoke grenades and shells that fill the "battle scene" with the fog of propaganda war.

The beauty of Episode 8 is that it lays out the main criticisms of the official storyline in a comprehensive, straightforward manner with powerful interviews and strong rebuttals of key tenets of the "Hani Hanjour slammed the Pentagon" theory of what happened that fateful day of September 11th, 2001. This is not mere wild-eyed speculation, but information grounded in reality. Is it the final word? No, but it certainly adds to the evidence that the official story is not right.

*****

Jesse begins the episode by recounting a phone call he received from Charles Lewis, a Los Angeles Airport Contractor conducting inspections for the LA Building and Safety Department at the LA airport. As 9/11 was going down, Charles, with approved credentials, happened to be in the vicinity of restricted air traffic controller conversations on a high-level, official radio frequency. He told Ventura, in person, how he overheard controllers demanding to know, with great distress, why NORAD hadn't been informed of the hijacking of Flight 77, to which a shocking reply eventually floated across the secured airwaves: NORAD HAD INDEED BEEN INFORMED BUT HAD BEEN TOLD TO STAND DOWN. When it was asked who had stood NORAD down, the reply came back: THE HIGHEST LEVEL OF THE WHITE HOUSE. NORAD's multi-billion dollar air defense system had been rendered useless by a simple command: Stand down. And this was despite the fact that the Pentagon is in a high-level no-fly zone and equipped with its own anti-aircraft defenses, and where shooting down an invading aircraft is a prime option.

Was this Cheney or Bush who gave that command? We are all too aware that George Bush during this time period was in a Florida schoolroom reading My Pet Goat to young students, so we must assume the order to stand down came from the man at the helm in the White House underground control bunker in Washington DC at the time: Dick Cheney.

But Charles was not done with his revelations in Episode 8: the next shocker he heard coming across the radio as clear as a bell was the statement that the Pentagon had been HIT BY A MISSILE, not a plane, yes, a missile! So imagine his surprise when he finally went home, turned on his TV and heard reports that the Pentagon had been hit by an airplane. The question now becomes, was the radio transmittal just hearsay or insider knowledge?

*****
Based on Lewis's statements, Jesse and his team faned out across Washington DC to investigate the entire bailiwick surrounding the official Pentagon attack scenario, beginning with the the all-but-repressed and forgotten testimony of then Transportation Secretary Norman Mineta before the 9/11 Commission on May 23, 2003, wherein he stated that he was in the White House underground bunker with Vice-President Cheney on the morning of 9/11 as one young man repeatedly came forth to inform Cheney of how close to Washington the plane being tracked was approaching : 50 miles, 30 miles, etc., and when he announced "10 miles" he also asked Cheney if the "orders still stand", to which Cheney replied, according to Mineta, "Of course the orders still stand!" It doesn't take a psychic to figure out what those orders might be.

Mineta's testimony did not show up in the official 9/11 Commission Report. Worse still, his report has been excised from the 9/11 Commission's video report! Why is that? Could it be because it puts Dick Cheney in an extremely bad light, one of willfully NOT protecting the Pentagon from attack, of letting it get hit instead and killing all those innocent people?

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

 

I am a student of history, religion, exoteric and esoteric, the Humanities in general and a tempered advocate for the ultimate manifestation of peace, justice and the unity of humankind through self-realization and mutual respect, although I am not (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Follow Me on Twitter

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
143 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Alleged Hijackers ALWAYS the Weakest Link by Ed Encho on Saturday, Dec 18, 2010 at 9:05:25 PM
got a figure by zonie on Sunday, Dec 19, 2010 at 9:42:06 AM
Density of Asses by Ron Brassfield on Sunday, Dec 19, 2010 at 11:57:26 AM
Jesse did a great job on this episode by 911TRUTH on Saturday, Dec 18, 2010 at 11:20:37 PM
Video by Bob Gormley on Sunday, Dec 19, 2010 at 8:28:01 AM
I thought the same thing by 911TRUTH on Sunday, Dec 19, 2010 at 10:26:12 AM
"CONSPIRACY THEORY" Is by aberamsay on Sunday, Dec 19, 2010 at 4:52:19 AM
Wikileaks... by Dennis Kaiser on Sunday, Dec 19, 2010 at 7:11:24 AM
Jesse Ventura by Debbie S on Sunday, Dec 19, 2010 at 2:00:36 PM
flight 77 by crispy on Sunday, Dec 19, 2010 at 10:38:35 AM
"I ain't got time to think" by J. Edward Tremlett on Sunday, Dec 19, 2010 at 12:01:06 PM
Drats, You've Exposed Us by Mac McKinney on Sunday, Dec 19, 2010 at 12:40:22 PM
well that's a relief by J. Edward Tremlett on Sunday, Dec 19, 2010 at 2:46:41 PM
What would stop murderers... by zonie on Monday, Dec 20, 2010 at 3:12:27 AM
How did Hani Hanjour find the Pentagon? by Old Uncle Dave on Sunday, Dec 19, 2010 at 10:58:32 AM
Good report on a good report by Mike Preston on Sunday, Dec 19, 2010 at 11:59:00 AM
Thanks by Mac McKinney on Sunday, Dec 19, 2010 at 12:04:33 PM
Make that a "foolish faith" by Mike Preston on Sunday, Dec 19, 2010 at 12:05:28 PM
Thanks for Keeping the Reality Before Us by Ron Brassfield on Sunday, Dec 19, 2010 at 12:50:27 PM
Actually The Weakest by Dennis Kaiser on Sunday, Dec 19, 2010 at 1:17:10 PM
Gordon Duff Article by Mac McKinney on Sunday, Dec 19, 2010 at 1:47:19 PM
911 Conspiracy Theory by Gerald Bertholl on Sunday, Dec 19, 2010 at 3:46:31 PM
Just a few more points to consider: by Richard Lee on Sunday, Dec 19, 2010 at 9:56:08 PM
Second photo not the same as the first by GUY P. FRASER on Wednesday, Dec 22, 2010 at 4:27:32 PM
The Difference by Dennis Kaiser on Wednesday, Dec 22, 2010 at 5:53:45 PM
no plane made the hole by GUY P. FRASER on Thursday, Dec 23, 2010 at 7:14:15 PM
no plane made the hole by GUY P. FRASER on Thursday, Dec 23, 2010 at 9:40:27 PM
Which Begs the Question by Robert Arend on Sunday, Dec 19, 2010 at 11:25:05 PM
Good question. by Mac McKinney on Monday, Dec 20, 2010 at 12:19:05 AM
As I noted above... by zonie on Monday, Dec 20, 2010 at 3:16:17 AM
Could it be.... by Dennis Kaiser on Monday, Dec 20, 2010 at 9:11:15 AM
No. That was Flt 93 shot down by F-16 from Otis or Andrews by Richard Lee on Monday, Dec 20, 2010 at 10:58:19 PM
Flight 93 by Dennis Kaiser on Tuesday, Dec 21, 2010 at 5:13:36 AM
Also an excellent question by J. Edward Tremlett on Thursday, Dec 23, 2010 at 10:35:27 PM
Funny how Ventura ...... by Natalie Oberman on Monday, Dec 20, 2010 at 4:31:22 AM
When logic rears its ugly head ;) by Perry Logan on Monday, Dec 20, 2010 at 5:17:26 AM
"Debunkers are usually Establishment types whose ignorance by Richard Lee on Wednesday, Dec 22, 2010 at 6:25:30 PM
seeing plane crash remains? by crispy on Monday, Dec 20, 2010 at 6:07:36 AM
Prove it. by Dawn Owens on Monday, Dec 20, 2010 at 4:50:29 PM
re: Prove it. by Natalie Oberman on Tuesday, Dec 21, 2010 at 3:59:03 PM
But... by Bia Winter on Wednesday, Dec 22, 2010 at 7:24:09 AM
re: But..... by Natalie Oberman on Wednesday, Dec 22, 2010 at 9:36:56 PM
It's not hard to believe they are in on the conspiracy. by Jeff Poster on Thursday, Dec 23, 2010 at 12:10:46 PM
yeah, because... by J. Edward Tremlett on Thursday, Dec 23, 2010 at 11:19:29 PM
Well, yeah, actually. by Jeff Poster on Wednesday, Dec 29, 2010 at 7:37:54 AM
Conversely.... by Jeff Poster on Wednesday, Dec 29, 2010 at 8:07:54 AM
re: Conversely.... by Natalie Oberman on Wednesday, Dec 29, 2010 at 11:15:53 AM
Direct evidence by Jim Arnold on Wednesday, Dec 29, 2010 at 11:43:44 AM
Please support your claim by Jeff Poster on Wednesday, Dec 29, 2010 at 5:52:47 PM
re: Please support your claim by Natalie Oberman on Wednesday, Dec 29, 2010 at 9:30:04 PM
Ask Ventura by Mac McKinney on Monday, Dec 20, 2010 at 6:10:42 PM
Drones... by Dennis Kaiser on Tuesday, Dec 21, 2010 at 5:07:50 AM
re: Ask Ventura by Natalie Oberman on Tuesday, Dec 21, 2010 at 3:49:52 PM
Oh Come on Natalie by Mac McKinney on Tuesday, Dec 21, 2010 at 5:40:33 PM
re: Oh Come on Natalie by Natalie Oberman on Tuesday, Dec 21, 2010 at 6:43:49 PM
re: Oh Come on Natalie by Ron Brassfield on Thursday, Dec 23, 2010 at 5:23:27 AM
Hmmm.. by Bia Winter on Thursday, Dec 23, 2010 at 7:25:08 AM
the most interesting thing by Jim Arnold on Thursday, Dec 23, 2010 at 8:09:13 AM
gold stars for everyone by J. Edward Tremlett on Thursday, Dec 23, 2010 at 10:40:35 PM
You want credible journalism? One word: David Ray Griffin by Jeff Poster on Wednesday, Dec 29, 2010 at 8:26:00 AM
re: You want credible journalism? ..... by Natalie Oberman on Wednesday, Dec 29, 2010 at 9:57:39 PM
Exactly, Mac by Bia Winter on Thursday, Dec 23, 2010 at 7:21:22 AM
re: Exactly, Mac by Natalie Oberman on Thursday, Dec 23, 2010 at 10:47:11 AM
Magic Fireball by Mac McKinney on Thursday, Dec 23, 2010 at 2:11:42 PM
Blase as Usual, and Off-Base Again by Ron Brassfield on Thursday, Dec 23, 2010 at 9:33:47 PM
Natalie! Hellooooo????? by Jeff Poster on Tuesday, Dec 28, 2010 at 7:44:10 PM
re: Natalie! Hellooooo??????? by Natalie Oberman on Wednesday, Dec 29, 2010 at 10:10:01 AM
HUH? by Jeff Poster on Monday, Dec 20, 2010 at 6:11:41 PM
Military Pilots by Dennis Kaiser on Wednesday, Dec 22, 2010 at 1:32:08 PM
100 ton aircraft disappears by Dave Kisor on Wednesday, Dec 22, 2010 at 4:12:35 PM
RE: Funny how... by Mary Davis on Wednesday, Dec 22, 2010 at 5:24:25 PM
FOX NEWS? by Mac McKinney on Wednesday, Dec 22, 2010 at 5:43:55 PM
Check Your Reason at the Door? by Ron Brassfield on Thursday, Dec 23, 2010 at 8:11:12 PM
You want logic???? by Jeff Poster on Wednesday, Dec 29, 2010 at 7:50:00 AM
reply to crispy and others by Natalie Oberman on Tuesday, Dec 21, 2010 at 3:19:58 PM
Cherry-Picking Business by Mac McKinney on Tuesday, Dec 21, 2010 at 5:23:10 PM
re: Cherry-Picking Business by Natalie Oberman on Tuesday, Dec 21, 2010 at 6:30:51 PM
Trotting Out by Mac McKinney on Tuesday, Dec 21, 2010 at 10:25:30 PM
re: airplane crashes by Natalie Oberman on Tuesday, Dec 21, 2010 at 6:53:46 PM
Now we have caveats by Mac McKinney on Tuesday, Dec 21, 2010 at 7:41:27 PM
re: Now we have caveats by Natalie Oberman on Tuesday, Dec 21, 2010 at 9:12:38 PM
This debate is lacking pertinent details! by Richard Lee on Wednesday, Dec 22, 2010 at 10:03:09 PM
re: This debate is lacking ...... by Natalie Oberman on Thursday, Dec 23, 2010 at 3:27:27 AM
You are Dodging, As Usual by Ron Brassfield on Thursday, Dec 23, 2010 at 5:11:14 AM
re: You are Dodging, As Usual by Natalie Oberman on Thursday, Dec 23, 2010 at 11:15:37 AM
Contrived "Culture Clash" by Mac McKinney on Thursday, Dec 23, 2010 at 1:31:37 PM
I don't know where you live, Mac by Jim Arnold on Thursday, Dec 23, 2010 at 2:36:17 PM
re: Contrived "Culture Clash" by Natalie Oberman on Friday, Dec 24, 2010 at 12:17:34 AM
Your Hubris is Showing by Mac McKinney on Friday, Dec 24, 2010 at 2:01:58 AM
re: Your Hubris is Showing by Natalie Oberman on Friday, Dec 24, 2010 at 3:44:55 AM
because.... by J. Edward Tremlett on Friday, Dec 24, 2010 at 7:42:34 AM
Still Projecting, eh? by Mac McKinney on Friday, Dec 24, 2010 at 10:19:24 AM
re: Still Projecting, eh? by Natalie Oberman on Saturday, Dec 25, 2010 at 12:13:20 AM
McVeigh? by Mac McKinney on Saturday, Dec 25, 2010 at 3:24:11 AM
re: McVeigh? by Natalie Oberman on Saturday, Dec 25, 2010 at 1:58:17 PM
Hanjour the Ace, McVeigh theTorture Victim by Mac McKinney on Saturday, Dec 25, 2010 at 3:49:56 PM
re: Hanjour the Ace, McVeigh the Orture Victim by Natalie Oberman on Saturday, Dec 25, 2010 at 10:48:03 PM
Yawn by Mac McKinney on Sunday, Dec 26, 2010 at 12:50:05 AM
I see no prejudice by J. Edward Tremlett on Saturday, Dec 25, 2010 at 9:55:48 PM
Not Looking too Hard by Mac McKinney on Saturday, Dec 25, 2010 at 11:57:47 PM
re: Not Looking too Hard by Natalie Oberman on Monday, Dec 27, 2010 at 3:03:54 AM
Disingenuous by Mac McKinney on Monday, Dec 27, 2010 at 8:12:32 AM
No by J. Edward Tremlett on Monday, Dec 27, 2010 at 12:51:45 PM
Reading Between the Lines by Mac McKinney on Monday, Dec 27, 2010 at 1:51:32 PM
endless white space by J. Edward Tremlett on Monday, Dec 27, 2010 at 2:34:42 PM
Bravo Edward by Mac McKinney on Monday, Dec 27, 2010 at 7:59:17 PM
Gunning for the Buddha by J. Edward Tremlett on Monday, Dec 27, 2010 at 10:00:24 PM
Subjective by Mac McKinney on Monday, Dec 27, 2010 at 11:35:34 PM
Don't ever become a district attorney by Jeff Poster on Wednesday, Dec 29, 2010 at 8:00:38 AM
re: Reading Between the Lines by Natalie Oberman on Monday, Dec 27, 2010 at 3:10:06 PM
911 Happened, Just not the Way We Think it Did by Mac McKinney on Monday, Dec 27, 2010 at 10:56:36 PM
re: 9/11 Happened.... by Natalie Oberman on Tuesday, Dec 28, 2010 at 3:35:43 AM
Really by Mac McKinney on Tuesday, Dec 28, 2010 at 11:52:39 AM
re: Really by Natalie Oberman on Tuesday, Dec 28, 2010 at 4:17:38 PM
Nice Try by Mac McKinney on Tuesday, Dec 28, 2010 at 6:35:28 PM
re: Nice Try by Natalie Oberman on Wednesday, Dec 29, 2010 at 10:27:06 PM
Wishing Away Cossiga by Mac McKinney on Thursday, Dec 30, 2010 at 8:37:03 PM
re: Wishing Away Cossiga by Natalie Oberman on Friday, Dec 31, 2010 at 12:10:26 AM
Pointless by Mac McKinney on Friday, Dec 31, 2010 at 1:57:09 AM
cheap cheap cheap by J. Edward Tremlett on Friday, Dec 31, 2010 at 8:03:07 AM
A Little Sarcasm by Mac McKinney on Friday, Dec 31, 2010 at 8:58:00 AM
A Little Sarcasm by Mac McKinney on Friday, Dec 31, 2010 at 9:01:45 AM
re: Origins of Gladio by Natalie Oberman on Saturday, Jan 1, 2011 at 2:03:00 PM
Hmmmmmmm Yourself by Mac McKinney on Saturday, Jan 1, 2011 at 3:59:52 PM
I see no prejudice, I hear no prejudice, I speak, well... by Jim Arnold on Sunday, Dec 26, 2010 at 12:40:49 AM
You mean the Islamics.... by Bia Winter on Thursday, Dec 23, 2010 at 7:35:24 AM
re: You mean the Islamics..... by Natalie Oberman on Thursday, Dec 23, 2010 at 10:25:30 AM
You've Confirmed Our Theory About You, Too by Ron Brassfield on Thursday, Dec 23, 2010 at 7:21:02 PM
re: You've Confirmed Our Theory...... by Natalie Oberman on Thursday, Dec 23, 2010 at 11:04:37 PM
colonel mustard in the conservatory with the alien ray gun by J. Edward Tremlett on Thursday, Dec 23, 2010 at 11:24:02 PM
OpEdNews "Hall monitor" huh? More like agenda driven asset by Richard Lee on Tuesday, Dec 28, 2010 at 7:39:58 PM
stately wayne manor by J. Edward Tremlett on Tuesday, Dec 28, 2010 at 10:17:05 PM
There are people you cannot have a rational debate with. by Richard Lee on Thursday, Dec 23, 2010 at 9:06:48 PM
re: There are people ..... by Natalie Oberman on Thursday, Dec 23, 2010 at 11:07:23 PM
Simple Minds by Bill Cain on Wednesday, Dec 22, 2010 at 5:11:29 PM
Maybe it was Thermal Expansion and CONTRACTION What Done It by Ron Brassfield on Wednesday, Dec 22, 2010 at 7:40:16 PM
re: Simple Minds by Natalie Oberman on Thursday, Dec 23, 2010 at 2:35:09 AM
Simple Minds by Bill Cain on Thursday, Dec 23, 2010 at 9:57:54 AM
re: Simple Minds by Natalie Oberman on Thursday, Dec 23, 2010 at 10:21:05 AM
9-11 by Bill Cain on Thursday, Dec 23, 2010 at 11:33:05 AM
re: 9/11 by Natalie Oberman on Thursday, Dec 23, 2010 at 10:59:20 PM
The Mind by Bill Cain on Friday, Dec 24, 2010 at 4:16:29 PM
re: The Mind by Natalie Oberman on Saturday, Dec 25, 2010 at 2:19:44 PM