Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 1 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 1 (2 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   1 comment

OpEdNews Op Eds

It's Putin vs Bandar Bush on the Syrian chessboard

By       Message Pepe Escobar     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 1   News 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H2 12/14/13

Author 73066
Become a Fan
  (156 fans)
- Advertisement -
Original published at RT


Everyone remembers the spectacular four-and-a-half hour meeting last August in Moscow between President Putin and Bandar Bush -- aka Bandar bin Sultan, Saudi Arabia's Director of National Intelligence.

Well, there was a remix last week, also in Moscow. And once again in absolute secrecy, until a formidable leak from "a close and reliable source" in Russia reached Lebanese newspaper al-Manar.

Bandar Bush's first offensive was a disaster; not only did Putin rebuff his attempt to "bribe" Moscow into abandoning Damascus, but subsequently Russia was pivotal in preventing the Obama administration from bombing Syria.

Now Bandar Bush has "offered" softer terms. After all, Saudi Arabia is on board with the Geneva-2 peace conference scheduled for January 22 -- although it didn't used to be. President Bashar Assad may remain in Damascus during this period, but real power should be transferred to an interim government headed by the "opposition" (which opposition is open to speculation; certainly the "rebels" controlled by Riyadh).

Moreover, Bandar Bush expects Russia to pressure Assad not to call for a 2014 presidential election. According to the Syrian constitution, a new constitution should be written and approved during the interim government and only then elections should be called -- with Assad excluded. If Moscow abides, Saudi Arabia will be more than willing to "contribute" to the cost of rebuilding Syria (which it helped destroy via financed/weaponized mercenaries).

Leaving aside the mind-boggling spectacle of the House of Saud's medieval paradise dictating the terms for the future of a third country,  President Putin's answer can be summarized as a model of restraint.

The "opposition" armed and financed by Saudi Arabia and Qatar is on a losing streak. Saudi support for the opposition has nothing to do with democracy; these "rebels" are in fact terrorists.

- Advertisement -

Neither Damascus nor Moscow needs Saudi funds to rebuild Syria; Russia, Iran and China will do the job. Moreover, Russia and the US reached an understanding that takfiri terrorism is a danger not only to American security, but to Russian and global security. The Europeans -- fearful of returnee terrorists -- also agree.

As the cherry on the sundae, Putin suggested to Bandar Bush to abandon "sectarian instigations and supporting terrorism, because it is a double-edged sword that will rebound inside Saudi Arabia and gather momentum in a manner that you will not be able to control."

Geneva II: Dead on arrival

Does all of this mean Bandar Bush will desist from his non-stop shadow play and role of enforcer of the House of Saud's jihad on Syria? Far from it.

A few days after the Putin-Bandar Bush get-together, the supreme commander of the Washington-backed Free Syrian Army (FSA), self-described "General Doctor Engineer" Salim Idris, was forced to flee Syria after the Islamic Front -- Bandar Bush's brigades -- took over the headquarters and warehouses of Idris' Supreme Military Council (SMC) at the Bab al-Hawa crossing near the Turkish border. Washington immediately announced it was freezing all "non-lethal aid."

The Islamic Front is a coalition of Islamist "rebels" that -- in theory -- do not include the two top al-Qaeda-linked outfits, Jabhat al-Nusra and the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL). Washington believes its own propaganda that the Islamic Front is more "moderate" than the ISIL.

- Advertisement -


After the debacle at Bab al-Hawa, Idris' followers started spinning that the General Doctor Engineer himself invited the Saudi-backed Islamic Front to take over the warehouses.

No wonder US Think-Tank-Land was as perplexed as crocodiles in the Hindu Kush; after all, the General Doctor Engineer was their updated version of Ahmad Chalabi, the future of democracy for Syrians and Arabs. How come he fled the scene of his greatest triumph? After Idris fled to Doha, Washington told him to get his act together and go back to Syria. Instead, he relocated to his fancy digs in Turkey.

Arab media has a different take on the whole operation -- but it must be taken with a bulldozer of salt, as Arab media is overwhelmingly controlled by Saudi money. The warehouses may not have been taken over at all; they were "handed over" to the Islamic Front, according to an agreement supervised by the cousin of the Doctor Engineer General ("rebel" nepotism, anyone?).

Although Washington (laughably) swears it doesn't know what was stolen from its "non-lethal aid"  package, the content of the warehouses couldn't be juicier; a weaponizing orgy -- M79 Osa rocket launchers, rocket-propelled grenades, 14.5mm heavy machine guns, and even Stinger missiles -- generously supplied by Saudis, Qataris, and Emiratis, obviously after a green light from Washington.

And by the way -- US lethal, semi-lethal, or non-lethal "aid" continues and will continue to flow via Jordan, while Turkey "discreetly" does nothing to prevent ISIL deployments in both Syria and Iraq.

Washington -- via the CIA -- is in close contact with the Islamic Front; after all, these are Bandar Bush's goons, and Bandar Bush has access to everyone that counts in Washington. To essentially summarize the "opposition" nebulae in Syria, there are absolutely negligible ideological differences between the FSA of General Doctor Engineer Idris, Bandar Bush's brigades of the Islamic Front, and ISIL.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Must Read 1   News 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

Pepe Escobar is an independent geopolitical analyst. He writes for RT, Sputnik and TomDispatch, and is a frequent contributor to websites and radio and TV shows ranging from the US to East Asia. He is the former roving correspondent for Asia (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Why Putin is driving Washington nuts

You Want War? Russia is Ready for War

Why Qatar wants to invade Syria

All aboard the New Silk Road(s)

It was Putin's missile?

Where is Prince Bandar?