Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter 3 Share on Facebook 1 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! 1 Share on Reddit 1 Share on StumbleUpon 1 Tell A Friend 2 (9 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   8 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

It Was Awesome But Are We Asking Too Much Of The US Navy?

By       Message Steven Bustin     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

- Advertisement -
"Whiskey 291" is not the latest blend from Makers Mark, the "Junkyard" is not full of old GM X-cars and "COD" is not collect on delivery.  You learn these and other lexicons when you spend 24 hours on a Nimitz class aircraft carrier.  You also learn what the Navy's greatest asset is (hint, it's perishable) and perhaps the most serious threat to that asset.

I just had the privilege of being one of 15 writers, bloggers and social media executives selected to participate in the Navy's Distinguished Visitor Program and spend 24 hours on the USS Carl Vinson CVN70, a Nimitz Class aircraft carrier.  We boarded a Navy C2 COD (Carrier Onboard Delivery) Greyhound turboprop at North Island Naval Air Station, Coronado and flew 150 miles out to sea southwest of San Diego where we did a tail hook landing ("Trap" in navy parlance) on the carrier, operating in a 100,000 square mile area known as Whiskey 291.

From http://www.flickr.com/photos/56594044@N06/8721176296/: An F/A-18C Hornet lands aboard USS Carl Vinson.
An F/A-18C Hornet lands aboard USS Carl Vinson.
(image by Official U.S. Navy Imagery)
  DMCA

That landing inducted us into an exclusive group, exclusive enough that the Navy gave us a patch (the Navy loves patches, all kinds of patches), a "Trap 1" to mark the occasion.  We were nothing but fluid filled bio-cargo safely secured into our rear facing and well worn seats by our 3 point harnesses, but it's enough to give us all some serious cred back at the cube farm and the local bar.

In The Club.  Landing on an aircraft carrier, even via a twin 8 blade prop plane, is a jarring, unnerving experience.  Touching down at 105 mph (vs.150 mph for an F18 SuperHornet), one of the 4 arresting cables caught our tail hook and stopped us completely in 2 seconds.  It felt as if a few of your lesser organs are compressed, rearranged and your belly button shifted.  Thus began a 24 hour adventure that would add an extra quart of testosterone to each of our bodies, regardless of gender.

The plane taxied even as the wings were folding up and the rear ramp, our egress and exit, opened to flood our noisy, dim cocoon with brilliant light, roaring jet engine noise that vibrated our teeth and the fresh ocean breeze.  Big guys with big helmets, big goggles and big ear phones guided us out and over the deck to a catwalk hanging 70 feet above the fast moving ocean and then back into a quiet, calm sanctuary holding strong hot coffee, cool water and fresh baked cookies, the Captain's stateroom.  "Welcome, please come in and take off your Cranials and lifejackets" were the first words from the Master Chief Petty Officer.  Cranial is of course the helmet but I felt like my real cranial was still foggy from the landing.

We were briefed by the Executive Officer and the Captain on how our next 24 hours would unfold (awesome, thanks for asking) before we posed for the obligatory but genuinely smiling group photo (providing evidence we did arrive safely) and then started our day but where else, the flight deck yards away from landing F18 SuperHornets.  But of course.

- Advertisement -

We stood there, cameras clicking, smiles widening and bones vibrating as $67,000,000 state of the science, 51,000 pound jets landed and catapulted off the 4.5 acre deck, far closer than I would have expected but still, there was a magic line and none of us dared cross it. We were just on the stern side of the "Junkyard" where a few SeaHawk helicopters, an AWACs plane and some forklift like machines were parked.  Our plane had landed less than 30 minutes prior and we already had sustenance, assurance and recognition and were closer to live carrier flight operations than 99.99% of people on the entire planet ever get"and we had more, much more coming.

From http://www.flickr.com/photos/56594044@N06/8684250242/: A C2 COD Greyhound prepares to launch.
A C2 COD Greyhound prepares to launch.
(image by Official U.S. Navy Imagery)
  DMCA

As stated, we are all writers, bloggers and social media types to say nothing of being very tech savvy.  Naturally, we were mesmerized by the technology, much of it in operation all day and much of our restless night.  Advanced communications, radar, navigation, billions of dollars of equipment, a 100,000 ton, 1,100 foot nuclear powered ocean going Borg-city moving far faster than the official 34 knots through the water (you can't fool me), water desalination, etc., all it of was very cool and we were suitably impressed.  But"the real asset of the carrier and ultimately the most impressive to us was the crew, men and women, officers and enlisted, young and, well, younger still than me.

From http://www.flickr.com/photos/56594044@N06/8683117119/: USS Carl Vinson Sailors conduct training.
USS Carl Vinson Sailors conduct training.
(image by Official U.S. Navy Imagery)
  DMCA
- Advertisement -

Nothing, absolutely nothing works without the crew and everything does, like clockwork, with the crew.  You may rightly feel that you work hard, long hours.  Perhaps you do, especially if you work for a startup.  You know the feeling of a 12-14 hour day 5 or even 6 days a week.  Sure, the money is good and there is a potential payoff at the end of your startup if it goes IPO or better yet, quickly gobbled up by Google.  You know this even as you check Facebook 20 times a day and email and text your friends while you are eating pizza and drinking the local brew beer at 7:30 PM while working on that media campaign or coding some game changes.

But do you know what it is like to work 16-18 hours a day, 6 or sometimes 7 days a week, have but 15 minutes of internet access a day (maybe), no cell coverage, no long term payout, work for below market rates, sleep in bunks stacked 3 high with but a curtain for privacy and oh, let's just toss in that you will often be away from your loved ones for 8, 9 or even now, maybe 10 months?  As I thought, so stop whining.

This is not an exaggeration, these are the working conditions of the men and women on the carrier.  They work, work and work some more so that you and I can pat ourselves on the back and think we are cool because of our jobs or where we live.  Ah, freedom!

Keep in mind, not only the Navy but the entire US Military, the most powerful and dominant the world has ever seen, is all-volunteer.  So, not a problem working like this, they volunteered, right?  Well, there is.

Life in the Navy was never easy, it was always hard work but it was reasonable and offered, and still does, many tangible and intangible rewards not the least of which is doing something for your country on a grand scale.  But the issue is that the Navy is being asked to do more and more because Congress allocates less and less.  I noticed empty billets (bunks, sorry, I have the lexicon down now) and people are doing more, more with less so to speak.  Deployments lengths are creeping up as we have gone from a 11 carrier navy to a 10 carrier navy in what many believe is actually a 15 carrier world.  Deployments lengths go up, the number of personnel goes down, what do you have?  You have an extremely capable, professional, focused, dedicated and patriotic crew that works harder and longer and does not see their loved ones for longer and longer periods of time.  That is as you should surmise, assuming your IQ is over 80 and your common sense is in tact, not good, not good at all.

I'm not interested in having a military budget and procurement conversation, I'll leave that to those perpetual pork-seeking politicians.  But"whatever is the right level of budget for the navy needs to match the mission at hand. One highly educated, thoughtful and very senior officer who's name I will not reveal (ask NSA if you want a transcript of the conversation), in response to a question of budget cuts and their effects, stated ""the trick is to get that right balance.  It may be just as bad to give the military too much money as it is not enough".  Well said, true and revealing in it's honesty and simplicity.  If you reduce the budget and reduce the manpower, then reduce the mission.  I know common sense is not a characteristic of Congress, but it is simple enough even for them to understand the concept.  Forget national security for the moment"no, no, I can't.  Fine.  Don't forget national security but focus on the proper matching of resources and mission.  If national security depends on X number of carriers, budget that and the resources to operate and never forget, the most important resource is the crew, those young men and women who sacrifice daily for the rest of us.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It

Steven Bustin is an internet pioneer and entrepreneur, having founded two early successful internet advertising and marketing agencies. He is also the author of the book "Humble Heroes, How The USS Nashville CL43 Fought WWII" and various articles (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; , Add Tags
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

It Was Awesome But Are We Asking Too Much Of The US Navy?