Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 2 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest 1 Share on Fark! 1 Share on Reddit 1 Share on StumbleUpon 1 Tell A Friend 4 (10 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   14 comments, In Series: Middle East Articles

General News

Is the Syria Chemical Weapons Attack a false flag event?

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 4   News 4   Well Said 3  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H2 9/11/13

Become a Fan
  (60 fans)
From http://www.flickr.com/photos/73610375@N07/9711756272/: Syria War - whose war is it anyway?
Syria War - whose war is it anyway? by The Israel Project

 

I am not a conspiracy hound (some would say "conspiracy nut').   If given the choice between incompetence and conspiracy, I generally choose the former.   That's why I'm more inclined to believe Bush incompetently ignored the warnings of 9/11 than he deliberately ignored them.

But in the case of the recent Syrian chemical weapons attack, the evidence continues to mount, from within the CIA, to sources placed in Syria itself, to multiple reports on British (this article was posted to Mail Online, but later removed, but the Wayback Machine has an archive) and Russian media, and even to footage in Syria showing what could clearly be civilians (i.e. rebels) launching chemical weapon attacks, that the evidence is beginning to look very strongly that the Syrian government did not launch a chemical weapons attack on its own people.    The few Congressional representatives who have looked at actual evidence say, "it proves nothing."

Who's in on the conspiracy?

Secretary of State John Kerry seems to literally be having trouble keeping a straight face when discussing the Syria situation.   Some people think this indicates he is lying, or even has an organic disorder.   Since, as previously stated, I tend to see incompetence more than conspiracy, I think this may be a case where a top official, who is nevertheless not totally in the loop, as Colin Powell admitted he wasn't leading up to Iraq, may be showing signs of cognitive dissonance -- "the discomfort experienced when simultaneously holding two or more conflicting cognitions: ideas, beliefs, values or emotional reactions."  This is the man, after all, who was an anti-war veteran after serving in Vietnam.  Perhaps his head is telling him something his heart doesn't believe?

 

The president, on the other hand, has no such cognitive dissonance.   He seems to believe what he is saying, or else he is such an accomplished liar, even a psychopath, that no signs of lying are evident.   But, there is another possibility -- that even the president himself is not "in the loop."   This last possibility would be earth-shattering, to be sure, and would be a mortal blow to any notion that we live in anything remotely resembling the "Democracy" we've all been taught to believe in since Grade School, but is it so much harder to believe than that the president is a habitual liar about to launch us into what might be (another possible) Russia-involved-response leading to WWIII under false pretenses?  Ray McGovern, former US Army infantry/intelligence officer & CIA analyst, seems to think so.    McGovern says the evidence "would not stand up in a court of law" and that we've been down this road before, leading up to Iraq" and that the evidence is not being released in order to protect the president.   This would explain the sycophant Democratic support for Obama, contrary to their former reputation as less hawkish than the Right-wing Republicans.   Does anyone really believe if Bush were still in office and pressing for the same action, that Democrats would be the ones beating the war drums the most?   McGovern says the military got to the president, over-riding even the objections of the military's Joint Chief of Staff's objections, Gen. Martin Dempsey:

"Dempsey has been unusually blunt in his remarks with both Obama and Vice President Joe Biden," the source said. "His assessment is that any U.S. war against Assad will automatically involve his foreign allies, and that means Teheran and to a smaller extent, Moscow."

Meanwhile, the public is overwhelmingly opposed to further American involvement in the Syrian Civil War, by at least 2-1 majorities in most polls, and is becoming even less supportive as the case for intervention unravels.    The height of irony appears to be right-wing Tea Party Republican opposition to the president's war plans, albeit in some cases, because they want even more intervention.   It is hard to understand how former Vietnam P.O.W. John McCain could be leading such a charge, even while flip-flopping in his support and saying if the president put "boots on the ground" it might lead to his impeachment.   This is not cognitive dissonance; it is cognitive, and legal, incoherence.   The president is already in violation of "international norms," as he puts it, when trying to make what has been a failing case so far, for further intervention.   It is an open secret that the U.S. is already supplying weapons and training to the rebel forces, many of which are aligned with Al-Qaeda.  

Some have suggested that Israel is behind the path to an attack on Syria, despite the probability that a toppled Assad regime could lead to increased hard line Islamic influence, as has been the case in Egypt since Mubarak was deposed in 2011.   More likely is that Israel wants "stable instability' or having Syria "being a little bit pregnant" with both sides occupying Assad so he cannot focus on Israel.   Instability, then, is a policy choice.   The only question is, who is making the policy?   

 

Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people:
Do not go to war with Syria

Click here to see the most recent messages sent to congressional reps and local newspapers

http://newthinking.blogspot.com/

Scott Baker is a Managing Editor & The Economics Editor at Opednews, and a blogger for Huffington Post, Daily Kos, and Global Economic Intersection.

His anthology of updated Opednews articles was published by Tayen Lane Publishing (December, 2014) and may be found here:
https://tayen-lane.squarespace.com/america-is-not-broke/

Scott is President of Common Ground-NYC (http://commongroundnyc.org/), a Geoist/Georgist activist group. He has written (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Obama Explains the FEMA Camps

Was Malaysian Flight MH370 Landed Safely in Afghanistan?

Let the Sun Shine on a State Bank in Florida

Batman, The Dark Knight Rises...and Occupy Wall Street Falls

The Least Productive People in the World

The continuing plight of Malaysian Flight MH370 - 2 month update

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
7 people are discussing this page, with 14 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

> More likely is that Israel wants "stable ins... by Josh Mitteldorf on Wednesday, Sep 11, 2013 at 7:19:52 AM
One further possibility: This is a 'win-win' for ... by Paul Repstock on Wednesday, Sep 11, 2013 at 6:58:51 PM
i vote for scenario 3 - where Bush and Obama were/... by b. sadie bailey on Wednesday, Sep 11, 2013 at 2:24:29 PM
Sorry Sadie. We would all 'like' to believe that. ... by Paul Repstock on Wednesday, Sep 11, 2013 at 10:19:48 PM
Another aspect of the insanity of Obama's threat a... by Brian Cooney on Wednesday, Sep 11, 2013 at 3:01:46 PM
If you are not sure, why not wait for more facts b... by BFalcon on Wednesday, Sep 11, 2013 at 3:18:33 PM
"Ray McGovern, former US Army infantry/intelligen... by Scott Baker on Wednesday, Sep 11, 2013 at 6:36:32 PM
I didn't say that all your sources were Russian, o... by BFalcon on Wednesday, Sep 11, 2013 at 10:33:24 PM
As someone else said, Putin seems to be the only a... by Scott Baker on Thursday, Sep 12, 2013 at 2:17:16 AM
As always, you address this complex situation with... by BFalcon on Thursday, Sep 12, 2013 at 6:31:56 AM
Even John Kerry admits that Al Qaeda is now a sign... by Scott Baker on Thursday, Sep 12, 2013 at 10:23:23 AM
Sorry but this is not right: "  NO chemical a... by BFalcon on Thursday, Sep 12, 2013 at 12:07:19 PM
The first question the article queries that Oba... by George Flower on Wednesday, Sep 11, 2013 at 5:39:48 PM
Being a "Good" liar is a major part of the job des... by Paul Repstock on Wednesday, Sep 11, 2013 at 7:17:44 PM