Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 2 (2 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   29 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

In Congress We Trust... Not

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 3 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H1 5/4/09

- Advertisement -

I have been known to quote long-dead men in my past writings. Whether eloquently expressed thoughts by our founding fathers, or those artfully expressed by ancient Greek thinkers, these quotes have always done a better job starting or ending my thoughts - that tend to be expressed in long winding sentences. For this piece I am going to break with tradition and start with an appropriate quote from a living current senator, John Kerry:
"It's a sad day when you have members of Congress who are literally criminals go undisciplined by their colleagues. No wonder people look at Washington and know this city is broken."

The people do indeed look at Washington and know that this city is 'badly' broken, Senator Kerry. The public confidence in our Congress has been declining drastically. Recent poll results highlight how the American people's trust in their Congress has hit rock bottom. A survey of progressive blogs easily confirms the rage rightfully directed at our Congress for abdicating its role of oversight and accountability. Activists scream about promised hearings that never took place - without explanation. They express outrage when investigations are dropped without any justification. And they genuinely wonder out loud why, especially after they helped secure a major victory for the Democrats. The same Democrats who had for years pointed fingers at their big bad Republican majority colleagues as the main impediment preventing them from fulfilling what was expected of them.

The recent stunning but not unexpected revelations regarding Jane Harman (D-CA) by the Congressional Quarterly provide us with a little glimpse into one of the main reasons behind the steady decline in the integrity of Congress. But the story is almost dead - ready to bite the dust, thanks to our mainstream media's insistence on burying 'real' issues or stories that delve deep into the causes of our nation's continuous downward slide. In this particular case, the 'thank you' should also be extended to certain blogosphere propagandists who, blinded by their partisanship, myopic in their assessments, and ignorant in their knowledge of the inner workings of our late Congress and intelligence agencies, helped in the post-burial cremation of this case.

Ironically but understandably, the Harman case has become one of rare unequivocal bipartisanship, when no one from either side of the partisan isle utters a word. How many House or Senate Republicans have you heard screaming, or even better, calling for an investigation? The right wing remains silent. Some may have their hand, directly or indirectly, in the same AIPAC cookie jar. Others may still feel the heavy baggage of their own party's tainted colleagues; after all, they have had their share of Abramoffs, Hasterts and the like, silently lurking in the background, albeit dimmer every day. Some on the left, after an initial silence that easily could have been mistaken for shock, are jumping from one foot to the other, like a cat on a hot tin roof, making one excuse after another; playing the 'victims of Executive Branch eavesdropping' card, the same very 'evil doing' they happened to support vehemently. Some have been dialing their trusted guardian angels within the mainstream media and certain fairly visible alternative outlets. They need no longer worry, since these guardian angels seem to have blacked out the story, and have done so without the apparent need for much arm twisting...

- Advertisement -

Hastert Redux

I am going to rewind and take you back to September 2005, when Vanity Fair published an article, which, in addition to my case and the plight of National Security Whistleblowers, exposed the dark side of the then Speaker of the House, Dennis Hastert (R-IL), and the corroborated allegations of his illegal activities involving foreign agents and interests.

Vanity Fair printed the story only after they made certain they were on sure footing in the face of any possible libel by lining up more than five credible sources, and after triple pit-bull style fact-checking. They were vindicated; Hastert did not dare go after them, nor did he ever issue any true denial. Moreover, further vindication occurred only a month ago. On April 10, 2009, The Hill reported that the Former Speaker of the House was contracted to lobby for Turkey. The Justice Department record on this deal indicates that Hastert will now be "principally involved" on a $35,000-a-month contract providing representation for Turkish interests. That seems to be the current arrangement for those serving foreign interests while on the job in Congress -- to be paid at a later date, collecting on their IOU's when they secure their positions with 'the foreign lobby.'

In a recent article for American Conservative Magazine, Philip Giraldi, former CIA officer stationed in Turkey, made the following point:

- Advertisement -
"Edmonds's claims have never been pursued, presumably because there are so many skeletons in both parties' closets. She has been served with a state-secrets gag order to make sure that what she knows is never revealed, a restriction that the new regime in Washington has not lifted."

And then, he hits the nail on its head:

"In Hastert's case, it certainly should be a matter of public concern that a senior elected representative who may have received money from a foreign country is now officially lobbying on its behalf. How many other congressmen might have similar relationships with foreign countries and lobbying groups, providing them with golden parachutes for their retirement?"

Congress went mum on my case after theVanity Fair story, with, of course, the mainstream media making it very easy for them. They turned bipartisan in not pursuing the case, with the same zeal as they have, so far, not pursued the Harman case. Similarly, the mainstream media is happily letting it all disappear.

I was not aware that during the publication of the Hastert story in Vanity Fair, Jane Harman's AIPAC case was already brewing in the background. Moreover, one of the very few people in Congress who was notified about Harman was none other than Hastert -- the man himself. The same Hastert, who in addition to being one of several high-ranking officials targeted by FBI counterintelligence and counterespionage investigations, was also known to be directly involved in several other high profile scandals: from his intimate involvement in the Abramoff scandal, to the Rep. William Jefferson scandal; from his 'Land Deal' scandal, where he cashed in millions off his position while "serving," to the 2006 House Page scandal.

All for One, One for All?

How does it work? How do these people escape the consequences of accountability? Are we talking about the possible use of blackmail by the Executive Branch against Congressional representatives, as if the days of J. Edgar Hoover were never over? Cases such as NSA illegal eavesdropping come to mind, when Congressional members were briefed long before it became public, yet none took any action or even uttered a word; members of both parties. Or is it more likely to be a case of secondhand blackmail, where members of Congress watch out for each other? Or, is it a combination of the above? Regardless, we see this 'all for one, one for all' kind of solidarity in Congress when it comes to criminal conduct and scandals such as those of Hastert and Harman.

Although at an initial glance, based on the wiretapping angle, the Harman case may appear to involve blackmailing -- or a milder version, exploitation of Congress by the Executive Branch -- deeper analysis would suggest even further implications, where Congressional members themselves use the incriminating information againsteach other to prevent pursuit or investigation of cases that they may be directly or indirectly involved in. Let me give you an example based on the Hastert case mentioned earlier:

In 2004 and 2005 I had several meetings with Rep. Henry Waxman's (D-CA) investigative and legal staff. Two of these meetings took place inside a high-security SCIF, where details and classified information pertaining to my case and those involved could be discussed.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

Sibel Edmonds, a former FBI language specialist, was terminated from the bureau after reporting security breaches, cover-up, and blocking of intelligence with national security implications. Since that time, court proceedings in her whistleblower (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The FBI "Kamikaze Pilots" Case; Omitted From 911 Commission Report

Bin Laden Death Script and the Needed Trigger for Next Step -- Pakistan

9/11 Family Members Demand Answers: The Censored Testimony of FBI's Behrooz Sarshar

The Divine Rights of the US Federal Government

Two Sides of the Same Coin: Heads-Heads

In the Name of a General, his Son, a Spook & the Godmother of Neocons


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
19 people are discussing this page, with 29 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)
Your courage and tenacity is much admired.  M... by jersey girl on Tuesday, May 5, 2009 at 5:15:28 AM
Jersey, My position is clear (and I think the C... by William Whitten on Wednesday, May 6, 2009 at 12:11:04 PM
....bribery and prostitution were illegal.How do l... by Dennis Kaiser on Tuesday, May 5, 2009 at 6:28:18 AM
...who, specifically, are their "johns"?... by Jennifer Hathaway on Tuesday, May 5, 2009 at 6:13:01 PM
Don't ever give up.  The essence of our p... by Nick van Nes on Tuesday, May 5, 2009 at 7:43:48 AM
Thank you Ms. Edmonds for your courage and patriot... by boomerang on Tuesday, May 5, 2009 at 9:01:42 AM
As a true American patriot, you have my utmost res... by Jason Paz on Tuesday, May 5, 2009 at 9:15:24 AM
The true cleansing will come in the form of Nuremb... by tjb on Tuesday, May 5, 2009 at 9:37:27 AM
When they have been convicted and stripped of ALL ... by tjb on Tuesday, May 5, 2009 at 10:58:40 AM
Although I will not pretend that I have the necess... by Blaine Kinsey on Tuesday, May 5, 2009 at 10:49:58 AM
It's fantastic to hear the voice of someone in... by Mark Watterson on Tuesday, May 5, 2009 at 11:32:50 AM
is a fact. I liked your use of the 'Cave' .... so... by richard on Tuesday, May 5, 2009 at 6:35:58 PM
Below is the Lead-In for Casper's First Update... by boomerang on Tuesday, May 5, 2009 at 12:55:15 PM
Ms. Edmonds' information on the approval ratin... by Perry Logan on Tuesday, May 5, 2009 at 12:56:39 PM
the color blue over the color red?... by Mark Watterson on Tuesday, May 5, 2009 at 1:42:59 PM
Despite your valiant attempt to polish a turd, the... by Blaine Kinsey on Tuesday, May 5, 2009 at 3:08:39 PM
Just to make certain that there is no confusion on... by Blaine Kinsey on Wednesday, May 6, 2009 at 12:52:32 PM
the color blue over the color red?... by Mark Watterson on Wednesday, May 6, 2009 at 11:05:01 AM
Perry... the Patriot's Name is spelled Sibel, ... by boomerang on Tuesday, May 5, 2009 at 2:20:52 PM
  America: 'Sold Out' for $5.2 Bil... by boomerang on Tuesday, May 5, 2009 at 4:05:37 PM
" I will support and defend the Constitu... by Nemo on Tuesday, May 5, 2009 at 4:25:52 PM
are nearly all traitors aren't they? And to the... by richard on Tuesday, May 5, 2009 at 6:46:02 PM profiles- 1 patriot, and 3 tr... by Better World Order on Tuesday, May 5, 2009 at 6:58:09 PM
Pretty much the true, BWO.... by Pixie on Tuesday, May 5, 2009 at 7:37:09 PM
All Americans owe a debt of gratitude to the tirel... by Jeffrey Rock on Tuesday, May 5, 2009 at 8:28:50 PM
and especially our government, has become so casua... by Laudyms on Tuesday, May 5, 2009 at 8:35:53 PM
Why not post all the information you have on vario... by Daniel Geery on Tuesday, May 5, 2009 at 11:15:33 PM
I wonder which left wing blog Sibel feels is in ca... by Gustav Wynn on Wednesday, May 6, 2009 at 12:40:37 PM
Fractional Reserve Lending (FRL) is fraudulent. A... by William Whitten on Wednesday, May 6, 2009 at 1:39:02 PM