Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 2 (2 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Article Stats   2 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

IF MICHAEL MOORE WAS GERMAN, HE MIGHT HAVE BEEN ELECTED CHANCELLOR this SEPTEMBER 2009

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H2 9/27/09

Become a Fan
  (6 fans)
On the eve of the German national elections on Sunday September 27,
2009, Michael Moore opened his new movie: "CAPITALISM: A LOVE STORY".
click here
THE NEW YORK TIMES says of the film, "In many ways, . . . this is Moore
's magnum opus: the grandest statement of his career-long belief that
big business is screwing the hard-working little guy while government
connives in the atrocity. . . . so in Capitalism he attempts to make a
citizen's arrest of AIG executives, and puts tape around the New York
Stock Exchange building, declaring it a crime scene."
click here

I think some Europeans might like to see the AIG executives arrested as
Michael Moore suggested in the film. AIG's collapse last year broke
banks all over Europe . As a result, this very year, despite
predictions for two decade that the real progressive left in Europe's
days were (over) or numbered, the leftist parties in Europe including
THE LEFT party in Germany and the PIRATE party across Europe are
becoming more and more acceptable to voters--even as the traditional
ruling parties are forced to join forces to beat back rise of the Left.
In short, the words of Michael Moore are acceptable to a rising number
of European citizens. On Democracy Now, Michael Moore said on Thursday,
"We need to quit having the argument about the economic system that was
invented in the sixteenth century versus the one that was invented in
the nineteenth century. We need to--come on, we're smart people. We're
in the twenty-first century. We have a whole new set of issues and
problems that we face. Can't we come up with an economic order that has
these two basic underpinnings: that it is run democratically and that
it is run with a sense of ethics and morality?


So, whatever we construct, for me, personally, it has to have those two
things in its foundation."
Unity seems to be easy for those on the far left in Germany these days.
. THE LEFT party, led by a partnership of former East and West German
leadership is expected to receive nearly 12 or 13% of the vote in the
national elections in Germany on Sunday. Eastern Germany 's Gregor Gysi
"said it (the elections September 2009) was more important to fight for
the rights of the people than against opponents within the party.
Lafontaine stressed that the relatively small Left party, by standing
up for working people, pensioners and students had forced the other
parties to take positions well to the left of what they once advocated,
while the Social Democrats and Greens unblushingly opposed the same
anti-social measures they had themselves introduced when they formed
the government -- like cutting aid to the jobless, raising retirement
age from 65 to 67, radically cutting taxes on the big corporations and
the super wealthy, and sending soldiers off to war despite the German
constitution. Their current election promises were caused by their
great fear of any growth of the Left."
click here

There are actually supposedly two or three clearly leftist parties in
Germany , who have been in government in recent years. There are THE
LEFT, THE GREENS, and the center-left SPD (Socialist Part of Germany). http://www.gruene.de/
The SPD has been leading the German government in coalition with other
parties for over a decade in Germany . The SPD is currently still
heading the government with Chancellor Angela Merkel's CDU-CSU alliance
(a center right party). However, in the run-up to this year's elections
the SPD has been running as low as 20% in recent state elections. http://www.spd.de/start/portal/start.html
SPD AND FAR LEFT
Historically speaking, this current split among the leftist parties
harks back to the 19th century in Germany when the Socialists and
Communists could not get along. Moreover, until 1875 there were
actually two SPD parties in Germany . 1875 was the first time when the
USPD (United Social Party of Germany) joined the SPD in a permanent
agreement. Franz Walter notes concerning modern German history, "But
the sharp disagreements between the parliamentary groups and extreme
wings of the party continued. In 1917 it reached the point where
another split was inevitable. The USPD (German Independent Social
Democratic Party) was founded, and in the years of revolution from 1918
to 1920 the social democratic workers of both party blocs gunned each
other down in murderous brawls. It was largely because of this that the
USPD in Germany gave birth to the largest communist party outside of
Russia ."
click here
Similarly, in Germany over the past two years, the SPD and THE LEFT
have joined on occasion in coalitions--(and sometimes with the Greens,
too)--at the state level ad city level of governance. However, at the
national level, there is no unifying forces currently in Germany for
uniting the left because the former SPD-Green Coalition under
Chancellor Schroeder had bowed too often to more conservative and
neo-liberal tendencies in the late 1990s and early part of this decade.
Walter adds, "The army of the long-term unemployed (in Germany ) no
longer feel connected to today's upwardly mobile SPD."

From the 1980s and 1990s onwards, the problem was that the SPD was
continually alienating the progressives, who had been the backbone of
the party for decades. The modern SPD is now seen as a party "which
feels no cultural affinity with the new upwardly mobile SPD, has turned
in part to the Left Party. This was dramatically demonstrated in the
Saarland state elections on 30th August." On that day only a little
over 20% of the voters in Saarland had chosen the SPD, whereby they
used to run the state only a decade or so ago totally by themselves.


The Western German leader of THE LEFT, Oscar Lafontaine, has actually
dominated the SPD political landscape for four decades. He left the SPD
party about 5 years ago to unite with former communists of Eastern
German and younger progressives from across Germany . Walter writes the
following praise of Lafontaine:
"Lafontaine is undoubtedly one of the most hated politicians in Germany
: but what is equally clear is that he has achieved more, and pushed
more political issues up the agenda, than most of his opponents. But
what is he really after? Is it all a campaign to destroy the social
democrats, by whom he feels betrayed and abandoned? Or is he seeking to
unify the left, creating a new socialist unity party for our times, so
to speak -- but this time on a voluntary basis?"
Moreover, says Walter, "There is no doubt that Lafontaine is one of the
few true strategic thinkers in German politics. He starts thinking from
where he wants to end up, and not from the situation where he is now.
2013 is surely going to be a crucial year for him. By then the
political landscape of the Federal Republic will have to be gradually
reordered. From his perspective a national CDU/FDP coalition might not
be at all a bad thing for an ongoing change of government in the German
states, paving the way for a coalition of left-wing parties in Berlin,
in the Saarland, in Thuringia, in Brandenburg, later on in
Mecklenburg-Vorpommern -- and who knows, in North Rhine-Westphalia in
May 2010?"
Some predict that Lafontaine will destroy the SPD of today.



However, THE LEFT is apparently becoming successful simply by being
more factual and to-the-point than the other major and more centrist or
traditional parties in Germany .
The BBC notes, "While Germany 's larger parties have kept their
election promises frustratingly vague -- with slogans like 'Confidence
(the Christian Democrat CDU) and "Our Country Can Do More" (the Social
Democrat SPD), by contrast the Left has been far more specific. 'German
Troops out of Afghanistan , says one poster on the square; Tax Wealth'
says another. 'No to Nuclear Power,' another. And there are leaflets
entitled: "More money for Education, Less for the Banks." The BBC
summarized the point by quoting several political commentators: For
example, "I think it's a very successful campaign to use these concrete
slogans," says political commentator Michael Weidemann. "Many people
who are not close to the Leftists might vote for them. Because they are
the only party which acts this way." PERHAPS, MICHAEL MOORE COULD TAKE
OVER for the Left and United the disparate forces today?

As the title of this article suggests, Michael Moore of the USA is also
a strategic thinker and critique of capitalism of 2009 and is seriously
calling for change--not just in his homeland: the USA . For this reason,
Germans who are tired of capitalism as usual, might invite Michael
Moore to lead a coalition of the major three left parties in Germany .
For an example of Moors rhetoric, the day his new film on Capitalism
opened in New York , Moore stated unequivocally that CAPITALISM of 2009
(as it is now) needs to be suspect and forced to reform. Moore say it
is simply a big Pansy or pyramid scheme for the elite (and the very
lucky) or well-connected. Speaking on inequality and lack of access to
good loan conditions and livelihood for the vast majority, Moore stated
"There's the larger crime, though, of course, of how the pie is divided
in this country. And the fact that one guy can come to the table and
take nine slices of that pie and leave one slice for everyone else at
the table to fight over, that is criminal.


That is offensive on so many levels. If we say we believe in democracy,
it's offensive on that level. If you have any kind of moral or ethical
code that you live by, whether it's because of your religion or your
own spirituality or just because you know right from wrong, anyone,
anyone over seven years old, maybe even a few five- and six-year-olds,
know that if one guy takes nine slices of the pie and leaves one slice
for everybody else, that's just inherently wrong. And we allow that to
happen."
Two to three times as many Germans do not own their own homes--as
compared to those who live in the UK or USA
Moore's is the kind of logic that has brought the new LEFT in Germany
into the position of forcing changes in federal and state governments
over the past few years.


Moore has called for Americans to create a ruckus:
"Well, I'm very clear in the film that, you know, I'm
not an economist. But the alternative, the economic order that we need
to create for the twenty-first century--and that's what we really need
to do. We need to quit having the argument about the economic system
that was invented in the sixteenth century versus the one that was
invented in the nineteenth century. We need to--come on, we're smart
people. We're in the twenty-first century. We have a whole new set of
issues and problems that we face. Can't we come up with an economic
order that has these two basic underpinnings: that it is run
democratically and that it is run with a sense of ethics and morality?
So, whatever we construct, for me, personally, it has to have those two
things in its foundation."

Moore could call German progressives to act, too--and as a newcomer, he
would not be seen as a traitor to the SPD and the Progressive front as
Lafontaine is.
In America , Moore wisely pointed out on DEMOCRACY NOW last week that
the FBI has already noted that most of the financial fraud an
foreclosures in America are the result of criminal incompetence and
criminal activity of bankers. click here
Therefore, where are the government investigators at the crime scenes
across America ?
In Germany , the new LEFT asks the same question.
Moore 's exact quote is more noteworthy than that. Moore asks
legitimate questions about AIG and Goldman Sachs and how they and other
financiers have forced America , Germany and numerous other lands
around the globe to throw out billions of taxpayer billions on banking
firms over the past year.
Moore stated in the DN interview:
"But now the FBI has said that this mortgage fraud, that 80
percent of it--80 percent of it--was caused by the banks and the
lending--other lending institutions, mortgage companies, etc., not the
people. Eighty percent of it. And the number one reason, it turns out,
that people lose their homes is because of medical bills. It's the
number one cause of foreclosure and the number one cause of
bankruptcies in this country. And we're at a point right now where one
in eight homes are either in delinquency or foreclosure, homes with
mortgages, and there's a foreclosure filing in this country once every
seven-and-a-half seconds. Every seven-and-a-half seconds there's a
foreclosure filing in this country. I mean, this is a crisis."

That is robbery and the LEFT in Europe are demanding that those who
profit by capitalism and financial crime pay for the debt they have
caused nationally and internationally! Will Americas do the same?
MEDIA SPIN AND FAILURE
Moore added during the DN interview,
"You know, I can't stand the nightly news with that
Dow Jones average they always show to report how well the wealthy are
doing on Wall Street and how it's climbing every day, etc., etc., and
there's never any indicators about what's happening to people in their
daily lives, the bulk of the people in this country, the 14,000
yesterday who lost their health insurance and the 14,000 who will lose
their health insurance today and tomorrow and the day after that.
Where's that index? Wouldn't that be great to see that on the nightly
news each night, where before cutting to commercial break we list the
number of people who lost their homes today, lost their jobs today,
lost their health insurance today, people who died today because they
didn't have health insurance? You know, these statistics are readily
available, so this isn't just rhetoric. I mean, these are actually
proven facts. And they could report that every night."

I can't stand that either. Can you?
Luckily, many Germans are turning again towards unions and real union
parties to get support. They also have better media sources, i.e. many
progressive organizations have produced their own news stories for
years. The growth in this media savvy young voting population in recent
years has brought the new LEFT success and will continue to do so.
Progressive parties; alliences, and personages in Germany would
certainly agree with Moores other comments on the failure of big media
and publicly run media. The media focuses on Wall Street or the German
DAX stock exchange daily but not on people and those who cannot afford
homes and are losing their jobs.
"Instead, they (the national media)--you know, they're there
to report on what benefits those in power, and they go to places of
power to cover that, but what they consider power. But the actual
power, the way this country's set up, is you and me, everyone listening
and watching, everybody else who's not listening and watching. The
power is supposed to be with us, but we rarely, rarely, rarely hear our
stories being covered by the media, other than in your column, on your
show here, and a few other places."


Another pair of leftist parties on the ticket in Germany elections this
autumn 2009 in Hessen include: The Movement for Citizen Solidarity
(Bueso).
http://www1.bpb.de/methodik/6HODDI,0,B%fcSo.html
click here
This party (Bueso) focuses on international solutions to the crises
through people-to-people developments across borders. In addition,
there is also the strictly Marxist-Leninist party (MLPD) that is
putting its signs up all over Wiesbaden .
http://www.mlpd.de/
There is also the liberal-progressive party, THE PIRATES, which might
take more votes than expected on September 27.
http://www.piratenpartei.de/
If none of them succeeds, perhaps, they could ask Michel Moore to join
their campaigns in the future. He sure understands media and speaks
their language: Progressive and leftist language.

 

http://eslkevin.wordpress.com/2009/07/09/3-big-paradigms-hol

KEVIN STODA-has been blessed to have either traveled in or worked in nearly 100 countries on five continents over the past two and a half decades.--He sees himself as a peace educator and have been-- a promoter of good economic and social development--making-him an enemy of my homelands humongous DEFENSE SPENDING and its focus on using weapons to try and solve global (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

BED-INs and Other Protests Needed Now

GULF CIVIL SOCIETY FORUM calls for Gulf Monarchies to abandon absolutism and to adopt European-style Parliaments

TRIBE, TRIBALISM AND CULTURAL CHANGE-KUWAIT 2008

PHILIPP ROESLER, of Vietnamese Descent. to Head the Health Ministry in Germany, as his own Party Plans to Push for more

WHY ARE THE TOTAL FIGURES ON UNINSURED AMERICANS and Residents between 30 MILLION & 90 MILLION? CAN'T ANYONE COUNT??

Mitigation of Tsunami's and Earthquakes--Has JAPAN DONE ENOUGH?

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
2 people are discussing this page, with 2 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

You go MM! I like what you do and I look foward to... by David H Abernathy on Monday, Sep 28, 2009 at 12:05:28 PM
Come on, Michael, run as a candidate--even if just... by Kevin Anthony Stoda on Monday, Sep 28, 2009 at 6:21:37 PM