Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; , Add Tags  (less...)
Add to My Group(s)

Well Said 9   Must Read 6   Supported 4   View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H2) on 12/3/11:     Permalink
View Article Stats      (54 comments)

How is that Packing for Guantanamo Coming? Primary Obama in the GOP

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (22 fans)   -- Page 1 of 1 page(s)

opednews.com


i
We, the grass roots Democrats, have begged our leaders to challenge Obama, but they are either distracted by dirty tricks aimed at removing their Congressional districts or by their own lack of certain organs required for giving them courage.

Now all but three Senate Democrats (Ron Wyden, Jeff Merkley, and Tom Harken, four if you count Socialist Bernie Sanders) have voted to let Obama and future Republican Presidents haul your progeny, yourselves and your parents off to Guantanamo without charges or trial and to detain you and your loved ones for life.   Check the vote on the Defense Appropriations (World Battlefield/Detention) Act, number 218 in the current Senate roll call votes.  One source is Thomas.loc.gov.

Barack Obama himself repeatedly voted to renew the PATRIOT Act and to give the Secretary of Homeland Security the right and authority to be above all laws, including murder, rape and terrorism (see Real ID act, section 102).   

With Obama bailing out the banks and becoming the mastermind behind a city by city national police assault on Americans, violently removing OWS campsites, do we really want four more years of more wars, Wall Street bailouts, tax cuts for the rich, cuts in Social Security and Medicare, foreclosures and evictions, and the elimination of what is left of our rights?

The problem in 2008 was Democrats never told Obama he had to do anything at all  in exchange for their votes.   Hence, since 2008, Obama has gotten through more Republican legislation and crushed more Democratic hopes and dreams than any other President in the history of America.

What's next?   Nuclear war with California and sterilizing all first-born children of parents in the 99%?   Don't laugh.   The Defense Authoriation/Detention of All bill that was passed by the Senate last week would have seemed implausible in 2008.

Of all organizations, the Jewish Republican Coalition has told us how to really primary Obama.   In excluding Presidential candidate Ron Paul from their debate,   the Coalition's Executive Director Matt Brooks said that it would be, "like having Obama in the debate."   In other words, the Jewish Republican Coalition feels that Ron Paul is as much of a Democrat as Barack Obama.   So, if Ron Paul is nominated, we will get our chance to primary Obama in November of 2012.

Think of all the issues that will be discussed in the final debates.   Ron Paul is opposed the wars/occupations of the Middle East (more money home), wants to cancel NAFTA (bring back jobs), wants to withdraw from the WTO (bring back more jobs), wants to close down the Federal Reserve (end the theft of our money by a private corporation), opposes corporate and Wall Street welfare (no more corporate/Wall Street bailouts), opposes the death penalty (too bad he wasn't President when Troy Davis was murdered), wants to overturn the PATRIOT Act and restore the Bill of Rights and wants to protect the rights of third parties voters.    Where Democrats differ is on social issues.  Obama will have to stand up and differentiate himself as Obama has sold out on every social issue before him since 2008.   In order to win, Obama would have to show that he not only is better on pulling us out of war and restoring our freedom and saying no to the banks (a huge problem since he has been for war, removal of our civil liberties and giveaways to the banks) but that he would actually do something a Republican wouldn't do on issues of Social Security and national health care.

It is more than conceivable that Ron Paul will win the Republican nomination.   He is polling second in Iowa and third in New Hampshire.   His only opposition comes from the corporations and their lackeys.

Unlike the Iowa Democratic Caucuses, the Iowa Republican caucuses are democratic.   In the Democratic Caucuses, there is a threshold vote that is required for getting any delegates at all.   Hence Democratic candidates have to make deals with each other to get Iowa delegates. The Republicans award delegates based on the caucus vote with no threshold to exclude candidates from getting if they are popular enough to get votes.

Democrats might as well stay home as vote in the Democratic caucus in Iowa as there is no opposition to Obama.   So reregistering and voting where it counts is a good alternative.   Everyone can be sure, the Obama forces are planning to do just that in order to ensure a Romney or Perry victory.

The Republicans could win or come closer to winning by a Paul nomination too. Mitt Romney and Rick Perry are Obama's best hopes for re-election.   America isn't going to elect a Mormon President, especially not one connected to Gulag Schools that torture children and send them home in body bags (See George Miller's House hearings on the Gulag Schools run by Romney's top financier Robert Lichfield).    So Mitt Romney's out.  His campaign is his postmortem.   Rick Perry is executing everyone in sight, including little old ladies.   He has a speaking IQ that resembles that of George W. Bush.   He is so extreme and stupid that Obama would win by default.   Michael Moore even questioned whether putting up loser candidates like Romney and Perry meant that Republicans already had their man (Barrack Obama) in place in the White House.

Paul. on the other hand. could count on votes from the fiscal Republicans of yesteryear, on independents, and on a third or more of the registered Democrats.   Unless Obama is up to the challenge and offers Americans something they haven't seen in his first three years in office, the Republicans will reclaim the White House under Paul, while Obama would at most claim votes from part of his own party in an Obama-Paul race.   Obama would have to fight for votes and offer the people something in exchange for those votes.

There is one more possible plus to a Paul nomination.   Four years ago, Paul said he would consider Dennis Kucinich for a running mate.   So with a Paul nomination, the Republicans could have a realistic chance at the White House, the winner (whether Obama or Paul) would be forced to end the bank bailouts and the wars, and Dennis Kucinich could become one of the two top men in America.   It is a no-lose situation for anyone (Democrat or Republican) fed up with the status quo.

Like Kucinich, Paul is facing opposition from Wall Street, from the corporations (including the news media that is already trying to push him out of the race), from the war lobbies and from the Military Industrial Complex that President Dwight Eisenhower warned us about.   If Paul wins Iowa, they won't be able to keep him out of any further debates.   The war policy, our rights and corporate bailouts will become up front and center in the debates.   Let's make that happen so that the election turns on who supports the people, rather than who supports the corporations and the war machine.

If the Democrats won't give us a primary, lets create our own for November 2012.   Let's end corporate control of elections, starting with this next one.   Either this is our country or it belongs to the corporations trying to control who will be nominated for President.
Occupy Oakland by Ruth

Occupy L.A. by Ruth

 

Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people:
Primary Obama through making Paul the GOP candidate

Click here to see the most recent messages sent to congressional reps and local newspapers

The author is the chairman of a liberal Democratic club that is working to move the Democratic Party towards it's true base, the people. She has organized major political events and helped elect some of the most liberal politicians in America. Her (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
54 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

We generally let the Republicans pick our candidates. by Ruth Hull on Saturday, Dec 3, 2011 at 3:26:59 PM
If you think Ron Paul... by John Sanchez Jr. on Sunday, Dec 4, 2011 at 11:46:10 AM
What has Obama done for social programs but gut them? by Ruth Hull on Sunday, Dec 4, 2011 at 12:18:54 PM
I guess with enough support for Ron Paul,... by John Sanchez Jr. on Sunday, Dec 4, 2011 at 1:42:31 PM
Ron Paul is a doctor by Sandra on Sunday, Dec 4, 2011 at 3:56:33 PM
Really? Millions dying? Do tell. by John Sanchez Jr. on Sunday, Dec 4, 2011 at 8:16:30 PM
Sandra's numbers fit the statistics by Ruth Hull on Monday, Dec 5, 2011 at 8:19:33 AM
You are not a victim of Obamacare. by John Sanchez Jr. on Monday, Dec 5, 2011 at 9:44:19 AM
Obamacare was always insurance care by Ruth Hull on Monday, Dec 5, 2011 at 3:57:46 PM
How are you to raise your sights... by John Sanchez Jr. on Monday, Dec 5, 2011 at 4:20:26 PM
Paul is much better than Obama on almost all issues by Sandra on Monday, Dec 5, 2011 at 9:00:19 PM
Then join the Republican Party and work for Ron Paul. by John Sanchez Jr. on Monday, Dec 5, 2011 at 9:23:15 PM
Backing Paul is a Democratic concept. Backing Obama isn't. by Ruth Hull on Tuesday, Dec 6, 2011 at 1:08:35 AM
Would that be newspeak? by John Sanchez Jr. on Tuesday, Dec 6, 2011 at 7:46:39 AM
Newspeak is what we get from Herbert Hoover Obama by Ruth Hull on Tuesday, Dec 6, 2011 at 2:24:22 PM
Webster Tarpley is the LaRouchie... by John Sanchez Jr. on Tuesday, Dec 6, 2011 at 4:18:29 PM
I think LaRouche is stupid - especially on nuclear power by Ruth Hull on Wednesday, Dec 7, 2011 at 1:02:56 AM
Thank you Sandra by Ruth Hull on Tuesday, Dec 6, 2011 at 2:32:33 PM
That's Not the Issue by Randy Moor on Monday, Dec 5, 2011 at 10:34:47 AM
If Obama were to be primaried... by John Sanchez Jr. on Monday, Dec 5, 2011 at 4:17:09 PM
Where is the Democrat? by Sandra on Monday, Dec 5, 2011 at 9:07:22 PM
What you missed... by John Sanchez Jr. on Monday, Dec 5, 2011 at 9:24:21 PM
Still Looking For A Better Idea by Randy Moor on Tuesday, Dec 6, 2011 at 12:12:51 PM
If you really want a better idea,... by John Sanchez Jr. on Tuesday, Dec 6, 2011 at 12:57:10 PM
Of course we need a better Congress too... by Randy Moor on Tuesday, Dec 6, 2011 at 3:06:54 PM
I think my arguments against Ron Paul in this thread... by John Sanchez Jr. on Tuesday, Dec 6, 2011 at 4:22:34 PM
Your arguments against Ron Paul miss the point by Randy Moor on Wednesday, Dec 7, 2011 at 5:57:20 AM
Are we to suppose that there is a measurable difference... by John Sanchez Jr. on Wednesday, Dec 7, 2011 at 12:30:53 PM
Enough already! by Fay Paxton on Saturday, Dec 3, 2011 at 5:11:02 PM
Everyone drank the koolaid by Davey Jones on Saturday, Dec 3, 2011 at 7:40:01 PM
I never trusted Obama. I'm a Kucinich person. by Ruth Hull on Sunday, Dec 4, 2011 at 3:52:33 AM
Ruth, I was a strong advocate for DK myself. by Daniel Geery on Sunday, Dec 4, 2011 at 11:26:32 AM
I'm impressed by Ruth Hull on Sunday, Dec 4, 2011 at 12:02:49 PM
The Dims are soft on treason by Mike Preston on Sunday, Dec 4, 2011 at 8:38:26 PM
Obama is a treacherous corporate shill by Robert James on Monday, Dec 5, 2011 at 2:19:28 PM
Good article by Ruth Hull on Wednesday, Dec 7, 2011 at 1:14:58 AM
Paul-Kucinich or Kucinich-Paul, a Great Idea by Ken on Saturday, Dec 3, 2011 at 5:15:43 PM
Online Petitions by djk on Saturday, Dec 3, 2011 at 9:17:32 PM
This is the most exciting idea I've seen this election cycle by Sandra on Sunday, Dec 4, 2011 at 1:29:16 AM
Forget Kucinich and Paul by Ronnie Roberts on Sunday, Dec 4, 2011 at 4:42:53 PM
I may play along with the Ruse, but... by Bia Winter on Friday, Dec 9, 2011 at 9:33:32 AM
This is THE only story to pay attention to re EMPIRE by Alan MacDonald on Sunday, Dec 4, 2011 at 10:40:43 AM
The US political system is irretrevably broken by Michael Byron on Sunday, Dec 4, 2011 at 6:20:23 PM
Thank you Mike by Ruth Hull on Monday, Dec 5, 2011 at 2:00:55 AM
Indeed! It's high time to evolve! by Bia Winter on Friday, Dec 9, 2011 at 9:43:29 AM
Go for it! by Robert James on Sunday, Dec 4, 2011 at 6:55:19 PM
your action link is dead by lila york on Monday, Dec 5, 2011 at 5:38:24 AM
Paul vs. Obama by Truth Will Prevail on Monday, Dec 5, 2011 at 8:26:41 AM
I like it, too by Dean on Friday, Dec 9, 2011 at 3:52:25 PM
Vote Green Party by Vernon Huffman on Tuesday, Dec 6, 2011 at 2:28:15 PM
Please run to win next time by Ruth Hull on Tuesday, Dec 6, 2011 at 2:44:23 PM
Agreed by Vernon Huffman on Friday, Dec 9, 2011 at 4:17:57 PM
I guess by Dean on Friday, Dec 9, 2011 at 3:42:51 PM
For What It's Worth by Randy Moor on Saturday, Dec 10, 2011 at 10:58:17 AM