Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 1 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend (1 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   No comments

General News

How Fraudster Economists Assert That "Higher Taxes Won't Reduce the Deficit"

By       Message David Fiderer     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H2 12/8/10

- Advertisement -

Rather than confront the evidence of their own failures, fraudster economists, like Stephen Moore at  Free Enterprise Fund and Richard Vedder at the American Enterprise Institute, double down on their lies. They manufacture phony evidence to establish that "Higher Taxes Won't Reduce the Deficit," and get their scam promoted on the editorial page of The Wall Street Journal.

Here's how they do it:

In the late 1980s, one of us, Richard Vedder, and Lowell Gallaway of Ohio University co-authored a often-cited research paper for the congressional Joint Economic Committee (known as the $1.58 study) [actually, it was the $1.59 study] that found that every new dollar of new taxes led to more than one dollar of new spending by Congress. Subsequent revisions of the study over the next decade found similar results.

We've updated the research. Using standard statistical analyses that introduce variables to control for business-cycle fluctuations, wars and inflation, we found that over the entire post World War II era through 2009 each dollar of new tax revenue was associated with $1.17 of new spending. Politicians spend the money as fast as it comes in--and a little bit more.

Translation: After Clinton raised taxes, deficits shrank but did not go away until 1999. Ergo, "Subsequent revisions of the study over the next decade found similar results." Ergo, raising taxes does not reduce the deficit. And when you consider the entire post-war period, taxes rarely exceeded expenditures. So raising taxes will not reduce the deficit. And let's ignore how tax cuts caused deficits to explode.

It's all designed to preempt any kind of honest debate. "The grand bargain so many in Washington yearn for--tax increases coupled with spending cuts--is a fool's errand," they write. "Our research confirms what the late economist Milton Friedman said of Congress many years ago: "Politicians will always spend every penny of tax raised and whatever else they can get away with.'"

Here's the truth: Between 1950 and 1980, the U.S. government spent $1.12 for every dollar of revenue. During the Reagan/Bush years of 1981 through 1992, the government spent $1.35 for every dollar of revenue. During the Clinton years, the government spent $1.11 for every dollar of revenue. But that average obscures the progress made toward deficit reduction during that period. Here are the real numbers that refute these lying crackpots:

- Advertisement -

Source: OMB On Budget Revenues and Outlays See 1950-1980 data below.

The biggest driver in deficit reduction is economic growth. When the GDP rises, and more people have jobs, more tax revenues come in. The evidence on tax cuts is overwhelming. As noted in the evidence laid out here  earlier, they do very little to stimulate real economic growth. But a scam artist like Stephen Moore, a fixture on CNBCCNNMSNBC and, of course, Fox News, can find new and clever ways for concealing the truth.


- Advertisement -


View Ratings | Rate It

For over 20 years, David has been a banker covering the energy industry for several global banks in New York. Currently, he is working on several journalism projects dealing with corporate and political corruption that, so far, have escaped serious (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Fatal Flaws In The Lawsuit Against Fannie Mae Execs, Part 2

Mortgages, Ed Pinto, And A Vast Conspiracy Of Silence

Fannie Mae "Accounting Scandal" Discredited In Court

How Niall Ferguson Invented False Quotes By Paul Krugman

How Paulson's People Colluded With Goldman to Destroy AIG And Get A Backdoor Bailout

The Bush Tax Cuts And The Republican Cult of Economic Failure