OpEdNews Op Eds

Goldman, Other Welfare Queens Tell Us Forget Social Security-Medicare Until 70

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H2 1/22/13

Become a Fan
  (112 fans)


(Washington, DC 1/21)  A long standing  Money Party front, the Business Roundtable, wants you to wait until you're 70 years old before you get Social Security and Medicare benefits.  This is just a reprise of the November 2012 dictate from the king of corporate cronyism, Goldman Sachs CEO Lloyd Blankfein.  (Image: DonkeyHotey)  (Greenspan statement)

The boss announced, "So there will be things that, you know, the retirement age has to be changed, maybe some of the benefits have to be affected, maybe some of the inflation adjustments have to be revised. But in general, entitlements have to be slowed down and contained."  Lloyd Blankfein, CBS News, November 2012

That's easy for Lloyd to say.  He makes tens of millions of dollars a year without so much as lifting a finger.  You can be sure that Blankfein has a deluxe health insurance and retirement plan.

Most seniors lack these necessities.  Half of those 65 or older make  $45,000 a year ($3,750 a month) or less.  If you have to wait until 70 for Medicare, you can either pay monthly health insurance premiums of $1,000 to $3,000 a month (if you can get it) or you can learn pain and suffering up close without coverage.  You can eat much less and downsize to substandard shelter to pay your health care costs (premiums and out-of-pocket expenses).  Perhaps the combination of restricted health care, substandard diet, and inadequate shelter may even kill you, in which case the problem is solved.

How would Lloyd react if he had to pay anywhere from 25% to 60% of his gross income for medical coverage?  Would he have a different opinion given the choice between food and shelter versus health insurance premiums?

The Money Party proposals for entitlements represent a looming disaster for millions of working people who struggle to make it to a retirement age of 65.  In fact, nearly 20% take the lower Social Security benefits that come with early retirement at 62.

Medicare eligibility is fixed at 65.  Let's say it's raised to 70.  Instead of waiting three years for medical coverage, the early retirees (often unfit to work or unemployed) would wait eight years for Medicare.  For those who take the full Social Security benefit at 66 (born from 1948-1954) or 67 (born after 1960), the wait for Medicare would be three to four years.   Imagine the possibilities for complications and tragedy while waiting for Medicare.

There's a real genius to the Blankfein-Roundtable proposals that escapes public examination.   The longer benefits are delayed, the more people will die before claiming any of the benefits.  The longer benefits are delayed, the longer people will end up working.  That means greater stress on health with more people axed from the Social Security and Medicare rolls due to an earlier than expected demise.

It gets even worse.  The higher the retirement age for Social Security, the more seniors end up paying in Social Security taxes.  That creates an even larger poll of funds for the annual borrowing from Social Security surpluses (aka rake-off) by the government to cover a much of the pork-laden Federal budget.  All we get is a promise that our taxes and contributions will be repaid as we hear various executives, politicians, and commissions demand that those benefits be reduced.   Their scamming is without end.

The real money shot for the Money Party would be to leave Social Security retirement ages alone but insist on and get the 70 year old requirement for Medicare benefits.  Since most of the retired population likely can't afford to buy private health insurance while they await Medicare, the death toll would rise exponentially.

Some of you may be wondering, Can't people just keep working until the later eligibility age so they're not reliant on either Social Security or Medicare?

 The irrefutable answer to that question is no .  The real unemployment rate is 23%.  The jobs aren't there for those challenged by increased eligibility ages.  This isn't a controversial analysis.   Here's how you get to the real unemployment rate of 23%?   Start with the Bureau of Labor Statistics U-6 unemployment rate of 15%  (which incorporates the official rate of around 8%)  then add all those unemployed for more than twelve months who want to work and you get 23% real unemployment (See the Shadow Government Statistics analysis).

You'd think Lloyd would hire an adviser to brief him before he shoots his mouth off.

Why should he?  Blankfein and his Wall Street pals got away with the biggest theft of all time - trillions of dollars in home equity value, retirements, etc.  as a result of the 2008 financial collapse.  Nothing happened then and certainly nothing will happen now to any of the financial elite for their nonstop, profoundly offensive and deadly proposals.

There is no justice when theft like this goes unchallenged.  The perps are still fat and happy with plenty of walking around money.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

http://www.opednews.com/author/author3863.html

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Worst President Ever - Barack H. Obama

Ukraine President Once Agent for U.S. State Department

It's official! You're on your own

Rigged Elections for Romney?

Real Unemployment at 23% - Dampening the Excitement

Humiliation And Death As A Tool Of National Policy

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
12 people are discussing this page, with 36 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Clearly this will drive the elderly suicide rate s... by Kim Cassidy on Tuesday, Jan 22, 2013 at 3:15:43 AM
We can't let this happen... by BFalcon on Tuesday, Jan 22, 2013 at 12:36:48 PM
When they go for the fundamentals necessary for li... by Michael Collins on Wednesday, Jan 23, 2013 at 9:26:38 PM
The weird thing is, the people who are 'owed' the ... by Kim Cassidy on Thursday, Jan 24, 2013 at 2:25:38 AM
I believe that their point is to have as many elde... by Marta B on Tuesday, Jan 22, 2013 at 4:28:58 AM
The populous would never condone suicide, (or woul... by James Tennier on Tuesday, Jan 22, 2013 at 1:29:26 PM
RE: "The fact that the "Christian Right" comes dow... by Marta B on Tuesday, Jan 22, 2013 at 7:19:12 PM
You should pitch that idea to WalMart.  I'm s... by Sister Begonia on Tuesday, Jan 22, 2013 at 3:02:14 PM
.... with the Euthanasia drug manufactured in Chin... by Marta B on Tuesday, Jan 22, 2013 at 7:23:40 PM
possible, and bankruptcy, so that every nickel sen... by Jill Herendeen on Wednesday, Jan 23, 2013 at 8:13:36 AM
You're right, Every single penny has to go into th... by Marta B on Wednesday, Jan 23, 2013 at 9:23:51 AM
It's either the zealots plus the plutocrats or jus... by Michael Collins on Wednesday, Jan 23, 2013 at 9:31:24 PM
And we should remember that, just like with the co... by Kim Cassidy on Thursday, Jan 24, 2013 at 12:22:21 AM
that people, in general, have never been in worse ... by Kim Cassidy on Tuesday, Jan 22, 2013 at 1:42:15 PM
the illnesses and disabilities that the people the... by Doc McCoy on Tuesday, Jan 22, 2013 at 10:13:00 PM
Without any doubt.  Here are the chronic dise... by Michael Collins on Wednesday, Jan 23, 2013 at 9:40:10 PM
Consider that toxic additives in cigarettes and al... by Suzanne Broussard on Wednesday, Jan 23, 2013 at 1:20:48 PM
HUGE assumption that signifies the campaigns desig... by Kim Cassidy on Thursday, Jan 24, 2013 at 12:42:59 AM
You guys are so hard on the welfare queens.  ... by Sister Begonia on Tuesday, Jan 22, 2013 at 3:00:08 PM
to make it more solvent.  One would be to abo... by Doc McCoy on Tuesday, Jan 22, 2013 at 10:17:36 PM
But what will you do when they pull the persian ru... by Kim Cassidy on Tuesday, Jan 22, 2013 at 11:41:24 PM
The gloom and doom that you predict for me is hila... by Doc McCoy on Wednesday, Jan 23, 2013 at 12:33:40 AM
When your chickens come home to roost. :)... by Kim Cassidy on Wednesday, Jan 23, 2013 at 1:42:22 AM
Who the hell is Blankfein and Goldman Sachs to hav... by Textynn N on Wednesday, Jan 23, 2013 at 12:21:49 AM
Through employer contributions for each employee, ... by Doc McCoy on Wednesday, Jan 23, 2013 at 2:28:45 AM
Are you playing Devil's Advocate, or are you the D... by Marta B on Wednesday, Jan 23, 2013 at 9:35:21 AM
euthanasia.  Dr. Jack Kervorkian (Dr. Death) ... by Doc McCoy on Wednesday, Jan 23, 2013 at 11:50:29 PM
NY Times did an article about older people going t... by Marta B on Thursday, Jan 24, 2013 at 1:37:04 AM
I have traveled extensively abroad for decades - a... by Doc McCoy on Thursday, Jan 24, 2013 at 2:27:33 AM
They are the owners of the media, the politicians,... by Suzanne Broussard on Wednesday, Jan 23, 2013 at 1:29:55 PM
Why even bring this issue up? The real problem is ... by SwamperTom on Wednesday, Jan 23, 2013 at 4:10:48 AM
Host (human biology and culture) and par... by Ned Lud on Wednesday, Jan 23, 2013 at 6:17:12 AM
"It is by will alone I set my mind in motion. It i... by SwamperTom on Wednesday, Jan 23, 2013 at 9:29:52 AM
the moon with such fetid, festering trash, do you?... by Kim Cassidy on Thursday, Jan 24, 2013 at 12:59:04 AM
Dead on!!!  And you answered my question;)&nb... by Michael Collins on Wednesday, Jan 23, 2013 at 9:43:33 PM
Well I was just being ironic, metaphorical and sar... by SwamperTom on Thursday, Jan 24, 2013 at 11:59:28 AM