Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 3   News 3   Valuable 3   View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H3) on 4/8/09:     Permalink
View Article Stats      (11 comments)

GMO Clones, the FDA, HR 875, and Congress

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan   -- Page 1 of 2 page(s)

opednews.com

As I think about the ”food safety” bills HR 875, HR 814, and HR 759, I take a stroll through the web to see what I can find. Lo and behold, I find some very interesting information. 

I have been thinking about the connection between the genetic modification of animals and these bills. I wondered just how the agribusiness giants would keep track of their GM animals once they enter the mainstream food supply market. It’s one thing to go to a farmer’s canola field and take samples back to the lab for testing to see if they contain the patented GM gene, but a whole cow? Not likely.  

The following was published on January 15, 2009 at CNN

The Food and Drug Administration announced formal guidelines Thursday that will regulate the production of genetically engineered (GE) animals. 

“Genetic engineering is a cutting edge technology that holds substantial promise for improving the health and well being of people as well as animals,” Randall Lutter, deputy commissioner for policy at the FDA, said in a statement. 

“In this document, the agency has articulated a scientifically robust interpretation of statutory requirements. This guidance will help the FDA efficiently review applications for products from GE animals to ensure their safety and efficacy.” 

The FDA emphasized GE animals are not cloned, but instead have new characteristics or traits introduced into the organism through their DNA. 

The new guidelines would require all GE animals to go through rigorous scientific testing before being sold on the market, according to Dr. Bernadette Dunham, director for the FDA’s Center for Veterinary Medicine. 

“We want the public to understand that food from GE animals will not enter the food supply unless FDA has determined that it is safe,” she said. 

The FDA approves GM animals for the food supply, and just like the canola, the products from them such as meat, milk, etc., do not have to be labeled. 

Consumers will more than likely not see any changes in labeling of these animal products. Unless the physical makeup of the animal is altered, companies and producers will not be required to let consumers know their meat products come from a genetically engineered animal. (CNN)

Okay, but what do the tracking bills have to do with it? 

The breeding industry is mostly concerned with tracking animals descended from clones,” [Jaydee Hanson, a policy analyst at the Center for Food Safetysays. Clones are genetic copies of other animals, but don’t necessarily have foreign DNA inserted. But most GM mammals, Hanson points out, are clones. “Once you get it right,” he says, “you clone it.” (AlterNet

Genetically modified meat is on its way, and the FDA has already approved clones, but there is a moratorium on them due to “marketing reasons.” 

The following information was obtained from World Science in an article dated January 16, 2008: 

Meat and milk from cloned an­i­mals are as safe as that from their coun­ter­parts bred the old-fash­ioned way, the U.S. Food and Drug Ad­min­istra­t­ion said Tues­day - but sales still won’t beg­in right away.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

http://farmwars.info

Barbara H. Peterson is retired from the California Department of Corrections, where she worked as a Correctional Officer at Folsom Prison. She was one of the first females to work at the facility in this classification. After retirement, she went to (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
11 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Holy Cow!!! by Kathryn Smith on Wednesday, Apr 8, 2009 at 11:57:45 PM
A few thoughts by Robert Wager on Thursday, Apr 9, 2009 at 12:25:29 AM
CODEX by Angelo on Thursday, Apr 9, 2009 at 8:25:54 AM
You are absolutely right! More: by Kathryn Smith on Thursday, Apr 9, 2009 at 8:39:20 AM
freedom of speech by Robert Wager on Thursday, Apr 9, 2009 at 10:58:03 AM
It's about impact on human life, not free speech by Kathryn Smith on Thursday, Apr 9, 2009 at 2:49:49 PM
Food Freedom and Body Integrity by Dawn B on Friday, Apr 10, 2009 at 3:42:39 PM
GAO by Barbara Peterson on Thursday, Apr 9, 2009 at 11:29:59 AM
not only, but also.. by amicus curiae on Sunday, Apr 12, 2009 at 8:52:28 PM
heres the links to more info by amicus curiae on Sunday, Apr 12, 2009 at 9:57:47 PM
Thanks! by Barbara Peterson on Sunday, Apr 12, 2009 at 11:07:03 PM