Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 6 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 6 (12 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   31 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Five WikiLeaks Myths and their Disturbing Truth

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 5 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 14   Well Said 12   Valuable 7  
View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H1 12/11/10

Become a Fan
  (3 fans)

"Your concept looks terrific. I wish you the best of luck" Daniel Ellsberg by inju

On December 6, I received a message from a friend celebrating the fact that Julian Assange, the controversial founder of WikiLeaks, was leading a Times magazine poll for the next "person of the year."

Up to then, I had been somewhat dismissive of the whole WikiLeaks debacle, perceiving this Assange character as someone who practiced "irresponsible" journalism, releasing thousands of private communications that seemed to have little to do with national security and a lot to do with mean-spirited back-channel insults between diplomats. Add to this an accusation of rape (which did seem suspiciously timed to me, but still) and this did not seem like someone I wanted to have coffee with, never mind nominate for person of the year!

However, due to the popularity implied by the Times poll, and to my great respect for my friend's political senses, my interest was piqued. Thus, I began to dig into the WikiLeaks story, reading sources I have personally come to trust over the years to put together a credible version of the facts for myself.

What I discovered troubled me greatly.

Surprisingly, what was disturbing were not Assange's actions, or even the unethical and untruthful actions revealed about our government by some of the leaked cables (although these are very sad to me), but by the actions and words of our political leaders (like Joe Lieberman) and major organizations (like Amazon and Visa/Mastercard) which have summarily decided on Assange's guilt without evidence or a due process. I am also disturbed by the mainstream story told about WikiLeaks, Assange, and the leaked cables, which weave the myths below into a tale of narcissism, drama, irresponsibility, and (yawn) petty diplomatic cat-fights, with "treason" and "terrorist" accusations thrown in for flair.

The counter-story that emerged out of my reading is far more complex and nuanced, and raises many questions about who has really crossed ethical boundaries here -- Assange or those that have tried to discredit and shut him down.

It is to be expected, of course, that no government wants to be embarrassed or have their state secrets (especially ones that showcase lies or human rights abuses) revealed publicly. However, if such a thing occurs, officials (and the media, and corporations) have a decision point a moment in which they can choose the level of dignity, morality, ethics, and legality with which they will approach the disclosures.

It is these actions and words, which have stemmed from the moments of choice presented to our leaders by WikiLeaks, that worry me in terms of what they reveal about their commitment to democracy, civil liberties, human rights and use of power.

But I will let you judge for yourself.


Assange is an anti-establishment, anti-business trouble maker who is trying to create chaos for his own enjoyment.

Evidence and statements made by Assange and those who know him suggest that he is neither anti-establishment nor anti-business but anti-corruption and illegality.

WikiLeaks neither steals documents nor pays others to do so nor investigates actions and crimes. Instead, WikiLeaks acts as a secure online publishing clearinghouse for documents submitted to them voluntarily by "whistleblowers" (people who want to expose corruption, human rights abuses, and illegal activities by organizations, corporations and nations).

Whistleblowers throughout history, although not always popular at that moment, have been willing to take risks to inform us about decisions that have critical implications for our health (e.g., tobacco industry); the welfare and lives of our family members (e.g., Vietnam war Pentagon Papers); our preferences for how our tax dollars are spent and our ability to make a living (e.g., financial corruption by governors, luxury purchases by our representatives); and our ability to decide on the match between the actions of those who lead us and our own moral compass (e.g., sales of arms to certain groups and nations, child molestation and sex scandals, financial support to governments that are officially at war with us or unsupported by us, etc.)

Legal protection for whistleblowers varies widely by topic and geographic locale and whistleblowers are often at risk for serious recriminations ranging from job loss to incarceration and death.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5

Elaine Shpungin, Ph.D. is a student and practitioner of Non Violent Communication (NVC) and Restorative Circles (RC).

She is currently exploring restorative and non-violent approaches to conflict and ways to meaningfully share power in (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Five WikiLeaks Myths and their Disturbing Truth

Speaking While Upset: Moving from Destructive to Constructive in 6 Simple Steps

3 Steps that Transform Sibling Conflict into Sibling Camaraderie

Avatar: Tantalizing Possibilities Laced With Disappointment

The Most Important Thing to Know About Conflict

The Key to Getting the Relationship and Love You Want


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
12 people are discussing this page, with 31 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Assange make a living?I mean....where does he get ... by zonie on Saturday, Dec 11, 2010 at 8:20:00 PM
Hi Zonie,My understanding is that WikiLeaks and As... by Elaine Shpungin on Saturday, Dec 11, 2010 at 8:38:25 PM
Donations? Hmmmm....many websites ask for donatii... by zonie on Saturday, Dec 11, 2010 at 9:40:26 PM
Evil dirty Israeli spies appear whenever he snaps ... by J. Edward Tremlett on Saturday, Dec 11, 2010 at 8:39:11 PM
It's one of many questions folks should be asking.... by zonie on Saturday, Dec 11, 2010 at 9:41:26 PM
There is a fine line between critical questioning ... by Saman Mohammadi on Saturday, Dec 11, 2010 at 10:04:45 PM
isIt is also not a wholesale is wi... by zonie on Saturday, Dec 11, 2010 at 10:36:29 PM
"And some folks knew that already without wikileak... by Saman Mohammadi on Saturday, Dec 11, 2010 at 11:01:27 PM
if that didn't confirm any suspicions....You said.... by zonie on Saturday, Dec 11, 2010 at 11:20:18 PM
You make a very good point. The contention that Wi... by Daniel Noel on Sunday, Dec 12, 2010 at 3:10:27 PM
. The questioning about WikiLeaks's origins and it... by zonie on Saturday, Dec 11, 2010 at 10:43:28 PM
Sorry, I should have been clearer about my forked ... by J. Edward Tremlett on Sunday, Dec 12, 2010 at 10:47:07 AM
Question where your politicians get their 'donatio... by ibrahim turner on Sunday, Dec 12, 2010 at 2:46:10 PM
Of course I do.Campaign finance....I think it shou... by zonie on Monday, Dec 13, 2010 at 1:07:26 AM
He's a secret agent.So, it's a secret. ;)... by Ned Lud on Saturday, Dec 11, 2010 at 8:43:39 PM
I suppose you've heard of Jones the spy?;)... by zonie on Saturday, Dec 11, 2010 at 9:43:26 PM
Some people figure things out sooner, Than other... by Ned Lud on Saturday, Dec 11, 2010 at 8:36:38 PM
Ned,Thanks for your (-ahem-) support.I agree with ... by Elaine Shpungin on Saturday, Dec 11, 2010 at 8:49:42 PM
Not a problem, Elaine.I pick on doctors, sometimes... by Ned Lud on Saturday, Dec 11, 2010 at 8:56:19 PM
this whole is a crap. US never was ruled by law. I... by John Smith on Sunday, Dec 12, 2010 at 1:34:33 AM
It is all about a cyber 9/11 staged by the crimina... by aberamsay on Sunday, Dec 12, 2010 at 5:43:37 AM
Thanks for the link. Although I read Global Resea... by John Reed on Sunday, Dec 12, 2010 at 3:20:41 PM
I am leaning more towards this "event" as being ak... by zonie on Monday, Dec 13, 2010 at 1:33:17 AM
Now, an even better analysis has been written by M... by John Reed on Tuesday, Dec 14, 2010 at 1:53:49 PM
Hopefully, here.... by John Reed on Tuesday, Dec 14, 2010 at 2:08:54 PM
Elaine Shpungin is to be commended for the thoroug... by Daniel Noel on Sunday, Dec 12, 2010 at 3:21:17 PM
Thank you for the support and also for pointing ou... by Elaine Shpungin on Sunday, Dec 12, 2010 at 8:44:37 PM
Elaine Shpungin, Why in the hell do you feel th... by aberamsay on Sunday, Dec 12, 2010 at 5:59:23 PM
As I said to Daniel Noel, I agree that the part ab... by Elaine Shpungin on Sunday, Dec 12, 2010 at 8:51:56 PM
I don't think we should fight over this,Look at Fo... by Debbie S on Sunday, Dec 12, 2010 at 8:38:53 PM
If you've read F. William Engdahl's article, "Wiki... by Jim Eldon on Tuesday, Dec 14, 2010 at 9:52:59 AM