Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Article Stats
10 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

First Amendment Rights Watch: Criminalizing the Internet

By (about the author)     Permalink
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

News 2   Must Read 1   Well Said 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

Headlined to H2 5/16/09
Become a Fan
  (5 fans)

opednews.com

 
In the last few years as my work has increasingly integrated with the Internet, blogosphere and Netroots, I've been constantly reminded that there are a lot of great people out there -- but I've also been reminded that there are a number of really crazy, nasty, unhinged and generally bad people out there, too. The Internet's unique mix of interactivity, instant response and anonymity can really bring out the worst in people -- all you have to do is read the comments sections on many major blogs, both liberal and conservative, to know that there's a lot of hate out there.

 

However, the Internet is a terrifically democratizing force, and while most of us can't stand the haters who try to hijack this medium for their own sad agendas, any effort to criminalize speech in this medium is really unacceptable.

Unfortunately, such an effort is underway, headed by Democratic Rep. Linda Sanchez (D-CA). As Wired magazine notes, her bill, HR 1966, is called the "Cyberbullying Prevention Act" and includes this section:

Whoever transmits in interstate or foreign commerce any communication, with the intent to coerce, intimidate, harass or cause substantial emotional distress to a person, using electronic means to support severe, repeated and hostile behavior, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than two years, or both.

Look, I'm all for putting people in jail for violating the law, whether they violated it on the Internet or somewhere else. However, this bill is so broadly written as to be an affront to the First Amendment. Really, who is going to determine what "intent to coerce, intimidate or harass"? At times, I've felt intimidated and harassed by quasi-stalker-ish commenters and hate mailers. And I've certainly been the target of attempts to "coerce" - as has anyone who has read a blog post pushing a certain position. Should folks go to jail for that? I don't think so. 

 


David Sirota is a full-time political journalist, best-selling author and
nationally syndicated newspaper columnist living in Denver, Colorado. He blogs for Working Assets and the Denver Post's PoliticsWest website. He is a Senior Editor at In These Times magazine, which in 2006 received the Utne Independent Press Award for political coverage. His 2006 book, Hostile Takeover, was a New York Times bestseller, and is now out in paperback. He has been a guest on, among others, CNN, (more...)
 
Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
8 people are discussing this page, with 10 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

and probably just me....  do not believe in t... by richard on Saturday, May 16, 2009 at 10:06:39 PM
Articles 18 and 19 of the UN Universal Declaration... by Jason Paz on Sunday, May 17, 2009 at 2:30:26 AM
Yeah, well... I find that the creatures we call... by Kimmo Salonen on Sunday, May 17, 2009 at 5:13:51 AM
with one caveat.   I do believe in the r... by jersey girl on Sunday, May 17, 2009 at 7:54:15 AM
"We are now living in a suveillance society.... ca... by Sister Begonia on Sunday, May 17, 2009 at 4:53:47 PM
I think I could support this law if the wording wa... by crispy on Sunday, May 17, 2009 at 8:18:20 AM
"I agree: in the current for this is about SE... by crispy on Sunday, May 17, 2009 at 8:26:00 AM
"Whoever transmits in interstate or foreign c... by Sister Begonia on Sunday, May 17, 2009 at 4:49:14 PM
The manual will most likely be written by those wh... by Dave Kisor on Sunday, May 17, 2009 at 8:53:01 PM
IMO, before the government considers criminalizing... by Kyle Griffith on Tuesday, May 19, 2009 at 10:57:54 AM

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend


Copyright © 2002-2014, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum