Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook
  11
Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend
  10
21 Shares     
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Article Stats
76 comments
OpEdNews Op Eds

Elizabeth Warren Comes Down Hard Against Global Warming, Separates Herself From Hillary Clinton on Climate Change

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 7   News 4   Valuable 4  
View Ratings | Rate It

Headlined to H2 12/22/13

Become a Fan
  (64 fans)

opednews.com

On Friday, December 20th, Democratic U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren finally separated herself clearly from former U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, regarding the issue of climate change and global warming. Here is the story:

TransCanada Corporation wants to build the Keystone XL Pipeline to carry oil from Alberta Canada's tar sands to two refineries owned by Koch Industries near the Texas Gulf Coast, for export to Europe; and Hillary Clinton has helped to make that happen, but Elizabeth Warren has now taken the opposite side.

Secretary of State Clinton, whose friend and former staffer Paul Elliot is a lobbyist for TransCanada, had worked behind the scenes to ease the way for commercial exploitation of this, the world's highest-carbon-emitting oil, 53% of which oil is owned by America's Koch Brothers. (Koch Industries owns 63% of the tar sands, and the Koch brothers own 86% of Koch Industries; Elaine Marshall, who is the widow of the son of the deceased Koch partner J. Howard Marshall, owns the remaining 14% of Koch Industries.)

David Goldwyn, who "served as Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's Special Envoy and Coordinator for International Energy Affairs," is yet another   lobbyist for TransCanada.   So, TransCanada has two of Hillary's friends working for them. Misters Elliot and Goldwyn thus worked intimately with Hillary's people to guide them on selecting a petroleum-industry contractor (not an environmental firm, much less any governmental agency) to prepare the required environmental-impact statement for this proposed pipeline.

Hillary Clinton as the Secretary of State had already displayed a record of carrying out the policies that were being promoted by her lobbyist friends, when she did everything possible, early in President Obama's first term, to support U.S. funding for the fascist junta in Honduras that perpetrated a coup d'etat on 28 June 2009 overthrowing that nation's progressive democratically elected President, and who then installed their own regime, and promptly placed their country into a continuing violent terror that caused Honduras ever since to be the nation with the highest murder rate in the world. Hillary's lobbyist friend in that particular matter was Lanny Davis, who also is an occasional Fox News contributor.

Secretary Clinton's State Department thus allowed the environmental-impact statement on the proposed Keystone XL Pipeline to be performed by a petroleum-industry contractor that was chosen by the company that was proposing to build and own the pipeline, TransCanada. That contractor had no climatologist, and their resulting report failed even at its basic job of estimating the number of degrees by which the Earth's climate would be additionally heated if this pipeline is built and operated. Their report ignored that question, and instead evaluated the impact that climate change would have on the pipeline, which was estimated to be none.

President Obama himself is now trying to force the European Union to relax their anti-global-warming regulations so as to permit them to import the Kochs' dirty oil. His agent in this effort is his new U.S. Trade Representative, Michael Froman, from Wall Street.

But on December 20th, Senator Warren signed onto a letter criticizing the Obama Administration's apparent effort to force the European Union to agree to purchase this oil. As the Huffington Post's Kate Sheppard reported, "Six senators and 16 House members, all Democrats, wrote a letter to Froman on Friday asking him to elaborate on his position on the matter. 'If these reports are accurate, USTR's [the U.S. Trade Representative's] actions could undercut the EU's commendable goal of reducing greenhouse-gas emissions in its transportation sectors," these 22 Democratic lawmakers wrote.

This is, essentially, a rebellion by 22 progressive congressional Democrats against the Clinton-Obama effort to provide a market for the Kochs' dirty oil. This letter was actually written by Representative Henry Waxman and Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, and co-signed by Senators Barbara Boxer, Ed Markey, Dick Durbin, Jeff Merkley, and Elizabeth Warren; and Representatives John Conyers, Jr., Barbara Lee, Raúl M. Grijalva, Rush Holt, Louise M. Slaughter, Jerrold Nadler, Judy Chu, Peter DeFazio, Anna G. Eshoo, Sam Farr, Peter Welch, Alan Lowenthal, Mark Pocan, and Steve Cohen.

What is at issue in the Keystone XL and Alberta tar-sands matter is governmental policies that will determine whether the tar-sands oil will undercut the production-costs of normal oil. Right now, normal oil costs far less to mine, process, and get to market (because tar sands oil is so dirty and so land-locked). However, if the Kochs win, then the existing governmental policies will change in ways that will eliminate this cost-advantage of normal oil. The result of that would be increased sales and burning of the tar-sands oil, and thus reduced sales and burning of cleaner oil. That would throw into the atmosphere "more than $70 billion in additional damages associated with climate change over 50 years." However, that added $70 billion would be the added harms to the entire world, not to the owners of the tar sands.

The benefits to Koch Industries, from this competitive re-alignment in favor of tar-sands oil, have been estimated to be around $100 billion. This would add about $45 billion to the net worth of David Koch, $45 billion to the net worth of Charles Koch, and $15 billion to the net worth of Elaine Marshall. (David and Charles would then become the two wealthiest individuals in the world.)

On December 17th, the Republican House budget chief, Paul Ryan,   threatened to drive the U.S. government into default unless President Obama approves the Keystone XL Pipeline.

President Obama holds the sole authority to approve or disapprove this project, because it crosses the international border, but he has delayed this decision for years, because he doesn't want to enrage the environmental community, and also because his tipping his hand in that way would be almost entirely a waste if he cannot first get Europe to weaken their environmental standards so as to allow this oil to compete in Europe with normal oil as if it weren't far more damaging to the climate than normal oil is --- just ignore that harm being added to the entire planet.

Thus, Senator Warren has now joined with the progressives on two big issues that arouse intense opposition to her from the aristocrats who finance most political campaigns: She opposes the taxpayer-handouts to Wall Street, and she now also opposes the entire planet's, basically, environmental handouts, to the owners of the most-harmfully polluting corporations, such as Koch Industries. (The other owners of tar-sands oil are Conoco-Phillips, Exxon-Mobil, and Chevron-Texaco.)

This could be a turning-point in Warren's political career. She's no longer at war against only the financial-industry corruption that dominates the conservative, Clinton and Obama, establishment within the Democratic Party (and all of the Republican Party), but she is also at war against their environmental corruption. For yet another example of that corruption: On 2 October 2013, Joe Romm at Think Progress headlined "More Bad News For Fracking: IPCC Warns Methane Traps Much More Heat," and he reported that, "The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) reports that methane ... is far more potent a greenhouse gas" than previously known, so bad it "would gut the climate benefits of switching from coal." And then, just five days after that, Jon Campbell in upstate New York headlined "In Oneida County, Hillary Clinton Touts U.S. Oil-and-Gas Production," and he reported that at Hamilton College, Hillary Clinton praised fracking for methane, by saying, "What that means for viable manufacturing and industrialization in this country is enormous." However, if Warren won't be able to get either Wall Street or the oil patch to finance her political campaigns, then how can she even possibly rise within the power-structure?

----------

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Investigative historian Eric Zuesse is the author, most recently, of  They're Not Even Close: The Democratic vs. Republican Economic Records, 1910-2010,  and of  CHRIST'S VENTRILOQUISTS: The Event that (more...)
 
Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

First Examination of Malaysian MH-17 Cockpit Photo Shows Ukraine Government Shot that Plane Down

Indications that the U.S. Is Planning a Nuclear Attack Against Russia

Harry Reid Effectively Kills Obama's TPP and TTIP International Trade Deals

The Propaganda War About Ukraine: How Important It Really Is

Elizabeth Warren Comes Down Hard Against Global Warming, Separates Herself From Hillary Clinton on Climate Change

How Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, and Congressional Republicans, Created Child-Refugee Flood

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
23 people are discussing this page, with 76 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)
As a progressive, given our current election syste... by Kyle Gordy on Sunday, Dec 22, 2013 at 2:40:47 PM
I'm curious about your reasoning here. Are red-sta... by Patrick Walker on Monday, Dec 23, 2013 at 10:22:15 AM
A negative self-fulling prophecy. Next...... by Daniel Geery on Monday, Dec 23, 2013 at 11:45:35 AM
I hate to think of her being president because the... by b. sadie bailey on Sunday, Dec 22, 2013 at 3:56:12 PM
So, you would have voted against Abraham Lincoln?... by Eric Zuesse on Sunday, Dec 22, 2013 at 8:31:33 PM
Yep! And more but we are not allowed to say!... by Bill Johnson on Friday, Dec 27, 2013 at 11:52:30 AM
This goes into Warren's plus column, but I'm havin... by Vernon Huffman on Sunday, Dec 22, 2013 at 7:33:06 PM
Progressives who look for ideological perfection a... by Eric Zuesse on Sunday, Dec 22, 2013 at 7:57:29 PM
Eric, I'm in some rational sympathy with your vie... by Patrick Walker on Monday, Dec 23, 2013 at 8:59:57 AM
The impression that I have from conversations is: ... by Eric Zuesse on Monday, Dec 23, 2013 at 9:24:20 AM
For me, an essential prerequisite for supporting W... by Patrick Walker on Monday, Dec 23, 2013 at 9:50:32 AM
An advantage, Mr. Walker? No, it's a game-changer,... by Mort Persky on Tuesday, Dec 24, 2013 at 2:38:54 PM
He doesn't care about that difference. (Or else he... by Eric Zuesse on Tuesday, Dec 24, 2013 at 3:22:07 PM
Yep. Hard to understand the contradiction here, is... by Mort Persky on Tuesday, Dec 24, 2013 at 4:32:30 PM
How is there a contradiction if he doesn't care ab... by Eric Zuesse on Tuesday, Dec 24, 2013 at 5:04:07 PM
Eric, you're the one who's wrong here, as I AM pur... by Patrick Walker on Thursday, Dec 26, 2013 at 1:04:08 PM
Yeah, I agree that she does not yet see the light ... by David Mills on Monday, Dec 23, 2013 at 8:55:35 AM
We are overpopulating because a very small percen... by molly cruz on Tuesday, Dec 24, 2013 at 11:27:06 AM
Elizabeth Warren for Prez., enough of the Clinton'... by George Buzzetti on Sunday, Dec 22, 2013 at 7:41:35 PM
The dynamics of politics indicate that there is a ... by Doc McCoy on Sunday, Dec 22, 2013 at 8:49:22 PM
Respectfully disagree.I believe that there is actu... by BFalcon on Wednesday, Dec 25, 2013 at 6:47:05 AM
It is amazing to see that only a mere handful of l... by Donald Goldmacher on Sunday, Dec 22, 2013 at 10:21:15 PM
And where is Grayson?... by Jim Arnold on Monday, Dec 23, 2013 at 2:10:54 AM
Thumbs up, Donald! Have you seen my current articl... by Patrick Walker on Monday, Dec 23, 2013 at 9:06:23 AM
On some issues, Bernie Sanders's record is more pr... by Eric Zuesse on Monday, Dec 23, 2013 at 9:30:02 AM
PROVIDED the person is ADEQUATELY progressive--and... by Patrick Walker on Monday, Dec 23, 2013 at 10:01:00 AM
Nonsense. "ADEQUATELY progressive" isn't an issue,... by Eric Zuesse on Monday, Dec 23, 2013 at 10:23:00 AM
Eric, with your "Nonsense," you're torturing a st... by Patrick Walker on Monday, Dec 23, 2013 at 10:54:30 AM
Your concept of "progressive" will be different fr... by Eric Zuesse on Monday, Dec 23, 2013 at 12:11:30 PM
Eric, you've misidentified my obsession--it's not... by Patrick Walker on Monday, Dec 23, 2013 at 2:18:17 PM
Naturally, they fear Warren more, because (1) she'... by Patrick Walker on Monday, Dec 23, 2013 at 3:19:25 PM
Re. your "But any strategizing must take into acco... by Eric Zuesse on Monday, Dec 23, 2013 at 3:50:11 PM
PS: Elizabeth Warren signed that letter, and Berni... by Eric Zuesse on Monday, Dec 23, 2013 at 3:55:26 PM
What Patrick Walker fails to see is the interdepen... by Charles Roll on Monday, Dec 23, 2013 at 4:42:29 PM
Re. your "it doesn't work to try to save a species... by Eric Zuesse on Monday, Dec 23, 2013 at 5:27:27 PM
Abrasive words are NOT arguments; try making one. ... by Patrick Walker on Monday, Dec 23, 2013 at 9:08:46 PM
I am sorry if I missed something but I noticed no ... by Eric Zuesse on Monday, Dec 23, 2013 at 10:04:47 PM
Eric, the ONLY "perfectionistic" demand I ... by Patrick Walker on Tuesday, Dec 24, 2013 at 8:48:53 AM
You want a "climate champion" but insist that it b... by Eric Zuesse on Tuesday, Dec 24, 2013 at 9:23:20 AM
You read far too much into a mere letter signing--... by Patrick Walker on Thursday, Dec 26, 2013 at 7:16:18 AM
Actually, co-signing that letter from Congress to ... by Eric Zuesse on Thursday, Dec 26, 2013 at 8:23:13 AM
The Democrats have been almost as gung-ho as Repug... by Patrick Walker on Thursday, Dec 26, 2013 at 11:50:13 AM
You've also unfairly caricatured my viewpo... by Patrick Walker on Thursday, Dec 26, 2013 at 1:40:05 PM
Isn't it strange that USA would want to export oil... by Charles Roll on Monday, Dec 23, 2013 at 4:13:23 PM
Way to go Liz.... by Connie Brady on Monday, Dec 23, 2013 at 4:33:40 PM
I read this last nite and felt like I had been... by janet O'Connell on Monday, Dec 23, 2013 at 6:15:59 PM
We are overpopulating because a very small percent... by molly cruz on Tuesday, Dec 24, 2013 at 9:58:32 AM
We need to put an emissions tax on any intesti... by Floyd Howard Jr on Monday, Dec 23, 2013 at 6:19:49 PM
I think Hillary Clinton is lost in the past; reare... by molly cruz on Tuesday, Dec 24, 2013 at 9:48:38 AM
I volunteered for Obama during the '08 primary sin... by Jackie Heinl on Tuesday, Dec 24, 2013 at 1:53:16 PM
Climate change will not be a big issue during the ... by Peter Duveen on Tuesday, Dec 24, 2013 at 2:20:40 PM
No SirI believe that a lady will become the Presid... by BFalcon on Wednesday, Dec 25, 2013 at 6:51:38 AM
Well, however appealing to the left, Warren is a l... by Robert S. Becker on Thursday, Dec 26, 2013 at 10:39:52 AM
I always like hearing your opinions but believe th... by BFalcon on Thursday, Dec 26, 2013 at 11:24:00 AM
Not  a chance?? You are delusional if you ... by Robert S. Becker on Thursday, Dec 26, 2013 at 12:43:32 PM
Bush Sr. was a shoo-in, but for some  very od... by Peter Duveen on Thursday, Dec 26, 2013 at 3:55:37 PM
Not odd at all if you recall a self-made comic and... by Robert S. Becker on Thursday, Dec 26, 2013 at 11:42:24 PM
Yes, Robert, I forgot the details. I was banking o... by Peter Duveen on Friday, Dec 27, 2013 at 11:00:51 AM
No, he got like 8-10% of the vote and Bush I was n... by Robert S. Becker on Friday, Dec 27, 2013 at 11:20:43 AM
GOP  can't find anything less objectionable t... by BFalcon on Thursday, Dec 26, 2013 at 7:10:12 PM
I am shocked, shocked that someone of your eruditi... by Robert S. Becker on Thursday, Dec 26, 2013 at 11:46:35 PM
What I meant was that none of these can come on to... by BFalcon on Friday, Dec 27, 2013 at 7:06:56 AM
Both of these get blasted in a national election, ... by Robert S. Becker on Friday, Dec 27, 2013 at 9:13:41 AM
That "blasting" I hope will be done by Sen Elizabe... by BFalcon on Friday, Dec 27, 2013 at 10:22:10 AM
Nobody with real traction among the electorate wil... by Peter Duveen on Friday, Dec 27, 2013 at 10:56:56 AM
Your assessment is that there are no elections.I w... by BFalcon on Friday, Dec 27, 2013 at 1:22:59 PM
What is it about her saying she won't run that doe... by Robert S. Becker on Friday, Dec 27, 2013 at 11:22:41 AM
Agreed, but she might make a good stoolie, so don'... by Peter Duveen on Friday, Dec 27, 2013 at 11:28:57 AM
She has refused to say she won't run; she has only... by Eric Zuesse on Friday, Dec 27, 2013 at 12:43:28 PM
Fully agree, I think that the discussion here is a... by BFalcon on Friday, Dec 27, 2013 at 1:31:45 PM
Gee, all I have is her word against yours. from ea... by Robert S. Becker on Friday, Dec 27, 2013 at 1:36:21 PM
Not true. A journalist knows that only a "Shermane... by Eric Zuesse on Friday, Dec 27, 2013 at 2:44:09 PM
Re. your "Not all Nader votes would have gone to G... by Eric Zuesse on Friday, Dec 27, 2013 at 2:53:35 PM
Why satiric, I am just optimistic.Which part about... by BFalcon on Friday, Dec 27, 2013 at 1:26:42 PM
You are too good-spirited for me to invoke again t... by Robert S. Becker on Friday, Dec 27, 2013 at 2:36:22 PM
You have successfully presented the dots, and conn... by thepiffler on Friday, Jan 31, 2014 at 10:11:11 AM