Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 2 (2 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   5 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Did I Just Have a Bad Dream

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 1   News 1   Valuable 1  
View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H4 9/3/09

- Advertisement -

On Friday morning I was enjoying my daily ritual, getting my world and national news fix over a cup of coffee on my patio. I came upon two statements that caused me to choke on a gulp of coffee. Mentally I asked myself, "What did he just say?" I read the two statements again, then a third time. There was no mistaking what the man said. I was thoroughly shocked and angered. I said to no one in particular - I was alone on the patio - I told you so ...I told you so!

I was in for an even greater shock in the days that followed. It is now Tuesday as I pen this article. Despite the shocking nature of the statements, there has been no follow-up, no reaction. My morning paper, the original culprit, had no further information on Saturday, Sunday, Monday, or this morning. Of course, the worthless MSN did not even mention the statements, let alone a follow-up. Most surprising, my usually reliable news sources on the Internet, including OEN, did not mention the statements, thus no follow-up. Trying desperately to maintain a sense of equilibrium I reached out to my networks of friends that span the entire country, from the East Coast to Hawaii. That, too, ended in failure. Some had read the original article, but, no, they had not heard anything since, no reaction to the astounding statements from Congress nor the White House nor the Pentagon. In fact there has been no coverage whatsoever since the original article on the 28th.

Did I dream this up? Is my imagination playing tricks on my aged brain cells. No, I still have the article from my Friday morning paper, and the article can be found on the Internet, but only the original article. Despite intensive searching, the Internet also failed to provide me with follow-up information. But the Internet can only find what is out there. There was no follow-up, no reaction to the shocking statements from anyone... period.

Before continuing, let's go back a couple of weeks. The Obama administration had launched, perhaps, the most popular program yet of his so far short regime. It's popular name was the "Cars for Clunkers" program and it was a rousing success. While having some detractors, the program had three beneficial results. Courtesy of the federal government, John Q. Public was able to get a new car as opposed to other federal programs that financed some of the largest corporations in America. By getting the "clunkers" off the street, the environment gets a breather. It put people to work to restore inventories on car lots. It ended prematurely on Aug. 16th. The announcement came from the Department of Transportation without an explanation. I went through the steps mentioned above searching for some sort of an explanation from a government official with same results as mentioned above. No federal official ever explained why the popular program was cut short. I speculated with others that this may be the new communications policy of the Obama administration. If it is bad news, don't say a word. Let the media sort it all out. The media did, concluding the program ran out of money. Is that the media's new job, explaining government actions? Maybe I am just old school, but I always thought it was the government's job to explain the government's actions.

Or in this case the words of a very prominent government official, a general actually. Unfortunately, the media in this case simply ignored the issue as did our federal government. But, as they say in this business, you can't un-ring a bell.

So what did this general say that caused the entire news media, including the ever reliable Internet news media, and our political and military leaders to simply clam up, hoping the words will just go away, be forgotten. By the way, this wasn't just any general, not some retired type spouting off his expertise after the fact. The general's name is Stanley McChrystal. He is currently the general commanding, Afghan theater of operations. The words will not go away for a very simple reason. Gen. McChrystal spoke the truth, an unspoken truth known for years by many. The general spoke reality, a harsh reality that Americans must understand, more importantly, a harsh reality that our political and military leaders must understand.

On a placid Friday morning I read these statements from an A.P. article.

The top U.S. commander in Afghanistan released his new counterinsurgency strategy Thursday, telling troops that the supply of militants is "effectively endless" and that U.S. and NATO forces need to see the country through the eyes of its villagers [emphasis is mine].

- Advertisement -

Gen. Stanley McChrystal said troops "must change the way that we think, act and operate." McChrystal hopes to install a new approach to counterinsurgency where troops will make the safety of villagers the top priority, above killing an endless supply of militants.
Essentially what we have is America at war in a certain region. The general commanding the theater states that the enemy has an "effectively endless supply" of recruits. Should this not cause some consternation amongst our political and military leaders? One would think so. The lack of reaction from the Pentagon and the Defense Department is revealing.
- Advertisement -
A recent report from McClatchy Newspapers states McChrystal may ask for as many as 45,000 additional American troops in Afghanistan.
If it turns out there is no reaction, if this story and McChrystal's comments pass into oblivion, our nation, in terms of apathy, is on life support.
Never have I wanted to be more wrong.

"Forward, the Light Brigade!"
Was there a man dismay'd?
Not tho' the soldier knew
Someone had blunder'd:
Theirs not to make reply,
Theirs not to reason why,
Theirs but to do and die:
Into the valley of Death
Rode the six hundred

Cannon to right of them,
Cannon to left of them,
Cannon in front of them
Volley'd and thunder'd;
Storm'd at with shot and shell,
Boldly they rode and well,
Into the jaws of Death,
Into the mouth of Hell
Rode the six hundred.

Next Page  1  |  2


I am the author of two novels, "The Bode Testament" and "Impeachment." I am also a columnist who keeps a wary eye on other columnists and the failures of the MSM (mainstream media). I was born in Minnesota, and, to this day, I love the Vikings (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -
Google Content Matches:

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

America Divided

Classic military blunders

Expanded Presidential "War" Power: a Time-Bomb Threatening Our Democracy

What Exactly Is COIN?

War With Iran Imminent?

The Trilogy of Despair as Bin Laden Dances in His Cave


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
4 people are discussing this page, with 5 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)
Yes I saw it, too. We don't have an endless supply... by sandy valencour on Friday, Sep 4, 2009 at 12:59:38 PM
American Generals are trained and educated at our ... by psycheboat on Friday, Sep 4, 2009 at 1:37:38 PM
General McChrystal seems to be a General who actua... by kwalsh on Sunday, Sep 6, 2009 at 6:16:31 PM
In my mind it doesn't really matter who he is. Nor... by Sandy Shanks on Monday, Sep 7, 2009 at 5:09:50 PM
The days when over there was over there are over. ... by kwalsh on Wednesday, Sep 9, 2009 at 9:55:04 PM