Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H3) on 7/12/08:     Permalink
View Article Stats      (24 comments)

Coming To Terms With Obama's FISA Vote

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (8 fans)   -- Page 1 of 1 page(s)

opednews.com

Still fuming over the FISA sellout, and greatly disappointed by Barack Obama's "Yea" vote, I decided to do more research.

What I found did help a bit, but I'm still disgusted by the fact that the telecoms who illegally spied on us now have retroactive immunity.

What I found, the thing that helped me feel a tiny bit better about all this, was a statement by Barack Obama about why he decided to support the FISA bill.

In a nutshell, he voted for the bill because:

• it brings the FISA court back into the picture and demands compliance with the court;

and

• it requires the Inspectors General to investigate past misconduct, so maybe someone(s) -- other than the now-immune telecoms, of course -- will be exposed for their role(s) in the illegal wiretapping and perhaps even held accountable.

So he obviously put a great deal of thought into it and did what he felt was best for now. That's his prerogative.

But I still strongly oppose this legislation.

Sure, the FISA court is back as a requirement, but that never stopped the Bushies from sidestepping the court.

And the Inspectors General may launch an investigation, but we know that the Bushies are good at dodging any kind of proceedings through which they might be held accountable for their misdeeds. They just play the "state secrets" card, or the "executive privilege" card, like they're above the law. And they always seem to get away with it.

And the fact still stands that Congress gave the telecoms a get-out-of-jail-free card.

Imagine the outrage if Bill Clinton had illegally spied on us like Bush has. They probably would have used that to impeach Clinton all over again, not pass a bill supporting the activity.

But Bush -- with a 25% approval rating -- gets a free pass and a Congressional blessing. Why?

No wonder this Congress now has a 9% approval rating.

In an ideal world, Obama would have joined with Senators Russ Feingold, Chris Dodd, Pat Leahy, and others who firmly opposed the bill, and we would have seen a filibuster.

But this is not a perfect world, and Obama is not a perfect person. He is a politician, and this is a very important election year. We know that the Republicans will continue to play the fear card. Hence, Obama's "Yea" vote.

Disappointed as I am, however, I will still support Obama's campaign in every way I can.

Because no one is perfect.

Because this election is about more than just one issue.

And because the alternative -- a McCain presidency -- is unthinkable.

 

Mary Shaw is a Philadelphia-based writer and activist, with a focus on politics, human rights, and social justice. She is a former Philadelphia Area Coordinator for the Nobel-Prize-winning human rights group Amnesty International, and her views (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Follow Me on Twitter

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
24 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Democrats-- How much more evidence? by Nathaniel Heidenheimer on Saturday, Jul 12, 2008 at 9:17:56 AM
Obfuscation by JC Garrett on Saturday, Jul 12, 2008 at 9:56:59 AM
the only reason... by Bia Winter on Monday, Jul 14, 2008 at 9:07:56 AM
Not A Single Issue?????? by Dennis Kaiser on Saturday, Jul 12, 2008 at 10:04:22 AM
It is imperative... by Daniel Geery on Saturday, Jul 12, 2008 at 10:29:56 AM
Not a perfect world by Angelo on Saturday, Jul 12, 2008 at 10:48:55 AM
Sham - You said it, bro by Rady Ananda on Saturday, Jul 12, 2008 at 5:40:18 PM
Rady is absolutely right! by Goblue on Saturday, Jul 12, 2008 at 8:29:10 PM
I AGREE by RICH SHA on Sunday, Jul 13, 2008 at 3:08:35 AM
Re: Coming To Terms With Obama's FISA Vote by Munich on Saturday, Jul 12, 2008 at 12:56:37 PM
Obama's response adds insult to injury by Josephus on Saturday, Jul 12, 2008 at 3:05:38 PM
Great Article by freedomrider on Saturday, Jul 12, 2008 at 4:38:44 PM
I AGREE by RICH SHA on Sunday, Jul 13, 2008 at 3:21:43 AM
Well by pft on Saturday, Jul 12, 2008 at 5:35:33 PM
No More Republicans In Government by AllDems08 on Saturday, Jul 12, 2008 at 9:14:42 PM
Time to vote by Jack Harrington on Friday, Jul 18, 2008 at 6:36:29 PM
Why Focus on the Telecoms Rather than Bush? by Julie Johnson on Saturday, Jul 12, 2008 at 10:34:49 PM
About the Original FISA Law and Telecoms ... by AllDems08 on Saturday, Jul 12, 2008 at 11:10:29 PM
What This FISA Amendments Act Means To You and Me ... by AllDems08 on Sunday, Jul 13, 2008 at 12:05:37 AM
I AGREE by RICH SHA on Sunday, Jul 13, 2008 at 3:26:49 AM
Not about one issue... by John R Moffett on Sunday, Jul 13, 2008 at 5:33:40 AM
Absolutely by francine on Monday, Jul 14, 2008 at 3:33:35 AM
Better without Obama! by old91A10 on Sunday, Jul 13, 2008 at 1:18:34 PM
FISA hardly just another "issue" by Mark Welkie on Monday, Jul 14, 2008 at 7:34:16 AM