Home
Refresh   Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ;
Add to My Group
October 18, 2009 at 11:27:52

Funny 1   Interesting 1   View Ratings | Rate It

Can You Be Intelligent and Believe in Evolution?

submit to twitter
submit to reddit
submit to digg
Tell A Friend

By Robert Affolter (about the author)     Page 1 of 1 page(s)

opednews.com     Permalink

For OpEdNews: Robert Affolter - Writer

Now before you flip out, I'm asking you to set aside your previous bias and follow the following line of reason. If you find a fallacy in my thinking, please write your findings. Let's have an intelligent discussion about intelligence.

Physicist John Gribbin mentioned the problem of predestination in his book on quantum mechanics.(1) If Big Bang Theory is true, the Universe started from a central location and is expanding outward. In theory, if a physicist knew the position and velocity of every particle of the Universe shortly after the Big Bang, then using Newton's Laws of Motion, the physicist could predict the position and velocity of every particle in the Universe for any time in the future. The Universe would be quite predictable and predetermined.

If we couple that thought with the idea of Evolution that life evolved from the interaction of particles of matter then we could predict when life would evolve and what forms of life would evolve. If we further that thought with the idea that intelligence also evolved from the interaction of matter, then we could predict when intelligence would evolve. We could also predict when we would be born. We could even predict what our thoughts would be because we could predict the configuration of matter of our brains. We would lead a life of ultimate predestination.

I define intelligence as the ability to adapt to new and trying situations. From the lowly virus to the human being, life seems to have that ability. However, we can only say that we adapted, if we had choices. We can only say we are intelligent if we have choices.

We cannot say that one of us is more intelligent than another unless we can say that we made an intelligent decision. If Christians, Muslims and Atheists have no choice but to act the way they do and believe what they do, nobody is right or wrong. Nobody is intelligent. Nobody is stupid. Our arguments and discussions become pointless.

If Big Bang Theory and Evolution are true, there is no such thing as intelligence. We have no choice. Therefore you cannot be intelligent and believe in Evolution.

The television series Flash Forward is an interesting and entertaining example of predestination. In the series, everyone on Earth passes out for a couple of minutes. During that time they have a vision of what they are doing on a certain day in the future. The series follows people as they try to determine why the event occurred and seek to avoid or embrace their futures. The series is an excellent example of the futility of our lives if Evolution is true. No matter what people do, their futures are inexorable.

Are you intelligent? Does your brain create thoughts or does your brain express thoughts created in another realm – a realm of intelligence? Can you control your thoughts and actions?

Those questions are not only central to our lives they are key to understanding the problems we are facing in health care. For nearly 100 years, evolution-based-medicine has been the dominant system in America. In following articles I will show the fallacies of that approach and argue that intelligent-design-based-medicine may offer a more successful approach.

(1)Gribbin J. In Search Of Schrodinger's Cat: Quantum Physics and Reality. New York (NY): Bantam Books; 1984; pg. 9.

 

Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people:
Do not consolidate more power in evolution-based-medicine.

Click here to see the most recent messages sent to congressional reps and local newspapers

www.affolterclinic.com

Dr. Affolter has written two ebooks on health care reform and has been practicing chiropractic for 24 years. He received two degrees from the University of Kansas, B.A. chemistry(1977) and M.B.A.(1978). He received the Doctor of Chiropractic Degree (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Follow Me on Twitter

 

Book Recommendations for "Brain Evolution Health"
A Symphony in the Brain: The Evolution of the New Brain Wave Biofeedback
by Jim Robbins

$14.00
Lowest New Price $8.05

Number of pages: 272
Publisher: Grove Press

View All Book Recommendations

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

FACEBOOK      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      NETSCAPE      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
62 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
 

Falicies in your argument by Scott Baker on Sunday, Oct 18, 2009 at 1:54:34 PM
Thanks for the reply by Robert Affolter on Sunday, Oct 18, 2009 at 7:48:39 PM
Article misses a big point: Reality by RickK on Sunday, Oct 18, 2009 at 4:53:14 PM
Reality - Really? by Robert Affolter on Sunday, Oct 18, 2009 at 8:00:02 PM
This makes no sense by RickK on Sunday, Oct 18, 2009 at 8:31:18 PM
Think? by Robert Affolter on Sunday, Oct 18, 2009 at 10:47:37 PM
Anti-vaccination by Robert Affolter on Sunday, Oct 18, 2009 at 11:01:56 PM
Panspermia by Peter Duveen on Sunday, Oct 18, 2009 at 7:22:38 PM
Re Panspermia - what is your point? by RickK on Sunday, Oct 18, 2009 at 8:08:57 PM
The point is obvious by Peter Duveen on Sunday, Oct 18, 2009 at 8:35:48 PM
Panspermia is completely irrelevant to this discussion. by RickK on Sunday, Oct 18, 2009 at 10:41:20 PM
Cause and Effect? by Robert Affolter on Sunday, Oct 18, 2009 at 10:52:24 PM
Robert Affolter puts fourt mythology as fact. by kanawah on Sunday, Oct 18, 2009 at 8:28:13 PM
Evidence? by Robert Affolter on Sunday, Oct 18, 2009 at 10:38:38 PM
Robert Affolter puts fourt mythology as fact. by kanawah on Sunday, Oct 18, 2009 at 8:28:30 PM
The formal flaw by Jim Arnold on Sunday, Oct 18, 2009 at 11:05:52 PM
Comments by Paul Burnett on Sunday, Oct 18, 2009 at 11:15:48 PM
Intelligence? by Robert Affolter on Sunday, Oct 18, 2009 at 11:26:01 PM
Define Intelligence by Scott Baker on Monday, Oct 19, 2009 at 3:20:37 AM
Intelligence Defined by Robert Affolter on Monday, Oct 19, 2009 at 10:19:40 AM
The premise seems doubtful to me. by John Sanchez Jr. on Sunday, Oct 18, 2009 at 11:50:19 PM
The Point Really is Cause and Effect by Robert Affolter on Monday, Oct 19, 2009 at 10:23:46 AM
You lost me completely by Scott Baker on Monday, Oct 19, 2009 at 1:56:21 PM
Your Argument is Against Evolution by Robert Affolter on Monday, Oct 19, 2009 at 4:01:52 PM
NO! by Ben Snyder on Monday, Oct 19, 2009 at 4:13:57 PM
Operationalize life by Robert Affolter on Monday, Oct 19, 2009 at 6:26:08 PM
Now you're not making any sense by Ben Snyder on Monday, Oct 19, 2009 at 7:12:18 PM
Random Walks by Ben Snyder on Monday, Oct 19, 2009 at 1:27:06 AM
Huh? by Bryan Emmel on Monday, Oct 19, 2009 at 4:21:42 AM
Sorry to see this discussion derailed by Dick Thomson on Monday, Oct 19, 2009 at 9:10:57 AM
Determinism by Robert Affolter on Monday, Oct 19, 2009 at 10:33:26 AM
My mistake by Dick Thomson on Monday, Oct 19, 2009 at 10:43:32 AM
Ad Hominem by Bob Ready on Monday, Oct 19, 2009 at 1:04:40 PM
I like Feynman, and I like irreverence by Dick Thomson on Monday, Oct 19, 2009 at 1:43:56 PM
Too Late Doc, Frank Herbert Beat You To It 45 Years! by James Hadstate on Monday, Oct 19, 2009 at 9:23:07 AM
This discussion is labeled one thing, but is about another by RickK on Monday, Oct 19, 2009 at 9:44:00 AM
Good job by Robert Affolter on Monday, Oct 19, 2009 at 10:36:01 AM
Heisenberg principle by Ariel Monserrat on Monday, Oct 19, 2009 at 11:06:21 AM
Mind over matter by Robert Affolter on Monday, Oct 19, 2009 at 2:44:16 PM
Here are a few fallacies: by Bob Ready on Monday, Oct 19, 2009 at 12:39:05 PM
The Big Bang Theory and Evolution by Robert Affolter on Monday, Oct 19, 2009 at 3:00:14 PM
No by Ben Snyder on Monday, Oct 19, 2009 at 3:19:32 PM
Beyond duality by Jim Arnold on Monday, Oct 19, 2009 at 3:27:00 PM
Evolution and determinism by Jim Arnold on Monday, Oct 19, 2009 at 1:03:17 PM
Adaptation of Consciousness not meaningless by Bob Ready on Monday, Oct 19, 2009 at 1:28:18 PM
Not meaningless, but not scientifically meaningful by Jim Arnold on Monday, Oct 19, 2009 at 3:19:28 PM
This is pseudo-science by Josh Mitteldorf on Monday, Oct 19, 2009 at 3:01:46 PM
Rebuttal by Don Smith on Monday, Oct 19, 2009 at 8:35:49 PM
Now you've hit on (at least potentially) a real problem by Robert Affolter on Monday, Oct 19, 2009 at 10:50:48 PM
Oversimplifying Physics by Starla Immak on Monday, Oct 19, 2009 at 8:56:53 PM
rebuttal by Robert Affolter on Monday, Oct 19, 2009 at 11:07:03 PM
Wrong again by Ben Snyder on Tuesday, Oct 20, 2009 at 10:03:13 AM
evollution of consciousness by Robert Affolter on Tuesday, Oct 20, 2009 at 10:37:03 AM
What exactly are we talking about now? by Ben Snyder on Tuesday, Oct 20, 2009 at 11:54:00 AM
You are making my point. by Robert Affolter on Tuesday, Oct 20, 2009 at 3:18:25 PM
Huh? by Ben Snyder on Tuesday, Oct 20, 2009 at 9:51:55 PM
Adaptation by Robert Affolter on Tuesday, Oct 20, 2009 at 10:30:02 PM
Sober and Trewavas by Robert Affolter on Tuesday, Oct 20, 2009 at 10:44:49 PM
Intelligence and projection by Jim Arnold on Tuesday, Oct 20, 2009 at 11:17:37 AM
What is consciousness? by Robert Affolter on Tuesday, Oct 20, 2009 at 3:25:33 PM
What consciousness is by Jim Arnold on Thursday, Oct 22, 2009 at 1:14:41 PM
I look forward to it. by Robert Affolter on Thursday, Oct 22, 2009 at 5:27:56 PM

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment


 

 

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum