Tag(s): ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 3   Well Said 3   News 2   View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H3) on 12/27/10:     Permalink
View Article Stats      (31 comments)

Bradley Manning's Pre-Trial Punishment

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (8 fans)   -- Page 1 of 1 page(s)

opednews.com

Private First Class Bradley Manning spent his Christmas this year in a 6-foot by 12-foot prison cell at the Quantico Marine Corps Base in Virginia, where he has been held since May. He is in solitary confinement. He is under continuous surveillance, and must respond to cell checks every five minutes. He cannot keep any personal items in his cell. And he is not even allowed to exercise in his small quarters.

These conditions, as described by Manning's attorney, David E. Coombs, seem like harsh and cruel punishment even for the most violent, most dangerous convicted criminals. But Manning has not been convicted of any crime at this point. He is accused of being the source of the classified U.S. government documents that Wikileaks has been sharing with the world, but he still awaits his day in military court.

Daphne Eviatar, Senior Associate of the Law and Security Program at Human Rights First, questioned the legality of Manning's treatment, saying: "At the very least, the conditions would seem to amount to a violation of Article 13 of the [Uniform Code of Military Justice], which states, 'No person, while being held for trial, may be subjected to punishment or penalty other than arrest or confinement upon the charges pending against him, nor shall the arrest or confinement imposed upon him be any more rigorous than the circumstances required to insure his presence, but he may be subjected to minor punishment during that period for infractions of discipline.'"

Eviatar continued: "No one has claimed that Bradley Manning has been anything less than completely cooperative with prison guards. And given that he's not accused of a violent crime, it's difficult to see why such extreme security measures are necessary."

According to Glenn Greenwald at Salon.com, Manning's detention conditions "constitute cruel and inhumane treatment and, by the standards of many nations, even torture," and are "likely to create long-term psychological injuries."

The case has caught the attention of the United Nations' special rapporteur on torture, Manfred Nowak, who is investigating Manning's treatment. According to the Washington Post, "The U.N. could ask the United States to stop any violations it finds." But would it even matter?

I get the impression that the military is trying to get some extrajudicial revenge on Manning. And this is another glaring example of how prisoner rights, the law, and true justice have all taken a back seat since George W. Bush declared his "war on terror".

This is what America has become. And we don't have Bush to blame for it now.

 

Mary Shaw is a Philadelphia-based writer and activist, with a focus on politics, human rights, and social justice. She is a former Philadelphia Area Coordinator for the Nobel-Prize-winning human rights group Amnesty International, and her views (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Follow Me on Twitter

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
31 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Reporting Official Crimes in the US by Steven G. Erickson on Monday, Dec 27, 2010 at 8:45:35 AM
Not correct by Steven Leser on Monday, Dec 27, 2010 at 1:04:44 PM
A really complex situation by Sherwin Steffin on Monday, Dec 27, 2010 at 3:11:35 PM
Sorry, see my response below intended for you by Steven Leser on Monday, Dec 27, 2010 at 10:02:32 PM
If you like movies by BFalcon on Tuesday, Dec 28, 2010 at 2:14:47 PM
Sorry, see my response below intended for you by Steven Leser on Monday, Dec 27, 2010 at 10:02:35 PM
I must agree with Mr. Leser by Doc "Old Codger" McCoy on Monday, Dec 27, 2010 at 11:05:12 PM
In the movie "Enemy of State" by BFalcon on Tuesday, Dec 28, 2010 at 2:18:35 PM
Enemy of the State by Doc "Old Codger" McCoy on Tuesday, Dec 28, 2010 at 6:06:33 PM
I really don't care... by Dak on Tuesday, Dec 28, 2010 at 12:07:37 AM
constitutional rights by liberalsrock on Monday, Dec 27, 2010 at 10:06:17 AM
Hopelessy Entrapped by Sadism by zephyr on Monday, Dec 27, 2010 at 12:52:52 PM
Manning the Wikileaker by Super Cop on Monday, Dec 27, 2010 at 4:29:40 PM
It is Disgraceful by Timothy Bickford on Monday, Dec 27, 2010 at 5:16:25 PM
So. We Have the Military Perspectives From: by Charlene Richards on Monday, Dec 27, 2010 at 8:35:46 PM
A bit of a clarification... by Doc "Old Codger" McCoy on Tuesday, Dec 28, 2010 at 2:11:52 AM
Speedy trial by Timothy Bickford on Tuesday, Dec 28, 2010 at 5:06:50 AM
You are applying civilian law concepts by Doc "Old Codger" McCoy on Tuesday, Dec 28, 2010 at 6:16:03 AM
Thanks for the reference by Timothy Bickford on Tuesday, Dec 28, 2010 at 11:31:32 AM
You write very sensible by BFalcon on Tuesday, Dec 28, 2010 at 2:13:12 PM
Presumed innocent, but still confined by Sherwin Steffin on Tuesday, Dec 28, 2010 at 2:37:07 PM
That is because you are always considered "in custody" while by Steven Leser on Tuesday, Dec 28, 2010 at 2:49:03 PM
Sorry, but by BFalcon on Tuesday, Dec 28, 2010 at 3:25:10 PM
Oh yes you absolutely can waive almost all of your rights. by Steven Leser on Tuesday, Dec 28, 2010 at 4:09:54 PM
We're in more trouble than I thought by BFalcon on Tuesday, Dec 28, 2010 at 9:17:37 PM
It seems they are going against precidence by Timothy Bickford on Tuesday, Dec 28, 2010 at 9:14:12 PM
A clarification... by Doc "Old Codger" McCoy on Tuesday, Dec 28, 2010 at 9:31:54 PM
Its a Wild World by Timothy Bickford on Friday, Dec 31, 2010 at 4:59:01 PM
Every military person knows about the Inspector Generals by Steven Leser on Monday, Dec 27, 2010 at 9:59:58 PM
A question, though by BFalcon on Tuesday, Dec 28, 2010 at 2:30:02 PM
People use the IG's all the time. They are very popular by Steven Leser on Tuesday, Dec 28, 2010 at 3:18:16 PM