Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 1 (1 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   2 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Arlen Specter's NSA Probe Gone Lame

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H3 4/29/09

Become a Fan
  (19 fans)

My favorite Arlen Specter moment was the grilling of Alberto Gonzales during Senate Judiciary Committee hearings. Like the rest of us, Specter wanted to know what the NSA program entailed. Who was the government listening to and why didn't they file the proper warrants?

The FISA law was meant to protect US citizens from Nixon-style dirty tricks, making clear no president could single-handedly infringe on the privacy of Americans. FISA allows spying to catch terrorist plots ahead of time, but requires keeping a record for the Judiciary to ensure the government isn't abusing wiretap apparatus.

George W. Bush specifically promised voters on the campaign trail he would comply with this law, but after one FISA judge quit in protest, it came to light that Bush's NSA program to wiretap US citizens had no paper trail. The NY Times article blew the lid on the scheme only after Bush had been re-elected in 2004, winning Ohio in the middle of the night in an improbable upset in precincts that had polled heavily Democratic.

But February 6, 2006, in front of Arlen Specter, Gonzales squirmed around without disclosing who was being spied on, when and why. In a blow to the outraged citizens, it was decided that Gonzales' testimony would be continued behind closed doors to preserve "national security" secrets.

During the hearings, the Washington Times offshoot Insight Magazine warned any Republican senator participating in the probe of Bush's surveillance program would have future reelection funding withheld by Karl Rove and the RNC.

Tellingly, the hearings just ended. They did not resume the next morning and no explanation was given.

While it's possible the NSA program was listening in on terrorists, it's also possible the Bush administration was spying on political enemies in conjunction with the alleged conspiracy to intimidate and prosecute Democratic officials and fundraisers in swing states, gethering dirt for Rove's red file. The required paperwork would easily have cleared this up.

We know now Gonzales had been surveilling Jane Harman, ranking member of the House Intelligence Committee in 2005 or 2006. The NSA has asserted the surveillance was lawful but has not released any documentation to verify this. Regardless of who the NSA was after, it's unclear why no records would be kept for the FISA court to review.

Gonzales had no comment when asked about the Harman allegations - his then decision not to pursue charges against any supposed shady dealings was due to Harman's silence on the NSA program. Ironically, she gave a free hand to those she now claims abused their powers.

Between the hijacking of the DOJ to allegedly tilt elections, thousands of warrantless NSA wiretaps, the FBI's bungling of National Security Letters improperly snooping on thousands, missing e-mails by the millions and the infiltration of peace activism groups, it's apparent Nixon's protege Karl Rove may have been using executive intel apparatus, or even regional police forces or private contractors to gather data on anti-Bush dissenters.

One can only wonder how many in positions of power have their hands tied by the evidence collected on their dealings and personal lives? Granted, Elliot Spitzer, Kwame Kilpatrick, John Edwards, William Jefferson and Rod Blagojevich have themselves to blame for their predicaments, but if they represent the Democratic culture of corruption, the lack of indictments of an appreciable number of Republicans seems suspicious, especially in light of the mountains of actionable evidence begging for investigation here, here, here and here.

 

(OpEdNews Contributing Editor since October 2006) Inner city schoolteacher from New York, mostly covering media manipulation. I put election/finance reform ahead of all issues but also advocate for fiscal conservatism, ethics in journalism and (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
Related Topic(s): ; , Add Tags

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Limbaugh/Hannity Parent Company Admits Hiring Actors to Call Radio Shows

The #OWS Video Rupert Murdoch Doesn't Want You To See

LocalLeaks' Charges of Cover-Up by Parents, Police in Steubenville Rape Forces Official Response [Updated]

Limbaugh, Hannity, Beck Respond To Report That Parent Company Hires Actors for Call-ins

#OWS Cheers As Defiant Judge Stops Obama From Selling Immunity To Wall Street

Obama to Grant Banks Robosigning Immunity in Showdown With Breakaway AGs [Updated]

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
2 people are discussing this page, with 2 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Spector was the lead attorney for the Warren Commi... by John McCarthy on Thursday, Apr 30, 2009 at 1:41:53 PM
While I agree Specter's hearings seem to be only f... by Gustav Wynn on Friday, May 1, 2009 at 10:07:46 AM