It says a lot about the supposed thinking of the Republicans that they can't use the word "liberal" without associating it with the most vile obscenities, epithets, expletives and vulgarities. To the Republicans, the word "liberal" is all those things and the same as taking the Lord's name in vain, condemning you to God's eternal damnation, questioning the legitimacy of your birth, referring to your canine maternity and asserting that you are a practitioner of the Oedipal Complex.
In a GOP diatribe published here on OEN on June 4 by Rob Kall, the Republicans said that liberals elected Obama. No kidding? Did they think that we might have thought that the Republicans elected him? Rob said that, "The GOP will be calling him liberal and vilifying his supporters." This is undoubtedly true, and begs the question, "Why is calling someone a liberal considered the worst possible thing that a Republican can call someone?" And, "Why don't liberals attach the same connotation to the word "conservative"?
The answers to those questions are all but clear, but we can come close to finding out why Republicans are that way. Republicans practice the ideology of conservatism. Their ideology is to make up your mind about how you want things to be, then distort reality until it fits. What the Republicans call the "values" of Republicanism, as so ably demonstrated by the number one Republican, George Bush, are first and foremost, hypocrisy, followed by what they are hypocrites about, corruption, cronyism, bribery, corporate welfare, manipulation, deceit, outright lying and the general attitude that what's good for Republicans is even better if it can be made bad for everyone who is not a Republican.
Liberals don't have an ideology. Has any one ever heard of "liberal ideology"? What really chaps the ass of Republicans is for liberals to point out the obvious fact that the United States was founded, prospered and became the most wealthy, powerful country in the history of the world, based on liberal principles. That came about because of the most liberal document ever to be written about how to govern a country, giving the people of our country the most liberal rights that any people have ever had. That document is the Constitution, and the liberal writers included in that document the Bill of Rights, guaranteeing that the people would have the rights of a liberal democracy.
The Republicans hate that document. It is the antithesis of everything they believe. Yet, the conservative Republicans owe everything they are to that document. They have parasitically attached themselves to the products of the liberals who built the country with liberal principles and manipulated, deceived and cronied their way to wealth, all the while deriding the very thing that made it possible, liberal principles.
Just ask any conservative Republican who hates liberal principles, if, when he's arrested and jailed without charge, deprived of counsel, deprived of habeas corpus, has all his property confiscated without due process, he's willing to stick to his conservative principles and give up those very liberal principles that prevent that from happening to him. Until it actually happens to him, he'll lie about it and say, yes. But when it actually happens, he'll squawk and scream and yell and holler and beg for some of those liberal principles.
I'm really, really tired of having the word "liberal" applied to me as if I were a maggot. Especially by people who have lived off of and benefited from liberals all their lives and who, hypocritically, profess to hate those liberal principles. By people who, when it comes right down to the nut cuttin' and they get their ass in a crack would give anything for just some of those liberal principles.
Ed Martin is an unindicted curmudgeon. He is not a Democrat, Republican, conservative, liberal, deist, atheist, or a member of any -ism.
Yes, they are. And yes, they are working very well because they pique the affective realm in the average person, not his intellectual realm. If one takes any word and utters it with disgust in their tone of voice, eventually the word becomes pejorative, no matter what its original meaning. The words, liberal and conservative have taken on a completely different meaning than their original meaning as stated in any dictionary - when applied to politics.
The sinister neoconservative cabal has used this to influence the minds of the average person through distraction with 'heartfelt' concepts, like religion, drugs, crime, guns, etc. So, the average guy out there becomes incensed with the 'enemy' who are now called 'liberals'.
This is an excellent article revealing the irony of what has evolved in our culture and government.
by
michal54 (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 14 comments)
on Tuesday, June 10, 2008 at 9:24:08 AM
the approach i am advocating is to the attack the Failed Conservative Values. The foundation of the conservative movement are their values and that is what progressives should go after and unmask.
here is the outline of the campain I am proposing to do this and some of the posts I have done on the topic.
Failed Conservative Values: Barack Obama on the Status Quo v Change Progressive Values Stories: Peter Harvey on Community versus Intolerance Failed Conservative Values: Violence and Brutality Failed Conservative Values: Barbara, Carole, Nina on Dogmatism Progressive Values Stories: Michelle on Values or Non-Values is Insulting
Edwin Rutsch What Are Progressive Values? Documentary Project
i for one am proud to be a liberal.This country was built on liberalism.Thomas Jefferson,tom payne were all liberal for their time.The middle class was virtually created by FDR.Conservatie means people who with failed policies who refuse to change even when those policies have been discredited and proven harmful to others,it truly is based on personel greed with no concern for others.The reason liberal has swuch a bad conniotation is the press since Roosevelts time have blasted the liberals positions and quoted the republicans every chance they get.We have to start ennunciating what conservative stands for and find a way to get it out to the people,just saying it on liberal blogs won"t do the job.How to do this i really don"t know but until pleople firmly understand what conservatism stands for we are fighting a losing battle.
by
liberalsrock (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 113 comments)
on Thursday, June 5, 2008 at 3:36:26 PM
It has long seemed to me that conservatives (I'm not sure that's the right word, but I don't know what else to call them) have a flexible definition of liberal that changes day-to-day to fit whatever happens to be convenient. However, what it means is those who we should ridicule. The concept usually comes into play when something goes wrong in the world. Whoever they can describe as responsible for that wrong must be a liberal. In fact, that seems to be their definition of a liberal.
As an example, I recall a few years ago, conservatives were all talking about the additive MTBE that liberals had urged to be put in gasoline. The additive was leaking into water systems and poluting them, so of course it was necessary to blame it on liberals.
Similarly, when Enron was driving up the price of electricity in California, the conservative line that the price rise was due to liberal environmentalists who would not allow new power plants to be built.
by
PrMaine (8 articles, 5 quicklinks, 1 diaries, 284 comments)
on Thursday, June 5, 2008 at 3:45:57 PM
I am a liberal moderate. When I hear people like Rush Limbaugh grind out the term "liberal" and make it sound like "sonofabitch!!" I merely mentally counter in a moderately toned voice ("conservative" =) "asshole."..."Greedy asshole" is understood.
by
unclecasey (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 12 comments)
on Thursday, June 5, 2008 at 6:25:35 PM
Using the term "liberal" or "conservative" are meaningless out of context.
We're told that Barack Obama is the most Progressive candidate - but if you ask me, his stated policies very closely resemble that of Clinton. For 18 months we've heard oversimplified policies and even further oversimplified polls.
For example if asked what are the most pressing issues in the upcoming election, and the choices are as follows"
- The Economy
- The Iraq War
- Health Care
- Infrastructure
The poll is meaningless because it fails to create a discussion of the meaning of the policy. National Health Insurance, keeps Insurance companies entrenched, would create very little change except to make Insurance Companies (and Doctors) even wealthier and probably create "mandates" for people to purchase health insurance. It creates indentured servants.
A national Health Care Single Payer Not for profit health care system, one in which employers and employees contribute on a fair an equitable basis according to their means and receive care according to their need is a completely different system. Of course in this system, if you are out of work or otherwise unemployed, you still would still be eligible for health care. If you were self employed, you would be paying the employer and employee share, but it would still be a substantial savings due to the savings of the insurance companies executive compensation, profit, reserves and administration costs.
Of course everyone is interested in "Health Care" but without any definition, without any broader policy statement, the term is meaningless and the "Health Care" we are likely to get is worse for the middle class wage earner and small business person then what we have today.
Large businesses, shift cost, become self insured and maximize their employees out of pocket expenses by increasing deductibles, co-pays and co-insurance.
Isn't a corrupt form of super capitalism, the kind where their are monopolies, reduced competition, and concentration of wealth - just grand for the fat cats at the top?
The same interests lobbying 24/7/365 and paid for with our insurance premium and pharmacy dollars! Nice...
But let's just say we'll do something about "health care" it's a lot simpler and easier to say that we did something - anything - even if it makes the whole system worse.
Liberal or Conservative - it's the same ONE PARTY corporate system, the candidates and our representatives are still beholden to the powerful interests that have an iron grip and direct dials to the corrupt politicians that are supposed to be representing the people but instead manipulate the people and represent the $money$.
And this election, isn't about to change that. Want progressive change? Better ramp up for a long protracted battle, this system is designed to move at a glacial pace.
by
August Adams (10 articles, 0 quicklinks, 1 diaries, 429 comments)
on Thursday, June 5, 2008 at 6:31:11 PM
There is nothing conservative about the Republican party. They believe the ends justify the means like every other criminal organization. The will lie, cheat, steal and murder to achieve their ends, just like militarists, Communists, Nazis, Zionists, Al Queda, and all the other organizations that really believe only in the use of force and fraud.
by
John Hanks (1 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 1094 comments)
on Thursday, June 5, 2008 at 9:17:18 PM
It's 2009 and it's Gitmo, Mexico City annex. And there are two people kneeling in their stress positions with zip-ties on their hands and black hoods over their heads. Both in orange jump suits and both with sense-dep ear muffs on and gags in their mouths. Both face east a with guard carrying an AR15 between them.
Which one is the republican and which is the democrat?
by
scott creighton (21 articles, 10 quicklinks, 1 diaries, 179 comments)
on Thursday, June 5, 2008 at 10:19:16 PM
they want less government and spending. Can you name one republican administration that has decreased the size of government and spending? Not one has achieved this, and they are the ones responsible for increasing the size of government and its run-away deficit spending.
Republicans claim to lower taxes, yes this is true, but only does it apply mainly to the wealthy. While the middle and lower classes have their burden increased. Offsetting the loss in tax revenue to successive generations to repay these $ with higher accrued interest with a depreciated $'s value.
Republicans (conservatives) claim to be a moral compass and "Family Values" party, with Ronald Reagan as their most recent God like worshiping mentor. Yet, they fail to admit, he swapped wives who badgered him to become a turn-coat republican. He was a B rated actor snitch, having never starred in a major motion picture. His supporting actor in many of his movies was a monkey, providing just how challenging his scripts were for this bumbling fool.
While governor of California, he took the state from being #1 in education to becoming #1 in incarceration. and caused severe budget deficits. Which he did the same while as president, and almost 30 years later we are still only paying the interest against the principle from these deficits.
Conservatives claim he broke apart the USSR, which he had nothing to do with. This empire was on the decline long before Ronnie became president. His rouge government was a union busting, EPA gutting, S&L scandalizing, weapons for drug dealing with Iran-Contra, junk bond promoting, voodoo economics, Al-CIAda supporting, "Freedom Fighter's" Saddam Hussein & Osma Bin Laden backing", the republicans now re-label as terrorist's.
The 3 worst recent presidential administrations happen to all be republican with #1 being George Bu$h Jr., followed by senile Ronnie, and a close 3rd is George Bu$h Sr..
The world would have been much better off if these "SonofaBitches" with their administrations of "Goon's & Thug's" "Enemy Combatant's" against the Constitution, had never assumed leadership roles of the #1 most admired nation in the world that is now the #1 pariah state of sponsored Terrorism the world has known.
With mouthpieces like prescription drug addicts "Rush Limbaugh" and his kind leading the charge of hypocrites, closet homosexuals, pedophiles, "Youthful" Indiscretion" sexual deviants power hungry, greedy a*@-wipes this country has known. Which should heed Buckshot Dick stated words to go "F*@#k Themselves.
by
Stanimal (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 15 diaries, 433 comments)
on Friday, June 6, 2008 at 3:04:07 AM
A large part of the problem is that the Republican/Reich Wing propaganda juggernaut has too long been able to capitalize on the Democratic party's abandonment of labor in favor of a coaliton of easily caricatured, squabbling identity groups.
The joking about liberal will stop when the old left fighting spirit returns and not one minute sooner. Trust me, smirky punk Republicans will think twice about attacking liberals when they find out that they will be picking their asses up off of the ground. Give me a return of the tire iron swinging as opposed to sign toting real radicals, the labor left, the unions, the true patriots instead of the wishy washy crap that passes for the left now.
EE
by
Ed Encho (6 articles, 12 quicklinks, 55 diaries, 383 comments)
on Friday, June 6, 2008 at 6:10:31 AM
But the way a lot of us Southerners view the term "liberal" is like this...
The U.S. Constitution is what defines us as uniquely American. It is the blueprint FOR America and is a written signed CONTRACT between we the people and our government.
It is NOT a living breathing document. It is a DEFINED written contract with LIMITATIONS.
Over the last 100 years there have been a steady stream of illegal unconstitutional laws brought forward and actually passed into law by northern liberal democrats.
One of the worst laws on the books to this very day is THE FEDERAL RESERVE ACT OF 1913.
Bankers of NYC brought this law forward thru another puppet of theirs NY senator Nelson Aldrich (Rockefeller) A northern liberal democrat. This unconstitutional law was SIGNED into law by another northern liberal democrat named Woodrow Wilson.
The creation of this one law coming from the northern liberal democrats was enough to earn the moniker of 'liberal' as TRAITOR to the USA.
Governor Woodrow Wilson of New Jersey, before he became president, was working on another illegal unconstitutional bill to bring forward, some kind of workers compensation bill.
His legal adviser told Woodrow Wilson his law as written would be tossed in the trash as unconstitutional.
Woodrow Wilson got angry and rose from his chair and told Walter Evans Edge that he did not care about the U.S. Constitution or the U.S. Supreme Court and that he wanted to RAM this bill through by popular demand and let any challengers hammer it out in court AFTER it becomes law.
This perfectly explains WHY other Americans who are NOT northern liberal democrats look upon them as absolute TRAITORS to our nation because they handed our financial sovereignty over to the bankers of NYC who have bought and paid for Hillary Clinton today and robbed this nation and bankrupted us into the drained broken country we are today.
Woodrow Wilson is considered a traitor just for that one single law. As soon as his name was written upon the Federal Reserve Act Bill, President Woodrow Wilson forever signed himself over as a traitor to the people of the United States Of America now and forever.
WE DO NOT WANT THE FEDERAL RESERVE PRIVATE FOR PROFIT BANK ON OUR SOIL OR THE OWNERS OF IT INSIDE OUR NATION!!!
Maybe next we should show you his 14 points and how his Secretary of State informed president woodrow wilson that he did not have the constitutional authority to be doing what he was doing! He fired his secretary of state Robert Lansing so he could continue building the new world order for his banker masters. TRAITOR!!!
And now United Nations sits in NYC with the Federal Reserve Bank and Depository Trust too!
Most Americans have no clue, but the term liberal now says it all for every American who does know, especially us Southerners who will look upon the northern liberal as a traitor now and forever.
Keep in mind this same northern liberal is who we Southerners fired upon and fought a bitter war with to prevent exactly what we see happening today.
We tried and we lost. And now we continue to view the northern liberal with ZERO trust and consider them as traitors to our nation and illegal occupiers of Southern territory by force.
I believe this is at the core of why things are the way they are today.
So this is the problem the term liberal has among Americans today. The very first meaning of liberal is traitor.
Republicans are NOT the only ones who feel this way about northern liberals.
We feel liberals have SOLD us out. Sold out the Constitution. Gave the farm away without a fight. Kidnap our children for ransom money called child support and the list goes on...
Some of the laws of northern liberals go directly against the U.S. Constitution, especially where it says the governments of America SHALL treat ALL citizens as equals- that is until you become a father here in America, then you are a non-citizen with no rights while the opposite sex gets it all- children included, the house, the bank accounts and much more...
What part of EQUAL don't liberals get?
The term liberal is today forever synonymous with TRAITOR plain and simple. They are considered as NON-Americans who tore up the U.S Constitution for a career. That is how it is viewed here in the South by my homies.
Liberal = traitor = non-Americans.
If liberals want to change this, I think they need to show America they want to SAVE the U.S Constitution by going back and UNDOING some of the disasterous laws liberals put on the books.
Show us you want to save this country now instead of destroying it as we have clearly seen for the last 100 years of progressive liberalism- the new world order crowd- not the American crowd.
So the truth is, when someone calls you a liberal, they are not calling you a sonofabitch, they are calling you a traitor who has betrayed America (Past tense). Already a done deal decades ago.
KG
by
Levin Sheridan (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 5 diaries, 174 comments)
on Friday, June 6, 2008 at 7:27:57 AM
In what part of the original Constitution did it express the sentiment of equality?
If you were not a white, property owning male, you were pretty, much closed out of the vote. Was that equal?
Conservatives have a long tradition of militarism, using power to overturn the status quo. Is that equal?
Conservatives have a long tradition of fighting against equality, in race, in sex, in disabilities... is that equal as you see it?
I guess, being a northern liberal traitor and one of those who supported such horrendous things like public education for all children. the vote extended to all citizens of appropriate voting age, being for the drive to end child labor or extend a minimum wage or a reasonable limited workweek, that I will continue in your view to be a traitor. But don't think your views of the world allow me to see you with a halo.
by
Jack Harrington (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 274 comments)
on Friday, June 6, 2008 at 1:08:59 PM
The tiny little good things of the liberals can never out-weigh the bad of the Federal Reserve Act of 1913.
With this law liberals gave it all away. All of it.
And they had to come up with a way of paying for it all.
IRS.
Funny thing is, they were smart enough to create the IRS and DIRECT INCOME TAX first- as a way to pay for the upcoming debt system about to be passed in December 1913.
IRS was created in February 1913. And the Federal Reserve Bank in December 1913. As the debt to foreign bankers grows so too does the income tax up to -according to FDR and his expansion of Wilson's machinery- up to 90% of our income can be taken by these two laws alone.
When America fails. When our economy collapses and the dollar is worthless we know who wrote this bill.
We know who passed this bill.
And we know who signed this bill into law.
There is no escaping the truth of the past.
WE KNOW WHO SOLD US UP THE RIVER WITHOUT A PADDLE AND TO WHOM!!!
The Federal Reserve Banking Act of 1913 and IRS and other laws are anchors around the liberal democrats neck to this very day.
And when the U.S. does finally collapse, and warfare comes to the streets of north America, all your good deeds won't amount to a hill of beans.
The road to hell is paved with good intentions. And we are on the path to hell. Nice road you have there!
-----------------
You also mentioned how wonderful it is that liberals have created public education.
Did you read the entire comment on who signed the new world order manifesto?
Did you read the part about liberal democrats using the public school system ya'll created to force-feed the minds of young children the new world order manifesto like you see today?
Democrats want to take credit for the public education system, and then secretly use it to program our children into new world order puppets.
The agenda is clear and exposed. It is documented.
I think your view of your party is way off base.
But that is just my opinion and it don't amount to a hill of beans either!
KG
---------------------------
Brief History of IRS
Origin The roots of IRS go back to the Civil War when President Lincoln and Congress, in 1862, created the position of commissioner of Internal Revenue and enacted an income tax to pay war expenses. The income tax was repealed 10 years later. Congress revived the income tax in 1894, but the Supreme Court ruled it unconstitutional the following year.
16th Amendment In 1913, Wyoming ratified the 16th Amendment, providing the three-quarter majority of states necessary to amend the Constitution. The 16th Amendment gave Congress the authority to enact an income tax. That same year, the first Form 1040 appeared after Congress levied a 1 percent tax on net personal incomes above $3,000 with a 6 percent surtax on incomes of more than $500,000.
In 1918, during World War I, the top rate of the income tax rose to 77 percent to help finance the war effort. It dropped sharply in the post-war years, down to 24 percent in 1929, and rose again during the Depression. During World War II, Congress introduced payroll withholding and quarterly tax payments.
-----------------
President GWB thinks and has said publicly the income tax should go no higher than 33%.
Wilson did what with it? 77%. And FDR approved up to 90%.
We KNOW liberals. We KNOW.
You can only fool some of the people some of the time, but you will never fool all of the people all of the time.
by
Levin Sheridan (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 5 diaries, 174 comments)
on Friday, June 6, 2008 at 5:01:20 PM
We liberals are not, and I know how this must hurt you, the new world order crowd. That distinction goes to you conservatives. Neocons and adherents of the free market, Milton Friedman economics. Strictly conservatives.
by
Jack Harrington (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 274 comments)
on Friday, June 6, 2008 at 1:11:40 PM
The liberals have most definitely been the new world order crowd! It is through the liberal democrat party that much of the globalist agenda has been rammed down our throats! And it is proveable by Senate Records which I have already posted ages ago when I showed the new world order manifesto that was voted on in Congress in 1976.
It was indeed the liberal democrats almost exclusively who put it forward, wrote it, and VOTED on it! The new world order manifesto known as THE DECLARATION OF INTERDEPENDENCE which is easily searched out.
You are completely mistaken about your party!
The Republicans have jumped on the bandwagon after the passage of the Federal Reserve Act of 1913. It was liberal democrats who lead the way and prepared all the ground work and then by popularity the Republicans took over the work and left the democrats hanging with the baggage never to recover from it really. Ever since, a liberal has been synonymous with constitution destroyer and hence, traitor to America.
Every step of the way, the record SHOWS democrats behind much of the new world order agenda fostered onto helpless Americans.
Big money bankers have used both parties, but none more so than the liberal democrats who have jumped all over the new world order agenda from day one well over one hundred years ago and beyond!
Let me name a few of them... Federal Reserve Act of Dec. 1913. IRS income tax law Feb 1913, War Powers Act of 1933 from which flows martial law and executive orders, and how about United Nations? And child protection laws and domestic violence laws and this is the tip of the new world order iceberg and it has liberal democrats all over it in spades and then some.
I will repeat myself about Woodrow Wilson. When he signed the Federal Reserve Act of December 1913 into law, he effectively stepped outside his constitutional powers and became a dictator and gave unstoppable powers over our financial sovereignty to private for profit bankers who have destroyed America. That is the single worst act ever passed in this country's history.
Woodrow Wilson became a traitor to the good people of this nation when he sold us out under banner of northern liberal democrat. A traitor to all of us.
This would not have happened BEFORE the war for Southern Independence. It could only happen after Americans had been defeated and the central government moved to top dog. Now we were ripe for the picking.
Create a few runs on the bank and economic turmoil and they will scream for relief of any kind and look what we got. Screwed. And by whom? The record speaks for itself sir.
Don't blame the messenger because much of America thinks liberals are traitors to all that it means to be an American- the U.S. Constitution- which stood for nothing to the liberal democrats who have ruined it piece by piece by turning it into a living breathing document open to any kind of interpretation.
Do you want me to repost the Congressional roll call of the new world order manifesto and show you who voted for it in Congress? I am prepared to do that again if need be to make it clear here my point is very accurate and shown in Congressional record roll call.
As I recall from the count it was like over a hundred democrats with maybe a handful of republicans fooled into voting for it like it was a good idea back then or now.
I did warn you before you read this that you would not like my Southern opinion, but it is the gosh darned truth! And now ya know.
I am just trying my best to follow the rules and present another view point from the pages of history.
I have more members of my family than I can count who fought on both sides of the War For Southern Independence, and today I am a hereditary member of the SONS OF CONFEDERATE VETERANS historical fraternal organization with access to the recovered records of the Confederate States Of America. I know my history and have access to history and historical documents most Americans do not know exists.
It is incredible to read the notes of our field officers at war. It is incredible to read the communications between Washington and the Confederate Capitol in Montgomery. To hold in your hands the books used on the battlefields will send chills up and down your spines to hold the battle in your hands.
We KNOW who is our ally and who is not make no mistake about it.
That war may be over, but by all accounts America is yet to face another one and I can assure all of you the first ones prepared on this soil will be EDUCATED Confederates and Native Americans who are already gearing up for trouble on the streets of this country.
I have seen the signs in the wind for a while now. There are dark clouds on the horizon. Evil is approaching. Sauron is upon us. The dark shadow comes. Liberal democrats are the Nazgul and goblins. The shire is not safe any more. They are coming...
Problem is, most liberals don't own nor want any guns, so when the Sh*t hits the fan on the streets who is going to get caught in the middle without even a pea shooter to depend on? Try calling the police then.
I don't paint a pretty picture for our future do I? This is how I have been taught my entire life. That eventually collapse is coming and planned and we are suppose to be ready.
Are you? And where will you run to for cover and food and protection?
My former dentist wrote a great book about it called "The Planned Destruction Of America" by Dr. James Wardner.
If America comes unglued one day it could make Iraq look like a boy scout party. Or, it could be over very quickly and many of us rounded up and herded off to brand new concentration camps.
What ever happens, Southerners know who and what and why. We saved the documents for proof while Washington shreds it.
Ya'll come back now, y'hear?
KG
by
Levin Sheridan (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 5 diaries, 174 comments)
on Friday, June 6, 2008 at 2:46:43 PM
DECLARATION OF INTERDEPENDENCE New World Order Manifesto
Here it is... who supported the new world order manifesto... who voted for it and signed THE DECLARATION OF INTERDEPENDENCE in 1976 from records researched out of the congressional record. And this is only a partial list mind you... which means even MORE democrats signed this than shown here, and maybe a few more republicans, but the numbers are clear as to who the new world order traitors are with this 1976 Congressional roll call.
Oh and please don't miss down at the bottom how liberals planned on programming our children at our expense!!!
These are the official documents of the U.S. Congress researched out by mother in 1976.
Seantors:
James Abourezk (D-SD) Edward W. Brooke (R-Mass) Frank Church (D-Idaho) Dick Clark (D-Iowa) Alan Cranston (D-Cal) Jacob Javits (R-NY) Mike Gravel (D-Alaska) Mark Hatfield (R-Or) Hubert Humphrey (D-Minn) Daniel K. Inouye (D-Hawaii) George McGovern (D-SD) Thomas J. McIntyre (D-NH) Spark Matsunaga (D-Hawaii) Charles Mathias (R-MD) Lee Metcalf (D-Mont) Gaylord Nelson (D-Wisc) Robert Packwood (R-Ore) James B. Pearson (R-Kans) Claireborne Pell (D-RI) William Proxmire (D-Wisc) Abraham A. Ribicoff (D-Conn) John Sparkman (D-Ala) Adlai E. Stevenson, III (D-Ill) Harrison A. Williams, Jr. (D-NJ)
Representatives:
Mark Andrews (R-ND) John B. Anderson (R-Ill) Les Aspin (D-Wisc) Herman Badillo (D-NY) Max S. Baucus (D-Mont) Berkley W. Bedell (D-Iowa) Jonathan B. Bingham (D-NY) Michael T. Blouin (D-Iowa) Edward P. Boland, Jr. (D-Mass) Richard Bolling (D-Mo) John Brademas (D-Ind) George E. Brown, Jr. (D-Cal) William E. Brodhead (D-Mich) Yvonne B. Burke (D-Cal) Robert Carr (D-Mich) Cardiss Collins (D-Ill) Barber L. Conable (R-NY) Silvio O. Conte (R-Mass) John J. Conyers, Jr. (D-Mich) James C. Corman (D-Cal) George E. Danielson (D-Cal) Ronald V. Dellums (D-Cal) Christopher John Dodd (D-Conn) Robert F. Drinan (D-Mass) Robert B. Duncan (D-Ore) Robert W. Edgar (D-Pa) Don Edwards (D-Cal) Joshua Eilberg (D-Pa) Millicent H. Fenwick (R-NJ) James J. Florio (D-NJ) William D. Ford (D-Mich) Edwin B. Forsythe (R-NJ) Donald M. Fraser (D-Minn) Sam Gibbons (D-Fla) Thomas R. Harkin (D-Iowa) Michael Harrington (D-Mass) Augustus F. Hawkins (D-Cal) Elizabeth Holtzman (D-NY) Frank Horton (R-NY) Barbara Jordon (D-Tex) Robert W. Kastenmeier (D-Wisc) Martha E. Keyes (D-Kans) John J. LaFalce (D-NY) Edward I. Koch (D-NY) Robert R. Leggett (D-Cal) Matthew F. McHugh (D-NY) Lloyd Meeds (D-Wash) Ralph H. Metcalfe (D-Ill) Helen D. Meyner (D-NJ) Abner D. Mikva (D-Ill) Norman Y. Mineta (D-Cal) Parren J. Mitchell (D-Md) John J. Moakley (D-Mass) William S. Moorehead (D-Pa) John E. Moss (D-Cal) John M. Murphy (D-NY) Robert N. C. Nix (D-Pa) Richard Nolan (DFL-Minn) Richard L. Ottinger (D-NY) Edward W. Pattison (D-L-NY) Claude D. Pepper (D-Fla) Charles B. Rangel (D-NY) Henry S. Reuss (D-Wisc) Frederick W. Richmond (D-NY) Peter W. Rodino, Jr. (D-NJ) Fred B. Rooney (D-Pa) Benjamin Rosenthal (D-NY) Edward R. Roybal (D-Cal) Leo J. Ryan (D-Cal) Fernand J. St. Germain (D-RI) Patricia Schroeder (D-Colo) John F. Seilberling, Jr. (D-Ohio) Paul Simon (D-Ill) Stephen J Solarz (D-NY) Fortney H. Stark (D-Cal) Louis Stokes (D-Ohio) Frank Thompson, Jr. (D-NJ) Paul E. Tsongas (D-Mass) Morris K. Udall (D-Ariz) Lionel Van Deerlin (D-Cal) Charles A. Vanik (D-Ohio) Antonio B. Won Pat (D-Guam) Delegate to Congress
Members of the 94th Congress who endorsed the Declaration of Interdependence:
Senators: Philip Hart (D-Mich) Vance Hartke (D-Ind) Gale W. McGee (D-Wyo) Mike Mansfield (D-Mont) Walter F. Mondale (D-Minn) Hugh D. Scott (R-Pa) John V. Tunney (D-Cal)
Representatives:
Carl Albert (D-Okla) William A. Barrett (D-Pa) Jaime Benitez (D-Puerto Rico) Edward G. Biester, Jr. (R-Pa) William J. Green (D-Pa) Gilbert Gude (R-Md) Henry Helstoski (D-NJ) Robert E. Jones (D-Ala) Torbert H. MacDonald (D-Mass) Edward Mezvinski (D-Iowa) Patsy Mink (D-Hawaii) Thomas E. Morgan (D-Pa) Thomas M. Rees (D-Cal) Herman T. Schneebli (R-Pa) James W. Symington (D-Mo) Richard F. Vander Veen (D-Mich)
December 1976
Let me quote from their pamphlet:
"...The World Affairs Council of Philadelphia will expand its already well-established school program, and work to ensure that the Declaration and its precepts will be included in the curricula and the texts of our schools.
Starting with the schools of our region as a base, the prospects for national involvement are realistic and are being actively pursued. The National Education Association, Overseas Development Council, and Foreign Policy Association are assisting in this effort."
Advisory Committee For "A Declaration Of Interdependence":
Dr. Derek C. Bok, President Harvard University
Hon. Joseph S. Clark, Former U.S. Senator and former Mayor of Philadelphia
Hon. William T. Coleman, Jr., U.S. Secretary of Transportation
Dr. R. Bruckminster Fuller, World Fellow In Residence, Consortium of: University of Pennsylvania, Haverford College, Swarthmore College, Bryn Mawr College, and University City Science Center
Hon. John P. Humes, Former Ambassador to Austria
Arthur C. Kaufmann, Chairman, Independence National Historic Park Commission
Thomas B. MCCabe, Director Scott Paper Company
Frank C. P. MCGlinn, Executive Vice President, The Fidelity Bank, and member of the Commission on the Organization of the Government for the conduct of Foreign Policy
Rev. Henry H. Nichols, President, Philadelphia Fellowship Commission, and former President, Board of education of Philadelphia
Howard C. Petersen, Chairman of the Board, The Fidelity Bank
Mrs. Donald A. Petrie, Board Member, United Nations Association Of U.S.A.
Joseph M. Segel, Former Chairman, The Franklin Mint, and Member, U.S. Delegation, 29th General Assembly of The United Nations
Hon. Marietta Tree
Advisory Committee To Professor Henry Steele Commager for drafting of "A Declaration Of Interdependence":
Dr. Herbert Agar, Author
M. Raymond Aron, Author, with Centre European de Sociologie Historique
Dr. Harland Cleveland, Director, The Aspen Institute's Program in International Affairs
Ruth Clusen, President, The League Of Women Voters of the U.S.
Dr. Bowen C. Dees, President, The Franklin Institute
Dr. Richard N. Gardner, Henry L. Moses Professor of Law and International Organization, Columbia University
James A. Harris, Past President, National Education Association
Gabriel Hauge, Chairman of the Board, Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company
Frederick Heldring, President, Philadelphia National Bank
Dr. Robert M. Hutchins, President, The Center For the Study of Democratic Institutions
Professor John J. Logue, Director, World Order Research Institute
Professor Archibald MacLeish, Poet, Former Librarian of the U.S. Congress
Dr. Martin Meyerson, President, University of Pennsylvania
Clifford C. Nelson, President, The American Academy, Columbia University
Nicolas Nyrary, President, Fund For Peace
Francis T. P. Plimpton, Esq., DeBevoise, Plimpton, Lyons, & Gates
Dr. Charles C. Price, Benjamin Franklin Professor of Chemistry, University of Pennsylvania
Gus Tyler, Assistant President, Int'l Ladies Garment Workers Union
Dr. Randall M. Whaley, President, University City science Center
Dr. Helen D. Wise, Chairman, NEA Bicentennial Committee
Dr. Harris L. Wofford, Jr., President Bryn Mawr College
Leonard Woodcock, President, Int'l Union, United Auto Workers
Officers of the Board, World Affairs Council Of Philadelphia:
Chairman of the Board: A. Addison Roberts
Vice Chairmen:
Edwin J. Foltz Raymond S. Green Isadore M. Scott Walter A. Spiro Mrs. William White, Jr.
President: William W. Bodine, Jr.
Secretary: Mrs. Robert D. Harrison
Treasurer: Samuel H. Ballam, Jr.
Executive Director: Mrs. Edward D. Churchill, Jr.
The following prestigious organizations comprise the initial roster of those cooperating in this first step of the council's program:
American Assembly American Chemical Society American College Of Physicians American Institute Of Architects Aspen Institute's Program in International Affairs COSPAR: The Committee On Space Research Council On Foreign Relations Fund For Peace Girl Scouts 'International Congress-76' International Peace Academy Members Of congress for Peace though Law National Council of Community World Affairs Organization, Inc. Section of International Law, American Bar Association U.S. Council of the International Chamber of Commerce
Specialized and related agencies of the United Nations:
Food And Agriculture Organization Inter-Governmental Maritime Consultative Organization International Atomic Energy Agency International Bank for Reconstruction and Development 'World Bank' International Civil Aviation Organization International Court of Justice "World Court" International Development Association International Finance Corporation International Labor Organization International Monetary Fund International Telecommunications Union United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization United Nation's Children Fund Universal Postal Union World Health Organization World Meteorlogical Organization The Interdependence Assemblies, their concluding consultation, and Convocation will provide the initial 1976 program agenda for the Bicentennial era paralleling the thirteen years matching the period between 1776 and final adoption of the U.S. Constitution in 1789.
In the context of a Bicentennial Era program spanning thirteen years, the nation's primary and secondary schools call out for involvement.
The graduates of 1976 will find themselves in positions of decision-making authority before the program reaches its conclusion. And the path of knowledge for kindergarten children of the Bicentennial year will parallel the entire program.
It is timely, therefore, to reach as many students as possible at all grade levels in our primary and secondary schools to carry an awareness of Interdependence into America's third century. These very students will be called upon to make decisions based on the ideas set forth in the Declaration and the actions initiated by participating bodies.
The World Affairs Council of Philadelphia will expand its already well-established school program, and work to ensure that Declaration and its precepts will be included in the curricula and the texts of our schools.
Starting with the schools of our region as a base, the prospects for national involvement are realistic and are being actively pursued. The National Education Association, Overseas Development Council, and Foreign Policy Association are assisting in this effort.
by
Levin Sheridan (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 5 diaries, 174 comments)
on Friday, June 6, 2008 at 2:58:15 PM
