Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 5 (5 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   14 comments

Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

Are recessions just a transfer of money, are stock market crashes artificially created?

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 3 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H3 7/25/08

Become a Fan
  (8 fans)
- Advertisement -

I took three classes in economics when I was in college. I realized then that it was just like mathematics: if you can easily learn everything by heart, you can get a perfect score of 100%. Yes, I excelled at economics, and yet, I was the only one who stated out loud that none of it made any sense, that I could not understand how it could all work. I think I was the only one still based in a world of reality and logic.

"How is capitalism to work," I asked my teacher; "Why is there a recession every 10 years or so, and a big crash at least every century? What causes them?"

I never found a satisfying answer. And today, I wonder, are recessions just a transfer of money from many poor and rich alike to the billionaires controlling the markets? Are these recessions and stock market crashes artificially created? Dear me, what a thought! This thought could annihilate the world as we know it.

That would explain a lot; finally economics could make sense. None of the identified factors affecting the economy truly affect it, and all those elaborate equations and diagrams to explain how markets evolve, are false and explain nothing.

Those courses I took are way in the past, and today I know next to nothing about money matters. Perhaps it is good that a layman should question what might be really going on, since, can we really trust economists?

Most people in my college class were puzzled indeed about what the world of economics was all about, and never questioned anything. Forecasting the markets is like predicting the weather: they often get it wrong. They get it wrong more often than usual, as if suddenly statistics and probabilities were not operating as they should be in those markets. They don't. It seems all random, but is it really random?

It is as if, somehow, pretty much everything is controlled at a distance, by governments first, then by powerful financial institutions, then by very powerful corporations and then by very rich men. Who could predict what any of them will do next, how powerful they truly are and how badly it will affect the markets? No one can reliably forecast anything, I thought, especially when a small war between two unknown countries somewhere can affect the markets so much. Who can predict wars? The ones planning and ordering wars, of course.

Not so long ago, it was prohibitively costly to send a shuttle into space; Nasa could not spend two billion dollars just like that on a whim. This was how I actually understood what was really expensive and what was not. If you spent a billion dollars on anything, I thought, you are mad.

- Advertisement -

Twenty years later we are spending 100 billion dollars on a space station, we are spending 500 billion dollars and counting on a war in Iraq, as if none of it mattered. Is it really worth it?

I understand about inflation and other financial mechanisms, and that a billion today is worth much less than a billion a few decades ago. However, I will not believe that spending a billion today is like spending a million less than 20 years ago. Something is wrong here, really wrong. I am not a fool.

Our salaries have not multiplied by any such factor in the last 20 years. Quite the contrary: the standard of living keeps getting lower and we are getting poorer.

Where once a man alone could support his entire family, now both the husband and wife are working like crazy and can barely make the ends meet.

Moreover, they are being completely alienated at work under such pressures of today's corporate structure designed to send us all into deep depression, if not driving us to suicide. No one can think anymore, that much is certain.

- Advertisement -

A quick calculation of what we are spending right now on just about everything, will show you that we are certainly spending at least two if not three trillion dollars we don't have! How is this possible? How can capitalism still work under those conditions?

Is this just adding to a huge debt somewhere, kept hidden as much as they can, and one day America will declare bankruptcy, like, next week? Is this what this big recession coming is all about? The one no one wishes to make quite official yet, when economists have known for a quite a while that we are already there, and the worst is still to come?

In that case, you can see that I may feel justified in questioning if recessions are not actually artificially created, and if they don't profit someone. Trillions of borrowed money and unknown amounts of printed currency going up in smoke.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

Roland Michel Tremblay is an author. More information here:

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -
Google Content Matches:

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Expansion Theory - Our Best Candidate for a Final Theory of Everything?

Is money the root to all evil?

Breakthrough in Faster-Than-Light Travel and Communication, and the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (SETI)

Strauss-Kahn's plot thickens with the identical charges of Mahmoud Abdel-Salam Omar

Gravity Breakthrough: Springing into a Gravitational Revolution

Could unbiased election opinion polls prove electoral fraud?


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
11 people are discussing this page, with 14 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

And a subject that needs to be talked about more o... by Steve Windisch (jibbguy) on Saturday, Jul 26, 2008 at 2:02:23 AM
This is a good article. You are young and your... by Bob Gormley on Saturday, Jul 26, 2008 at 8:16:33 AM
Yes.The whole existence of finance is a fake, neve... by amazin on Saturday, Jul 26, 2008 at 8:57:23 AM
- you are on the right track - it's all a big scam... by siamdave on Saturday, Jul 26, 2008 at 9:23:00 AM
I wonder if it is a transfer of funds though. ... by John Hanks on Saturday, Jul 26, 2008 at 10:36:30 AM
Have we ever taken the time to notice that ALL gov... by im4unity on Saturday, Jul 26, 2008 at 1:20:30 PM
The stock market needs small investors much like h... by Matthew Peters on Saturday, Jul 26, 2008 at 7:11:38 PM
The World is ruled by those at the top of the hier... by Ty on Saturday, Jul 26, 2008 at 9:22:51 PM
Well, there are elemental fundamentals.First, I su... by meremark on Sunday, Jul 27, 2008 at 12:09:44 AM
The 'oil pigs' (CIA) para-militating to d... by meremark on Sunday, Jul 27, 2008 at 1:08:23 AM
Thank you everyone for the intelligent comments an... by Roland Michel Tremblay on Sunday, Jul 27, 2008 at 8:01:20 AM
Roland, I started a reply to this message that dis... by Kitty Antonik Wakfer on Thursday, Jul 31, 2008 at 6:20:59 PM
This is my first rating and I want to see if my ID... by Kitty Antonik Wakfer on Thursday, Jul 31, 2008 at 6:31:29 PM
Kitty, I think I am too drunk tonight to unders... by Roland Michel Tremblay on Thursday, Jul 31, 2008 at 8:22:07 PM