Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...)
Add to My Group(s)

Well Said 3   Must Read 1   News 1   View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (12 comments)

Are Republicans Going the Way of the Whig Party?

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend
Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (12 fans)   -- Page 1 of 1 page(s)

opednews.com

The Republicans began as a third party rooted into anti-slavery that ran its first presidential candidate in 1856 with General John C. Fremont of California.

The election of James Buchanan and a resultant do-nothing posture in the wake of national calamity, resulting in America’s most costly conflict in human terms - the Civil War - brought the fledgling Republican Party a golden opportunity to gain power in 1860.

A little known former  congressman and lawyer from Springfield, Illinois, named Abraham Lincoln gained national stature by coming within an eyelash of defeating one of the nation’s powerful and best known senators, Stephen A. Douglas.  The historic series of debates between the two candidates held throughout Illinois established the platform on which Lincoln’s presidential candidacy would hinge.

In order for the Republicans to move into a spot to challenge the nation’s oldest party, the Democrats, it was exceedingly helpful to benefit from the atrophy of the Whig Party. 

In analyzing the factors in play from the first quarter of the nineteenth century to the Civil War period there are some notable similarities between the extinct Whigs and the party that catapulted to the presidency following their demise.

The Whigs were a natural outgrowth of the Federalist Party.  John Adams was president during the bleak period of the Alien and Sedition Acts.  His son John Quincy Adams became a Whig president supporting a national bank held by an entrenched monopoly.

What was the name of the second father and son executive combination?  The name was Bush. 

Another striking similarity also exists between the Adamses and Bushes. 

In the 1824 election populist Democrat Andrew Jackson of Tennessee took deadly aim on the national bank that the Whigs supported and ran a campaign that saw him win the popular vote while being deprived of the presidency through a pattern of irregularities that he denounced as fraud, campaigning with vigor for a 1828 rematch with incumbent Adams.

How did George W. Bush gain the presidency in 2000?  After obtaining it on the basis of the single vote majority in the Supreme Court that stopped a recount that post-election analysis revealed would have given Vice President Al Gore the presidency, a rapacious corporate interest administration took office, reminiscent of the shadow Federalist Whigs.

Similarities become particularly intriguing in view of the way that the Whigs bowed out, not with a whimper but a loud bang. 

Former Whig President Millard Fillmore, a protégé of the powerful and corrupt Boss Tweed New York political organization, succeeded to the presidency after Zachary Taylor died after 116 days in office.

The last remnants of the Whigs formed the Anti-immigrant, anti-Semitic, anti-Catholic Know-Nothings  in the 1856 election with the same Millard Fillmore as standard bearer, representing both parties.  

What have the current Republicans been up to lately with Supreme Court nominee District Court of Appeals Judge Sonia Sotomayor? 

Was it not Rush Limbaugh, the self-designated titular head of the current Republican Party, who labeled Judge Sotomayor a “racist” and “bigot”?

Is this the same talk show host of such “sensitivity” that he once told an African American caller to “stick a bone in your nose” and labeled feminists “Femi-Nazis”?    
 

 

Began in the journalism field in hometown of Los Angeles. Started as Sports Editor and Movie Writer at Inglewood Daily News chain after working in sportswriting of high school events at the Los Angeles Examiner.

Received a bachelor's in (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
12 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Bill. by GL Rowsey on Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 11:22:02 AM
Old Hatreds Die Hard by Jason Paz on Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 11:30:36 AM
The Calamity was National by Bill Hare on Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 12:22:26 PM
Re Jason's Comment by Bill Hare on Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 12:28:03 PM
Very similar to today. by Gallaher on Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 2:18:36 PM
About the same time the country broke up by Gallaher on Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 2:05:47 PM
Whigs making a comeback by Jim Finley on Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 3:31:39 PM
An Interesting Point by Bill Hare on Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 6:03:21 PM
What is the difference? by Michael Lee on Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 10:04:57 PM
American Whigs by Robert Winn on Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 11:34:39 PM
Independents as a force by Bill Hare on Monday, Jun 1, 2009 at 12:35:11 AM
Also, at that time in a Gallup Poll by Bill Hare on Monday, Jun 1, 2009 at 3:22:59 AM