Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter 1 Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 4 (5 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   20 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

An Anti-War Candidate Announces for President

      (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 1   Well Said 1   Supported 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H2 4/25/11

Author 18468
Become a Fan
  (4 fans)
- Advertisement -

Last week, former New Mexico governor Gary Johnson announced his candidacy for President of the United States.

This was a historic event, because 1) Gary Johnson wants to end the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq and 2) Gary Johnson is a Republican. He also wants to slash the military budget.

Gary Johnson is also opposed to the "war on drugs," which he has called "an expensive bust". Indeed, as The Hill noted:

Last year, he teamed up with singer Melissa Etheridge and actor Danny Glover for a Hollywood rally in favor of Proposition 19 -- an initiative that would have legalized marijuana in California.

This suggests that Gary Johnson can play well with others around issues of common concern.

It is tremendously important that there be at least one Republican candidate for President who is against the war in Afghanistan.

Polls show that Republican voters have turned against the war. But the majority of Republican voters who want US troops out of Afghanistan are so far almost totally unrepresented by Republican officials in Washington. Gary Johnson's campaign could break through the national Republican wall, because as a candidate for president, Gary Johnson will be able to get into the media, and the national Republican party leadership - "the party's ruling class," as The Hill put it - won't be able to silence him. Even if he doesn't get a dime from Lockheed or Raytheon, they won't be able to keep him off the stage in the early Republican debates, and that will change the discussion.

A Washington Post/ABC News poll in March found that 56% of Republicans think the United States should "withdraw a substantial number of U.S. combat forces from Afghanistan this summer." That is, the majority of Republican voters are ahead of the Obama Administration, which hasn't yet committed to a substantial withdrawal this summer.

But the high-water mark in the House so far for Republican support on any initiative against the indefinite continuation of the Afghanistan war is nine votes. That's about 5% of the Republicans in the House. 5% versus 56% - that's a pretty big gap. The enforcement of the will of the Republican Party's "ruling class" against the will of the majority of Republican voters is a key pillar sustaining the war.

- Advertisement -

This pillar of the war must be attacked. The candidacy of Gary Johnson is a weapon for doing so.

Of course, Gary Johnson's candidacy faces obstacles. He is not a billionaire. He is not backed by the party establishment - no candidate against the war will be. He will not be backed by the establishment media.

On the other hand, Gary Johnson's candidacy has a potential X weapon: Americans who typically don't vote in Republican primaries and caucuses who want to end the war.

After all, we all want to support democracy in Cairo and Madison. Why not support democracy in the Republican Party on the question of the war?

Now, some may be thinking, what does this have to do with me? I am not a "Republican."

- Advertisement -

But whether you are a "Republican" or not, you have to live with the consequences of the fact that the national Republican Party is not representing the majority of Republican voters who want to see US troops come out of Afghanistan, because this is a key buttress of the continuation of the war.

Corporations back Republicans and Democrats, as it suits their perceived interests. So do labor unions, environmentalists, women's groups, and gay rights groups. Why should peace advocates be any different? What one does in November in one thing; what one does in the primary season is another. If there is no Democratic primary for President, if there is no anti-war primary for Congress where you live, why waste your anti-war vote in an uncontested primary? Many states have open primaries: any voter can vote in any primary. In other states, you have to register with a given party in order to participate in that party's primary. New Hampshire - a critical, early state, where the Eugene McCarthy campaign showed the Lyndon Johnson Administration the depth of anti-war sentiment - is in-between: if you register as an "undeclared" voter, you can vote in any primary.

But even if you live in a state with a "closed primary" - check with local authorities for rules and deadlines - political parties in America are squishy things. Who's to say you're not a "Republican"? You are if you say you are. In the future, you can say something else.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

http://www.justforeignpolicy.org

Robert Naiman is Senior Policy Analyst at Just Foreign Policy. Naiman has worked as a policy analyst and researcher at the Center for Economic and Policy Research and Public Citizen's Global Trade Watch. He has masters degrees in economics and (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -
Google Content Matches:

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Does AIPAC want war?

An Anti-War Candidate Announces for President

Kucinich to Introduce Gaza Ceasefire Resolution - Who Will Co-sponsor?

Reset: Stephen Kinzer's Vision of a New U.S. Relationship with Turkey and Iran

Amnesty vs. AIPAC: Senate to Consider AIPAC Resolution Endorsing War in Gaza

The New York Times misleading public on Iran

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
14 people are discussing this page, with 20 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

I'm really hoping that a large number of democrats... by John Hoover on Monday, Apr 25, 2011 at 11:23:28 AM
Sad, but true. And, I don't know how many other s... by Jill Herendeen on Monday, Apr 25, 2011 at 8:25:36 PM
If the Democrats are such a firmly pro-war party t... by Samson on Monday, Apr 25, 2011 at 12:50:57 PM
He might be republican by brand, but everything I ... by h4x354x0r on Monday, Apr 25, 2011 at 1:02:38 PM
Primary Elections are a waste of time. We all know... by Ty on Monday, Apr 25, 2011 at 2:50:37 PM
or a royal serpent...hmmm.:-)... by Kevin Cody on Tuesday, Apr 26, 2011 at 10:59:12 PM
please support him in the primaries and the genera... by William Waugh on Monday, Apr 25, 2011 at 3:00:54 PM
be paid for w/ tax credits (as if we all had nice ... by Jill Herendeen on Monday, Apr 25, 2011 at 8:32:21 PM
Ron Paul opposes abortion as a matter of personal ... by June Genis on Tuesday, Apr 26, 2011 at 9:33:01 AM
Thanks.... by William Waugh on Tuesday, Apr 26, 2011 at 11:09:43 AM
However, the candidates in my opinion are ALL repu... by Kevin Cody on Tuesday, Apr 26, 2011 at 11:03:24 PM
Maybe to younger readers, "communist" has become a... by David McCorquodale on Wednesday, Apr 27, 2011 at 7:23:44 AM
Absolutely!!!!!!!... by Ronnie Moehrke on Monday, Apr 25, 2011 at 3:59:02 PM
I have never voted Republican in my life but would... by Dr Stuart Jeanne Bramhall on Monday, Apr 25, 2011 at 8:42:57 PM
Those who vote on the basis of a single issue usua... by Bruce Morgan on Monday, Apr 25, 2011 at 9:07:36 PM
So the U.S. should continue along the path of a pe... by David McCorquodale on Tuesday, Apr 26, 2011 at 10:28:01 AM
As in my own statement here, the Republicans have ... by Greg Campbell on Tuesday, Apr 26, 2011 at 12:14:29 PM
It presumes your vote could actually do something ... by conrad elledge on Tuesday, Apr 26, 2011 at 11:02:37 AM
While I applaud Gary Johnson's stance on the wars,... by Greg Campbell on Tuesday, Apr 26, 2011 at 12:06:09 PM
Well, Greg, I'm glad you give a nod to the Green P... by David McCorquodale on Tuesday, Apr 26, 2011 at 2:27:18 PM