Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 17 (17 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Article Stats   1 comment

Life Arts

Americans Should Study ARISTOTLE'S NICOMACHEAN ETHICS (Book Review)

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 3 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 3   Well Said 2   Valuable 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

Become a Fan
  (18 fans)

Duluth, Minnesota (OpEdNews) July 5, 2011: Each Fourth of July, we Americans remember and celebrate the Declaration of Independence, the rightly famous document that set in motion of rightly famous American experiment in democratic governance through democratically elected representatives.

But we may not be so keen of remembering that Thomas Jefferson, who is customarily credited with being the primary author of the Declaration of Independence, also famously spoke of the rise of a natural aristocracy. So we should remember that the American Revolution is best understood as a revolution against hereditary aristocracy, not in principle against aristocracy in all forms and not against the spirit and principle of aristocracy.

In the spirit of one-upmanship, however, President John F. Kennedy went far beyond Thomas Jefferson's imagined natural aristocracy when he (President Kennedy) urged his fellow Americans not to ask what their country can do for them, but what they can do for their country. When I was a junior in high school, I published my first op-ed editorial about this line in President Kennedy's inaugural address in 1961. So the present essay is my second op-ed editorial about Kennedy's inaugural address.

As Garry Wills has pointed out, President Kennedy was in effect urging American citizens to be aristocrats, the people who are duty bound to ask what they can do for their country. If I were to defend Kennedy's call on all American citizens to be aristocrats, I would argue that American citizenship as such confers a benefits package on American citizens and that people who accept the benefits package are by virtue of accepting the benefits thereby duty bound to act as aristocrats with respect to their fellow American citizens. But if you do not want to be duty bound to act as an aristocrat toward your fellow American citizens, then you should not accept the benefits package and should instead leave the country and go somewhere else. However, if you do accept the benefits package of being an American citizen, then you should act as an aristocrat toward your fellow American citizens, even when many of them seem to be up to no good, as many Republicans today seem to me to be.

When I speak of the benefits package of American citizenship and the duties that should go with it, I am deliberately echoing an important passage in the Homeric epic the ILIAD, Sarpedon's speech to Glaucon in book 12, lines 310-328. In his big book THE GREEK CONCEPT OF JUSTICE: FROM ITS SHADOW IN HOMER TO ITS SUBSTANCE IN PLATO (Harvard University Press, 1978), the classicist Eric A. Havelock (1903-1988) renders Sarpedon's speech as follows:

Glaucus, why have we two been honored most

With seating and meats and cups filled full

In Lycia, and all look at [us] as on gods,

And we have and hold a section of the banks of Xanthus

Fair with vineyard and plowland for growing grain.

Therefore, now it is necessary, in the front ranks of Lycians being set,

To stand ground and in burning battle to engage,

So that a man may speak this word, even one of the Lycians well armed:

"Indeed, not unrenowned through Lycia do they rule lordly

even the "kings' [basileis] we have, and they eat fat sheep

and selected honeyed wine; yes, the force (of them)

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3


Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people:

Click here to see the most recent messages sent to congressional reps and local newspapers

Thomas James Farrell is professor emeritus of writing studies at the University of Minnesota Duluth (UMD). He started teaching at UMD in Fall 1987, and he retired from UMD at the end of May 2009. He was born in 1944. He holds three degrees from Saint Louis University (SLU): B.A. in English, 1966; M.A.(T) in English 1968; higher education, 1974. On May 16, 1969, the editors of the SLU student newspaper named him Man of the Year, an honor customarily conferred on an administrator or a faculty member, not on a graduate student -- nor on a woman up to that time. He is the proud author of the book (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Who Was Walter Ong, and Why Is His Thought Important Today?

Was the Indian Jesuit Anthony de Mello Murdered in the U.S. 25 Years Ago? (BOOK REVIEW)

More Americans Should Live Heroic Lives of Virtue (Review Essay)

Martha Nussbaum on Why Democracy Needs the Humanities (Book Review)

Hillary Clinton Urges Us to Stand Up to Extremists in the U.S.

Matthew Fox's Critique of the Roman Catholic Church


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
1 people are discussing this page, with 1 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

If there is any justice, they need to go and read ... by Richard Girard on Tuesday, Jul 5, 2011 at 3:45:55 PM