Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 2 (2 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Article Stats   2 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Almond Growers and Handlers File Federal Lawsuit

By Lynn Buske  Posted by Will Fantle (about the submitter)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Contact Will Fantle, 715-839-7731   

Almond Growers and Handlers File Federal Lawsuit Seeking to End "Adulteration" of Raw Nuts 

Lawsuit Would Halt Treatment of Almonds with Toxic Fumigant or Steam Heat  

WASHINGTON, D.C. "" A group of fifteen American almond growers and wholesale nut handlers filed a lawsuit in the Washington, D.C. federal court on Tuesday, September 9 seeking to repeal a controversial USDA-mandated treatment program for California-grown raw almonds. 

 

The almond farmers and handlers contend that their businesses have been seriously damaged and their futures jeopardized by a requirement that raw almonds be treated with propylene oxide (a toxic fumigant recognized as a carcinogen by the EPA) or steam-heated before they can be sold to American consumers.  Foreign-grown almonds are exempt from the treatment scheme and are rapidly displacing raw domestic nuts in the marketplace.

 

Tens of thousands of angry consumers have contacted the USDA to protest the compulsory almond treatment since the agency's new regulation went into effect one year ago.  Some have expressed outrage that even though the nuts have been processed with a fumigant, or heat, they will still be labeled as "raw."

 

"The USDA's raw almond treatment mandate has been economically devastating to many family-scale and organic almond farmers in California,"- said Will Fantle, the research director for the Wisconsin-based Cornucopia Institute.  Cornucopia has been working with almond farmers and handlers to address the negative impacts of the USDA rule, including the loss of markets to foreign nuts. 

 

The USDA, in consultation with the Almond Board of California, invoked its treatment plan on September 1, 2007 alleging that it was a necessary food safety requirement.  Salmonella-tainted almonds twice this decade caused outbreaks of food related illnesses.  USDA investigators were never able to determine how salmonella bacteria somehow contaminated the raw almonds that caused the food illnesses but they were able to trace back one of the contaminations, in part, to the country's largest "factory farm," growing almonds and pistachios on over 9000 acres.

 

Instead of insisting that giant growers reduce risky practices, the USDA invoked a rule that requires the gassing or steam-heating of California raw almonds in a way that many consumers have found unacceptable. 

 "For those of us who are interested in eating fresh and wholesome food the USDA's plan, to protect the largest corporate agribusinesses against liability, amounts to the adulteration of our food supply," said Jill Richardson, a consumer activist and blogger at: www.lavidalocavore.org. 

"This ruling is a financial disaster and has closed a major customer group that we have built up over the years,"- said Dan Hyman, an almond grower and owner of D&S Ranches in Selma, CA.  His almond business relies on direct sales to consumers over the internet.  Hyman notes that his customers were never consulted by the USDA or the Almond Board before they were denied "a healthy whole natural raw food that they have eaten with confidence, enjoyment and benefit for decades."-

 

The lawsuit contends that the USDA exceeded its authority, which is narrowly limited to regulating quality concerns in almonds such as dirt, appearance and mold.  And even if the USDA sought to regulate bacterial contamination, the questionable expansion of its authority demanded a full evidentiary hearing and a producer referendum, to garner public input "" neither of which were undertaken by the USDA.

 

"The fact that almond growers were not permitted to fully participate in developing and approving this rule undermines its legitimacy,"- said Ryan Miltner, the attorney representing the almond growers.  "Rather than raising the level of income for farmers and providing handlers with orderly marketing conditions,"- added Miltner, "this particular regulation creates classes of economic winners and losers.  That type of discriminatory economic segregation is anathema to the intended purpose of the federal marketing order system. "

 Retailers of raw almonds have also been expressing their unhappiness, based on feedback from their customers, with the raw almond treatment rule. 

"We've been distributing almonds grown by family farmers in California for over 30 years and we regard them as the common heritage of the American people,"- said Dr. Jesse Schwartz, President of Living Tree Community Foods in Berkeley, CA.  "We can think of no reply more fitting than to affirm our faith that ultimately the wisdom and good sense of the American people will prevail in this lawsuit."- 

Barth Anderson, Research & Development Coordinator for The Wedge, a Minneapolis-based grocery cooperative, noted that their mission has always been to support family farmers.  "We weren't surprised when Wedge shoppers and members wrote nearly 500 individual letters expressing disapproval of the USDA's mandatory fumigation law for domestic almonds,"- Anderson said.  "Our members especially did not like the idea that fumigated almonds could be called "-raw.'"-  

Next Page  1  |  2

 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Editor

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Organic: Food Justice for the 99% (Response to Time Magazine/Dr. Oz denigration of organic consumers)

Not Good Enough for Pet Food: Chinese Organic Food Scrutinized at Congressional Hearing

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
2 people are discussing this page, with 2 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Great news and wonderful article thank you.  ... by Pamela Drew on Thursday, Sep 18, 2008 at 12:26:16 AM
Thank you, Pamela, for reading, supporting and pas... by Lynn Christianson on Thursday, Sep 18, 2008 at 12:38:36 PM