OpEdNews Op Eds

Aleppo, Yabrud, and the end of the war on Syria

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 5   Supported 3   News 2  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H1 2/15/14

Become a Fan
  (113 fans)
From http://www.flickr.com/photos/15731869@N05/7899880108/: Flag-Cross
The persecution of Syria may end soon
(image by michael_swan)

The Syrian Arab Army may be on the verge of another set of victories that go far beyond those gained in the summer of 2013 when the Syrian army and Hezbollah took the rebel held city of Qusayr.   The hotly contested battles rage in the major city of Aleppo and the much smaller mountain city of Yabrud. Major gains in either locale would be significant.  Victories in both would raise questions about the various rebel factions and their ability to continue contesting for control of the country

Syria's commercial center and largest city, Aleppo, was divided at the start of the Syrian conflict in July 2012.  The government lost control of half of the metropolitan area, key towns surrounding the city, and the international airport.

The situation has changed substantially since October 2013.   The Syrian army captured key towns in the countryside surrounding Aleppo, a critical army base, the international airport, and scores of smaller villages.   Government forces continue to take key locations in preparation for a final push to retake the city.  The tactics on both sides are brutal.  Syrian forces drop barrel bombs on Aleppo's rebel strongholds.  Rebels recently executed twenty-one Syrian government sympathizers.   

Yabrud is a small town in the mountainous region known as Qalamoun.  It borders Lebanon.  Control of this area can facilitate or stop the flow of arms to Syrian rebels.  The city is controlled by a local group of the now weakened Free Syrian Army.  By reports, the majority Sunni Moslems and minority Christians have worked together to survive the ravages of the conflict common throughout the troubled nation.  The city also serves as a home to a substantial number of "rebel gunmen."

As the Syrian army advances, the rebels fight with each other.  The Al Qaeda affiliated Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIS) routinely attacks other rebel forces and both ISIS and the Saudi sponsored Islamic Front attack the remnants of the Free Syrian Army (FSA) at will.

Is a victory by the Syrian government probable or even inevitable?

This question was unthinkable at the onset of hostilities between the Syrian government and rebel forces aided by outside funding and fighters?  Taking back all or a substantial part of the rebel held area in Aleppo would place Syria's two largest urban areas under government control (Damascus is the second largest city).  Controlling Yabrud would cut off supplies to rebel forces from one of the most productive routes.  Both areas are key to the control of northern Syria.   The remaining source of rebel weapons for the north, the Turkish government of embattled Prime Minister Recep Erdogan, is drying up as greater scrutiny is placed on the prime minister's aid to Islamist jihadist rebel groups.

Reports indicate that a government victory in Yabrud may spark a renewed offensive in the southern region of Syria near the city of Daraa, a hotbed of revolutionary activity near the border with Jordan.  United States troops are stationed near the border giving the Obama administration one last opportunity for a Gulf of Tonkin variation to justify U.S. military intervention.  While a possibility, the lucrative rewards of a rapprochement with Iran, Syria's steadfast ally, are too great to justify anything close to a commitment of ground forces or ongoing aerial attacks on Syria. That was tried and failed miserably.

Far from the cries of "Assad must go" heard from former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, the realpolitik of today's situation in Syria is grim for the United States, Turkey, the Gulf oil states, and other NATO supporters of regime change.  The sovereign state of Syria may remain that way.  The costs to the Syrian people are enormous.  Millions have fled, the nation is largely gutted due to the choice by rebels to focus their fight in urban areas, and over 100,000 died in the conflict to date.

The only outright winners in the tragic conflict are Syria's allies, Iran and the Soviet Union.  Iran's billions of dollars in aid to the government and Russia's diplomatic skills and weapons supply have allowed the Syrian government to fight the combined resources and personnel of the major NATO players (with the exception of Germany), Saudi Arabia, Qatar, plus jihadist volunteers from Moslem countries from Libya to Indonesia.

A final resolution of this conflict will allow broader global efforts to move forward, efforts that involve increased U.S. oil activity in Iran, and lobbying for Syrian reconstruction efforts by the original supporters of the carnage, the Western powers,


Creative Commons 3.0



The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; , Add Tags

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Worst President Ever - Barack H. Obama

Ukraine President Once Agent for U.S. State Department

It's official! You're on your own

Rigged Elections for Romney?

Real Unemployment at 23% - Dampening the Excitement

Humiliation And Death As A Tool Of National Policy


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
8 people are discussing this page, with 18 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

I agree Mr. Collins.  I am sitting here in Sy... by Lilly Martin on Saturday, Feb 15, 2014 at 4:59:37 AM
This way would be great, but be certain that the w... by jean labrek on Saturday, Feb 15, 2014 at 5:44:05 PM
Lilly, thank you for your important comments. ... by Michael Collins on Saturday, Feb 15, 2014 at 11:23:36 PM
Unfortunately, one false flag coupled with a push ... by Mark Adams JD/MBA on Saturday, Feb 15, 2014 at 12:33:50 PM
Yes MarkJust another example why the American publ... by Cliff Carson on Saturday, Feb 15, 2014 at 7:07:38 PM
It will have to be one heck of a false flag. ... by Michael Collins on Saturday, Feb 15, 2014 at 11:32:45 PM
This support for crimes may be your worst mistake.... by BFalcon on Sunday, Feb 16, 2014 at 12:00:12 AM
What support?  What crimes?  This artic... by Michael Collins on Sunday, Feb 16, 2014 at 12:54:57 AM
Unfortunately, the use of chemical weapons agains... by BFalcon on Sunday, Feb 16, 2014 at 1:59:33 AM
Please note that I did not comment here on your a... by BFalcon on Sunday, Feb 16, 2014 at 2:17:22 AM
Try reading the report.  Here is the conclusi... by Michael Collins on Sunday, Feb 16, 2014 at 10:28:58 PM
Yes, they say: "the US Government's Interpretati... by BFalcon on Sunday, Feb 16, 2014 at 11:40:39 PM
Hooray for Assad, long live his dynasty (however m... by BFalcon on Saturday, Feb 15, 2014 at 11:59:25 PM
Why the vilification against Assad ? From where I... by Eddy Schmid on Sunday, Feb 16, 2014 at 10:45:37 PM
You obviously know little about Syria and distort... by BFalcon on Monday, Feb 17, 2014 at 6:07:07 AM
I am the only one writing comments here who actual... by Lilly Martin on Monday, Feb 17, 2014 at 3:38:37 AM
Did the rebels use sarin gas in the attack that wa... by BFalcon on Monday, Feb 17, 2014 at 6:01:00 AM
Unlike here??? ... by Leland E.Wheeler on Monday, Feb 17, 2014 at 8:07:32 AM