![]() |
|
|
June 20, 2008 at 11:58:20
Afterwards They Descended Into a Political Orgy by Kevin Gosztola Page 1 of 1 page(s) |
|
|
The FISA debate should have been a showdown. Instead, it was a prime example of what politics has become: a combination of rhetoric sifted through a strainer that only lets out buzz words and talking points that support so-called "post-9/11" thinking and bipartisanship compromises that embraces bad ideas so long as some of the good ideas can be included in the compromise. As I watched the debate bounce around between Rep. Lamar Smith's blind patriots, Rep. Silvestre Reyes' friends, and Rep. John Conyers' defenders of liberty, I was in awe at the number of reacharounds, back scratches, and stroke jobs that were being given. There was no limit to the praise and thank yous given to those who had capitulated on this bill or chose to forfeit our nation's civil liberties because of this so-called Age of Terrorism. Even better, the compromise began to sound more and more like a marriage agreement. The two parties each cited how this was not the bill they wanted but each put a lot of work and effort into it. Each made it evident that this isn't what we would want to be debating and that there are better options but then they went back to justifying this bill and giving reacharounds, back scratches, and stroke jobs. The camraderie was sickening and grew more offputting as Rep. Bobby Scott rose to speak, and then Rep. Jerrold Nadler rose to speak, and then Rep. Rush Holt rose to speak, and then Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee, and then Rep. Barbara Lee, and Rep. Dennis Kucinich. Each one described how this compromise trampled the Fourth Amendment and granted immunity to telecoms.
If you didn't believe them, Rep. Mike Pence from Indiana came out and said it with pride and clarity:
...America's at war. We have to do all that we can to protect our nation from those who seek to harm this country, our communities, and our families. And after nearly a year of delays, we finally have a FISA bill that will institute a long term fix to our nation's foreign intelligence surveillance laws and provide the intelligence community with the tools it needs to protect this country. (Praises Republican leaders.) While this bill is tough on terrorism, it includes strong protections for civil liberties and Americans that have also been put in place by extensive measures of oversight and review in the Department of Justice and it protects those patriotic telecommunications companies who assisted the federal government in the wake of 9/11.
Speaker Nancy Pelosi ended the debate by giving a round of reacharounds, back scratches, and stroke jobs to all members of the House. She carefully outlined how this bill was better than what could have been put on the table but made it clear this is not what she would like to have to pass but something must be passed and they did work to compromise so let's pat ourselves on the back and be proud that we stood up for freedom and bipartisanship...
To those who were undeserving of praise, Pelosi made it clear that she did not come here today to tell anyone to vote for this but just to say why she would.
And she and others would be voting because they had put together a compromise that was hard work. No matter how bad it was, time had been spent and to not produce results would be unacceptable.
So, the House today will pass this bill for "the kids", Americans and America. Mommy Democrats and Daddy Republicans will not fight because it simply does not matter who's right---what matters is that something gets done.
The desire to get something done is why we “kids” were ignored as we voiced our displeasure with this compromise through phone calls, emails, and letters to representatives. Two hundred and ninety-three representatives ignored an array of people that cut across the political spectrum for their political gain.
After this hard work is completed, we can expect our Mommy Democrats and Daddy Republicans to embrace each other, caress and hold each other, kiss and touch each other, and descend into a political orgy that will last throughout the weekend and spill out into the political television shows of the weekend like Face the Nation, This Week, Late Edition, and FOX News Sunday.
Democrats and Republicans will hold hands and tell us how they continued to fund the war, reestablished FISA laws so intelligence gathering could have more oversight and be more effective, and how they think this show signs they will be able to come together on issues that have normally divided Democrats and Republicans.
We concerned Americans who fear for our Constitution will look on amazed at the pornographic edge American politics has taken on.
Whether we Americans have the strength to oppose this behavior between our two parties and the leaders within them who have begun to engage in these actions as a solution to partisan gridlock remains to be seen.
One thing's for sure: As we debate and discuss what to do, our civil liberties and our power to combat corporate control and corporate welfare is eroding at a vicious rate that at some point will be impossible to reverse.
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Contact Author |
Contact Editor |
View Authors' Articles |
|
|
|
|
| 4 comments |
|
A punch in the gut
to think that this FISA bill was even introduced, let alone debated and passed, boggles my mind..to think that Congress would not only not protect the Constitution, but deliberately eviscerate the Constitution...? I can't even wrap my mind around that betrayal...fight back...please go to http://www. actblue.com or just.... actblue.com by Susan Nelsen (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 287 comments) on Friday, Jun 20, 2008 at 1:35:55 PM
|
|
this quote holds true even to this day
"Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." Ben Franklin by Michael Chavers (53 articles, 0 quicklinks, 15 diaries, 198 comments [5 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Friday, Jun 20, 2008 at 3:46:28 PM
|
|
The part that worries me
Nice work. Good shots, all around. It's that "impossible to reverse" part at the end that worries me. What if you're right? Oh, yuck. by Ivan Hentschel (12 articles, 0 quicklinks, 10 diaries, 302 comments [4 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Friday, Jun 20, 2008 at 10:17:36 PM
|
|
Obama joins the orgy
http://rawstory.com/news/2008/Obama_defends_new_FISA_bill_as_0620.html “Given the grave threats that we face, our national security agencies must have the capability to gather intelligence and track down terrorists before they strike, while respecting the rule of law and the privacy and civil liberties of the American people. There is also little doubt that the Bush Administration, with the cooperation of major telecommunications companies, has abused that authority and undermined the Constitution by intercepting the communications of innocent Americans without their knowledge or the required court orders. “That is why last year I opposed the so-called Protect America Act, which expanded the surveillance powers of the government without sufficient independent oversight to protect the privacy and civil liberties of innocent Americans. I have also opposed the granting of retroactive immunity to those who were allegedly complicit in acts of illegal spying in the past. “After months of negotiation, the House today passed a compromise that, while far from perfect, is a marked improvement over last year's Protect America Act. “Under this compromise legislation, an important tool in the fight against terrorism will continue, but the President's illegal program of warrantless surveillance will be over. It restores FISA and existing criminal wiretap statutes as the exclusive means to conduct surveillance – making it clear that the President cannot circumvent the law and disregard the civil liberties of the American people. It also firmly re-establishes basic judicial oversight over all domestic surveillance in the future. It does, however, grant retroactive immunity, and I will work in the Senate to remove this provision so that we can seek full accountability for past offenses. But this compromise guarantees a thorough review by the Inspectors General of our national security agencies to determine what took place in the past, and ensures that there will be accountability going forward. By demanding oversight and accountability, a grassroots movement of Americans has helped yield a bill that is far better than the Protect America Act. “It is not all that I would want. But given the legitimate threats we face, providing effective intelligence collection tools with appropriate safeguards is too important to delay. So I support the compromise, but do so with a firm pledge that as President, I will carefully monitor the program, review the report by the Inspectors General, and work with the Congress to take any additional steps I deem necessary to protect the lives – and the liberty – of the American people.” by Kevin Gosztola (302 articles, 146 quicklinks, 81 diaries, 1082 comments [77 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Friday, Jun 20, 2008 at 10:22:40 PM
|
Want to post your own comment on this Article?
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tell a Friend:
|
Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews |