Tags for This Article:

Human Rights (760)  New York (651)  Civil Liberties (473)  Marriage Civil Unions (48)  LGBT (43)  Religious Freedom (14) 

Populum Tag Cloud
       Control Panel
Fine tune your search to access content
Articles
Diaries Products
Events All
All time
Last 6 mos
Last month
Last week
Last 24 hrs
From:
Month  Day   Year

To:
Month  Day   Year
Alphabet
Popularity
Count ON
Count OFF
This Level
Sub-levels

 

 

 

Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ;
Add to My Group
May 29, 2008 at 20:14:34

Headlined on 5/29/08:
A Golden Year: NY Nears Marriage Equality

by Rady Ananda

www.opednews.com

 

Tell A Friend

View Ratings | Rate It  

New York Governor David Patterson made a sweeping pronouncement, instructing state agencies to recognize same sex marriages from other states, in accord with New York law, following the ruling in Martinez vs. Monroe County on February 1st. 

Governor Patterson initially made the announcement in a 5-minute videocast to the Empire State Pride Agenda (ESPA) 2008 Spring Dinner, when he especially thanked Lisa Golden and Patricia Martinez for their efforts leading him to say:  

I’m directing our agency heads that we will recognize marriages conducted outside our state right here in New York State, and this will be a strong step toward marriage equality right here within this state. 

On February 1st, the appellate court ruled: 

It is ADJUDGED and DECLARED that plaintiff’s marriage to Lisa Ann Golden in the Province of Ontario, Canada is entitled to recognition in New York State.


NYTimes Patricia Martinez & Lisa Golden
 

Patterson explained on his official May 29th news conference video: 

We would extend to people who were married in other states, whether of opposite sex or of the same sex the same equal opportunities in New York as we have granted those marriages traditionally that have existed in other states by law, or in foreign jurisdictions by witness. 

Martinez requires NY to consider its impact on state agencies, to avoid discrimination and to be in compliance with the law.  Patterson provides this timeline: 

On May 14th, the day before the Supreme Court of California granted marriage equality in that state, in New York, 24 hours earlier, I directed … the counsels of the agencies of our government to bring back reports to all of us on June 30th demonstrating any possible conflicts such that we can be in compliance with the law. 

In his videocast to ESPA, Gov. Patterson specified that health care coverage for all is included in his directive. This will require all state agencies to review, and likely change, policies and regulations to recognize such marriages.   


New York Gov. David Patterson

Fortunately for NY, in February, ESPA released its compendium of rights and responsibilities accorded heterosexual couples in NY, as part of a joint project with the New York City Bar Association. The 108-page report, 1,324 Reasons for Marriage Equality in New York State, admits this is the minimum number of special rights and privileges that straight couples enjoy, which lawyers and researchers were able to document. 

In defending marriage equality, Gov. Patterson displays his depth of understanding when he says: 

But it’s more than that.  We also have to fight so that young people are free from the bullying that comes with some of the preferences or choices that they make.  

Yes. I have known too many men, and some women, who were brutally beaten for their sexuality.  And, of course, we cannot forget Matthew Sheppard or Brandon Teena, among the thousands who have died as a result of such hatred. 

Next, Gov. Patterson reveals complete comprehension of the LGBT issue when he continues: 

We also have to make sure that transgendered Americans are not in any way discriminated more than any other Americans. 

Lesbians, gays, and bisexuals suffer from transgender discrimination for the same reason transgendered folk do:  we behave in ways that homophobes believe are outside gender-specific roles, which are artificially constructed to maintain the dominant patriarchal paradigm.

Khadijah Farmer’s experience at a NYC deli exemplifies why the LGBT movement cannot separate the T from our cause.  And since I’ve been mistaken for a male countless times, without even trying, I have to defend T’s – I am a part of their tribe as much as they are a part of mine.  

With California’s recent decision on same sex marriage, and Washington D.C.’s addition of 39 more protections for LGBT’s, and now NY recognizing same sex marriages from other states, 2008 may be the “Golden” year when social justice advocacy finally stems the rising homophobic tide stoked by Bush-Rove’s 2004 election strategy. 

We have much to celebrate this summer during our annual Pride Festivals. Thank you, David Patterson, and especially, Lisa Golden and Patricia Martinez.  Congratulations on your personal, legal, and political victories that serve human rights everywhere.

 

In 2004, Rady Ananda joined the growing community of citizen journalists. Focused mainly on elections, her blogs also address religious, gender, sexual and racial equality, as well as environmental issues; and are sprinkled with book and film reviews on various topics. She spent most of her working life as a legal investigator for private lawyers, and five years as an editor. She currently serves as a senior editor at OpEdNews. All material offered here is the property of Rady Ananda, copyright 2006, 2007, 2008. Permission is granted to repost, with proper attribution including the original link. In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. Tell the truth anyway. Sign this petition: http://www.electiondefensealliance.org/ny_levers_petition

Contact Author
Contact Editor
View Other Articles by Author

 

Bookmark this page: (what's this?)

NETSCAPE      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
4 comments

Midwesterner, veteran of VietNam era naval service, I still feel an obligation to defend the Constitution against "all enemies, foreign and domestic."
John Sanchez Jr.Midwesterner, veteran of VietNam era naval service, I still feel an obligation to defend the Constitution against "all enemies, foreign and domestic."

People being guarateed their rights is a good thing;...

but I have to ask, why do the courts (California) and governor's mansions (New York) always raise the issue within six months of an important national election, (as did Massachusetts) thereby rallying the Christian Right?

by John Sanchez Jr. (5 articles, 0 quicklinks, 11 diaries, 1155 comments) on Friday, May 30, 2008 at 8:28:09 AM
 


Amanda is a managing editor at OpEdNews and has worked with Rob Kall on the site since 2004. A retired research ethnographer specializing in organization and technological innovation and strategic business development, she now resides in Georgia where she builds and restores wooden and fiberglass boats with her husband, Tom, a retired electrical engineer. Amanda grew up in the Commonwealth of Kentucky on the 9AA that runs along the Ohio in an area that gave the world Larry Flynt, the Clooneys, R...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Amanda LangAmanda is a managing editor at OpEdNews and has worked with Rob Kall on the site since 2004. A retired research ethnographer specializing in organization and technological innovation and strategic business development, she now resides in Georgia where she builds and restores wooden and fiberglass boats with her husband, Tom, a retired electrical engineer. Amanda grew up in the Commonwealth of Kentucky on the 9AA that runs along the Ohio in an area that gave the world Larry Flynt, the Clooneys, R...

to see more of bio, click on member name

What's happening with the "Hate Crime" Bill anyway?

Last year the House passed H.R. 1592: Local Law Enforcement Hate Crimes Prevention Act of 2007 and as you might recall, Bush threatened to veto it.

GovTrack.us provides this update as of May 2, 2008:  The bill now goes on to be voted on in the Senate. Keep in mind that debate may be taking place on a companion bill in the Senate, rather than on this particular bill.

The bill entered the Senate on May 7, 2007, was read twice by Harry Reid. 

My questions? 

1.  What has happened on this important legislation since 2007?

2.  Is there a companion bill to this legislation?

3.  Is it currently under Senate debate?

Anyone with any information on the 'hate crime' bill status,  please post as a 'reply.'

by Amanda Lang (22 articles, 13567 quicklinks, 431 diaries, 577 comments) on Friday, May 30, 2008 at 11:36:07 AM
 

 

4 comments

 

Tell A Friend

 


Copyright © OpEdNews, 2002-2008

Blog Ads

 

 

 

 

Most Popular Articles
in the Last 2 Days
(by Recommend Emails)

Representatives Were Threatened with "Martial Law" if Bailout Bill Did Not Pass by Patrick Henningsen

30 Lies Refuted about Ayers and Obama Posted by John Wilson

Those Who Call Obama A Muslim Posted by Rob Kall

Palin Debate Performance Deconstructed by Steven Leser

Albright, Clarke, 200 Diplomats Laud Obama's Willingness to Talk Directly to Adversaries Without Preconditions Posted by Stephen Fox

This is Your Nation on White Privilege Posted by Siv O'Neall

The End of American Hegemony by Paul Craig Roberts

All that's missing are the uniforms! Posted by W. Christopher Epler (Bill)

Meet The $700 Billion Bailout Czar by Rob Kall

The Real Cause of the Current Financial Crisis by Joe Reeser

Go To Top 50 Most Popular