![]() |
|
|
July 10, 2008 at 18:55:08
Promoted to Headline (H3) on 7/10/08: by Dr. Doug Rokke, Ph.D. (Posted by Sherwood Ross) Page 1 of 1 page(s) |
|
|
(1) "Military personnel "identify, segregate, isolate, secure, and label all RCE" (radiologically contaminated equipment).
1. medical care for all casualties,
2. thorough environmental remediation,
3. immediate cessation of retaliation against all of us who demand compliance with medical care and environmental remediation requirements,
4. and stop the already illegal the use (UN finding) of depleted uranium munitions.
References- these references are copies the actual regulations and orders and other pertinent official documents:
http://www.traprockpeace.org/twomemos.html
http://www.traprockpeace.org/rokke_du_3_ques.html
http://www.traprockpeace.org/du_dtic_wakayama_Aug2002.html
http://www.traprockpeace.org/karen_parker_du_illegality.pdf
http://www.access.gpo.gov/su_docs/aces/fr-cont.html
http://cryptome.org/dhs010306.txt
http://www.boston.com/news/local/articles/2008/05/15/razing_urged_for_waste_site/ http://www.tdn.com/articles/2008/04/29/area_news/doc4816651072f72767559743.txt>
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Contact Editor |
|
|
|
|
| 15 comments |
|
Sickening
I learned about DU around 2004 and have read about it extensively. It's horrifying. Do the Iraqis even know about the dangers of DU and that it will pollute their homeland ... causing horrible disease due to exposure ... forever? bush's WMD gift that keeps on giving. It seems to me this is far worse than Saddam. What's going on in Idaho? Didn't they just "win" a contract for a nuclear reactor that was rejected by Washington state because [if I remember correctly] there would be contaminated water released into streams? Glow in the dark spuds, anybody? I would like to know how many of our illustrious congressmen and women know about or understand the impact of DU. Would they have voted to continue this illegitimate war if they knew? Considering the fact that 70 of them haven't been privy to information regarding the FISA bill they just voted to continue ... I wouldn't be surprised to learn they are in the DARK about most critical issues. This is UNACCEPTABLE. Is Barack Obama informed on DU? I think he should be contacted immediately - to find out - and if he doesn't understand the impact, he should be illuminated on the subject. If, after they all KNOW, they continue to fund this war -- they should be prosecuted for their complicity in this crime. And maybe, if they are educated, they will finally rise up to the task of IMPEACHMENT. Thanks for posting this article. It will take some time to read all the accompanying links. I think I will print the whole shebang and send copies to both of my useless senators here in GA. At least they will have been presented with the information. by AllDems08 (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 90 comments) on Friday, Jul 11, 2008 at 1:40:11 AM
|
|
Reply: Thanks for sending this article around!
Thanks for sending this article around! You ask a lot of good questions, and the people responsible for the radioactive ammunition horror need to be called to account to answer for. -- Sherwood Ross P.S. The stuff is "radioactive ammunition" and should be called that, not "depleted uranium." by Sherwood Ross (222 articles, 0 quicklinks, 1 diaries, 155 comments [4 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Friday, Jul 11, 2008 at 2:48:46 AM
|
|
Reply: A Question
Are you asking me [us] to start using the term "radioactive ammunition" rather than DU when referring to any use of depleted uranium? Like I try to remind people it's not "vote fraud" it's "election fraud." ?? TIA for clarification. by AllDems08 (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 90 comments) on Friday, Jul 11, 2008 at 5:16:36 PM
|
|
Reply: Oops, hit publish button by mistake
I do wish we could edit our comments after publishing ... :-( You did make it clear we should call depleted uranium "radioactive ammunition," but since everyone knows it as "DU," maybe use both terms together? Radioactive Ammunition, otherwise known as DU ... something like that? by AllDems08 (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 90 comments) on Friday, Jul 11, 2008 at 5:35:23 PM
|
|
Do Senators have time to read?
and U.S. Army, U.S. Department of Energy, U.S. Department of Defense, and British Ministry of Defence officials deny that there are any adverse health and environmental effects as a consequence of the manufacture, testing, and/or use of uranium munitions.... The emirate of Kuwait appears to know more about DU than all of the above mentioned Militarys. Let me read that once more, a bit slower.... "Recently the emirate of Kuwait required the United States Department of Defense to remove the contamination." If DU is harmless, why did DoD give in and remove the sand without further ado? If they are convinced DU is harmless, why were they not able to convince the emirat? Sherwood, thank you for re-posting this here. by Tony Forest (7 articles, 18 quicklinks, 166 diaries, 1429 comments [5 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Friday, Jul 11, 2008 at 2:46:31 AM
|
|
Should Have
Should have dumped the DU at Bush's ranch. If it's harmless as they say he should have no problem with it, right? by Bob Gormley (1 articles, 0 quicklinks, 3 diaries, 1094 comments [65 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Friday, Jul 11, 2008 at 10:58:08 AM
|
|
Reply: Very funny but impeachment is preferable to revenge
Revenge achieves nothing; justice achieves everything. -- Sherwood by Sherwood Ross (222 articles, 0 quicklinks, 1 diaries, 155 comments [4 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Friday, Jul 11, 2008 at 11:02:03 AM
|
|
Reply: Somehow
Somehow that seems like justice. Although he would be getting away easy at that . by Bob Gormley (1 articles, 0 quicklinks, 3 diaries, 1094 comments [65 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Friday, Jul 11, 2008 at 5:59:17 PM
|
|
BLESS YOU SAINT DOUG!!!
BREAKING NEWS FROM THE LAND OF ALOHA: (good news and bad) Mahalo OPEDNews for this forum! SEND MONEY, YOU GUYS!!! Rob needs your help to continue to bring us REAL news! by Shannon Rudolph (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 14 comments) on Friday, Jul 11, 2008 at 3:04:56 PM
|
|
JUST KEEP ON DIGGING YOUR OWN GRAVES
We used DU in 91 in Iraq, then in Kosovo in 98, now in Afghanistan and Iraq in 2003 to the present. Enough said. How many of you geniuses viewed the Leuren Moret videos I sent in my other comments? What did you learn from them? Is anybody out there on planet Earth who is intelligent. If you are ,I would like to make contact because I feel lonely here being ignored by the ubermensch of liberalism and free will. by Wolfie (9 articles, 0 quicklinks, 33 diaries, 1208 comments) on Friday, Jul 11, 2008 at 4:47:13 PM
|
|
DU and Congress
I am wondering if all the members of Congress and members of the Bush Administration, including GW himself would equal the weight that was shipped, oh what the hell, throw them into it and bury them along side with the DU. by Andrew Abraham (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 6 comments) on Friday, Jul 11, 2008 at 5:25:59 PM
|
|
re: Bless you saint Doug
by Alan Williams (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 858 comments) on Friday, Jul 11, 2008 at 5:41:09 PM
|
|
Well
We all know DU is a great depopulation tool of the neo-malthusian eugenics movement. Looks they are getting a head start on bringing it home to America. Wonder what Obama has to say. Boise is in his state after all. by pft (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 601 comments [7 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Friday, Jul 11, 2008 at 8:16:36 PM
|
|
Reply: DU
When did they move Boise, Idaho to Illinois? by Andrew Abraham (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 6 comments) on Saturday, Jul 12, 2008 at 2:02:25 AM
|
|
I doubt it.
PFT, why would they want to bring radioactive material to Idaho? Is this all a plot to bake potatoes? S.R. by Sherwood Ross (222 articles, 0 quicklinks, 1 diaries, 155 comments [4 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Friday, Jul 11, 2008 at 8:46:37 PM
|
Want to post your own comment on this Article?
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tell a Friend:
|
Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews |