![]() |
|
|
October 6, 2008 at 08:09:58
Promoted to Headline (H3) on 10/6/08: by John K. Wilson (Posted by John Wilson) Page 1 of 1 page(s) |
|
|
The gutter politics of the McCain campaign is reaching down once again to denounce Obama for his distant past links to Bill Ayers in an unprecedented guilt-by-association attack for a presidential campaign. CNN" target="_blank">click here Political Ticker evaluated Palin's "palling"- charges and concluded, "False. There is no indication that Ayers and Obama are now palling around, or that they have had an ongoing relationship in the past three years. Also, there is nothing to suggest that Ayers is now involved in terrorist activity or that other Obama associates are....CNN's review of project records found nothing to suggest anything inappropriate in the volunteer projects in which the two men were involved."
Sarah Palin declared," target="_blank">click here "This is someone who sees America as imperfect enough to pal around with terrorists who targeted their own country."-
The New" target="_blank">click here York Times article, which prompted Palin's remarks, actually concluded that "the two men do not appear to have been close. Nor has Mr. Obama ever expressed sympathy for the radical views and actions of Mr. Ayers."
Back in February, the Washington Post reported in a fact check, But the Obama-Ayers link is a tenuous one.(Washington" target="_blank">click here
As part of a larger project where I'm compiling a long list of all the lies and smears spread about Obama, here are 30 lies about Ayers and Obama.
Tonight's Hannity's America featured more of these absurd lies about Obama and Ayers in Hannity's infomercial for idiocy, including an amazing interview with legendary anti-Semitic crackpot Andy Martin:
LIE: "My view is that the community organizer was really a sham event. Bill Ayers was testing him."-(Andy Martin, Hannity's America, October 5, 2008, "Obama and His Friends: History of Radicalism"-)
TRUTH: Bill Ayers had nothing to do with Obama's community organizing job. It's pure lunacy to imagine that Ayers was "testing"- Obama.
LIE: Obama's "community organizing is a grand scheme perpetuated by none other than William Ayers."-(Sean Hannity, Hannity's America, October 5, 2008, "Obama and His Friends: History of Radicalism"-)
TRUTH: Obama's community organizing was not a vast conspiracy for revolution devised by Bill Ayers.
LIE: "They live half a mile from William Ayers, the unrepentant terrorist"- and "Just a half a mile from those homes is Louis Farrakhan."-(Hannity's America, October 5, 2008, "Obama and His Friends: History of Radicalism"-)
TRUTH: It's true, of course, that Obama lives in this same neighborhood, as do tens of thousands of other people who presumably are also guilty by geographical association. The logic of this argument would be, if you live half a mile from a sex offender, then you agree with child molesters.
LIE: Obama and Ayers "appeared together at various public engagements...it would seem that they are more than just a little bit friendly."-(Sean Hannity, Hannity's America, October 5, 2008, "Obama and His Friends: History of Radicalism"-)
TRUTH: Appearing on a speaking panel is not a sign of friendship. There is no evidence that Obama had any role in ever inviting Ayers to speak.
LIE: In 1995, Ayers and Dohrn "hosted a political coming out party for a young Barack Obama."-(Sean Hannity, Hannity's America, October 5, 2008, "Obama and His Friends: History of Radicalism"-)
TRUTH: This was an event for Alice Palmer, not a "coming-out party"- for Obama. Obama was invited by Palmer to the event.
But long before tonight's Hannity, the right-wing has been spreading a series of lies about Obama and Ayers.
LIE: "Bill Ayers is an unrepentant terrorist."-
TRUTH: Bill Ayers is not, and apparently never was, a terrorist. The conventional definition of a terrorist is someone who tries to kill innocent people for political purposes. As Factcheck.org noted, In fact, nobody died as a result of bombings in which Ayers said he participated as part of the Weather Underground. (Factcheck.org,
LIE: "I'm sure he's very patriotic, but his relationship with Mr. Ayers is open to question....Because, if you're going to associate and have as a friend and serve on a board and have a guy kick off your campaign that says he's unrepentant, that he wished he'd bombed more. And then, the worst thing of all, that I think really indicates Senator Obama's attitude, is he had the incredible statement that he compared Mr. Ayers, an unrepentant terrorist -- an unrepentant terrorist, with Senator Tom Coburn. Senator Coburn, a physician who goes to Oklahoma on the weekends and brings babies into life.' (John McCain, April 20, 2008, ABC's This Week with George Stephanopoulos:)
TRUTH: Obama was not friends with Ayers. Ayers did not kick off Obama's campaign. And Obama was not comparing Ayers' actions with Coburn. Obama was pointing out that he works with people even when he disagrees with them.
LIE: "Obama's oldest friend in politics is a murderer and unrepentant terrorist. Why are they friends?"(ExposeObama.com email, Sept. 7, 2008)
TRUTH: Ayers isn't Obama's oldest friend in politics.
LIE: Ayers was "Obama's boss."(Jerome Corsi, p. 147)
TRUTH: The chair of a foundation board is not the boss of the members.
LIE: Jerome Corsi claimed Alice "Palmer would never have introduced Obama to the Hyde Park political community at the Ayres-Dohrn home unless she saw an affinity between Ayers and Dohrn's radical leftist history, her own history of far-leftist politics, and the politics of Barack Obama."(p. 137)
TRUTH: The event wasn't held primarily for Obama. It was Palmer's own announcement that she would run for Congress. Obama was there as Palmer's endorsed successor for her Senate seat, but there's no evidence that he had any role in deciding to hold it at Ayers' home.
LIE: Jerome Corsi claims about Obama: "either he did not know Ayers and Dohrn are still radical leftists""in which case he is implausibly naive""or Obama did know, which would confirm he joined with Ayers and Dohrn because Obama too continues to believe, albeit silently and secretly, in the Far Left's radical agenda."(p. 140)
TRUTH: Obama probably knew Ayers was a leftist, but he didn't care. Obama believes in the notion of a free society, where you work with people you disagree with.
LIE: "Even today, Ayers appears to hold the same radical political beliefs he did in the Weather Underground, and Obama had to know that was also the case when he first met Ayers in 1995."(Jerome Corsi, p. 147)
TRUTH: Corsi doesn't explain how Obama "had to know" Ayers' views on politics when he first met him. Telepathy? Mind-reading?
LIE: David Freddoso calls Obama's distant connection with Bill Ayers "a remarkable relationship for a presidential nominee to have."(p. 122)
TRUTH: It reality, it's not remarkable at all. The notion that people should resign from foundations and refuse to speak in public in order to avoid any connection to a former radical never convicted of a crime is absurd.
LIE: "The major media simply have not reported on Obama's two years at New York's Columbia University, where, among other things, he lived a mere quarter-mile from former terrorist Bill Ayers."(Tony" target="_blank">click here Blankley, September 24, 2008)
TRUTH: Thousands upon thousands of people lived near Bill Ayers in Manhattan. Obama didn't know Ayers.
LIE: Mr. Ayers founded CAC and was its guiding spirit. No one would have been appointed the CAC chairman without his approval. (Stanley Kurtz, Wall" target="_blank">click here Street Journal)
TRUTH: Kurtz has no evidence to support his claim. Ayers was one of several people involved in starting the group, and was not its guiding spirit. According to the New York Times reporting, Obama was recruited by other CAC leaders who knew him through the Joyce Foundation.
LIE: Mr. Obama and Mr. Ayers worked as a team to advance the CAC agenda. (Stanley Kurtz, Wall" target="_blank">click here Street Journal)
TRUTH: Kurtz has no evidence that Obama and Ayers worked as a team. Ayers attended six meetings of the group along with Obama.
LIE: "Obama is hanging around with Bill Ayers and Jeremiah Wright. By the way, Bill Ayers advertised himself as being a communist with a small c just when he was beginning to
partner with Obama on the Chicago Annenberg Challenge. (Stanley Kurtz, Hudson" target="_blank">click here Institute, Washington DC, October 1, 2008)
TRUTH: Contrary to this McCarthyist attack, there's no evidence that Obama ever knew that Ayers supposedly called himself a communist, nor is that a good reason for Obama to end his work on school reform and charitable activities.
LIE: "who provided Obama with the only executive experience he has ever had in his young life? Bill Ayers, unrepentant domestic terrorist, communist revolutionary... (Joseph" target="_blank">click here Farah, World Net Daily, October 2, 2008)
TRUTH: Ayers did not provide Obama with the Chicago Annenberg Challenge job. And Obama has also had executive experience in community organizing, running a voter registration drive, as well as running his campaigns. The New York Times reported, "In fact, according to several people involved, Mr. Ayers played no role in Mr. Obama's appointment. Instead, it was suggested by Deborah Leff, then president of the Joyce Foundation, a Chicago-based group whose board Mr. Obama, a young lawyer, had joined the previous year."(Scott Shane, New" target="_blank">click here York Times, October 4, 2008)
LIE: "Barack Obama is friends with Ayers, defending him as quote 'respectable and mainstream.'"(American Issues Project ad," target="_blank">click here August 2008)
TRUTH: David Axelrod described them as "friendly," not friends. Obama didn't call Ayers respectable and mainstream (although Ayers now is); Obama's campaign on his website posted an op-ed in the press that described Ayers that way.
LIE: "I can't understand why somebody who wants to be president of the United States, I'll be perfectly honest with you, would want to associate or not condemn the actions of people in the past."(Paul" target="_blank">click here Ragonese, April 27, 2008, Fox News' Hannity's America)
TRUTH: Obama has condemned the past actions of Bill Ayers and called him somebody who engaged in detestable acts 40 years ago. (April 16, 2008 debate)br" target="_blank"click here/a />
LIE: "Mr. Ayers founded CAC and was its guiding spirit. No one would have been appointed the CAC chairman without his approval."(Stanley Kurtz, Wall" target="_blank">click here Street Journal)
TRUTH: Kurtz has no evidence to support his claim. Ayers was one of several people involved in starting the group, and was not its guiding spirit.
LIE: "Mr. Obama and Mr. Ayers worked as a team to advance the CAC agenda."(Stanley Kurtz, Wall" target="_blank">click here Street Journal)
TRUTH: Kurtz has no evidence that Obama and Ayers worked as a team. Ayers attended six meetings of the group along with Obama.
LIE: About Bill Ayers, "Barack Obama really couldn't bring himself to say 'you know, I really don't like that guy.' That was too much for him to say. He had to talk about what a decent guy he is and what a good professor."(Jim Geraghty, "Hype: The Obama Effect")
TRUTH: There is no record of Obama during the campaign calling Ayers "decent" and "a good professor." In fact, Obama really did bring himself to criticize Ayers, denouncing him during a Democratic debate as "somebody who engaged in detestable acts 40 years ago."
LIE: "Obama was feted at a fundraising event" at Ayers' home.("Hype: The Obama Effect")
TRUTH: Obama never had a fundraising event at Ayers' home.
LIE: Barack Obama and Bill Ayers had a close working relationship...the two of them were running the foundation together. (Stanley Kurtz, Fox News Channel's Fox and Friends, September 29, 2008)
TRUTH: Kurtz has no evidence of a "close working relationship"- beyond attending a few meetings together. The notion that Obama and Ayers were the only ones running the Chicago Annenberg Challenge is absolutely false.
LIE: "The most important smoking gun is that Barack Obama was funding Bill Ayers' radical educational projects."(Stanley Kurtz, Fox News Channel's Fox and Friends, September 29, 2008)
TRUTH: This is false. Obama was the president of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge, not its dictator. There's no evidence that Obama made any funding decisions. Moreover, it would have been completely unprofessional for anyone, including Obama, to ban Bill Ayers from receiving funding for educational projects because of alleged radical activities decades earlier which Ayers was never convicted of. Kurtz has no evidence that projects were judged based on anything other than their merits. This is a pure smear by association.
LIE: Emails "give us strong evidence that there may have been a cover-up in Bill Ayers' role choosing Barack Obama."(Stanley Kurtz, Fox News Channel's Fox and Friends, September 29, 2008)
TRUTH: This is a fabrication. The email Kurtz is referring to shows absolutely no kind of cover up. In fact, it shows exactly the opposite. In his blog," target="_blank">click here Kurtz quotes the entire email Ken Rolling wrote to CAC founders Warren Chapman and Anne Hallett and notes that Sam Dillon, Education Reporter for the New York Times, was working on an article. Rolling wrote about Dillon, He is trying to understand how Barack got "-picked' for the CAC board, by whom, why, etc. "" I have avoided that question head-on though I believe Barack was Debbie Leff's/Joyce nomination." This email reveals no kind of cover-up, and the New York Times article found several sources that said Obama was not picked by Ayers.
LIE: "There is a secret group in the Obama-Biden campaign tasked with shutting off any leaks from the record that links Barack Obama to his longtime adviser and mentor Bill Ayers, professor of education at the University of Illinois and unrepentant Weatherman terrorist and fugitive from the 1970s....There is a substantial independent report from a major Democratic source that confirms Diamond's suspicions. The source confirms the unit is led by Bill Ayers himself and likely includes Tom Hayden and other members of 'Progressives for Obama.' Most critically, the Democratic source says this unit has direct access to media adviser David Axelrod of the Obama-Biden campaign."(John Batchelor, Human" target="_blank">click here Events, September 12, 2008)
TRUTH: There is no "secret group." Hayden reports, "I am not part of any effort, personal or organized, trying to protect Obama against any leaks." The notion that Ayers is leading the "unit" is laughable. According to the University of Illinois library, "all papers have been available since August 26" about the school reform group that Ayers and Obama worked on. Diamond, the source cited for the existence of the "unit," declares," target="_blank">click here "I have no evidence of such a unit." Diamond added, "I told Batchelor that I would not speak to Human Events yet he made up a quote from me and placed it in his article." Post, 2/18/08)
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Contact Editor |
|
|
|
|
| 15 comments |
|
how Obama might respond
If I were one of Obama's folks, here's how I'd ask him to respond re by Skip Mendler (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 1 comments) on Monday, Oct 6, 2008 at 9:44:34 AM
|
|
Reply: How to Respond
They're lying & they know they're lying. Next Question? by Mary Callaghan (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 15 comments) on Monday, Oct 6, 2008 at 11:18:54 AM
|
|
How would Obama answering these TRUTHS?
Hey, Mr. Obama, how do you feel about CODEX Alimentarius? A new investigation into 9/11? The missing $3.5 TRILLION from Pentagon announced the day before 9/11 and buried since? Foreign troops on our streets? Pulling our troops out immediately, not just from Iraq and Afghanistan, but from the 102 countries around the world that make us more an imperial empire and the military branch for the One World Government, New World Order? Dissolving Federal Reserve Bank? Ridding us of our secret government and the gang of murders and thieves called the CIA? Impeachment? Trials for war crimes? E-voting machines? Your traitorous act of voting against the wishes of 95% public for this so-called "recovery bill"? Your meeting with Bilderbergs? Bohemia Grove? The New World Order? The Black Nobility City States of London, Washington DC and Vatican? Fluoride in our water? Chem-trails? HAARP? Giving corporations same rights as people? The fact that you're a sock-puppet for Illuminati and have lied about everything since you started your quest to become the titular-head of our corrupt phony government that neither represents the people but instead is doing everything to kill us? What's that? Nothing? I thought so ... oh well, let's go back to some trivial BS that most of you seem to be so impressed with. by Mr M (8 articles, 0 quicklinks, 66 diaries, 2845 comments [654 recommended, 27 rejected]) on Monday, Oct 6, 2008 at 11:51:02 AM
|
|
Inconsistency
You define a terrorist as someone who tries to kill innocents for political purposes, then declare Ayers innocent because he never succeeded. I thought he only had to try, by your definition? So, did he try? by UncleSim (1 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 514 comments [74 recommended, 3 rejected]) on Monday, Oct 6, 2008 at 12:53:04 PM
|
|
Absence of Evidence...
Is not evidence of innocence. I don't trust everything on TV, especially FOX, but most of these arguments in Obama's defense are as weak or weaker than the arguments against him. Would it be true that if Obama really doesn't know Ayers, that he has nothing in common, despite working and speaking for many of the same values both say they hold today? Even if I don't know, say, George Bush, if I went around acting like him, I'd expect criticism. by UncleSim (1 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 514 comments [74 recommended, 3 rejected]) on Monday, Oct 6, 2008 at 12:58:42 PM
|
|
Reply: You are SO RIGHT!
If you served on a school board 10 years ago with someone who supports the legalization of marijuana, does that mean you agree with them? Does it mean you are a drug addict? Of course it does! You had a relationship - you sat right there, knowing the whole time what that guy believed. If you didn't agree with him, how could you have had any kind of association with him? If you serve on the board of your local chamber of commerce with a person who was convicted 40 years ago for spousal abuse, does that mean you beat your wife? Does it mean you have a violent hatred for women? Sure, it does! How could you debase yourself like that if you weren't sympathetic to that scoundrel's views? If you serve on the deacon's board at your church with a man who was a member of a violent street gang nearly half a century ago, are you a common thug also? If you are on the city council with a woman who is known by all your neighbors to be a former prostitute who has cleaned up her act, does that make you a fornicator? If you work at the same company with a man who was long ago convicted of sexual assault, does that make you a rapist or a molester? Maybe he works in your department along with 6 other people, and you have to work closely with him. Does the sin rub off onto you? Now, for the really relevant question: If you serve in the Congress, and in the same party with fellow legislators and DC lobbyists who are flat-out crooks, many of them under indictment and some convicted, aren't you guilty by association of being a crook also? I guarantee you that McCain worked much more closely, and spent vastly more time with these criminals and riff-raff than Obama ever spent with Ayers. And this is just a partial list, past and present: Larry Craig - Convicted of waggin' his weenie at an undercover cop in an airport bathroom. Blamed his solicitation on his "wide stance." I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby - Chief of Staff for Dick Cheney. A federal grand jury indicted him on October 27, 2005 on five charges related to the investigation into the leak of a CIA operative's name (Valerie Palme) to the media.: one count of obstruction of justice, two counts of perjury and two counts of making false statements. The crimes charged in the indictment carry the following maximum penalties: Representative Randy "Duke" Cunningham of California was convicted of conspiracy and tax evasion. He resigned from Congress November 28, 2005 after pleading guilty to evading taxes and conspiring to pocket $2.4 million in bribes from defense contractors, including a Rolls-Royce, a yacht and a 19th-century Louis-Philippe commode. Jack Abramoff, a major Republican fundraiser, is being investigated by the Justice Department. An inquiry into Abramoff's activities has been broadened to include at least half a dozen lawmakers. Scanlon and Cunningham have agreed to cooperate with federal prosecutors. James Tobin, who was regional director of the National Republican Senatorial Campaign Committee and New England director of Bush's reelection campaign, was indicted in federal court on four felonies accusing him of conspiring to jam Democratic and labor union get-out-the-vote phone banks in November 2002. U.S. Senator Bill Frist, former majority leader of the Senate, was Tobin's boss at the time nad may have known about the phone-jamming plan. John Doolittle is reportedly under investigation by the Justice Department’s Public Integrity Unit for his ties to convicted lobbyist Jack Abramoff. Doolittle, who calls Abramoff a close friend, has accepted large amounts of campaign money from Abramoff (which he refused to return after the lobbyist’s conviction), allegedly helped Abramoff’s tribal clients in dealings with the Interior Department, and also helped him win a contract from the Northern Mariana Islands by endorsing a politician on the island. In addition, Doolittle's wife, Julie, was paid a retainer by Abramoff for event planning work from 2002 to 2004. In 2004, Julie Doolittle was subpoenaed for documents in connection with the probe. While John Doolittle paid a lawyer over $38,000 to speak with the Justice Department during 2006, he has denied any wrongdoing or that he is the target of an investigation. In April 2007, the FBI raided his Northern Virginia home, seizing materials related to Sierra Dominion Financial Solutions Inc. (Julie Doolittle's firm). Rep. Doolittle resigned from the House Appropriations Committee shortly thereafter. Tom Feeney has been mentioned multiple times in court documents filed by the Justice Department as "Representative #3" in the criminal investigation of Mark Zachares, a former congressional aide to Rep. Don Young (R-Alaska) and lobbyist who, in April 2007, pleaded guilty to accepting tens of thousands of dollars in gifts from lobbyist Jack Abramoff. In April 2007, the FBI asked Feeney for information about his dealings with Jack Abramoff as part of its ongoing investigation into the lobbyist convicted of defrauding clients. Feeney is one of three House members who accompanied Abramoff to Scotland on golfing trips (the others being convicted former Rep. Bob Ney and indicted former Rep. Tom DeLay). In January 2007, the House announced that Feeney had violated chamber rules by letting Abramoff pay for the trip. Feeney has stated that he is not a target of a probe and is "pleased to voluntarily cooperate" with the investigation. Jerry Lewis is currently under investigation for his use of the “earmarking” process to benefit a lobbyist and friend, Bill Lowery. Of interest to the investigation is the revolving door between Lewis’ office and Lowery’s – two Lewis staffers have gone to work for Lowery as lobbyists, with one of them coming back to Lewis’ office – and Lewis' earmarking of projects for firms that Lowery represents, which has included the Brent Wilkes-owned ADCS. Federal investigators are also looking into a land deal which protected nearly 41 acres in Lewis’ neighborhood from developers. The land was given to the city of Redlands by Jack and Laura Dangermond. The couple, who founded and operate Environmental Systems Research, Inc., have received tens of millions of dollars in government contracts from the House Appropriations Committee that Lewis chaired through the 109th Congress. Protecting the land from development keeps property values high, as it is part of a scenic canyon. Furthermore, the Federal Election Commission is reviewing whether Lewis’s campaign committee violated election laws by failing to disclose contributions within a 48-hour deadline. The FEC sent Lewis’s committee a letter back in January 2007 requesting additional information on items in its post-general filing. Lewis won reelection in November 2006, although he lost his chairmanship as a result of the Democrats winning a majority of seats in the House. Gary Miller is under investigation by the FBI for his real estate transactions. Specifically, in 2000, Miller appeared at a Monrovia City Council meeting to lobby city officials to purchase 165 acres of his in order to convert it into a wilderness preserve. In 2002, Miller sold the 165 acres to the city, earning a profit of over $10 million. The money earned from the land deal was then subject to both federal and state taxes, at a 31% rate. Miller, however, told the Internal Revenue Service and the state of California that Monrovia had forced him to sell the property under the threat of eminent domain. This, in his view, allowed him to shelter the profits from capital gains taxes for more than two years before he had to reinvest the money. Miller had previously claimed the same exemption in two subsequent Fontana property transactions. Monrovia officials, however, say that Miller sold the land willingly and that they did not force him to sell. Tax experts believe that Miller will have a difficult time proving that eminent domain was threatened three times by the same municipality. Tim Murphy is under federal investigation for allegedly having legislative staff members perform campaign-related activities in his Pennsylvania district office. The investigation was launched after several employees admitted to the Pittsburgh Post Gazette that they had been asked to do campaign-related tasks such as distributing literature and mailing greeting cards to financial donors. Such activities are prohibited by both House ethics rules and federal law. Murphy has denied that he instructed his legislative staff to do campaign work. Rick Renzi is currently the subject of two Justice Department investigations. First, he is under investigation for his involvement in a federal land swap deal. While officials have not revealed details of the probe, it is widely believed that it surrounds legislation Renzi agreed to introduce in 2005 completing a land swap for a former business partner, James Sandlin. Second, Renzi is being probed for introducing legislation (which became law) exempting the Fort Huachuca Army base in Arizona from maintaining water levels in the nearby San Pedro River. ManTech International, a military contractor who has been one of Renzi’s largest contributors and currently employs his father, has over $450 million in contracts at the base. In April 2007, the FBI raided Renzi's wife's Arizona insurance business, prompting him to step down from the House Intelligence, Resources and Financial Services Committees. Don Young, along with Sen. Ted Stevens (R-Alaska), is under federal investigation for delivering political favors for a company in Alaska. Specifically, officials are probing whether Young or Stevens accepted bribes, illegal gratuities or unreported gifts from VECO Corp., the largest oil-field engineering firm in Alaska. The company has been awarded numerous federal contracts since 2000, including several to provide logistics support for arctic research. Former VECO Chief Executive Bill Allen has held fund-raisers for Young in Anchorage, Alaska, and records show contributions to Young of at least $157,000 from VECO employees and its political-action committee between 1996 and 2006. Bob Beauprez is currently under investigation by the Justice Department’s Wyoming office. The probe is examining whether Beauprez, a candidate in the 2006 gubernatorial election in Colorado, accessed a restricted federal database for information used in a television ad to attack his Democratic challenger, Bill Ritter. State investigators, who began looking into the matter before the Justice Department, have concluded that the information in the ad came from the National Crime Information Center, a federal database for which only law enforcement officials have access. Using the database for any purpose other than law enforcement is a federal crime which carries a punishment of up to one-year in prison. Beauprez ultimately lost the gubernatorial election to Ritter. Randy “Duke” Cunningham was convicted of accepting $2.4 million in bribes in exchange for securing, through earmarks, defense and intelligence contracts for Mitchell Wade and Brent Wilkes. He is currently serving a sentence of 8 years and 8 months, the longest sentence ever given to a convicted member of Congress. The Justice Department is still investigating others in connection to Cunningham's misdeeds, including probing the House Appropriations Committee and the House Armed Services Committee. Tom DeLay was indicted in September 2005 for money laundering and conspiracy in connection with the Texas redistricting scandal. The conspiracy charges were waived, but the former Majority Leader still faces the money laundering charge. DeLay was named as “Representative #2” in the guilty plea of his former chief of staff Tony Rudy, who was convicted in connection to the actions of Jack Abramoff. DeLay’s name has also surfaced in the Brent Wilkes-Duke Cunningham scandal and the Justice Department may be looking at his actions in relation to that case. DeLay resigned from the House in 2006. In late September 2006, Mark Foley resigned from the House after the public revelation of "over-friendly" emails and sexually suggestive instant message conversations he had with teenage congressional pages. In early October, the FBI announced that it would be investigating his actions. Soon after, the Department of Justice sent a "preservation letter" to the House counsel ordering the House to preserve all documents and other materials possibly related to Foley's electronic correspondence with House pages. FBI agents also began searching the country for other pages that may have had contact with Foley. Officials indicated that the investigation thus far was into whether Foley had violated laws against crossing state lines or using electronic communications to entice a minor into sexual acts. Jim Gibbons, who is currently the governor of Nevada, is under investigation by the FBI for allegedly accepting unreported gifts and/or payments from a company, eTreppid Technologies LLC, in exchange for official acts while he served in Congress (1997-2007). The firm reportedly gave Gibbons airline tickets and a Caribbean cruise, and was later awarded secret military contracts while Gibbons served on the House Intelligence and Armed Services committees. In 2006, Gibbons was investigated by the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department for allegedly assaulting a Las Vegas cocktail waitress, Chrissy Mazzeo, in a parking garage outside of a bar. Following the initial accusations, Gibbons and his associates were accused of issuing contradicting statements, intimidating and bribing Mazzeo, and attempting to use their connections to the police department and others to obstruct the investigation. Gibbons was endorsed in his gubernatorial race that fall by the local sheriff in charge of the case, and his top political consultant had financial ties to the company that handled surveillance tapes from the garage where the alleged incident took place. Gibbons won the governorship in the November 2006 elections, and the investigation into his actions was dropped later that month after the Metropolitan Police Department found no evidence to support Mazzeo's accusations. Katherine Harris is under investigation by both the Justice Department and Defense Department for her relationship with Mitchell Wade, the former head of a defense company who pleaded guilty to a series of criminal bribery offenses in February 2006. Wade made $32,000 worth of illegal contributions to Harris' House campaign in 2004. In addition, he paid for at least two dinners with her at a Georgetown restaurant in 2004-2005 that totaled roughly $6,000. Later, Wade requested that Harris help secure $10 million in federal money for a company project of his in Sarasota, Fla. Federal officials have subpoenaed records from Harris' U.S. Senate campaign office and interviewed several of her former staffers. Harris was defeated in her Senate bid by Democrat Bill Nelson in the November 2006 elections. Katherine Harris was also mentioned in the best selling book "The Best Democracy Money can Buy" by Greg Palast. As Florida Secretary of State, Harris oversaw the state's vote count in the controversial 2000 presidential election, which was won by George W. Bush, brother of then-Florida Gov. Jeb Bush. In May 2006, ABC News cited “high-level official sources” in a report claiming that Hastert was under investigation by the FBI. According to the report, the FBI was looking into a letter Hastert wrote in 2003 urging then-Interior Secretary Gale Norton to block an Indian casino that would have competed with casinos operated by other tribes, which were represented by convicted lobbyist Jack Abramoff. Hastert denied the claim, and others suggested that the government leak of an investigation was retaliatory for Hastert’s public opposition to the FBI raid of Rep. William Jefferson’s congressional office. Days after the report, Deputy Attorney General Paul McNulty denounced it, stating “With regard to reports suggesting that the Speaker of the House is under investigation or 'in the mix,' as stated by ABC News, I reconfirm, as stated by the Department earlier this evening, that these reports are untrue." ABC News, however, refused to retract its original claim of an ongoing investigation. Hastert's office was also under investigation by the House Ethics Committee for its handling of early complaints about inappropriate contacts with House pages by former Rep. Mark Foley. On December 8, 2006, the committee reported that while Hastert had acted negligently, he had not violated any House rules. In October 2006, Bob Ney pled guilty to taking money, gifts and favors in return for official actions on behalf of convicted lobbyist Jack Abramoff and his clients. Ney also confessed to taking thousands of dollars in gambling chips from an international businessman who sought his help with the State Department. Ney was the eighth person convicted in the continuing federal investigation into Abramoff's activities, and the first member of Congress. The government has recommended that Ney be sentenced to twenty-seven months in prison. He resigned from Congress on November 17, 2006. On January 19, 2007, Ney was sentenced to thirty months in federal prison. Curt Weldon is under investigation by the Justice Department for trading his political influence for lobbying and consulting contracts for his daughter, Karen Weldon. Specifically, the investigation centers around Weldon's efforts between 2002 and 2004 to aid two Russian companies and two Serbian brothers with ties to Slobodan Milosevic, the former president of Serbia. The Russian firms and a Serbian group run by the brothers' family had each hired a lobbying firm co-owned by Karen Weldon for fees totaling nearly $1 million a year. In one instance, Weldon allegedly intervened on the behalf of Itera International Energy Corp, a Russian firm represented by Karen Weldon, when U.S. officials canceled a federal grant to the company. In addition, he allegedly encouraged U.S. firms to do business with Itera at a time when its reputation had been damaged by allegations of corruption. Late in 2006, the FBI formally referred the matter to the department's Public Integrity Section. Weldon was defeated in his 2006 bid for reelection by Democrat Joe Sestak. Following his defeat, the House Ethics Committee released a statement saying that Weldon had failed to repay $23,000 worth of improper travel expenses that he accepted for a trip to Belgrade, Serbia. The committee promised to continue monitoring Weldon's actions with regards to the funds. Pete Domenici is the subject of a "preliminary inquiry" by the Senate Ethics Committee for his role in the U.S. attorney firings controversy. In March 2007, Domenici admitted to contacting the U.S. attorney for New Mexico, David Iglesias, concerning an ongoing investigation into a New Mexico Democrat in late 2006. Iglesias, who was fired weeks later, alleged that Domenici pressured him to accelerate the pace of the probe. Domenici’s actions appeared to violate Senate rules. In a discussion of Senate Rule 43, the Senate Ethics Manual states that “[t]he general advice of the Ethics Committee concerning pending court actions is that Senate offices should refrain from intervening in such legal actions...until the matter has reached a resolution in the courts.” The manual also indicates that senators should not consult with an agency regarding any enforcement or investigative matter. Now... Do you really want to start a fight about associations? by JC Garrett (40 articles, 65 quicklinks, 7 diaries, 604 comments [10 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Monday, Oct 6, 2008 at 6:30:16 PM
|
|
Reply: Is this an article yet?
I have been listening to Fox here and there tonight. I have a desire for nightmares, bad ones. They have said the name Ayers like fifty times while I read your comment. Guests are trying to divert to the economy and they keep saying terrorist and Ayers. This is rediculous. We need to shout this from the rooftops of every building in this country! by Yvonne (5 articles, 0 quicklinks, 3 diaries, 38 comments) on Tuesday, Oct 7, 2008 at 12:03:31 AM
|
|
Reply: Great Post, and Yes I Do!
As I thought I said, if I were to act like Bush, I'd expect criticism. I believe all politicians deserve such criticism. If we are not allowed to examine their dealings, there can be no correction of error. The Republicans as well as the Democrats deserve criticism for both their associations and their actions. But their actions outweight their associations. The problem is, politicians rarely get the judicial attention they so richly deserve, simply because of their position, and the associations their positions bring. Perhaps politicians should be locked in their offices for the duration of their service, interacting with the world only through official communications, and perhaps a conjugal visit on occasion from their spouse. No campaigning, no press releases about what a good name they gave to the latest papercut they're about to unleash on the populace, just penitent service. After all, that's what we like to pretend we get from them, right? by UncleSim (1 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 514 comments [74 recommended, 3 rejected]) on Saturday, Oct 11, 2008 at 3:22:28 PM
|
|
Actually, there's absolutely nothing wrong with Bill Ayers &
he doesn't need any defending. Both Bill Ayers and the Rev Jeremiah Wright are far more principled & correct in their overall political perspective than Obama is. Obama could profit by hanging out with those guys more, not less. It's probably true that Obama & Ayers don't have much of a relationship, but that's Obama's loss. He's in desperate need of friends who could explain to him what's wrong with Wall St bailouts & the warfare state. Ayers knows about that stuff, and Obama doesn't. The violence tactic of the Weathermen was a mistake, as Ayers now acknowledges. But it wasn't nearly as terrible a crime as the US war in Vietnam. The mentality that we should furiously condemn the Weathermen for setting off bombs, while saying nothing about the criminality of US foreign policy that the bombs were protesting -- is utterly ridiculous & very much responsible for the disastrous straits in which the US now finds itself. Instead of distancing himself from Ayers, Obama should invite him & his brilliant wife over for tea and crumpets, & extended philosophical discussions. by Richard Mynick (2 articles, 4 quicklinks, 1 diaries, 1552 comments [255 recommended, 5 rejected]) on Monday, Oct 6, 2008 at 1:15:22 PM
|
|
me?
According to Jane Harmon's Homegrown Terrorist bill, I am a terrorist because I dissent to the Government's coup. I am concerned about animals and therefore, I am a homey terraist. I am against ppl that obstruct the laws of the constitution, again, homey terra. I am against the Iraq war, again, homey terra. I am against the ppl that are against protesting in public, again, I am a home grown terrorist, according to those that REIGN over us. Obama should just say, shut the F&^% up. I know, he can't. But he should debunk it all with facts and he just says, no I'm not. Uh huh, uh uh, uh huh, uh uh. Gawd, what a tragedy of football locker room BS. Figures with Rove in charge. Rove, Bush's brain but resembles the very end of the intestines. by shirley reese (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 592 comments [98 recommended, 1 rejected]) on Monday, Oct 6, 2008 at 3:05:02 PM
|
|
Oh, there is plenty wrong with Ayers
He wanted to blow buildings up but not kill innocent people, and that makes it OK? Hogwash! The terrorist label is appropriate. by Scott (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 745 comments [30 recommended, 3 rejected]) on Monday, Oct 6, 2008 at 9:50:34 PM
|
|
Reply: What label would you give to a government that makes up
a phony story about an "enemy attack" on one of its destroyers, then uses this deliberate lie to get Congress to approve the "Gulf of Tonkin Resolution," then uses this Resolution to send a half million US soldiers to Vietnam, where they kill several million Vietnamese -- mostly defenseless peasants -- over a period of years, while dropping fantastic quantities of napalm & poisonous defoliating chemicals all over the countryside? I'm just curious how someone like you would describe such a government. Do you find anything at all disturbing about power being used in that way? by Richard Mynick (2 articles, 4 quicklinks, 1 diaries, 1552 comments [255 recommended, 5 rejected]) on Tuesday, Oct 7, 2008 at 12:28:41 AM
|
|
McCain's mission PLEASE post a COMMENT ON THIS UNM LOBO ART
McCain's mission HERE IS URL; Close to 1,000 people came to see Republican presidential candidate John McCain on campus Monday. Meanwhile, outside the SUB, about 250 students and community members rallied in protest of McCain, chanting, carrying signs and marching on campus. McCain discussed the economic crisis and criticized his opponent, Sen. Barack Obama. "There are essential things we don't know about Sen. Obama or the record that he brings," McCain said. "All people want to know is what this man has actually accomplished and done." McCain said Obama does not have the experience to run a country and that he is unsure of the fate of America in Obama's hands. He said the only way to know which way Obama will take the country is to look at the direction he's taken in the past. But Obama has called McCain a liar every time he questions his policies or his record, McCain said. "I don't need lessons about telling the truth, and were I ever to need any improvement in that regard, I probably wouldn't seek advice from a Chicago politician," McCain said. The audience was vocal in their support of McCain. "Who is the real Obama?" McCain said. "A terrorist! A liar!" some audience members shouted. McCain said that if he becomes president, he will freeze spending on everything that is not a valuable function of the government. "I'll balance the federal budget by the end of my term in office," he said. McCain said the state of the economy will have an effect on students and that he will help students struggling to pay for college. McCain said Obama is personally acquainted with the people who created the economic crisis we are facing today. Obama has received more money from Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae than any other senator in history, McCain said. McCain said Obama is not being direct with how he will spend federal money and that Americans should pay careful attention to that. "According to third-party estimates, he will increase government spending by over $860 billion, but he denied it," McCain said. "He has refused to tell you how much he does plan to spend." While McCain directed attacks at his opponent, protesters assembled outside the rally to show their support for Obama. Sophomore Zoe Kolon said McCain's criticism of Obama wasn't strong enough to overcome the flaws in the Republican platform. "I would say Obama offers a lot for the economy. With the state the economy is in right now, I think Obama is more likely to pull it out than McCain would," Kolon said. "I am against McCain's stance on the war and his tax break, giving money to the upper class." Gabbi Campos / Daily Lobo Protesters outside the SUB ballroom where McCain was speaking were loud enough to be heard inside. Emily Zamballo, who attended the rally outside the SUB, said it was inspiring to see so many young people caring about politics. "It's just a nice thing to see traditions carried on when people like me are getting very depressed about what has been happening and we are very sorry about the state of our country," she said. "We feel responsible for it a lot." by Stephen Fox (96 articles, 3 quicklinks, 11 diaries, 802 comments [33 recommended, 1 rejected]) on Tuesday, Oct 7, 2008 at 1:42:13 AM
|
|
He's a terrorist alright ... and proud of it
by Alan Williams (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 858 comments) on Tuesday, Oct 7, 2008 at 1:54:39 PM
|
|
Refuting the refutations
by Alan Williams (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 858 comments) on Tuesday, Oct 7, 2008 at 5:38:14 PM
|
Want to post your own comment on this Article?
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tell a Friend:
|
Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews |