Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 59 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing Summarizing
OpEdNews Op Eds   

How Much Is Enough

By       (Page 3 of 4 pages) Become a premium member to see this article and all articles as one long page.   2 comments

Richard Girard
Message Richard Girard
Become a Fan
  (40 fans)

What Marx is essentially saying is that pure, laissez faire capitalism, or what I call antisocial capitalism, only works for a community of monks, who have taken a vow of poverty, and are expecting their reward in the afterlife.

Under such a system, human beings can only survive in the long term if they become mindless, unquestioning automatons. (Kind of makes you wonder if the war on drugs was ever supposed to work?)

Marx was not the first to question the inhumanity of antisocial capitalism: Charles Fourier, the Count de Saint-Simon, Robert Owen, Jeremy Bentham, Thomas Paine, and Thomas Jefferson all questioned aspects of this dehumanizing system before Marx did. To quote Jefferson, "How soon the labor of men would make a paradise of the whole earth, were it not for misgovernment, and a diversion of all his energies from their proper object "the happiness of man "to the selfish interest of kings, nobles, and priests." (Letter to Ellen W. Coolidge, 1825; The Complete Writings of Thomas Jefferson, Memorial Edition; volume18, page 341; 1904.)

Such a system, exploiting human beings for profit, is contrary to the ideals of most of the architects of our nation and its Constitution. This is because it devalues the common man in general, and his labor in particular, and signals the establishment of an aristocracy based on capital.

Abraham Lincoln was one of the first to directly point out the intrinsic value of labor in relation to capitalism. "Labor is prior to, and independent of, capital; President Lincoln stated in his annual message to Congress on 3 December 1861, "Capital is only the fruit of labor, and could never have existed if labor had not first existed. Labor is the superior of capital, and deserves much the higher consideration.

The "Gilded Age, as Mark Twain so aptly named the period immediately following the Civil War, saw the real beginning of this era of extreme exploitation in America. This was initially powered by profiteering on the public dime during the Civil War and Reconstruction. Identical exploitation of workers had been experienced and written of earlier in Great Britain by authors such as Charles Dickens, as well as by European philosophers and radicals including Blanc, Proudhon, Bakunin, Marx, Engels, and Lassalle.

The "cure proposed by these Europeans for the ills of antisocial capitalism was called socialism, or in its most extreme forms, communism and anarchism. The proponents of this cure were called reds, after the red in the French flag (or tricolor) the color of the Third Estate, or common people, in the French Revolution: a description they wore with pride.

Most American newspapers used the terms communism, socialism, and anarchism (together with their derivatives), interchangeably; often combining them indiscriminately with terms like worker's rights, strikes and strikers, unions, etc.. Anyone who showed sympathy for the rights of working men and women were called "pinks and "pinkos, or "fellow travelers. Far too many Americans accepted the lies and misrepresentations of these newspapers, who tried to conflate the ideas of the most extreme European radicals (Proudhon and Bakunin), with those of the more thoughtful and moderate thinkers (Marx and Engels).

One example of this is the statement that all Communists and Socialists "including Karl Marx--wanted to get rid of all private property, and do away with marriage; since at that time the wife was considered to be essentially the husband's property.

This is simply not true.

Some of the more extreme proponents of change did make such radical proposals; Marx did not. He in fact thought that the private ownership of property on a small or medium scale (such as individual housing, a small business or farm) was a good thing. It was only where the large aggregations of capital "finance, in the factories, the mines, the railways, etc. "tended most strongly towards monopoly, market manipulation, and worker exploitation, that the workers needed to control production and distribution (see Erich Fromm, Marx's Concept of Man, (1966), footnote 23, p.33; this book also contains a translation of Karl Marx, Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts (1844). "The Third Manuscript, particularly the sections on Private Property and Labor as well as Private Property and Communism, are worth reading, especially Marx's description of those wanting to think of women as property as "crude Communism, p.129).

As Nazi Propaganda Minister Josef Goebbels said (and I will paraphrase here), "Tell a big enough lie often enough, and strongly enough, and soon most people will believe it is the truth. So, too many middle class and rural Americans believed the lies and half-truths of the American press, written by newspaper publishers for their corporate cronies. However, even this did not prevent a few homegrown radicals and groups from emerging.

Eugene Debs, who would run for President on the Socialist Party's ticket, may be the most famous, followed by his colleague, Reverend Norman Thomas. Joe Hill, Big Bill Heywood, and the many others who organized the western miners against the mine owners. Daniel DeLeon, who started the Socialist Workers Party, helped found the IWW with Debs and Heywood, and wrote of the compatibility of James Madison's and Karl Marx's thought. Henry George, America's answer to Karl Marx, who wanted a single tax system based on the surplus value of land. Lincoln Steffens, Ida Tarbell, and the rest of the muckrakers, who made the public aware of many of the corporate and government scandals that pervaded American life: from the corruption in the cities, to the abuses of the monopolistic trusts, including Standard Oil.

Finally, notice was taken by the American people of the corruption, governmental and corporate, that was eating away at the fabric of America. The progressive era arrived, represented by the Presidencies of Theodore Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson. Standard Oil and other monopolistic trusts were broken up using the Sherman Anti-Trust Act, the first regulation of industries at a nationwide level took place with the establishment of agencies such as the FDA and the FTC, the first income tax was imposed on the richest Americans, and U.S. Senators were directly elected by the people of their state for the first time.

Unfortunately, this first attempt to curb corporate power lasted only twenty years. The huge fortunes made in the First World War due to war profiteering (see Marine Major General Smedley Butler's 1935 pamphlet War is a Racket, for more on this phenomenon), permitted most of the progressive era reforms to be undone by the corporations and their Republican lackeys in the 1920's. Laissez faire capitalism once again became a cancer on the American economy, and the subsequent abuses of the American economy under this system led to the Crash of '29, and the Great Depression.

When Franklin Roosevelt became President in 1933, among his most important actions in his first two terms was to set up a bureaucracy to prevent abuses by corporations and the wealthy such as those that had led to the Crash of '29 and the Great Depression. The Security and Exchange Commission, and the National Labor Relations Board were among the entities created to curb corporate and plutocratic power. When the Second World War came, Senator Harry Truman and his oversight committee made certain that war profiteering "for the first and only time in American history "was punished.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Rate It | View Ratings

Richard Girard Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Richard Girard is a polymath and autodidact whose greatest desire in life is to be his generations' Thomas Paine. He is an FDR Democrat, which probably puts him with U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders in the current political spectrum. His answer to (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter

Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The Great Enemy of the Truth

Into a Thousand Pieces

The Communist Takeover of America

The Judgment of History; Or Why the Breaking of the Oligarchs Avenges President Kennedy's Assassination--Part One

Social Capitalism

Honi Soit Qui Mal Y Pense

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend