Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; , Add Tags  (less...)
Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 2   Well Said 2   Supported 2   View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H3) on 2/26/09:     Permalink
View Article Stats      (13 comments)

FACING FUNDAMENTALISM

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)
Page 3 of 3 page(s)

opednews.com

Stem-cell research and cloning are other cases in which critical thinking makes a difference.  If the choice is between discarding stem cells or using them for research that might improve the human condition, what justifies the extreme attitude that they should be pitched?  Only the logically unjustifiable conclusion that they are persons could support their burial, which appears to be disrespectful of those of us who might benefit from their use for research.  And even cloning—which Congress, in its wisdom, has proscribed—would appear to be perfectly moral as a means for providing infertile couples with offspring that are as closely related to them genetically as is possible.  If there is anything disrespectful here, it is in denying them that right.  The practice of politics, alas, bears no discernable relationship to logic and evidence.

While The Ethics of Belief enables us to identify beliefs that should not be allowed to influence public policy debates—where the outcomes of those debates affect us all—I do not harbor the illusion that most or even many mortals are capable of embracing its strictures.  Freedom of religion combined with democratic procedures can strengthen or weaken our adherence to morality.  Ultimately, if we are to emancipate ourselves from the tyranny of ignorance and the influence of religion—when it leads to the suppression of knowledge or to the commission of immoral acts or the restraint of moral ones—it will have to be through a process of strengthening the public schools of this nation as secular institutions committed to educating our younger citizens within the boundaries of what empirical science and rational inquiry render justified as the knowledge of our time.  

Religion can serve as motivation for leading a moral life, but it affords no alternative to rationality, which ensures—in the tentative and fallible fashion of science—that our beliefs continue to provide appropriate guidance for our actions and survival as a species.

 Jim Fetzer discusses these and related issues in RENDER UNTO DARWIN (2007).

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

 

www.d.umn.edu/~jfetzer/

McKnight Professor Emeritus,
University of Minnesota, Duluth;
Founder, Scholars for 9/11 Truth;
Editor, Assassination Research.

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Editor

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
13 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

choose life by Joseph on Thursday, Feb 26, 2009 at 9:25:35 AM
depth of conditioning; by William Whitten on Thursday, Feb 26, 2009 at 8:20:05 PM
I find much to agree with by Peter Duveen on Thursday, Feb 26, 2009 at 2:58:17 PM
A Fine Article by John S. Hatch on Thursday, Feb 26, 2009 at 5:17:20 PM
Yes by Patrick Lafferty on Thursday, Feb 26, 2009 at 9:43:24 PM
civil law by William Whitten on Thursday, Feb 26, 2009 at 10:44:13 PM
Common Law by Patrick Lafferty on Friday, Feb 27, 2009 at 11:51:36 AM
tragic by William Whitten on Friday, Feb 27, 2009 at 4:13:59 PM
Idolatry by John Hanks on Thursday, Feb 26, 2009 at 9:59:20 PM
ONE THING I CAN STATE WITH CERTAINTY... by WML on Friday, Feb 27, 2009 at 5:17:17 PM
Did he actually read my article? by Jim Fetzer on Friday, Feb 27, 2009 at 7:48:58 PM
off the mark by William Whitten on Friday, Feb 27, 2009 at 8:06:38 PM
I think the author described it well for you by Patrick Lafferty on Saturday, Feb 28, 2009 at 3:54:27 PM