Home
Refresh   Tag(s): ;
Add to My Group
January 8, 2008 at 02:55:05

View Ratings | Rate It

ALL Diebold ALL the Time - It's the New Hampshire Primary

submit to twitter
submit to reddit
submit to digg

Tell A Friend

By Michael Collins (about the author)     Page 2 of 3 page(s)

opednews.com     Permalink

NH: First in the Nation with Corporate Controlled Secret Vote Counting

By Nancy Tobi
Democracy for NH Article

81% of New Hampshire ballots are counted in secret by a private corporation named Diebold Election Systems (now known as "Premier"). The elections run on these machines are programmed by one company, LHS Associates, based in Methuen, MA. We know nothing about the people programming these machines, and we know even less about LHS Associates. We know even less about the secret vote counting software used to tabulate 81% of our ballots. People like to say "but we use paper ballots! They can always be counted by hand!"

But they're not. They're counted by Diebold. Only a candidate can request a hand recount, and most never do so. And a rigged election can easily become a rigged recount, as we learned in Ohio 2004, where two election officials were convicted of rigging their recount. (Is it just a funny coincidence that Diebold spokesman is named Mr. Riggall?)

We need to get the count right on election night. Right now, nobody in New Hampshire, except the programmers at LHS Associates and Diebold Election Systems, knows if we are getting it right or wrong. Our state officials and representatives know this. They learned all about it when computer security specialists Harri Hursti and Bruce Odell testified before the legislative subcommittee on e-voting in September 2007 (Hursti's testimony is shown in this video). Scientific reports about the vulnerabilities and risks with Diebold optical scanners have been available since 2003.

We love our state. It takes courage and strength to admit where we are going wrong and to fix it. May our state officials and representatives find that courage and strength soon. Before we lose the other 19% of our votes.

END

This article may be reproduced in whole or part with attribution of authorship and a link to this article.

Appendix 1:

Citizens Gone Wild: Taking Control of Our Democracy
PowerPoint File

Nancy Tobi, Democracy for New Hampshire
Election Defense Alliance

Appendix 2: Recount Triggers

Below find a summary of the electionline.org survey (p. 3) on recounts across the country.

Candidate-initiated recounts: Losing candidates: 14 states, recounts only if race is very close; 25 states, requests allowed whatever outcome, usually with a cost per ballot.
Voter-initiated recounts: In 11 states, voter requests honored for candidates or ballot initiatives. In 7 states, voter requested recounts for ballot initiatives only.
Close election: 16 states have automatic recounts when the race is within 1%.
Automatic recounts: California, Kentucky, New York and West Virginia sample a small percent of ballots to check voting machines.
No recount provisions: Hawaii and Mississippi. Depends on litigation.

Appendix 3: Voter Attitudes Toward Electronic Voting and Honest Elections

New Zogby Poll on Electronic Voting Attitudes

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

 

Michael Collins is a writer in the DC area who researches and comments on the corruptions of the new millennium. His articles focus on the financial manipulations of The Money Party, the abuse of power by government, and features on elections and (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

FACEBOOK      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      NETSCAPE      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
12 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
 

Voter Fraud by Jeanette Doney on Tuesday, Jan 8, 2008 at 8:18:45 AM
Skepticism of governent is a good stance by Michael Collins on Tuesday, Jan 8, 2008 at 3:31:37 PM
Why by Michael Chavers on Tuesday, Jan 8, 2008 at 1:25:36 PM
Why? Because the candidates know the truth by Tom Murphy on Tuesday, Jan 8, 2008 at 1:53:56 PM
Oddly enough, they rarely do complain by Michael Collins on Tuesday, Jan 8, 2008 at 3:27:58 PM
Politicians have a different top priority than the public by Michael Collins on Wednesday, Jan 9, 2008 at 12:26:15 PM
Voter Fraud by memary on Tuesday, Jan 8, 2008 at 5:26:33 PM
WHO PICKS THE NEXT PRESIDENT ? by RICHARD SHADE on Wednesday, Jan 9, 2008 at 3:03:58 AM
...and Hillary weeped. by Michael Collins on Wednesday, Jan 9, 2008 at 12:28:22 PM
We snabbed them! by Jeanette Doney on Wednesday, Jan 9, 2008 at 2:38:30 PM
ALL Diebold ALL by dave stanley on Wednesday, Jan 9, 2008 at 6:25:45 PM
Crime Syndicate by gerard styles on Friday, Jan 11, 2008 at 3:54:50 AM

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment


 

 

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum