Tags for This Article:

Economy-Economics- US (919)  Empire (459) 

Populum Tag Cloud
       Control Panel
Fine tune your search to access content
Articles
Diaries Products
Events All
All time
Last 6 mos
Last month
Last week
Last 24 hrs
From:
Month  Day   Year

To:
Month  Day   Year
Alphabet
Popularity
Count ON
Count OFF
This Level
Sub-levels

 

 

 

Tag(s): ;
Add to My Group
March 25, 2007 at 21:28:33

"With Their Own Rope": non-violent overthrow of the global corporate/financial Empire

by Alan MacDonald     Page 2 of 2 page(s)

www.opednews.com

 
Tell A Friend

View Ratings | Rate It  

Naturally, the expanded and newly ‘branded’ Socially Responsible and Honest Investment Funds Industry will have to do much more than just toot their marketing horn about all their benefits over the old, crooked, Wall Street ‘gamers’ and con-artists of the traditional investment scam.  They will have to actually deliver results (which they already have been in their ‘socially responsible’ portfolios), but now they will also have to have an SR&H industry audit and approval mechanism that is actually based both on rules and ‘principles’, has teeth, and controls the use of an ‘Approved SR&H Investment Symbol’ (similar to such labels as ‘Energy Star”, “Dolphin Free”, “Green Power” etc. that give real assurance to average people).  [As an aside, the issue of ‘principle based’ vs. ‘rule based’ compliance was brought home to me in watching a recent C-Span TV broadcast of last week’s pompous, pontificating, elite “Capital Markets Competitiveness’ committee meeting of Wall Street big wigs, Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, the SEC Chief, GE’s president, and assorted Investment Fund crooks --- including Charles Schwab, who explained why ‘principle-based’ concerns are really of no concern, saying, and I’m paraphrasing, “Corporations are only required to make a profit, and that is the only basis for evaluating them.”   Well, as they say, “Sorry, Charlie”, but that old elitist, ill-considered, short-sighted, and ultimately ‘socially unsustainable’ answer, while it may be appealing to your globally detached elite investor bidness buddies, no longer cuts it in a world full of dangerous and hidden ‘negative externality bombs’ in our small and only remaining human world.  “It’s our world, and it’s our money, chump, and we won’t have it used to destroy the world and cheat us to boot.”

3. The ‘Socially Responsible and Honest Investment Funds’ industry will also have to really increase the focus of their company analysis methods, from what has thus far been a fortuitous accident of screening out companies that ‘do bad things’, to screen-out  companies that specifically dump ‘negative externality costs’ on our society.   It has just so happened that some companies that are socially irresponsible (like tobacco, asbestos, coal fired utilities and oil corporations) are that way because they dump negative externalities (sometimes called ‘social costs’) on society.   This type of dumping or polluting is what makes them come up on the radar of current ‘social responsibility funds’.  But there are many others ways for bad corporate behavior to dump negative externality costs than just the common direct method of polluting our lungs or the atmosphere.  The new SR&H fund analysis and profiling will have to be broadened to find more disguised and hidden ‘negative externality dumping ‘ tricks by proactively looking for other guileful ways that all forms of ‘gaming’ externalities are being hidden from the public and ‘our’ government.

One brief example of a much disguised variation on ‘negative externality dumping’ is a trick of hedge fund crooks and private equity pirates, who hide not pollution but debt bombs.  Even “BusinessWeek” magazine (hardly a left wing group) recently did a cover article exposé on this type of ‘gaming’ of the finance system --- where the externality that is dumped on society is not pollution, but bad debt that will explode in the future.  Other schemes of gaming negative externalities are even more esoteric and convoluted, but the key is that analysis and exposure of these dirty financial tricks are now, for the first time, being understood and examined --- so that honest people won’t be entrapped in investing in these anti-social scams.

Watch for big changes in the ‘socially responsible and honest investment fund’ industry and new opportunities to invest your funds in ways that you can feel good about both because of being socially responsible and because such investment firms are committed to basic honesty --- and you won’t have to be looking over your shoulder for constant cheating.  As far as the ‘negative externality dumping’ scams are concerned you can look into it more if you enjoy economic analysis, but if not, watch your favorite progressive news web sites --- this is going to be big news fast. 

The bottom-line is that by simply directing the investments of millions of average, honest, and socially responsible Americans to this new environment we can all have a much greater effect in bringing down the global corporate Empire than any misguided “don’t buy gas for the day” campaigns.   Working, voting and investing together in responsible and honest ways, we can actually bring down the global corporate Empire that has already stolen our government ---- and do so non-violently.  We can bring down the Empire, “with their own rope”.

Good luck on being a responsible voter and investor ---- it definitely is possible.

 1  |  2

 

Former computer/communications marketing and product strategist. Currently teaching part time in retirement.

Contact Author
Contact Editor
View Other Articles by Author

 

Bookmark this page: (what's this?)

NETSCAPE      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
2 comments

Jon Harrison is a freelance writer living in Vermont.
Jon HarrisonJon Harrison is a freelance writer living in Vermont.

Your piece "With Their Own Rope"

Having read and commented upon your previous piece, allow me to say that this one is much better written. I disagree with most of the ideas you put forward, but as I stated before, I have no real interest in debating facts in this forum.

This piece is much clearer - I do understand what you're saying (although, again, I for the most part disagree with your thesis). If I may I will point out a couple areas that you might want to work on a bit more.

Adjectives: less is always more. Too many adjectives clutter the thoughts you are trying to convey, rather than clarifying them. Adjectives have their place, no doubt about it, but discard as many as you can!

Paragraphs: Check and re-check where paragraph breaks should be made. Remember, the editors here are not doing that kind of stuff for you.

In that vein, your word processor should have a spelling/grammar/style function. Use it. Don't be a slave to it -- it's programmed always to reject the passive voice, for example, and sometimes the p.v. is appropriate. Be that as it may, however, there are important things the checker can do for you. There are, for example, several misplaced commas in your piece. The checker will point these out to you. Again, the editors here do not do that work for the submitting writers. Highly educated, intelligent people are more likely to pay attention to what you write if your grammar and style are, if not perfect, at least very good. It's important, unless you want only half-educated people for an audience.

This piece was nuch better than the previous one. Keep working at it and you can produce some really good writing (despite the obviously wrongheaded ideas!). 

 

 

 

 

by Jon Harrison (1 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 17 comments) on Thursday, April 5, 2007 at 8:40:18 AM
 


antiwar activist in Kirkland Wa
toddboyleantiwar activist in Kirkland Wa

Accounting for Externalities

Alan, loved your article (and your others around the web).

As a retired CPA, I've written on the problem of corruption, inaccurate framing and general stupidity of GAAP (the mandatory system of financial reporting.

 

Politics of Ledgerism http://ledgerism.net/leftside.htm#political
The Info Gap
FinancialDeregulation
Empirical Reputation 

Decentralization http://ledgerism.net/leftside.htm#Decentralization
Independent P2P axes
User Sovereignty
nonquantified

Community networks http://ledgerism.net/leftside.htm#CommunityNets
P2P Revolution
Devices and reputation
Carrier-Written specs

General Ledgerism http://ledgerism.net/
AR/AP Settlement Cloud
STR Shared Transactions
OMG AR/AP project

Our deliberately wrong system of notation for transactions results in wrong allocations of resources, and is at the root of both our economic and political conflicts, economic inefficiency and our environmental crisis.

While I don't expect tweaking GAAP or technology, for example will be a magic bullet solving the huge problems facing humanity, I strongly believe that the converse is untrue, that deliberatly blinding ourselves and preventing efficient communication and social and economic organization, will solve them either.

If I were the Stalin of GAAP I would require that all balance sheets maintain an expense account for Externalities Costs, resulting in lower net income, and a liability account, in long-term liabilities, for Externalities Liability. This new FASB pronouncement would be a fat one, with guidelines for recognition and measurement of various types of takings, harms, privatizations of commons, etc.

Personally I have grown skeptical in recent years whether correction of financial reporting, or any other legislated remedy, will solve the problems of pollution, global warming, energy depletion, wars, economic inequality, or other catastrophic problems if you assume that humanity continues to be organized around hard, reciprocal exchange. As long as we are all employees, contractors, etc. totally enslaving ourselves in obedience to whoever grants the paychecks, it's never going to work. We need to get away from money itself.

There are at least five schools of thought on how to fix the problems you and I are talking about, probably more.

(1) get more representatives of the people on the boards of corporations and equity funds of all types, who understand the problem and are capable of better stock picking and pressuring the corporate' boards,

(2) improve the accounting systems so that externalities are quantified more systematically, reflecting all harms not just environmental and militarism, so that literally, the problem companies that look profitable today-the exxons, the phillip morrises, the LMIs the Monsanto's naturally look less profitable and ordinary pension funds as well as individual investors can make more rational decisions.

(3) get beyond money intermediated exchange, towards multiparty barter nondenominated in money. Getting away from money towards transactions denominated in native resources, hours, quantities, etc. is well feasible with existing technologies like EDI. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronic_Data_Interchange

(4) introduce telecom and software architecture for decentralized P2P transactions without central servers like banks, based on mutual payables/receivables. Identity and reputation such as webs of trust are less tested than EDI or web services but have been researched and prototyped for at least 15 years.

(5) utopian ideas for new forms of social organization, ranging from religious, to communes, to libertarian or anarchist ideology. Outside my scope or expertise,

Todd Boyle www.ledgerism.net

 

by toddboyle (1 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 3 comments) on Wednesday, May 16, 2007 at 2:29:56 PM
 

 

2 comments

 

Tell A Friend

 


Copyright © OpEdNews, 2002-2008

Blog Ads

 

 

 

 

Most Popular Articles
in the Last 2 Days
(by Recommend Emails)

NEW IDEAS ON RESTORING U. S. ECONOMY, for the Next Secretary of Commerce, William Blaine Richardson III by Stephen Fox

End of the Road to Moronity by Rand Clifford

Saving the Big 3 for You and Me ...a message from Michael Moore by Michael Moore

Credit Card Crisis Is Here / Derivatives Next by Allen L Roland

THE LEGACY; Dubya's Musings in the Halls of Never-Never Land by Braun McAsh

Vampires in America by Rob Kall

A Tale of Two Terror Attacks by Dave Lindorff

Obama: Join the Conversation by Richmond Shreve

SO SAY THE BANKERS: Learn to Love the 'AMERO' by Patrick Henningsen

Paulson shoots another arrow into the heart of the Economy by Andrew Hughes

Go To Top 50 Most Popular