Tag(s): ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H3) on 6/8/08:     Permalink
View Article Stats      (3 comments)

The Persistent Myth of "Intelligence Failure"

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan   -- Page 2 of 4 page(s)

opednews.com

In the end, the Times says it "cannot say with certainty whether Mr. Bush lied about Iraq", but that withholding "vital information from the public" or leading the public "to believe things that" are known to be "not true" is "bad enough."

The New York Times should consider its own reporting on Iraq and take a long hard look in the mirror on this point. It should also look up the word "lie" in a dictionary, since making untrue statements with intent to deceive or creating a false or misleading impression is the very definition of the word. [10] So if the Times can say with certainty that Mr. Bush was guilty of the latter, then, by definition, he lied, and they could thus credibly say so with just as much certainty. Of course, the Times lied, too, so their reluctance to call Bush and Co. liars is perfectly understandable.

Others, of course, have even more self-interest in defending the administration. As the Washington Post noted, "The report's conclusions were sharply criticized by several Republican members, who accused the Democratic majority of rehashing old material for political advantage."[11]

Yet Democrats in the Senate have been just as complicit as Republicans not only in the decision to go to war, but also in attributing the patently false pretext for the war to an "intelligence failure".

In sum, the notion of an "intelligence failure" is a convenient myth for all who propagate it.

____________________

[1] Joby Warrick and Walter Pincus, "Bush Inflated Threat From Iraq's Banned Weapons, Report Says", The Washington Post, June 6, 2008; A03

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/06/05/AR2008060501523_pf.html

[2] Mark Mazzetti and Scoot Shane, "Bush Overstated Iraq Evidence, Senators Report", The New York Times, June 6, 2008

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/06/world/middleeast/06intel.html

[3] "The Truth About the War", The New York Times, June 6, 2008

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/06/opinion/06fri1.html?th=&emc=th&pagewanted=print

[4] Senate Select Committee on Intelligence Report on the U.S. Intelligence Community's Prewar Intelligence Assessments on Iraq" (Phase I), July 2004

http://www.yirmeyahureview.com/archive/iraq/iraq_war/congress_senate_committee_prewar_intelligence.htm

[5] I've written at length elsewhere on a number of specific aspects of the so-called "intelligence failure" with regard to WMD and the true motives for the invasion of Iraq:

"Inconvenient Facts and 'Conspiracy Theories'", January 7, 2004

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4

 

www.foreignpolicyjournal.com

Jeremy R. Hammond is the owner, editor, and principle writer for Foreign Policy Journal, a website dedicated to providing news, critical analysis, and commentary on U.S. foreign policy, particularly with regard to the "war on terrorism" and events (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
3 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

The myth exposed by MichaelOhio on Monday, Jun 9, 2008 at 6:03:18 AM
A scam, long since exposed by Laudyms on Monday, Jun 9, 2008 at 6:18:32 PM
Washington Post Spin by Jeremy R. Hammond on Tuesday, Jun 10, 2008 at 12:12:56 AM