Tag(s): ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H2) on 6/10/08:     Permalink
View Article Stats      (32 comments)

Rebut Conyers' Reasons Not To Impeach

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (193 fans)   -- Page 2 of 3 page(s)

opednews.com

       Rebuttal: Both Clinton and Nixon were impeached and threatened with impeachment [respectively] in a matter of months. And, there have been judges that have been impeached in much less time. Besides, Mr. Chairman, you’ve already done most of the work, as was laid out so eloquently in your book.

Reason four: Not enough votes.

       Rebuttal: We are only asking for hearings right now to begin the process of exposing the myriad crimes committed by the Bush administrations. In all likelihood, the rest will take care of itself. The votes will come after the American people begin to pressure their local representatives.

Reason five: It will most likely cost the Democrats the election.

       Rebuttal: Throughout history, I don't know if a correlation can be drawn. Democrats did win seats in Congress after Nixon, and the presidency in the next election. But it was the opposite after Clinton's impeachment when the Republicans lost seats.

 

Markthshark says:

Please mail or fax your rebuttals directly to Chairman Conyers, with the note that here are rebuttals to his objections to impeachment. Ask him to please consider them very carefully.

I have a feeling that now is the last chance to push for impeachment.

Here’s the address, phone numbers and faxes of all three of Conyers' offices.

Washington Office
2426 Rayburn Building
Washington, DC 20515

(202) 225-5126

(202) 225-0072 Fax

Detroit District Office
669 Federal Building
231 W. Lafayette
Detroit, MI 48226

(313) 961-5670
(313) 226-2085 Fax

Trenton District Office
2615 W. Jefferson
Trenton, MI 48183

(734) 675-4084

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

 

Rob Kall is executive editor, publisher and site architect of OpEdNews.com, Host of the Rob Kall Bottom Up Radio Show (WNJC 1360 AM), President of Futurehealth, Inc, inventor . He is also published regularly on the Huffingtonpost.com

With his experience as architect and founder of a technorati top 100 blog, he is also a new media / social media consultant and trainer for corporations, non-profits, entrepreneurs and authors.

Rob is a frequent Speaker on the bottom up revolution, politics, The art, science and power of story, heroes and the hero's journey, Positive Psychology, Stress, Biofeedback and a wide range of subjects. He is a campaign consultant specializing in tapping the power of stories for issue positioning, stump speeches and debates, and optimizing tapping the power of new media. He recently retired as organizer of several conferences, including StoryCon, the Summit Meeting on the Art, Science and Application of Story and The Winter Brain Meeting on neurofeedback, biofeedback, Optimal Functioning and Positive Psychology. See more of his articles here and, older ones, here.

To learn more about me and OpEdNews.com, check out A Voice For Truth - ROB KALL | OM Times Magazine and this article.

And there are Rob's quotes, here.

To Watch me on youtube, having a lively conversation with John Conyers, Chair of the House Judiciary committee, click here Now, wouldn't you like to see me on the political news shows, representing progressives. If so, tell your favorite shows to bring me on and refer them to this youtube video

My radio show, The Rob Kall Bottom Up Radio Show, runs 9-10 PM EST Wednesday evenings, on AM 1360, WNJC and is archived at www.opednews.com/podcasts Or listen to it streaming, live at www.wnjc1360.com

Rob also host a health/mind/body/heart/spirit radio show-- the Rob Kall Futurehealth radio show. Check out podcasts from it at futurehealth.org/podcasts

Follow me on Twitter

A few declarations.
-While I'm registered as a Democrat, I consider myself to be a dynamic critic of the Democratic party, just as, well, not quite as much, but almost as much as I am a critic of republicans.

-My articles express my personal opinion, not the opinion of this website.

Recent press coverage in the Wall Street Journal: Party's Left Pushes for a Seat at the Table

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Follow Me on Twitter

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
32 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Not so fast by Reverend Anthony Wade on Tuesday, Jun 10, 2008 at 11:26:14 AM
Refusal to Impeach by Bill Cain on Tuesday, Jun 10, 2008 at 11:28:01 AM
Responses to Conyers's concerns by Kathryn Smith on Tuesday, Jun 10, 2008 at 11:45:43 AM
Way to go!!! by Jack Harrington on Tuesday, Jun 10, 2008 at 11:59:06 AM
Conyers, a Raging Bull! by Hayesml47 on Tuesday, Jun 10, 2008 at 11:47:31 AM
Digg This! by Kathryn Smith on Tuesday, Jun 10, 2008 at 11:57:13 AM
Short summary! by Kathryn Smith on Tuesday, Jun 10, 2008 at 12:00:43 PM
great work by Better World Order on Tuesday, Jun 10, 2008 at 12:53:49 PM
democratzis by robert braunstein on Tuesday, Jun 10, 2008 at 12:56:39 PM
check the score by shirley reese on Tuesday, Jun 10, 2008 at 1:04:41 PM
Yes, but by Stewart Nusbaumer on Tuesday, Jun 10, 2008 at 1:14:27 PM
The crook media always drives the getaway car for the rich. by John Hanks on Tuesday, Jun 10, 2008 at 1:17:55 PM
The bottom line by ibrahim turner on Tuesday, Jun 10, 2008 at 2:29:46 PM
"People don't want this" ? by Aurora on Tuesday, Jun 10, 2008 at 2:35:44 PM
Corporate media by Aurora on Tuesday, Jun 10, 2008 at 2:53:20 PM
Impeachment by dglow on Tuesday, Jun 10, 2008 at 3:01:23 PM
Timing by Aurora on Tuesday, Jun 10, 2008 at 3:15:11 PM
Voting hypotheticals are not a rebuttal by Aurora on Tuesday, Jun 10, 2008 at 4:09:35 PM
Listen To Gore Vidal by aberamsay on Tuesday, Jun 10, 2008 at 4:23:07 PM
impeachment by GUY P. FRASER on Tuesday, Jun 10, 2008 at 4:31:35 PM
Law Professor Jonathan Turley by Sandy Sand on Tuesday, Jun 10, 2008 at 5:22:27 PM
Sandy, you are absolutely right by erik mouse on Wednesday, Jun 11, 2008 at 8:24:04 AM
HOWS ABOUT THEIR OATH! by Wolfie on Tuesday, Jun 10, 2008 at 9:22:29 PM
4 % by Mr M on Tuesday, Jun 10, 2008 at 11:00:26 PM
godhelpus by shirley reese on Tuesday, Jun 10, 2008 at 11:09:50 PM
A PARTING OF THE WAYS by Irvthom on Tuesday, Jun 10, 2008 at 11:24:37 PM
Pete Seegar's story should give us hope by Kathryn Smith on Wednesday, Jun 11, 2008 at 1:07:43 AM
IMHO by pft on Wednesday, Jun 11, 2008 at 4:20:16 AM
United Nations Totally Impotent Thanks To John Bolton by aberamsay on Wednesday, Jun 11, 2008 at 6:21:00 AM
Dick + Bush = Screwed so IMPEACH NOW! by Ben Marble, M.D. on Wednesday, Jun 11, 2008 at 5:12:40 AM
The Law Transcends Trivial Politics by Ed Encho on Wednesday, Jun 11, 2008 at 5:46:15 AM
Rebut Conyer's by Peter Wedlund on Wednesday, Jun 11, 2008 at 10:24:53 AM