Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...)
Add to My Group(s)

Well Said 5   Valuable 4   Must Read 2   View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H3) on 5/29/09:     Permalink
View Article Stats      (16 comments)

Obama Didn't Betray the Left, the Left Betrayed the Left

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (65 fans)   -- Page 2 of 3 page(s)

opednews.com

These liberals who whine and moan and groan and get livid over Obama’s “betrayal” are the same ones who carefully calculated Obama’s move and made excuses to those in the antiwar movement and those voting third party. These excuses were like: he’s just saying it to get elected, if he said what he really should say he would be assassinated, he’s not saying it but he’s thinking it and he will do it when he wins, and the best one of them all, we can’t let another Republican win so let’s get him elected and we’ll pressure him come January.

Well, it is way past January and the mothers and fathers and sisters and brothers who pledged to provide some backbone to the Democratic Party are missing in action. The grassroots social movements for change seem to be virtually non-existent and the antiwar movement is smaller than grandmother’s bridge club.

The tiny movements that exist like Single Payer Action are not receiving much help at all from progressive media like The Nation or progressive groups with visibility like MoveOn.org.  Few know health care activists are being arrested and prosecuted for raising their voice in Congressional hearings.

MoveOn has officially surrendered its antiwar movement credentials and is withholding the names of tens of thousands of left-leaning activists who would graciously mobilize to end the wars and establish single-payer health care.

Protests and rallies are not being attended presumably because they think Obama needs them to be patient because what he wants to do (whatever that is) is hard work. Groups like United for Peace and Justice (a massive liberal antiwar coalition) chose to not mark the Iraq war anniversary with a march because they were afraid people wouldn't pay attention since the economy was so bad.

All of this is despite the fact that Obama has been constantly compared to FDR by liberals through the citation of quotes like this one:

“You know, Mr. Randolph, I've heard everything you've said tonight, and I couldn't agree with you more. I agree with everything that you've said, including my capacity to be able to right many of these wrongs and to use my power and the bully pulpit. ... But I would ask one thing of you, Mr. Randolph, and that is go out and make me do it.” –FDR to Labor Activist A. Philip Randolph

Liberals tried to make Obama stand firmly against the FISA Amendments compromise when he was on the campaign trail, when they thought they had some power to leverage. His response to the tens of thousands who mobilized on his campaign website to oppose his support for something that would legalize many of “George W. Bush’s warrantless eavesdropping activities secretly and illegally ordered in 2001” was to talk them down and suggest he and the tens of thousands would have to agree to disagree.

Obama, a constitutional law professor, was allowed to further betray the Constitution. Furthermore, the campaign told those who talked to them about Obama’s decision to support telecom immunity,Come on, who really cares about that issue? Does anyone think the left is going to vote for McCain rather than Obama?”

Democratic voters were treated as political slaves because the campaign knew it didn’t have to worry about people standing up for what they believed in, because they knew nobody would dare vote Nader or some other third party candidate instead of Obama. Nobody would risk having Republicans rule this country for four more years.

One may have thought that when Obama did get into office, progressives and liberals would begin to tug Obama to the left. But, organizations have chosen to go along with Obama’s agenda for continuity we can believe in.

Now we read the headlines and find ourselves faced with a president who wants us to think he will use the values in our Constitution to dictate our future as he explains to us why he can't hold people accountable for violating the rule of law or abruptly end wars in the Middle East that may be in violation of the Constitution. 

Photos are being withheld that "show rape," Obama is planning a super embassy for Pakistan (to support his policy of "occupations we can believe in"), and there's suggestion that troops might be in Iraq for another decade.

So, what now? Where does a "betrayed" liberal go from here?

UPDATE 1

What led me to write this: Sherwood Ross's fine article "Obama Betrays the Liberals"

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

 

Kevin Gosztola is a writer and curator of Firedoglake's blog The Dissenter, a blog covering civil liberties in the age of technology. He is an editor for OpEdNews.com and a former intern and videographer for The Nation Magazine.And, he's the (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Follow Me on Twitter

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
16 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Just a couple of quibbles. by John Sanchez Jr. on Friday, May 29, 2009 at 10:45:44 AM
Here's someplace to look at: by John Sanchez Jr. on Friday, May 29, 2009 at 12:53:45 PM
By any other name.... by Jeffrey Rock on Friday, May 29, 2009 at 12:22:49 PM
Obama's corporate sponsors may be well known,,,, by John Sanchez Jr. on Friday, May 29, 2009 at 1:01:29 PM
Introducing...the Obama Democrats! by Perry Logan on Saturday, May 30, 2009 at 6:34:07 AM
Sure,... by John Sanchez Jr. on Saturday, May 30, 2009 at 7:11:47 AM
The issue of liberal betrayal would not have resolved itself by Kevin Gosztola on Saturday, May 30, 2009 at 9:49:29 AM
Hillary? by Laudyms on Saturday, May 30, 2009 at 4:54:49 PM
Agree but one Important exception by Philip Dennany on Saturday, May 30, 2009 at 1:36:11 PM
As was by sliphoch on Saturday, May 30, 2009 at 5:47:55 PM
A good war in Afghanistan? by B. Ross Ashley on Saturday, May 30, 2009 at 11:48:03 PM
You get what you pay for by Vinny Colletti on Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 7:06:17 AM
lest you 4'get, "Liberal Activists" by shirley reese on Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 2:22:45 PM
Lift the Labels by Michael Bonanno on Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 4:53:43 PM
Obama's most frightening recent quote by John Haigh on Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 4:56:10 PM
Blame the left? by Bryan Emmel on Monday, Jun 1, 2009 at 3:45:07 AM