Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (1 comment)

Not For Profit, Eh? Hold on There, Martha Nussbaum!

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (12 fans)   -- Page 2 of 2 page(s)

opednews.com

In any event, I am inclined to think that Socrates' famous quip about the unexamined life not being worth living is a gloss on the ODYSSEY.

Now, in the past certain people have described liberal arts education, or humanities education, as involving learning for the sake of learning, as distinct from learning for the sake of making a living. This is an understandable distinction. But why in the world should we want to learn something for the sake of learning it? To show ourselves that we are capable of learning it, which should bolster our confidence in ourselves as learners.

When we learn something for the sake of making a living from it, we might have to consider that life may not work out as we have planned it. To be sure, we would in such circumstances be able to fall back on our professional learning as a source of confidence in our ability to learn whatever it is going to take for us to cope with the twists and turns that life is throwing us.

But liberal arts education, or humanities education, says, "Forget about your professional learning. Instead, plan for the twists and turns of life. Learn how to learn, and you'll be well prepared for the twists and turns of life"

But if you want to play it safe, you can hedge your bets and try to get a mix of the two:

(1) professional training and (2) liberal arts education, or humanities education.

Making a living will be hard enough. But living an examined life, instead of living an unexamined life, will probably prove much harder for most Americans today.

But the American experiment in representative democracy requires that we should raise up more people like Socrates than ancient Athens managed to raise up during its experiment in limited participatory democracy. The quality of our American civic life depends on our having an army of people like Socrates to serve as intellectual gadflies to provoke the body politic into thinking and acting in ethical ways, as Martha Nussbaum herself admirably aspires to do in her various books, including her new book with such a terrible title. In any event, I hope that people disregard the title of her book but profit from it.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people:
Dis regard the title, but profit from reading Nussbaum's new book

Click here to see the most recent messages sent to congressional reps and local newspapers

www.d.umn.edu/~tfarrell

Thomas James Farrell is professor emeritus of writing studies at the University of Minnesota Duluth (UMD). He started teaching at UMD in Fall 1987, and he retired from UMD at the end of May 2009. He was born in 1944. He holds three degrees from (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
1 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

I am befuddled by Marta Steele on Saturday, Apr 3, 2010 at 7:27:50 PM