Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 5   Well Said 4   News 3   View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H3) on 3/5/11:     Permalink
View Article Stats      (65 comments)

Limbaugh/Hannity Parent Company Admits Hiring Actors to Call Radio Shows

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (14 fans)   -- Page 2 of 2 page(s)

opednews.com

While this actor's claim does not specifically prove hosts like Hannity used the fake caller services his parent company sells, Hannity's record of being caught manipulating public opinion, deceptively editing video, suppressing opposing views, and lopsided call ratios through the decades speaks for itself. His show doesn't sound like America and never has.

It has been documented and time-stamped on Twitter for years now, how "average" Hannity callers are denied public rebuttal time and guests set up the "false equivalency". Dissenters describe how Hannity's screeners practice bias and intimidation, requiring they produce a return phone number in exchange for air time. 

But if on-air calls to political commentary shows were faked without disclosure, fines or license revocation are well within the jurisdiction of the FCC or Attorney General's office. Although it might be hard to prove the host was in on it, it's the FCC license holder that would be accountable anyway.

Hannity has always maintained it's the listeners and sponsors who decide if they want deliberately distorted programming, but this would be deception of a higher order, if he had actors pretending for example to be soldiers, or military families, doctors, health care workers, etc. 

Hannity's tricks, out-of-context smears and questionable charity "expenses" suggest he at least owes a skeptical US public a simple denial of his knowledge of this practice. Otherwise, we may well assume he has been faking calls all throughout his 20 year career - especially if we follow his methods of reporting.

Update: In "Exclusive: Limbaugh's parent company still using actors to fake radio call-ins, exec tells Raw Story" a source in Premiere's entertainment division is reported to have confirmed the service was still being offered.

Limbaugh and Hannity have both responded on their Monday afternoon shows, denying they ever used this staged call service. A statement by the firm confirmed they are indeed supplying actors to deceive audiences with "custom calls": "Premiere On Call is a recently launched audio service connecting local entertainment radio stations with great voice talent to supplement their programming needs. The service is not utilized by News/Talk programs or stations."

Still suspicious a Limbaugh/Hannity call might not be authentic? Tweet a description with #hannity in it, or join this daily liveblog during Hannity's show to have your impressions or counter arguments documented and archived.

See Follow ups: 

Limbaugh, Hannity, Beck Respond To Report That Parent Company Hires Actors for Call-ins

Report: Glenn Beck Staged Calls as Wacky DJ, More Questions Abound

How Hannity's "Fair and Open" Screeners Censor Liberals

Next Page  1  |  2

 

(OpEdNews Contributing Editor since October 2006) Inner city schoolteacher from New York, mostly covering media manipulation. I put election/finance reform ahead of all issues but also advocate for fiscal conservatism, ethics in journalism and (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Follow Me on Twitter

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
65 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

I always thought this was the case by Davey Jones on Sunday, Mar 6, 2011 at 2:19:02 AM
If our own Government can lie to us... by Taylor on Sunday, Mar 6, 2011 at 10:21:34 AM
Why are you surprised? by Cliff Carson on Sunday, Mar 6, 2011 at 5:22:46 PM
not surprised by J. Edward Tremlett on Sunday, Mar 6, 2011 at 8:12:50 PM
Where's the traffic for this article coming from by Rob Kall on Sunday, Mar 6, 2011 at 10:24:53 PM
Reddit.com by Saman Mohammadi on Sunday, Mar 6, 2011 at 11:04:07 PM
Good question by Gordon Wayne Watts on Friday, Mar 11, 2011 at 9:39:45 AM
Conservative radio parallel in New Zealand by Rakesh Krishnan Simha on Monday, Mar 7, 2011 at 4:31:35 AM
We all knew this by Peter Duveen on Monday, Mar 7, 2011 at 6:34:31 AM
Scripted calls on Hannity? by Gustav Wynn on Monday, Mar 7, 2011 at 3:09:11 PM
Clarification by Peter Duveen on Monday, Mar 7, 2011 at 4:56:51 PM
re: Scripted calls on Hannity? by Natalie Oberman on Tuesday, Mar 8, 2011 at 2:49:58 PM
My point exactly by Gustav Wynn on Thursday, Mar 10, 2011 at 1:22:02 PM
Good point, Gustav: I am a perfect example of the 'unknown'' by Gordon Wayne Watts on Friday, Mar 11, 2011 at 10:08:20 AM
The saddest part to me by Daniel Geery on Monday, Mar 7, 2011 at 7:07:45 AM
You'll wait a long time... by John Sanchez Jr. on Monday, Mar 7, 2011 at 8:43:57 AM
It's a very old Con... by mrk * on Monday, Mar 7, 2011 at 9:13:58 AM
The best free-speech by Amanda Lang on Monday, Mar 7, 2011 at 12:40:21 PM
Much to-do about nothing by Natalie Oberman on Monday, Mar 7, 2011 at 2:54:56 PM
questionable by J. Edward Tremlett on Monday, Mar 7, 2011 at 3:28:37 PM
re: questionable by Natalie Oberman on Monday, Mar 7, 2011 at 4:47:26 PM
except by J. Edward Tremlett on Monday, Mar 7, 2011 at 5:02:37 PM
re: except by Natalie Oberman on Monday, Mar 7, 2011 at 9:24:04 PM
and... by J. Edward Tremlett on Wednesday, Mar 9, 2011 at 8:03:55 AM
re: and .... by Natalie Oberman on Wednesday, Mar 9, 2011 at 11:24:02 PM
quacks like a duck by J. Edward Tremlett on Thursday, Mar 10, 2011 at 7:52:27 AM
re: quacks like a duck by Natalie Oberman on Thursday, Mar 10, 2011 at 10:48:16 AM
Selective Outrage by Gustav Wynn on Thursday, Mar 10, 2011 at 12:27:53 PM
Wrong! -here's the testimony from many witnesses LOL by Gordon Wayne Watts on Saturday, Mar 12, 2011 at 12:55:09 AM
BS, Natalie by Carol Lemieux on Tuesday, Mar 8, 2011 at 10:28:39 AM
re: BS, Natalie by Natalie Oberman on Tuesday, Mar 8, 2011 at 2:30:13 PM
Natalie, Natalie, Natalie... by Carol Lemieux on Tuesday, Mar 8, 2011 at 3:37:25 PM
re: Natalie, Natalie, Natalie..... by Natalie Oberman on Tuesday, Mar 8, 2011 at 6:25:26 PM
False implications? Transparent astroturfing? by Gustav Wynn on Saturday, Mar 12, 2011 at 2:48:53 AM
re: False implications?..... by Natalie Oberman on Saturday, Mar 12, 2011 at 2:52:24 PM
Bias or Integrity by Gustav Wynn on Sunday, Mar 13, 2011 at 1:17:29 PM
Godwin's law confirmed once again by Natalie Oberman on Sunday, Mar 13, 2011 at 4:54:32 PM
Propaganda preceded and aided Nazism by Gustav Wynn on Sunday, Mar 13, 2011 at 10:02:59 PM
With Andrew Breitbart's record of journalistic integrity,... by John Sanchez Jr. on Monday, Mar 7, 2011 at 4:22:13 PM
re: With Andrew Breibart's record ...... by Natalie Oberman on Monday, Mar 7, 2011 at 4:39:43 PM
The evil of Brietbart/Limbaugh/the right by Cliff Carson on Monday, Mar 7, 2011 at 9:11:29 PM
re: The evil of Brietbart..... by Natalie Oberman on Monday, Mar 7, 2011 at 9:59:08 PM
Oh, no, there was no use of these actors. by John Sanchez Jr. on Tuesday, Mar 8, 2011 at 8:01:05 AM
POINT? by Carol Lemieux on Thursday, Mar 10, 2011 at 12:17:02 PM
re: POINT? by Natalie Oberman on Sunday, Mar 13, 2011 at 8:12:07 PM
Penalize planting bloggers and callers! by Carol Lemieux on Monday, Mar 7, 2011 at 6:03:27 PM
an interesting day by Rob Kall on Monday, Mar 7, 2011 at 9:23:17 PM
Methinks... by Sheila Samples on Monday, Mar 7, 2011 at 11:54:39 PM
Close, but probably incorrect... by Gordon Wayne Watts on Friday, Mar 11, 2011 at 10:38:11 AM
Since I give a balanced reporting -fair to both sides... by Gordon Wayne Watts on Friday, Mar 11, 2011 at 10:30:56 AM
Deception is the norm by Jay Farrington on Monday, Mar 7, 2011 at 10:10:19 PM
Does it really matter? by Doc "Old Codger" McCoy on Tuesday, Mar 8, 2011 at 12:57:23 AM
Congressman Peter King (R-NY)... by John Sanchez Jr. on Tuesday, Mar 8, 2011 at 7:46:51 AM
Dancing bears by Perry Logan on Tuesday, Mar 8, 2011 at 6:07:55 AM
Where's the FCC? by James Hadstate on Tuesday, Mar 8, 2011 at 6:52:07 AM
Aiming beyond the choir by Stephen Pitt on Tuesday, Mar 8, 2011 at 1:12:23 PM
Great image. by John Sanchez Jr. on Tuesday, Mar 8, 2011 at 3:06:57 PM
Cspan--"Washington Journal" by shirley reese on Tuesday, Mar 8, 2011 at 4:53:58 PM
Thank you for citing my news aticle by Gordon Wayne Watts on Friday, Mar 11, 2011 at 9:30:57 AM
All hypocrites will be exposed by J Nunn on Friday, Mar 11, 2011 at 7:49:01 PM
re: Wrong! -here's the testimony from many witnesses LOL by Natalie Oberman on Saturday, Mar 12, 2011 at 2:17:10 PM
In reply to all yr q, Nat. by Gordon Wayne Watts on Sunday, Mar 13, 2011 at 7:58:51 AM
further clarification 4 Natalie Oberman's q's... by Gordon Wayne Watts on Sunday, Mar 13, 2011 at 8:08:41 AM
re: further clarification ..... by Natalie Oberman on Sunday, Mar 13, 2011 at 5:24:31 PM
yr welcome, Natalie & erratum re my typos... by Gordon Wayne Watts on Monday, Mar 14, 2011 at 6:37:49 AM