Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 5   Well Said 4   News 3   View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H3) on 3/5/11:     Permalink
View Article Stats      (65 comments)

Limbaugh/Hannity Parent Company Admits Hiring Actors to Call Radio Shows

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (14 fans)   -- Page 1 of 2 page(s)

opednews.com


Radio Trickery Reported by GW

*Updated Below* - An online leak has emerged, revealing a questionable practice used by the employer of the biggest names in radio.

America's #1 and #2 radio broadcast hosts today and for decades have been Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity, whose ratings and profits have dominated once thriving local markets. After industry deregulation paved the way, their boss, Premiere Radio Networks and parent company Clear Channel Communications have used a Wal-Mart model of steamrolling or acquiring small, independent original radio businesses, syndicating everything from robotized genre music stations to talk show hosts selling political snake oil.

But according to an online account, Premiere is hiring actors to fake on-air calls to radio shows who do not divulge the scam. Before being abruptly removed, their website read: 

"Premiere On Call is our new custom caller service... We supply voice talent to take/make your on-air calls, improvise your scenes or deliver your scripts. Using our simple online booking tool, specify the kind of voice you need, and we'll get your the right person fast. Unless you request it, you won't hear that same voice again for at least two months, ensuring the authenticity of your programming for avid listeners". 

As reported, once the actor "passed the audition, he would be invited periodically to call in to various talk shows and recite various scenarios that made for interesting radio." In addition, the source was specifically told there would be no on-air disclosure of the fabricated nature of the call. He subsequently landed the job, at $40 per hour and a minimum one hour of work per day. 

This suggests an array of radio clients is broadcasting bogus calls by actors, categorized by their accents or vocal qualities. Next time you hear a "gruff", "clean", "crisp", "deep", or "textured" voice, you might just be hearing a Premiere On Call actor secretively playing a real person. 

But they can never go public because they are gagged from talking about it. Note their iron-clad confidentiality clause, also removed from the site, but cached here as reported:

"Confidentially agreement: By requesting an audition you are also agreeing to keep the details of the audition and the type of work that you may perform confidential. This applies to information acquired while working for Premiere or any of its affiliates. Disclosure to any third party, sharing project information or publicizing what you do (including via social media) may be considered grounds for dismissal or further action."

"I was surprised that it seemed so open. There was really no pretense of covering it up", the actor told the TabletMag.com interviewer. 

Why is this leaker not in trouble? According to the account, Premiere had this prospective employee audition for work by actually calling in live to a show and reading one of their scripts for free. This is worse by a magnitude - offering people a financial incentive to deceive promotes a disturbing moral message to people in need of work, a practice that monetizes and rewards unethical behavior.

Ironically, another clause in the fine print of the one-sided contract for use of their web service makes users sign away their "moral rights" and hypocritically claims to frown upon just this type of fraud and deception, banning activities which:

"[i]mpersonate another person or entity or falsely state or otherwise misrepresent your affiliation with a person or entity, or adopt a false identity if the purpose of doing so is to mislead, deceive, or defraud another."

Industry watchers claim they would not be surprised to find any number of goofy DJ shows using plants for their various pranks and exploits, but it would be a different story if used for political shows and "astroturfing". A Premiere Radio Networks spokesperson Rachel Nelson did not deny the service was being abused, saying instead that it is the stations that are responsible for how the calls are "integrated into programs". 

In 2008, we reported on an industry insider who worked at Milwaukee's WTMJ when they denied air time to sitting U.S. Senator Russ Feingold who was trying to refute slanted claims made to the Wisconsin public. Since no one filed any FCC complaints, the stations routinely turned away callers with opposing views, a former program director at the station revealed

Salon also reported at the height of the 2008 election that the McCain campaign was paying ghost-writers to falsify letters-to-the-editor across the US, claiming that Sarah Palin was a nifty, qualified candidate. 

Such dirty tricks stem from tactics exposed last year in primary documents made public at the Reagan library, calling for manipulation of book distribution and use of taxpayer money to seed foreign and domestic pro-war propaganda. Oliver North and "working groups" like the Heritage Foundation link these 1980s covert astroturfing ops with Hannity and the current Fox mileu.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

(OpEdNews Contributing Editor since October 2006) Inner city schoolteacher from New York, mostly covering media manipulation. I put election/finance reform ahead of all issues but also advocate for fiscal conservatism, ethics in journalism and (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Follow Me on Twitter

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
65 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

I always thought this was the case by Davey Jones on Sunday, Mar 6, 2011 at 2:19:02 AM
If our own Government can lie to us... by Taylor on Sunday, Mar 6, 2011 at 10:21:34 AM
Why are you surprised? by Cliff Carson on Sunday, Mar 6, 2011 at 5:22:46 PM
not surprised by J. Edward Tremlett on Sunday, Mar 6, 2011 at 8:12:50 PM
Where's the traffic for this article coming from by Rob Kall on Sunday, Mar 6, 2011 at 10:24:53 PM
Reddit.com by Saman Mohammadi on Sunday, Mar 6, 2011 at 11:04:07 PM
Good question by Gordon Wayne Watts on Friday, Mar 11, 2011 at 9:39:45 AM
Conservative radio parallel in New Zealand by Rakesh Krishnan Simha on Monday, Mar 7, 2011 at 4:31:35 AM
We all knew this by Peter Duveen on Monday, Mar 7, 2011 at 6:34:31 AM
Scripted calls on Hannity? by Gustav Wynn on Monday, Mar 7, 2011 at 3:09:11 PM
Clarification by Peter Duveen on Monday, Mar 7, 2011 at 4:56:51 PM
re: Scripted calls on Hannity? by Natalie Oberman on Tuesday, Mar 8, 2011 at 2:49:58 PM
My point exactly by Gustav Wynn on Thursday, Mar 10, 2011 at 1:22:02 PM
Good point, Gustav: I am a perfect example of the 'unknown'' by Gordon Wayne Watts on Friday, Mar 11, 2011 at 10:08:20 AM
The saddest part to me by Daniel Geery on Monday, Mar 7, 2011 at 7:07:45 AM
You'll wait a long time... by John Sanchez Jr. on Monday, Mar 7, 2011 at 8:43:57 AM
It's a very old Con... by mrk * on Monday, Mar 7, 2011 at 9:13:58 AM
The best free-speech by Amanda Lang on Monday, Mar 7, 2011 at 12:40:21 PM
Much to-do about nothing by Natalie Oberman on Monday, Mar 7, 2011 at 2:54:56 PM
questionable by J. Edward Tremlett on Monday, Mar 7, 2011 at 3:28:37 PM
re: questionable by Natalie Oberman on Monday, Mar 7, 2011 at 4:47:26 PM
except by J. Edward Tremlett on Monday, Mar 7, 2011 at 5:02:37 PM
re: except by Natalie Oberman on Monday, Mar 7, 2011 at 9:24:04 PM
and... by J. Edward Tremlett on Wednesday, Mar 9, 2011 at 8:03:55 AM
re: and .... by Natalie Oberman on Wednesday, Mar 9, 2011 at 11:24:02 PM
quacks like a duck by J. Edward Tremlett on Thursday, Mar 10, 2011 at 7:52:27 AM
re: quacks like a duck by Natalie Oberman on Thursday, Mar 10, 2011 at 10:48:16 AM
Selective Outrage by Gustav Wynn on Thursday, Mar 10, 2011 at 12:27:53 PM
Wrong! -here's the testimony from many witnesses LOL by Gordon Wayne Watts on Saturday, Mar 12, 2011 at 12:55:09 AM
BS, Natalie by Carol Lemieux on Tuesday, Mar 8, 2011 at 10:28:39 AM
re: BS, Natalie by Natalie Oberman on Tuesday, Mar 8, 2011 at 2:30:13 PM
Natalie, Natalie, Natalie... by Carol Lemieux on Tuesday, Mar 8, 2011 at 3:37:25 PM
re: Natalie, Natalie, Natalie..... by Natalie Oberman on Tuesday, Mar 8, 2011 at 6:25:26 PM
False implications? Transparent astroturfing? by Gustav Wynn on Saturday, Mar 12, 2011 at 2:48:53 AM
re: False implications?..... by Natalie Oberman on Saturday, Mar 12, 2011 at 2:52:24 PM
Bias or Integrity by Gustav Wynn on Sunday, Mar 13, 2011 at 1:17:29 PM
Godwin's law confirmed once again by Natalie Oberman on Sunday, Mar 13, 2011 at 4:54:32 PM
Propaganda preceded and aided Nazism by Gustav Wynn on Sunday, Mar 13, 2011 at 10:02:59 PM
With Andrew Breitbart's record of journalistic integrity,... by John Sanchez Jr. on Monday, Mar 7, 2011 at 4:22:13 PM
re: With Andrew Breibart's record ...... by Natalie Oberman on Monday, Mar 7, 2011 at 4:39:43 PM
The evil of Brietbart/Limbaugh/the right by Cliff Carson on Monday, Mar 7, 2011 at 9:11:29 PM
re: The evil of Brietbart..... by Natalie Oberman on Monday, Mar 7, 2011 at 9:59:08 PM
Oh, no, there was no use of these actors. by John Sanchez Jr. on Tuesday, Mar 8, 2011 at 8:01:05 AM
POINT? by Carol Lemieux on Thursday, Mar 10, 2011 at 12:17:02 PM
re: POINT? by Natalie Oberman on Sunday, Mar 13, 2011 at 8:12:07 PM
Penalize planting bloggers and callers! by Carol Lemieux on Monday, Mar 7, 2011 at 6:03:27 PM
an interesting day by Rob Kall on Monday, Mar 7, 2011 at 9:23:17 PM
Methinks... by Sheila Samples on Monday, Mar 7, 2011 at 11:54:39 PM
Close, but probably incorrect... by Gordon Wayne Watts on Friday, Mar 11, 2011 at 10:38:11 AM
Since I give a balanced reporting -fair to both sides... by Gordon Wayne Watts on Friday, Mar 11, 2011 at 10:30:56 AM
Deception is the norm by Jay Farrington on Monday, Mar 7, 2011 at 10:10:19 PM
Does it really matter? by Doc "Old Codger" McCoy on Tuesday, Mar 8, 2011 at 12:57:23 AM
Congressman Peter King (R-NY)... by John Sanchez Jr. on Tuesday, Mar 8, 2011 at 7:46:51 AM
Dancing bears by Perry Logan on Tuesday, Mar 8, 2011 at 6:07:55 AM
Where's the FCC? by James Hadstate on Tuesday, Mar 8, 2011 at 6:52:07 AM
Aiming beyond the choir by Stephen Pitt on Tuesday, Mar 8, 2011 at 1:12:23 PM
Great image. by John Sanchez Jr. on Tuesday, Mar 8, 2011 at 3:06:57 PM
Cspan--"Washington Journal" by shirley reese on Tuesday, Mar 8, 2011 at 4:53:58 PM
Thank you for citing my news aticle by Gordon Wayne Watts on Friday, Mar 11, 2011 at 9:30:57 AM
All hypocrites will be exposed by J Nunn on Friday, Mar 11, 2011 at 7:49:01 PM
re: Wrong! -here's the testimony from many witnesses LOL by Natalie Oberman on Saturday, Mar 12, 2011 at 2:17:10 PM
In reply to all yr q, Nat. by Gordon Wayne Watts on Sunday, Mar 13, 2011 at 7:58:51 AM
further clarification 4 Natalie Oberman's q's... by Gordon Wayne Watts on Sunday, Mar 13, 2011 at 8:08:41 AM
re: further clarification ..... by Natalie Oberman on Sunday, Mar 13, 2011 at 5:24:31 PM
yr welcome, Natalie & erratum re my typos... by Gordon Wayne Watts on Monday, Mar 14, 2011 at 6:37:49 AM