Tag(s): ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (23 comments)

Press Ignores Paul GOP-Debate Win

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan   -- Page 1 of 2 page(s)

opednews.com

The stranglehold of the mainstream (and even most of the so-called “alternative”) press on information they deem “unsafe” for the American public’s consumption has suffered a fatal blow.

According to the MSNBC post-debate poll, the very network that carried the first GOP Presidential Primary Debate, Ron Paul won hands down - but you wouldn’t know that if you read only the usual press accounts of the event.

The headlines seen from a Google News search using the keyword “debate”, at the time of this writing show only this:

“John McCain Wins First GOP Debate” (Fox News)

“Who Won the First GOP Presidential Debate?
(Answer provided in article: “Mitt Romney” - National Review Online)

"Republican Presidential Debate Gives No Clue on GOP Leader in Race”
(Axcess News)

Apparently the Axcess News editors don't have a clue - unlike actual debate viewers.

A news search for the keywords “won debate” reveals this:

“Noonan, Pundits: Romney Won Debate” (NewsMax)



"Giuliani Wary of Repeal of Roe” (Washington Times)


No need to go any further with this. Only one outlet (Earth Times) showed a headline that Ron aul won - but it was just a reprint of the Paul campaign’s post-debate news release, not an actual valuation by a media outlet’s reporter or pundit.

Unsurprisingly, not a single report of the actual political news story of the decade, namely, that a virtually unknown “dark horse” beats even the media favorite Romney handily - and utterly crushes the rest of the field.

Now you know why you can’t believe the press. Wanna bet the South Carolina debate will not have a post-debate poll published? After all, Fox News is the network chosen to carry it. Read this account of how Fox is trying to control the event. They don’t want to mess up the party for their
home boy, Mitt “Conme”.

Just in order to preserve the evidence (in case someone at MSNBC might consider tampering ith it later), I kept screen shots of the actual poll results and printed a hard-copy as well. You never know.


Poll1

Poll2

Poll3

Recent results are even more favorable (yes, it's still up today, May 5th).

This MSNBC poll shows one or two things that nobody in the Liberty Movement would have xpected this early on:

1. Americans are absolutely ready for Ron Paul’s message of Liberty under a small, non- intrusive government that doesn’t meddle in other countries’ affairs.

2. American conservatives - yes, even Republicans - are no longer mouthpieces of the neocon media’s talking points. They can actually think for themselves and even ignore attempts to ignore Ron Paul during the post-debate “analysis” stage of the carrying network Who would have thought?

If you search Google News for “Ron Paul debate” you, finally, get this:

Next Page  1  |  2

 

www.ronpaul.meetup.com/24

Alex Wallenwein, J.D., is a former attorney in Houston, Texas, and a grass-roots activist for the rule of law and American liberty. He organizes the Houston 4 Ron Paul 2008 (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
23 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Well.... by Blue Pilgrim on Saturday, May 5, 2007 at 6:01:34 PM
Social values by Alex Wallenwein on Saturday, May 5, 2007 at 8:36:41 PM
Society by Blue Pilgrim on Saturday, May 5, 2007 at 11:49:11 PM
Congress Right to Tax by pec615 on Sunday, May 6, 2007 at 9:06:36 AM
in any case by Blue Pilgrim on Sunday, May 6, 2007 at 2:48:04 PM
Supreme Court Decisions by pec615 on Monday, May 7, 2007 at 6:06:19 AM
Core Differences by Alex Wallenwein on Sunday, May 6, 2007 at 7:19:54 PM
Socialism vs. Capitalism by gg on Sunday, May 6, 2007 at 7:28:07 AM
Feudalism by any other name . . . by rabblerowzer on Sunday, May 6, 2007 at 9:29:39 AM
Re: Feudalism by any other name . . . by gg on Sunday, May 6, 2007 at 11:08:55 AM
"Tyranny of the majority." by rabblerowzer on Monday, May 7, 2007 at 7:26:33 AM
www.SemmelweisSociety.net by HButler on Saturday, May 5, 2007 at 8:42:16 PM
msnbc poll by Crazy John on Saturday, May 5, 2007 at 9:10:08 PM
Legitimate Government by libertarian Christian on Sunday, May 6, 2007 at 6:48:48 AM
Just what we need! by John R Moffett on Sunday, May 6, 2007 at 7:22:38 AM
Regulation... by gg on Sunday, May 6, 2007 at 7:44:23 AM
Couldn't agree less by John R Moffett on Sunday, May 6, 2007 at 9:08:22 AM
Re: Couldn't agree less by gg on Sunday, May 6, 2007 at 10:57:19 AM
Hmmm.... by John R Moffett on Sunday, May 6, 2007 at 12:29:17 PM
Another win for Paul by Catlover on Sunday, May 6, 2007 at 1:19:52 PM
libertarianism by Blue Pilgrim on Sunday, May 6, 2007 at 3:18:55 PM
JacksonHolly Ignores the Lapdog Press by JacksonHolly on Sunday, May 6, 2007 at 7:53:31 PM
Censorship rules the media by Lorring II on Monday, May 7, 2007 at 11:39:40 AM

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend


Copyright © 2002-2012, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum